<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week Two power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: taintedsaints2009</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2013573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[taintedsaints2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2013573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha 24]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha 24</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atacoshipinaseaofwhitesauce</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2013257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atacoshipinaseaofwhitesauce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2013257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a more accurate power rankings available.  In fact, it&#039;s infallible, it has never been wrong  

It&#039;s called the Standings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a more accurate power rankings available.  In fact, it&#8217;s infallible, it has never been wrong  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s called the Standings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elibestqbever</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2011500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elibestqbever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2011500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who says Giants are over rated don&#039;t understand football. The fact they aren&#039;t 1 is kinda funny. Best coach best qb best d-line. Also regular season record means nooooooothing. The giants can beat anyone anywhere when the games matter. You can&#039;t say that about a lot of team e.i. Eagles, Falcons, Texans, 49ers, Ravens, Dallas, ect ect]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who says Giants are over rated don&#8217;t understand football. The fact they aren&#8217;t 1 is kinda funny. Best coach best qb best d-line. Also regular season record means nooooooothing. The giants can beat anyone anywhere when the games matter. You can&#8217;t say that about a lot of team e.i. Eagles, Falcons, Texans, 49ers, Ravens, Dallas, ect ect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazblast</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2011424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mazblast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2011424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is winning in spite of a high number of turnovers supposed to be some sort of badge of honor?  Do they qualify for a higher rating because of that?

Reminds me of pitchers who get raved about for getting out of bases-loaded, nobody-out jams that they got themselves into, while the guys who quietly get them out one-two-three are ignored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is winning in spite of a high number of turnovers supposed to be some sort of badge of honor?  Do they qualify for a higher rating because of that?</p>
<p>Reminds me of pitchers who get raved about for getting out of bases-loaded, nobody-out jams that they got themselves into, while the guys who quietly get them out one-two-three are ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cow395</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2011199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cow395]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2011199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eagles got number #4 because they had 9 turnovers in 2 games and managed to win. and there defense has vastly improved. But i am an eagles fan, and they allways seem to piss me off so we&#039;ll see =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eagles got number #4 because they had 9 turnovers in 2 games and managed to win. and there defense has vastly improved. But i am an eagles fan, and they allways seem to piss me off so we&#8217;ll see =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy8123</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2008652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randy8123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2008652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oooh because the Bills owned the Chiefs.  That took me far too long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh because the Bills owned the Chiefs.  That took me far too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboys1988</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2007008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cowboys1988]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2007008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U guys are stupid, the giants lost to the cowboys and should of lost to the bucs but theyre number 8 and eagles should of lost to the browns and beat the ravens (which i admit was a good win) but still way too high. My honest opinion is:

1. 49ers
2. Packers
3. Falcons
4. Texans
5. Ravens]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U guys are stupid, the giants lost to the cowboys and should of lost to the bucs but theyre number 8 and eagles should of lost to the browns and beat the ravens (which i admit was a good win) but still way too high. My honest opinion is:</p>
<p>1. 49ers<br />
2. Packers<br />
3. Falcons<br />
4. Texans<br />
5. Ravens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 52willis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2006865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[52willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2006865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best Power rankings ever, very good spot on #9 Falcons,The Gruden nickname
49ers will win 3 out of next 5 superbowls
GO NINERS!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Power rankings ever, very good spot on #9 Falcons,The Gruden nickname<br />
49ers will win 3 out of next 5 superbowls<br />
GO NINERS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickynick04</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2005282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickynick04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2005282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE EAGLES !
Come on man...They had a one point win over the worse team in the league....and were lucky to get that....The &quot; Dynasty &quot; as Vick puts it is pathetic.....seriously  come one....and they were fortunite to beat the Ravens by one point
8 and 8 at best]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE EAGLES !<br />
Come on man&#8230;They had a one point win over the worse team in the league&#8230;.and were lucky to get that&#8230;.The &#8221; Dynasty &#8221; as Vick puts it is pathetic&#8230;..seriously  come one&#8230;.and they were fortunite to beat the Ravens by one point<br />
8 and 8 at best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boltsmobilecutlasssupreme</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2005030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boltsmobilecutlasssupreme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 05:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2005030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NE has only beat the Titans and are ranked 5, but the chargers have beat &quot;no one&quot;(Titans,Oakland) and are ranked 11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NE has only beat the Titans and are ranked 5, but the chargers have beat &#8220;no one&#8221;(Titans,Oakland) and are ranked 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passerby23</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[passerby23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those arguing the Chargers should not be ahead of the Cardinals need only look at two facts:

1) The Chargers&#039; wins were two convincing blowouts, while the Cardinals were two tight affairs (yes, I understand the quality of competition but a convincing win is a convincing win).

