<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report:  League will review Belichick incident</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatersweargreen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2017686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hatersweargreen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2017686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheatyface is going to continue to bully around the officials (and ya, the replacement officials are indeed horrid) until the league quits being so afraid of him.

he was not suspended for blatantly cheating fo Gods sake, what makes anyone think they are going to suspend him for this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheatyface is going to continue to bully around the officials (and ya, the replacement officials are indeed horrid) until the league quits being so afraid of him.</p>
<p>he was not suspended for blatantly cheating fo Gods sake, what makes anyone think they are going to suspend him for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metitometin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2017640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[metitometin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2017640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t blame Belichick at all.  The referees are an absolute disgrace to the game and pretty much handed the game to the Ravens last night.  So many disgusting calls last night, because obviously the refs were intimidated by Ray Lewis and the home fans.

These 4-hour games have become a joke.  I don&#039;t know how long this strike goes on but I&#039;m done with the NFL until the regular refs come back.  The better team did not win last night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t blame Belichick at all.  The referees are an absolute disgrace to the game and pretty much handed the game to the Ravens last night.  So many disgusting calls last night, because obviously the refs were intimidated by Ray Lewis and the home fans.</p>
<p>These 4-hour games have become a joke.  I don&#8217;t know how long this strike goes on but I&#8217;m done with the NFL until the regular refs come back.  The better team did not win last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blanchonegro</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2017426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blanchonegro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2017426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He needs to be suspended. This is not a first offense he was was caught cheating and now he is attacking refs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He needs to be suspended. This is not a first offense he was was caught cheating and now he is attacking refs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbiased8383</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2017357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[unbiased8383]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2017357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[swagger52 says:
Sep 24, 2012 8:17 AM
The Patriots have been winning games because of paid off Refs ever since the “tuck” rule and longer. When was the last time the Patriots lost a close game? Anybody remember? Redskins last year?

--------

Last week actually. They played Arizona. You can find the box score somewhere, I&#039;m sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swagger52 says:<br />
Sep 24, 2012 8:17 AM<br />
The Patriots have been winning games because of paid off Refs ever since the “tuck” rule and longer. When was the last time the Patriots lost a close game? Anybody remember? Redskins last year?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Last week actually. They played Arizona. You can find the box score somewhere, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabatimus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2017247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sabatimus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2017247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that Belichick should be punished, but I don&#039;t agree that shouting at the replacement officials should be punished.  They are SO BAD that no WONDER people like Harbaugh and del Rio get so mad at them.  

Here the NFL seems to be going in the direction of NBA, and that&#039;s a VERY bad thing for the sport.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Belichick should be punished, but I don&#8217;t agree that shouting at the replacement officials should be punished.  They are SO BAD that no WONDER people like Harbaugh and del Rio get so mad at them.  </p>
<p>Here the NFL seems to be going in the direction of NBA, and that&#8217;s a VERY bad thing for the sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaymc1988</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2017201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaymc1988]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2017201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[he deserved to get a nice fine. the Ref handled that like a man, im sure many other people would of took that different you dont put your hands on a man angerly idc what sport or w.e it is our involved with. 
people need 2 loosen up on these refs. at the end of the day its either replacement refs or no NFL bec the refs are asking for to much money just to be part time. and sure the replacement refs slow the game down a bit but do a decent job (minus the outrageous amount of flags called last night but then again, players need 2 stop holding). in my opinion there should of been many more flags i seen not called. I actually liket he replacement refs.. shows a side of great football play we havnt seen since the guy who thinks hes god stepped into the nfl office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he deserved to get a nice fine. the Ref handled that like a man, im sure many other people would of took that different you dont put your hands on a man angerly idc what sport or w.e it is our involved with.<br />
people need 2 loosen up on these refs. at the end of the day its either replacement refs or no NFL bec the refs are asking for to much money just to be part time. and sure the replacement refs slow the game down a bit but do a decent job (minus the outrageous amount of flags called last night but then again, players need 2 stop holding). in my opinion there should of been many more flags i seen not called. I actually liket he replacement refs.. shows a side of great football play we havnt seen since the guy who thinks hes god stepped into the nfl office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickster31</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickster31]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rkingndayton says:
Sep 24, 2012 8:24 AM
“If the poles were to continue upwards, and any part of the ball “would have” touched that “pole” then the field goal is good.”

Sorry, but that doesn’t make sense….if the poles went up further, the ball would bounce off the upright, and the field goal wouldn’t have been good.


