<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urlacher probable, Tillman questionable for Bears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetokyosandblaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1992288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetokyosandblaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1992288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I get it. A gay joke. Haha. 

You turned my name into something insinuating I like men. 

I can do that, too. 

Hey &quot;toomanymenruinedmypoopchute,&quot; you should tell Peppers to ask the league leader in sacks for some pointers in getting to the QB. 

Matthews can show peppers first hand, as he&#039;ll probably triple his sack total against that turnstile bears o-line.

PS, I like how you already have the built in ref excuse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I get it. A gay joke. Haha. </p>
<p>You turned my name into something insinuating I like men. </p>
<p>I can do that, too. </p>
<p>Hey &#8220;toomanymenruinedmypoopchute,&#8221; you should tell Peppers to ask the league leader in sacks for some pointers in getting to the QB. </p>
<p>Matthews can show peppers first hand, as he&#8217;ll probably triple his sack total against that turnstile bears o-line.</p>
<p>PS, I like how you already have the built in ref excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbcruinedpft</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1991851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nbcruinedpft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1991851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@thetokyomanblaster

That&#039;s almost as funny as the lame Conan O&#039;Brien poop &quot;joke&quot; from which you (perhaps appropriately) derived your name. 

You so crazy. 

My prediction:  Bears new improved offense preying upon Packers defense certainly helps shape the game, but it&#039;s the Bears DEFENSE that really makes the difference (despite all the refs&#039; best efforts otherwise).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@thetokyomanblaster</p>
<p>That&#8217;s almost as funny as the lame Conan O&#8217;Brien poop &#8220;joke&#8221; from which you (perhaps appropriately) derived your name. </p>
<p>You so crazy. </p>
<p>My prediction:  Bears new improved offense preying upon Packers defense certainly helps shape the game, but it&#8217;s the Bears DEFENSE that really makes the difference (despite all the refs&#8217; best efforts otherwise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetokyosandblaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetokyosandblaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bears don&#039;t have the weapons on offense to keep up with the Packers, even if Jennings is out.  Brandon Marshall would be the 3rd receiver in GB, Alshon would probably be on the Practice squad for a year or two.  

That, coupled with Tillman and Urlacher not being 100%, and the Bears having easily the worst offensive line in football (history?) will mean an easy victory for the Packers.

Packers 42, Bears 13.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bears don&#8217;t have the weapons on offense to keep up with the Packers, even if Jennings is out.  Brandon Marshall would be the 3rd receiver in GB, Alshon would probably be on the Practice squad for a year or two.  </p>
<p>That, coupled with Tillman and Urlacher not being 100%, and the Bears having easily the worst offensive line in football (history?) will mean an easy victory for the Packers.</p>
<p>Packers 42, Bears 13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I said URLACHER is done, not the Bears.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said URLACHER is done, not the Bears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louiespoon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[louiespoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Colts only scored twice Sunday, one first half drive and another 4th quarter drive without Lach. Ease up off the done talk....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Colts only scored twice Sunday, one first half drive and another 4th quarter drive without Lach. Ease up off the done talk&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beefbus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beefbus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher will improve as the year goes on.  He&#039;s just now getting into game shape.  He&#039;ll do enough to help the Bears win 30-24.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher will improve as the year goes on.  He&#8217;s just now getting into game shape.  He&#8217;ll do enough to help the Bears win 30-24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qbofthenever</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qbofthenever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing that the Bears will have the best receiver on the field for once. I&#039;d say the Packers&#039; secondary has the tougher job for a while.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing that the Bears will have the best receiver on the field for once. I&#8217;d say the Packers&#8217; secondary has the tougher job for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher is done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cutlertomarshall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cutlertomarshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going to be a great game on Thursday! 

&quot;CAN&#039;T WAIT&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going to be a great game on Thursday! </p>
<p>&#8220;CAN&#8217;T WAIT&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleguy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A creaky Urlacher trying to cover Finley in the middle of the field, and no Tillman on the outside?  Rodgers must be loving this news.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A creaky Urlacher trying to cover Finley in the middle of the field, and no Tillman on the outside?  Rodgers must be loving this news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevza</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/12/urlacher-probable-tillman-questionable-for-bears/#comment-1990141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thevza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1248026#comment-1990141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope Urlacher plays better than he did Sunday against the Colts. On a few of those big runs the Bears D gave up in the first half, he was pushed aside like a little kid and looked like he couldn&#039;t quite plant on that knee. Worrisome, indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope Urlacher plays better than he did Sunday against the Colts. On a few of those big runs the Bears D gave up in the first half, he was pushed aside like a little kid and looked like he couldn&#8217;t quite plant on that knee. Worrisome, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