2) The Cardinals are a terrible fumble, a phantom holding call negating a touchdown, and a horribly blown field goal away from losing to New England. 

When the Chargers stop blowing teams out and the Cardinals keep showing their first two wins weren&#039;t flukes, I will put put the Cardinals in the mix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those arguing the Chargers should not be ahead of the Cardinals need only look at two facts:</p>
<p>1) The Chargers&#8217; wins were two convincing blowouts, while the Cardinals were two tight affairs (yes, I understand the quality of competition but a convincing win is a convincing win).</p>
<p>2) The Cardinals are a terrible fumble, a phantom holding call negating a touchdown, and a horribly blown field goal away from losing to New England. </p>
<p>When the Chargers stop blowing teams out and the Cardinals keep showing their first two wins weren&#8217;t flukes, I will put put the Cardinals in the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC De La Torre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JC De La Torre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, let me get this straight - Tampa dominated #13 and had #8 on the ropes on the road before a late fourth quarter comeback.

Yet they are only 22. Yet the Redskins lose to the RAMS....the RAMS and they&#039;re 16?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, let me get this straight &#8211; Tampa dominated #13 and had #8 on the ropes on the road before a late fourth quarter comeback.</p>
<p>Yet they are only 22. Yet the Redskins lose to the RAMS&#8230;.the RAMS and they&#8217;re 16?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazblast</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mazblast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Miami hasn’t allowed an opposing running back to crack 100 yards in 16 straight games, the NFL’s longest current streak&quot;

I&#039;m sure that is a great comfort to Dolphin fans.  Citing that useless statistic reminds me of the stuff Bengal apologists spent the 1990s and early 2000s coming up with to &quot;prove&quot; their team &quot;isn&#039;t that bad&quot;. 

As for the Power Rankings themselves, I don&#039;t pay much attention to them until around Week 9.  Until then, IMO there is insufficient data from the current year, too much influence from previous years, and the serendipity of the schedule (one team playing the tough part of their schedule while another gets the relative creampuffs).  Come November, we have a better idea of where teams really stack up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Miami hasn’t allowed an opposing running back to crack 100 yards in 16 straight games, the NFL’s longest current streak&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that is a great comfort to Dolphin fans.  Citing that useless statistic reminds me of the stuff Bengal apologists spent the 1990s and early 2000s coming up with to &#8220;prove&#8221; their team &#8220;isn&#8217;t that bad&#8221;. </p>
<p>As for the Power Rankings themselves, I don&#8217;t pay much attention to them until around Week 9.  Until then, IMO there is insufficient data from the current year, too much influence from previous years, and the serendipity of the schedule (one team playing the tough part of their schedule while another gets the relative creampuffs).  Come November, we have a better idea of where teams really stack up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[meytonpanning says: Sep 18, 2012 9:40 PM

I gotta say I agree with these power rankings. Most accurate one yet, but… The Giants should be lower (and I’m a Manning/Giants/Colts fan)
-----

Can&#039;t be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meytonpanning says: Sep 18, 2012 9:40 PM</p>
<p>I gotta say I agree with these power rankings. Most accurate one yet, but… The Giants should be lower (and I’m a Manning/Giants/Colts fan)<br />
&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meytonpanning</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meytonpanning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I gotta say I agree with these power rankings. Most accurate one yet, but... The Giants should be lower (and I&#039;m a Manning/Giants/Colts fan)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say I agree with these power rankings. Most accurate one yet, but&#8230; The Giants should be lower (and I&#8217;m a Manning/Giants/Colts fan)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsutton84</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tsutton84]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Top Three: Niners, Texans and Falcons.

Too high: Patriots*, Ravens and Eagles.

Too low: Cardinals, Seahawks and Bengals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Top Three: Niners, Texans and Falcons.</p>
<p>Too high: Patriots*, Ravens and Eagles.</p>
<p>Too low: Cardinals, Seahawks and Bengals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev86</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kev86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eli and the Giants can beat any if these teams. Repeat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eli and the Giants can beat any if these teams. Repeat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbaxt</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2004102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbaxt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2004102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, based on KC&#039;s performance it&#039;s Todd Haley who was righting the ship in KC.  Sorry Todd, Pioli&#039;s a goon.  There are 2 &quot;i&#039;s&quot; in Pioli, he&#039;s more important than everyone times two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, based on KC&#8217;s performance it&#8217;s Todd Haley who was righting the ship in KC.  Sorry Todd, Pioli&#8217;s a goon.  There are 2 &#8220;i&#8217;s&#8221; in Pioli, he&#8217;s more important than everyone times two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gobills2012</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gobills2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[at least some of us get it: Ralph Wilson owns two teams: the Bills and by virtue of that the Chiefs as well (since the Bills own them)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at least some of us get it: Ralph Wilson owns two teams: the Bills and by virtue of that the Chiefs as well (since the Bills own them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisvegas</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisvegas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Texansteve-