I believe that the rule is, if ANY part of the ball is within where the poles would be if they were extended upward, then the FG is good.

Obviously there is no way to judge what kind of bounce would have happened if the poles were extended, which is why if any part of the ball is inside.

That being said, I don&#039;t care how bad a game was called, there is NO excuse for putting your hands on an official, PERIOD, END OF STORY.

Belichick is not exactly a big dude.  Say someone like King Kong Suh were to grab a ref like that?  What would happen to him?

Any coach that would be in this situation, I would say the same thing, NO LESS than 4 game suspension, and NO LESS than $1 million fine.

Then, the team needs to be fined another $1 million.

Things are getting out of hand, and it is going quick.  If ANY Ref becomes intimidated, he is going to start calling to favor that team.  Once that happens, then there is no chance that a game could be called fair.

The NFL needs to step up RIGHT NOW, TODAY, and show that abusing ANY ref, real or replacement IS NOT GOING TO BE TOLERATED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE!!!!

If players and coaches see that kind of fine and suspension, then they are going to stay within the limit because they know they would be screwed if they didn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rkingndayton says:<br />
Sep 24, 2012 8:24 AM<br />
“If the poles were to continue upwards, and any part of the ball “would have” touched that “pole” then the field goal is good.”</p>
<p>Sorry, but that doesn’t make sense….if the poles went up further, the ball would bounce off the upright, and the field goal wouldn’t have been good.</p>
<p>I believe that the rule is, if ANY part of the ball is within where the poles would be if they were extended upward, then the FG is good.</p>
<p>Obviously there is no way to judge what kind of bounce would have happened if the poles were extended, which is why if any part of the ball is inside.</p>
<p>That being said, I don&#8217;t care how bad a game was called, there is NO excuse for putting your hands on an official, PERIOD, END OF STORY.</p>
<p>Belichick is not exactly a big dude.  Say someone like King Kong Suh were to grab a ref like that?  What would happen to him?</p>
<p>Any coach that would be in this situation, I would say the same thing, NO LESS than 4 game suspension, and NO LESS than $1 million fine.</p>
<p>Then, the team needs to be fined another $1 million.</p>
<p>Things are getting out of hand, and it is going quick.  If ANY Ref becomes intimidated, he is going to start calling to favor that team.  Once that happens, then there is no chance that a game could be called fair.</p>
<p>The NFL needs to step up RIGHT NOW, TODAY, and show that abusing ANY ref, real or replacement IS NOT GOING TO BE TOLERATED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE!!!!</p>
<p>If players and coaches see that kind of fine and suspension, then they are going to stay within the limit because they know they would be screwed if they didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomguy9999</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randomguy9999]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BB should be fined....  a big one.... but the crackpots on here calling for a big suspension are gonna be disappointed...

bullying the refs is putting a lot more pressure and no doubt making the calls even worse....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB should be fined&#8230;.  a big one&#8230;. but the crackpots on here calling for a big suspension are gonna be disappointed&#8230;</p>
<p>bullying the refs is putting a lot more pressure and no doubt making the calls even worse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullman76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mullman76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think William will get off with a slap on the hand.  Kraft is tight with Goodell after the commish &quot;handled&quot; the SpyGate situation for him.

Mara, Rooney and Kraft run the league- the commish is their puppet and every other team/owner can go tuck themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think William will get off with a slap on the hand.  Kraft is tight with Goodell after the commish &#8220;handled&#8221; the SpyGate situation for him.</p>
<p>Mara, Rooney and Kraft run the league- the commish is their puppet and every other team/owner can go tuck themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daknight93</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daknight93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the complaining and whining won&#039;t stop with these scab refs officiating games every week...Goodell will say refs are doing a great job and just fine Bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the complaining and whining won&#8217;t stop with these scab refs officiating games every week&#8230;Goodell will say refs are doing a great job and just fine Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laxgolie19</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laxgolie19]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rules say that a defender CAN NOT launch himself head first at a receiver (which Reed obviously did) and they CAN NOT have the initial hit to the receiver be their head (a.k.a. spearing). Reed DID both. Should have been called. 

The irony is that you show from this statement alone you don&#039;t know anything.  Spearing is leading with the head - not hitting the other person in the head.  If the initial contact is in the head, but by say a shoulder, it is not spearing.  Spearing is when you lead with your head and make contact with any part of the body.

