<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 75-man roster churning commences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/28/75-man-roster-churning-commences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/28/75-man-roster-churning-commences/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddogdaddy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/28/75-man-roster-churning-commences/#comment-1961219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ddogdaddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1147839#comment-1961219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was hoping the first guy we picked up would be 1 foot taller and 150 lbs heavier. Oh well I guess you can&#039;t have to many Smurfs. Go Blue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping the first guy we picked up would be 1 foot taller and 150 lbs heavier. Oh well I guess you can&#8217;t have to many Smurfs. Go Blue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Florio</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/28/75-man-roster-churning-commences/#comment-1961150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Florio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1147839#comment-1961150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes and yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coloradocowboy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/28/75-man-roster-churning-commences/#comment-1961097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coloradocowboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1147839#comment-1961097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Mike.  

I appreciate the info on why a team would &quot;waive injured&quot; instead of simply IR a young player.  I did not know that the key was the first roster cut-down.

So if I&#039;m getting this correctly, there are two reasons to &quot;waive injured&quot; instead of waiting until the cut-down.

1.  Because they wanted to keep another body in Training Camp.

2. Because they wanted someone to take the player&#039;s contract off of their hands.


Now that we&#039;ve reached the cut-down, the only reason to do so is #2 above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike.  </p>
<p>I appreciate the info on why a team would &#8220;waive injured&#8221; instead of simply IR a young player.  I did not know that the key was the first roster cut-down.</p>
<p>So if I&#8217;m getting this correctly, there are two reasons to &#8220;waive injured&#8221; instead of waiting until the cut-down.</p>
<p>1.  Because they wanted to keep another body in Training Camp.</p>
<p>2. Because they wanted someone to take the player&#8217;s contract off of their hands.</p>
<p>Now that we&#8217;ve reached the cut-down, the only reason to do so is #2 above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
