<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PFT&#8217;s Week Three picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliffclavicle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2014214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cliffclavicle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2014214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over-ratetriots on the downhill slide, not a very good team aside from 2-3 players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over-ratetriots on the downhill slide, not a very good team aside from 2-3 players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2013529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2013529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Ravens have the Patriots&#039; number&quot;

Sir Michael - granted the contests between these two are not pretty - they&#039;re not supposed to be. They are nasty, ugly games, but from what corner of the parallel universe in which you hang your silly hat did you come up with that one?

&quot;No one will take the Falcons seriously until they win a playoff game.&quot;

I&#039;ll agree with that, although it is pretty much along the lines of &quot;the sun came up in the east today!!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Ravens have the Patriots&#8217; number&#8221;</p>
<p>Sir Michael &#8211; granted the contests between these two are not pretty &#8211; they&#8217;re not supposed to be. They are nasty, ugly games, but from what corner of the parallel universe in which you hang your silly hat did you come up with that one?</p>
<p>&#8220;No one will take the Falcons seriously until they win a playoff game.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree with that, although it is pretty much along the lines of &#8220;the sun came up in the east today!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba99m</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2013080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba99m]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2013080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Ravens have the Patriots number, it&#039;s only because someone on that team wrote it down as New England was pulling away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Ravens have the Patriots number, it&#8217;s only because someone on that team wrote it down as New England was pulling away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thunderconvoy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2011798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thunderconvoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2011798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Redskins over Bungals!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redskins over Bungals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superredskins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2010893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superredskins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2010893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope Redskins win this week...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Redskins win this week&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roadtrip3500</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2010063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roadtrip3500]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2010063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MDS got the pick right for Giants/Panthers, but no one expected the flat-out butt-kicking the Giants dispensed on Thursday.  Jerry Reese and Tom Coughlin strike again with depth and game planning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MDS got the pick right for Giants/Panthers, but no one expected the flat-out butt-kicking the Giants dispensed on Thursday.  Jerry Reese and Tom Coughlin strike again with depth and game planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmface</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2009871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmface]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 04:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2009871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty decents pics. I had the Giants of course. Lions should win big, 49ers, Cards Over 43, Steelers, Saints, &amp; Cowboys]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty decents pics. I had the Giants of course. Lions should win big, 49ers, Cards Over 43, Steelers, Saints, &amp; Cowboys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetokyosandblaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2009778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetokyosandblaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2009778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flo, 

I was going to commend you for picking the Lions to lose, because they probably will.

Then I saw you picked the Packers to lose.  Against a Rookie QB.  On MNF.

Funny stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flo, </p>
<p>I was going to commend you for picking the Lions to lose, because they probably will.</p>
<p>Then I saw you picked the Packers to lose.  Against a Rookie QB.  On MNF.</p>
<p>Funny stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chi01town</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2009738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chi01town]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2009738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chicago will beat the Rams at home
37/14 Cutler will light up the score board. Forte will play and Urlacher will look alot more like his old self. But the Rams will score first]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago will beat the Rams at home<br />
37/14 Cutler will light up the score board. Forte will play and Urlacher will look alot more like his old self. But the Rams will score first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincentbojackson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2009423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vincentbojackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2009423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what Tebow thinks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Tebow thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mancave001</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2009263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mancave001]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2009263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[larryfitzgerald4mvp says:
Sep 20, 2012 12:08 PM
I respect the Eagles and think they’re a good team, but the Cardinals should win this one.

They’ve won 6 straight at home and they’re 30-14 at home under Whisenhunt, counting the playoffs.

Both teams have good defenses, and while the Eagles have a talented offense, they don’t always produce results. Not to mention the fact that they beat the Eagles in Philadelphia last year, so the Cards have to be confident that they can win this one.
-------------------------------------

Dude, I respect your team, but come on.   The Eagles defense is *vastly* improved from last year.   We have a ridiculous amount of offensive weapons, and the best d-line in the league.  By contrast, your 0-line is terrible and Kolb has no weapons other than Fitz.  