Thanks for showing me further than you know nothing about football and have never played the game in your life.  Go back to your couch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules say that a defender CAN NOT launch himself head first at a receiver (which Reed obviously did) and they CAN NOT have the initial hit to the receiver be their head (a.k.a. spearing). Reed DID both. Should have been called. </p>
<p>The irony is that you show from this statement alone you don&#8217;t know anything.  Spearing is leading with the head &#8211; not hitting the other person in the head.  If the initial contact is in the head, but by say a shoulder, it is not spearing.  Spearing is when you lead with your head and make contact with any part of the body.</p>
<p>Thanks for showing me further than you know nothing about football and have never played the game in your life.  Go back to your couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerfanjo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerfanjo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bellacheat should be suspended for the season - this is worse than Sean Payton. But Goodell, A Pats, fan will no little. The NFL is becoming a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bellacheat should be suspended for the season &#8211; this is worse than Sean Payton. But Goodell, A Pats, fan will no little. The NFL is becoming a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laxgolie19</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laxgolie19]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pftwstbshmc

Really?  Did you see the same hit as me?  The point of contact is shoulder/forearms to chest.  Don&#039;t lecture me about football.  I played D1 college ball and played in semi-pro leagues for 2 years.

The point of contact was the chest, with his shoulder.  Watch the video above.  His shoulder pad does drift up after the initial contact and glance his head, but it is incidental.  I am all for punishments for head hunting hits where they launch with their helmets, but that was not what happened here.  This was a textbook shoulder to chest hit.

Maybe you should leave the football to people with experience and stick to your couch, where your tub butt has always been.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pftwstbshmc</p>
<p>Really?  Did you see the same hit as me?  The point of contact is shoulder/forearms to chest.  Don&#8217;t lecture me about football.  I played D1 college ball and played in semi-pro leagues for 2 years.</p>
<p>The point of contact was the chest, with his shoulder.  Watch the video above.  His shoulder pad does drift up after the initial contact and glance his head, but it is incidental.  I am all for punishments for head hunting hits where they launch with their helmets, but that was not what happened here.  This was a textbook shoulder to chest hit.</p>
<p>Maybe you should leave the football to people with experience and stick to your couch, where your tub butt has always been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcranshaw</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcranshaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple question... why do the uprights end where they do? It seems fairly obvious that the average NFL kicker puts the ball higher that the highest point of the uprights on most short to intermediate kicks. Why not raise them another 20 feet or so. This isn&#039;t the first game that was decided by a field goal that was higher that the uprights. The fact that it was close just highlighted how poorly the game was called all night.

Missed 15 yarder on Reed against Edleman. 

Phantom Offensive PI against Edleman.

No Call push off by Lloyd that extended a Pats scoring drive.

Wrong call on the late defensive holding the overturned the int... should have actually been a spot of the foul PI.

Phantom defensive holding against McCourty that negated a late 3 and out by the Ravens.

How ever... the Pats lost that game in the secondary by letting Flaco off with only 1 Int, when there should have been 3 if McCourty can hang on, and possibly a 4th if Arington didn&#039;t trip over the white lines in the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple question&#8230; why do the uprights end where they do? It seems fairly obvious that the average NFL kicker puts the ball higher that the highest point of the uprights on most short to intermediate kicks. Why not raise them another 20 feet or so. This isn&#8217;t the first game that was decided by a field goal that was higher that the uprights. The fact that it was close just highlighted how poorly the game was called all night.</p>
<p>Missed 15 yarder on Reed against Edleman. </p>
<p>Phantom Offensive PI against Edleman.</p>
<p>No Call push off by Lloyd that extended a Pats scoring drive.</p>
<p>Wrong call on the late defensive holding the overturned the int&#8230; should have actually been a spot of the foul PI.</p>
<p>Phantom defensive holding against McCourty that negated a late 3 and out by the Ravens.</p>
<p>How ever&#8230; the Pats lost that game in the secondary by letting Flaco off with only 1 Int, when there should have been 3 if McCourty can hang on, and possibly a 4th if Arington didn&#8217;t trip over the white lines in the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewj7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drewj7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate the Patriots but I don&#039;t think Bill should be fined. He was really just trying to get the ref&#039;s attention. The stadium is loud and the ref was running away.