Actually if the Eagles don&#039;t turn the ball over they are Easily a top three offense. Even with the turnovers they are still a top ten offense. It isn&#039;t unreasonable to conclude that the Eagles have a chance at finishing in the top 5 in both offense and defense this year. This team can be scary if they can stop taking bad penalties and stop turning the ball over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Texansteve-</p>
<p>Actually if the Eagles don&#8217;t turn the ball over they are Easily a top three offense. Even with the turnovers they are still a top ten offense. It isn&#8217;t unreasonable to conclude that the Eagles have a chance at finishing in the top 5 in both offense and defense this year. This team can be scary if they can stop taking bad penalties and stop turning the ball over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washstnative</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[washstnative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week 18
1. 49ers
2. Seattle Seahawks
3. Arizona Cardinals
NFC West is in BEAST MODE  
Get your Skittles....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Week 18<br />
1. 49ers<br />
2. Seattle Seahawks<br />
3. Arizona Cardinals<br />
NFC West is in BEAST MODE<br />
Get your Skittles&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staffordsyear</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[staffordsyear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way the lions have looked the first 2 weeks im more than happy being at 14.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the lions have looked the first 2 weeks im more than happy being at 14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldensuneagle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goldensuneagle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eagles should be 7-8 imo as an Eagles&#039; fan. Not enough on offense, but their defense has looked pretty good and is much improved than last year. Tenacity is different and have an actual leader to follow. They could be really good on both sides if they stop the turnovers, but I&#039;m not sure if Vick will ever do that. Hopefully it&#039;s a rust thing, but it wasn&#039;t all Vick on the turnovers this week.

As for the Cardinals, the only reason I see them not being ranked higher is because their offense has looked porous from what I&#039;ve seen.  Can&#039;t be giving one of, if not the best, receiver in the game one catch. Their defense is pretty much legitimate though, and they&#039;ll go as it goes.

Wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the Eagles lost to the Cardinals if the offense continues this way, but I don&#039;t know if the Cardinals have enough to hold up with an improved defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eagles should be 7-8 imo as an Eagles&#8217; fan. Not enough on offense, but their defense has looked pretty good and is much improved than last year. Tenacity is different and have an actual leader to follow. They could be really good on both sides if they stop the turnovers, but I&#8217;m not sure if Vick will ever do that. Hopefully it&#8217;s a rust thing, but it wasn&#8217;t all Vick on the turnovers this week.</p>
<p>As for the Cardinals, the only reason I see them not being ranked higher is because their offense has looked porous from what I&#8217;ve seen.  Can&#8217;t be giving one of, if not the best, receiver in the game one catch. Their defense is pretty much legitimate though, and they&#8217;ll go as it goes.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Eagles lost to the Cardinals if the offense continues this way, but I don&#8217;t know if the Cardinals have enough to hold up with an improved defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torontofalcon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torontofalcon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How in gods name are the steelers ravens eagles and giants better then ATL this season. Pats and packers are debatable but really who comes up with this list. Manning owns the steelers but then manning gets owned by atl great logic there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in gods name are the steelers ravens eagles and giants better then ATL this season. Pats and packers are debatable but really who comes up with this list. Manning owns the steelers but then manning gets owned by atl great logic there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texanssteve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[texanssteve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[phillyphannn83 says: 
Sep 18, 2012 1:46 PM 
For all the Eagles haters…

Do you REALLY think they’re going to throw 96 ints in one season?? C’mon there isn’t enough drugs in the world to make anyone actually believe that. Once they stop the turnovers they’ll be blowing teams out. They didn’t BARELY win those games, they ALMOST lost games they were dominating. Look at the stats, top 5 D and #1 offense against two more-than-decent defenses. 

You have to look beyond the score to properly analyze a team. I didn’t know that was rocket science.
*********************
Actually, philly is not even close to the number one offense. Just because you have more total yards doesn&#039;t make you number 1. Points per game and time of possesion matter way more and they&#039;re tied for 26th in points/game. And what makes you think Vick won&#039;t keep turning the ball over. He threw 14 picks last year and thats with him throwing less times than 20 other starters in the league. Some threw over 200 more times than he did and had less interceptions than he did and lets not talk about fumbles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phillyphannn83 says:<br />
Sep 18, 2012 1:46 PM<br />
For all the Eagles haters…</p>
<p>Do you REALLY think they’re going to throw 96 ints in one season?? C’mon there isn’t enough drugs in the world to make anyone actually believe that. Once they stop the turnovers they’ll be blowing teams out. They didn’t BARELY win those games, they ALMOST lost games they were dominating. Look at the stats, top 5 D and #1 offense against two more-than-decent defenses. </p>
<p>You have to look beyond the score to properly analyze a team. I didn’t know that was rocket science.<br />
*********************<br />
Actually, philly is not even close to the number one offense. Just because you have more total yards doesn&#8217;t make you number 1. Points per game and time of possesion matter way more and they&#8217;re tied for 26th in points/game. And what makes you think Vick won&#8217;t keep turning the ball over. He threw 14 picks last year and thats with him throwing less times than 20 other starters in the league. Some threw over 200 more times than he did and had less interceptions than he did and lets not talk about fumbles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daysend564</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daysend564]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Redskins at #16?  