Anything can happen, but betting the Cards on this one is not exactly smart money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>larryfitzgerald4mvp says:<br />
Sep 20, 2012 12:08 PM<br />
I respect the Eagles and think they’re a good team, but the Cardinals should win this one.</p>
<p>They’ve won 6 straight at home and they’re 30-14 at home under Whisenhunt, counting the playoffs.</p>
<p>Both teams have good defenses, and while the Eagles have a talented offense, they don’t always produce results. Not to mention the fact that they beat the Eagles in Philadelphia last year, so the Cards have to be confident that they can win this one.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Dude, I respect your team, but come on.   The Eagles defense is *vastly* improved from last year.   We have a ridiculous amount of offensive weapons, and the best d-line in the league.  By contrast, your 0-line is terrible and Kolb has no weapons other than Fitz.  </p>
<p>Anything can happen, but betting the Cards on this one is not exactly smart money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldrush36</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2009216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goldrush36]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2009216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@thisshiziswack... AP career vs niners... 33 carries 88 yds 0 TD&#039;s and the defense has gotten a lot better. I&#039;m sure they are terrified right now]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@thisshiziswack&#8230; AP career vs niners&#8230; 33 carries 88 yds 0 TD&#8217;s and the defense has gotten a lot better. I&#8217;m sure they are terrified right now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romeisfallingagain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[romeisfallingagain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Chiefs&#039; fan, I can tell you right now you&#039;re both giving way too much credit to Kansas City if you think the Saints are going to score under 45 points.  This team is one of the biggest dumpster fires I&#039;ve seen in the NFL in a long time.  The players are utterly hopeless and have no confidence whatsover in this organization.  Scott Pioli is a complete fraud and Romeo Crennel is a trainwreck as a head coach.  This game is going to be an epic beat down.  Chiefs will be lucky to win 2 games this year, and we can only hope it&#039;s enough to convince Clark Hunt to get rid of Pioli and his Patriot rejects and start over yet again.

Saints 56
Chiefs 14]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Chiefs&#8217; fan, I can tell you right now you&#8217;re both giving way too much credit to Kansas City if you think the Saints are going to score under 45 points.  This team is one of the biggest dumpster fires I&#8217;ve seen in the NFL in a long time.  The players are utterly hopeless and have no confidence whatsover in this organization.  Scott Pioli is a complete fraud and Romeo Crennel is a trainwreck as a head coach.  This game is going to be an epic beat down.  Chiefs will be lucky to win 2 games this year, and we can only hope it&#8217;s enough to convince Clark Hunt to get rid of Pioli and his Patriot rejects and start over yet again.</p>
<p>Saints 56<br />
Chiefs 14</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meytonpanning</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meytonpanning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Titans I mean Bucs...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Titans I mean Bucs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meytonpanning</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meytonpanning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carolina has an extremely underrated defense so far this year. 

1) They both played the Titans, and look at the difference in scores. Yes the Giants have a better offense (probably) but Carolina (at this point) has a better defense. 

2) They held drew Brees and the Saints to 27pts, which is pretty good. 


So, if the Giants were healthy, I&#039;d pick them hands down in a close game, but right now they do not look healthy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolina has an extremely underrated defense so far this year. </p>
<p>1) They both played the Titans, and look at the difference in scores. Yes the Giants have a better offense (probably) but Carolina (at this point) has a better defense. </p>
<p>2) They held drew Brees and the Saints to 27pts, which is pretty good. </p>
<p>So, if the Giants were healthy, I&#8217;d pick them hands down in a close game, but right now they do not look healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryfitzgerald4mvp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryfitzgerald4mvp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I respect the Eagles and think they&#039;re a good team, but the Cardinals should win this one. 

They&#039;ve won 6 straight at home and they&#039;re  30-14 at home under Whisenhunt, counting the playoffs.

Both teams have good defenses, and while the Eagles have a talented offense, they don&#039;t always produce results. Not to mention the fact that they beat the Eagles in Philadelphia last year, so the Cards have to be confident that they can win this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respect the Eagles and think they&#8217;re a good team, but the Cardinals should win this one. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve won 6 straight at home and they&#8217;re  30-14 at home under Whisenhunt, counting the playoffs.</p>
<p>Both teams have good defenses, and while the Eagles have a talented offense, they don&#8217;t always produce results. Not to mention the fact that they beat the Eagles in Philadelphia last year, so the Cards have to be confident that they can win this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninerhatersgetready4ring6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ninerhatersgetready4ring6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@thisshiziswack

   I don&#039;t understand your thought here when u say the Niners have no Offense when they are averaging 30 pts a game #2 rushing team and the best set of skilled players by position next to GB(who they beat), NE and New Orleans....