The field goal was good. It was a fine call. What was silly was the defensive pass interference call earlier in the drive that turned a failed 3rd down conversion into a 1st down. That pretty much gave the ravens the win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the Patriots but I don&#8217;t think Bill should be fined. He was really just trying to get the ref&#8217;s attention. The stadium is loud and the ref was running away.</p>
<p>The field goal was good. It was a fine call. What was silly was the defensive pass interference call earlier in the drive that turned a failed 3rd down conversion into a 1st down. That pretty much gave the ravens the win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkforlife</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hawkforlife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Belichick needs to be fined, too.&quot;
--------------------------
You seem to want to be commissioner so bad that objectivity goes right out the window. First, aren&#039;t all scoring plays mandated to be reviewed? If so then Belichick might have been trying to find out why this wan&#039;t and rightfully so.

Second, on that final drive a receiver stepped out of bounds and was the first to touch it and make the catch afterward. It moved so fast that it wasn&#039;t shown but I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s what B was upset about and it saved the game for the Ravens.

Find the film and review it before you get all high and mighty judge and jury.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Belichick needs to be fined, too.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
You seem to want to be commissioner so bad that objectivity goes right out the window. First, aren&#8217;t all scoring plays mandated to be reviewed? If so then Belichick might have been trying to find out why this wan&#8217;t and rightfully so.</p>
<p>Second, on that final drive a receiver stepped out of bounds and was the first to touch it and make the catch afterward. It moved so fast that it wasn&#8217;t shown but I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s what B was upset about and it saved the game for the Ravens.</p>
<p>Find the film and review it before you get all high and mighty judge and jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pftwstbshmc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pftwstbshmc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[laxgolie19 says: 
Sep 24, 2012 9:49 AM 
Oh – and the no call on the Reed-Edelman hit was the right call as well. Point of contact was the chest, and his should pad slid up after the contact and grazed his helmet. Good clean hit, and if you think otherwise then you have clearly never played a down of football in your life and are a couch warrior.

 
REALLY?  

Guys like you who don&#039;t know the rules and are homers should not comment on things they don&#039;t know about.  

The rules say that a defender CAN NOT launch himself head first at a receiver (which Reed obviously did) and they CAN NOT have the initial hit to the receiver be their head (a.k.a. spearing).  Reed DID both.  Should have been called.  

The league I expect, no scratch that, the league BETTER fine him for that.  The man has done it in the past, been warned about doing it going forward.  In fact he should be suspended for it.  If the league and all mighty goodell (I refuse to put a capital letter there) are serious about player safety (which I don&#039;t believe for a moment) then they will do just that.  Fine and suspend.  The man deserves both for his style of play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>laxgolie19 says:<br />
Sep 24, 2012 9:49 AM<br />
Oh – and the no call on the Reed-Edelman hit was the right call as well. Point of contact was the chest, and his should pad slid up after the contact and grazed his helmet. Good clean hit, and if you think otherwise then you have clearly never played a down of football in your life and are a couch warrior.</p>
<p>REALLY?  </p>
<p>Guys like you who don&#8217;t know the rules and are homers should not comment on things they don&#8217;t know about.  </p>
<p>The rules say that a defender CAN NOT launch himself head first at a receiver (which Reed obviously did) and they CAN NOT have the initial hit to the receiver be their head (a.k.a. spearing).  Reed DID both.  Should have been called.  </p>
<p>The league I expect, no scratch that, the league BETTER fine him for that.  The man has done it in the past, been warned about doing it going forward.  In fact he should be suspended for it.  If the league and all mighty goodell (I refuse to put a capital letter there) are serious about player safety (which I don&#8217;t believe for a moment) then they will do just that.  Fine and suspend.  The man deserves both for his style of play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackngold4877</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackngold4877]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Put his hands on him?  He should have been him in the friggin hospital after that travesty of a game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put his hands on him?  He should have been him in the friggin hospital after that travesty of a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFTiswhatitis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PFTiswhatitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly Reed went high with his forearm on that hit on Edelman...penalty, first and goal.  Not even a close call.  Fine too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Reed went high with his forearm on that hit on Edelman&#8230;penalty, first and goal.  Not even a close call.  Fine too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wludford</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wludford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fine him $10 or $20 grand.  It wasn&#039;t that bad, but the message needs to be sent.  Obviously he was mad, and reached out to stop the ref (who was running as fast as he could to get out of there) so he could yell at him.  