They beat the 0-2 Saints and lost to the Rams.

They also lost Carricker and Orakpo for the season.  They will fall swiftly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redskins at #16?  </p>
<p>They beat the 0-2 Saints and lost to the Rams.</p>
<p>They also lost Carricker and Orakpo for the season.  They will fall swiftly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisvegas</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisvegas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Power rankings really don&#039;t mean much to me, especially after two weeks. For those of you who say the Eagles don&#039;t belong as high as they are the same people who claimed the Ravens would blow the Eagles out on Sunday. Then when the Eagles beat the Ravens, you changed your tune to the Ravens are overrated. Hate the Eagles all you want but if you look at the talent level on that team and the fact that they are 2-0 despite playing poor offensively, how can you not see this team is for real? Not to mention, Andy Reid teams don&#039;t ever play on all cylinders until December. The Eagles are a top team in the NFL right now as they have a much improved defense and tons of weapons on offense. Hate all you want, but don&#039;t let your hatred dictate your opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Power rankings really don&#8217;t mean much to me, especially after two weeks. For those of you who say the Eagles don&#8217;t belong as high as they are the same people who claimed the Ravens would blow the Eagles out on Sunday. Then when the Eagles beat the Ravens, you changed your tune to the Ravens are overrated. Hate the Eagles all you want but if you look at the talent level on that team and the fact that they are 2-0 despite playing poor offensively, how can you not see this team is for real? Not to mention, Andy Reid teams don&#8217;t ever play on all cylinders until December. The Eagles are a top team in the NFL right now as they have a much improved defense and tons of weapons on offense. Hate all you want, but don&#8217;t let your hatred dictate your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelastpieceofcheese</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thelastpieceofcheese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dolphins number 26? I&#039;m shocked! based on PFT&#039;s articles and comments they were the worst team ever in the history of the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dolphins number 26? I&#8217;m shocked! based on PFT&#8217;s articles and comments they were the worst team ever in the history of the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphannn83</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphannn83]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all the Eagles haters...

Do you REALLY think they&#039;re going to throw 96 ints in one season?? C&#039;mon there isn&#039;t enough drugs in the world to make anyone actually believe that. Once they stop the turnovers they&#039;ll be blowing teams out. They didn&#039;t BARELY win those games, they ALMOST lost games they were dominating. Look at the stats, top 5 D and #1 offense against two more-than-decent defenses. 

You have to look beyond the score to properly analyze a team. I didn&#039;t know that was rocket science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the Eagles haters&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you REALLY think they&#8217;re going to throw 96 ints in one season?? C&#8217;mon there isn&#8217;t enough drugs in the world to make anyone actually believe that. Once they stop the turnovers they&#8217;ll be blowing teams out. They didn&#8217;t BARELY win those games, they ALMOST lost games they were dominating. Look at the stats, top 5 D and #1 offense against two more-than-decent defenses. </p>
<p>You have to look beyond the score to properly analyze a team. I didn&#8217;t know that was rocket science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnschatzan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/week-two-power-rankings-3/#comment-2003128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnschatzan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274132#comment-2003128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He said Ralph Wilson owns the chiefs cause bills have lost one game against chiefs all time. It was a joke. 

As far as the rankings go they are horrid. Eagles nearly lost to
The browns had a linebacker not had hands of stone they would be and a call gone the other way in the ravens game they would undoubtedly be 0-2. Number 4??? Lol and cardinals defense was one of the best in the league last year if you forgot they won like 6 in a row to end the year. And now they beat two good teams and nothing? I&#039;m a bills fan. They&#039;re ranking is about right. Bottom 12 of the league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He said Ralph Wilson owns the chiefs cause bills have lost one game against chiefs all time. It was a joke. </p>
<p>As far as the rankings go they are horrid. Eagles nearly lost to<br />
The browns had a linebacker not had hands of stone they would be and a call gone the other way in the ravens game they would undoubtedly be 0-2. Number 4??? Lol and cardinals defense was one of the best in the league last year if you forgot they won like 6 in a row to end the year. And now they beat two good teams and nothing? I&#8217;m a bills fan. They&#8217;re ranking is about right. Bottom 12 of the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
