I’m shocked. You mean no one has made the obvious “Of course they aren’t, they just made a rookie QB their starter!” joke?

The city hosting a Super bowl has nothing to do with who is on the team there

I think every team should be allowed to host a Super Bowl. Screw that perfect weather in the said cities weather mentioned above. Most of these teams had to get to the Super Bowl playing in the Rain, Snow and Wind. Let them play in the Super Bowl in that as well!

Having it in Jacksonville was a mistake the league won’t make again.

It’ll never happen.

It’s not that we mind the influx of tourists and guest hookers…

But i think Seattle is kinda done paying for jinky public/private civic projects, like the kind that you usually cough up to make a superbowl beg, er, bid.

And they probably won’t add non-existent seats, either.

I went to the inaugural game against the Cardinals, and numerous games since. Sat in various seats, various angles, never disappointed. Lots of great beers on tap, too…and they also serve Bud, just in case you don’t like beer.

After the Super Bowl, major party in Pioneer Square…it’s just a three-minute walk away. Plenty of hotel accommadations. Decent transportation system. Bears are still in hibernation during Feb, so it’s safe to bring your kids. Cougars seldom venture west past Bellevue anymore, either. But bald eagles are making a huge comeback, so leave your purse poodles at home, ladies.

Only real negative is that annoying train whistle…