PS... The Niners have the best defense in the league and have allowed only 1 100 yard rusher in 3 years(Marshawn Lynch).

Alex Smith is 16-4 in his last 20 starts and ranked #2 in Qbr rating and where is Ponder.....

You have no basis for your comments. Niners win 34-13]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@thisshiziswack</p>
<p>   I don&#8217;t understand your thought here when u say the Niners have no Offense when they are averaging 30 pts a game #2 rushing team and the best set of skilled players by position next to GB(who they beat), NE and New Orleans&#8230;.</p>
<p>PS&#8230; The Niners have the best defense in the league and have allowed only 1 100 yard rusher in 3 years(Marshawn Lynch).</p>
<p>Alex Smith is 16-4 in his last 20 starts and ranked #2 in Qbr rating and where is Ponder&#8230;..</p>
<p>You have no basis for your comments. Niners win 34-13</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imodan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imodan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got to know the logic behind the thought that being beaten 7 out of 8 times is some how having a teams number.  C&#039;mon man, please share with the rest of us.  This ought to be good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got to know the logic behind the thought that being beaten 7 out of 8 times is some how having a teams number.  C&#8217;mon man, please share with the rest of us.  This ought to be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunpuncher</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nunpuncher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I predict that there will be no kneel downs in the Buccaneers Vs. Cowboys game. I also predict that that the Jets will lose and the weekly hot topic debate will again be &quot;kneel downs&quot; instead of &quot;Tim Tebow&quot;. Everybody wins!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict that there will be no kneel downs in the Buccaneers Vs. Cowboys game. I also predict that that the Jets will lose and the weekly hot topic debate will again be &#8220;kneel downs&#8221; instead of &#8220;Tim Tebow&#8221;. Everybody wins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hehateme2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hehateme2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@justwinbaby29

I might be an optimist but…
Raiders are 0-2 but longsnapper ruined the San Diego game and they had the lead at Miami until the short week, heat, long flight caught up to them…

dude, stop making excuses. The Fins have beaten the Raiders like 7 of the past 8. And the past 3 were blowouts. Just a reality check.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@justwinbaby29</p>
<p>I might be an optimist but…<br />
Raiders are 0-2 but longsnapper ruined the San Diego game and they had the lead at Miami until the short week, heat, long flight caught up to them…</p>
<p>dude, stop making excuses. The Fins have beaten the Raiders like 7 of the past 8. And the past 3 were blowouts. Just a reality check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctimesthr33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ctimesthr33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Last year’s AFC title game notwithstanding, the Ravens have had the Pats’ number lately&quot;

Umm havent the patriots only lost ONCE in the history of these two teams playing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last year’s AFC title game notwithstanding, the Ravens have had the Pats’ number lately&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm havent the patriots only lost ONCE in the history of these two teams playing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cylondetector</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cylondetector]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep.

I&#039;ll be the next (but not last) person to state that the rationale behind the Patriots/Ravens prediction is quite possibly the best example of not thinking before typing this site has seen.

And it&#039;s not as if that category has any shortage of competitors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be the next (but not last) person to state that the rationale behind the Patriots/Ravens prediction is quite possibly the best example of not thinking before typing this site has seen.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not as if that category has any shortage of competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marima07</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marima07]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How exactly have the Ravens had the Patriots number lately?  

Even if you want to ignore the most recent game that the Patriots won, this statement makes no sense.

Is &quot;having their number&quot; the same as that blueprint all those teams had for beating the 2007 Patriots?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly have the Ravens had the Patriots number lately?  </p>
<p>Even if you want to ignore the most recent game that the Patriots won, this statement makes no sense.</p>
<p>Is &#8220;having their number&#8221; the same as that blueprint all those teams had for beating the 2007 Patriots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justwinbaby29</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justwinbaby29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might be an optimist but...

Raiders are 0-2 but longsnapper ruined the San Diego game and they had the lead at Miami until the short week, heat, long flight caught up to them...Pittsburgh is banged up and must go coast to coast - one of those that&#039;s why they play the game:

Raiders 24 Steelers 17]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be an optimist but&#8230;</p>
<p>Raiders are 0-2 but longsnapper ruined the San Diego game and they had the lead at Miami until the short week, heat, long flight caught up to them&#8230;Pittsburgh is banged up and must go coast to coast &#8211; one of those that&#8217;s why they play the game:</p>
<p>Raiders 24 Steelers 17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbc85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sbc85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Saints lose to the Chiefs, I am just going to go ahead and get ready for the draft. We will have a very high pick. (And no, Goodell didn&#039;t take away our first rounder. Thank God(ell).)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Saints lose to the Chiefs, I am just going to go ahead and get ready for the draft. We will have a very high pick. (And no, Goodell didn&#8217;t take away our first rounder. Thank God(ell).)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luvnlfe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[luvnlfe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browns always play the Bills tough...Browns are home...Bills haven&#039;t won a road game in over a year...Fitz performance is bipolar...my guess is Bills win a close one....and Lindell gets to finally kick the winning field goal with five seconds on the clock...17/14]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browns always play the Bills tough&#8230;Browns are home&#8230;Bills haven&#8217;t won a road game in over a year&#8230;Fitz performance is bipolar&#8230;my guess is Bills win a close one&#8230;.and Lindell gets to finally kick the winning field goal with five seconds on the clock&#8230;17/14</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbs1971</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2008003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cbs1971]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2008003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The 49ers look to me like the best team in the league by a wide margin. They should win this one handily,&quot;

Careful how you use the word &quot;handily&quot; because the Patriots should have beaten the Cardinals &quot;handily&quot;

Just saying....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The 49ers look to me like the best team in the league by a wide margin. They should win this one handily,&#8221;</p>
<p>Careful how you use the word &#8220;handily&#8221; because the Patriots should have beaten the Cardinals &#8220;handily&#8221;</p>
<p>Just saying&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thisshiziswack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2007994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thisshiziswack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2007994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Florio you are way off on the MN v SF matchup.

AP is 100%.  49&#039;s have no offense.  At the metrodome. Ponder &gt; Smith

Vikes - 38
49&#039;ers - 17]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florio you are way off on the MN v SF matchup.</p>
<p>AP is 100%.  49&#8242;s have no offense.  At the metrodome. Ponder &gt; Smith</p>
<p>Vikes &#8211; 38<br />
49&#8242;ers &#8211; 17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drainbameged</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2007957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drainbameged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2007957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[finsfan71 says:
Sep 20, 2012 9:19 AM
I understand the Dolphins are in the bottom third of the league. But when you pick the Raiders to beat the Dolphins in Week 2, coming off a short week and traveling cross country, it’s odd you support this weeks pick by pointing out the very thing you ignored last week.

Dolphins 20
Jets 17

Carson Palmer is definitely better than Sanchez and Tebow, even on a short week.  It&#039;ll be a good game for sure and as a dolphins fan I&#039;m fine with loosing the rest of the game sin a season as long as they beat the Jets twice. (If they beat the Bills twice its an added bonus)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finsfan71 says:<br />
Sep 20, 2012 9:19 AM<br />
I understand the Dolphins are in the bottom third of the league. But when you pick the Raiders to beat the Dolphins in Week 2, coming off a short week and traveling cross country, it’s odd you support this weeks pick by pointing out the very thing you ignored last week.</p>
<p>Dolphins 20<br />
Jets 17</p>
<p>Carson Palmer is definitely better than Sanchez and Tebow, even on a short week.  It&#8217;ll be a good game for sure and as a dolphins fan I&#8217;m fine with loosing the rest of the game sin a season as long as they beat the Jets twice. (If they beat the Bills twice its an added bonus)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenbleeder</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/20/pfts-week-three-picks-4/#comment-2007956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greenbleeder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1274322#comment-2007956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, one more thing....

&lt;b&gt;The formatting on this page drives me crazy every week.&lt;/b&gt; Would it kill you guys to take 1 minute to indent some stuff to make this darn page easier to read?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, one more thing&#8230;.</p>
<p><b>The formatting on this page drives me crazy every week.</b> Would it kill you guys to take 1 minute to indent some stuff to make this darn page easier to read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