It wasn&#039;t Belicheck&#039;s finest moment, but it doesn&#039;t deserve more than a $20K fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine him $10 or $20 grand.  It wasn&#8217;t that bad, but the message needs to be sent.  Obviously he was mad, and reached out to stop the ref (who was running as fast as he could to get out of there) so he could yell at him.  </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t Belicheck&#8217;s finest moment, but it doesn&#8217;t deserve more than a $20K fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamn6f</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamn6f]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maybe the league should send a memo to the replacement refs to review the rule book, instead of warning the coaches against &#039;bullying&#039; officials when it is compeletly justified]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe the league should send a memo to the replacement refs to review the rule book, instead of warning the coaches against &#8216;bullying&#8217; officials when it is compeletly justified</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theravens1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theravens1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that Belichick should be fined.  And, I understand that touching the ref is against the rules, and that was reinforced this week.  He was clearly just trying to get his attention to ask if the kick could be reviewed.  He wasn&#039;t attacking the ref, or threatening in anyway.  I think they should just forget about it.

There were many bad calls, going both ways, and no calls going both ways.  It was a tough physical emotional football game, and this non divisional rivalry is getting better.  A lot of calls were corrected on the fly as well.  Overall some of the calls may or may not have been better with the regular refs, but many of us would still be complaining today.

Pats fans - you guys have an awesome team, and will be playoff bound.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Belichick should be fined.  And, I understand that touching the ref is against the rules, and that was reinforced this week.  He was clearly just trying to get his attention to ask if the kick could be reviewed.  He wasn&#8217;t attacking the ref, or threatening in anyway.  I think they should just forget about it.</p>
<p>There were many bad calls, going both ways, and no calls going both ways.  It was a tough physical emotional football game, and this non divisional rivalry is getting better.  A lot of calls were corrected on the fly as well.  Overall some of the calls may or may not have been better with the regular refs, but many of us would still be complaining today.</p>
<p>Pats fans &#8211; you guys have an awesome team, and will be playoff bound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rahavort</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rahavort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is there to investigate? The refs did a horrendous job of officiating the game for both teams, which ended driving the players AND coaches to their breaking point. There, I summed up all the things they need to &quot;investigate&quot; right there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is there to investigate? The refs did a horrendous job of officiating the game for both teams, which ended driving the players AND coaches to their breaking point. There, I summed up all the things they need to &#8220;investigate&#8221; right there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newyorkgiants11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newyorkgiants11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Belichick is not above the game.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Belichick is not above the game&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holysmole</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[holysmole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[laxgolie19 says:Sep 24, 2012 9:49 AM 

Oh – and the no call on the Reed-Edelman hit was the right call as well. Point of contact was the chest, and his should pad slid up after the contact and grazed his helmet. Good clean hit, and if you think otherwise then you have clearly never played a down of football in your life and are a couch warrior.

You be the judge..........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBvfmunOT0k

Reed went high. Now after watching it several times, it&#039;s boarderline. Fact is, the players know they can get away with certain hits now, since there&#039;s no respect for the refs on the field. 

Also, Ray Lewis bitching about the Reed hit on Deion Branch was a head shot. Ray, just because it wasn&#039;t a helmet-to-helmet doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t against the rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>laxgolie19 says:Sep 24, 2012 9:49 AM </p>
<p>Oh – and the no call on the Reed-Edelman hit was the right call as well. Point of contact was the chest, and his should pad slid up after the contact and grazed his helmet. Good clean hit, and if you think otherwise then you have clearly never played a down of football in your life and are a couch warrior.</p>
<p>You be the judge&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZBvfmunOT0k?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>Reed went high. Now after watching it several times, it&#8217;s boarderline. Fact is, the players know they can get away with certain hits now, since there&#8217;s no respect for the refs on the field. </p>
<p>Also, Ray Lewis bitching about the Reed hit on Deion Branch was a head shot. Ray, just because it wasn&#8217;t a helmet-to-helmet doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t against the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernie ernie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ernie ernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ref was lucky Belly Check only tried to grab his arm from behind and not tackle him. What upset me and for sure him is they ran off the field immediately after the call was made and would not give ol Belly a talk. Like, we made the call, end of game, we go home now.  

I understand the field goal cannot be reviewed unless its between the uprights? Why would you review it if its between the uprights and went over the cross bar? Ones you need to review were the ones that happened last night that were maybe outside the crossbars? 

Oh, and get rid of Collins, he really sucks and the Jerk at the Saints game &quot; you can go anywhere in the country and not find more loyal fans that those of the Saints&quot;. What an idiot. Has he ever been to Green Bay?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ref was lucky Belly Check only tried to grab his arm from behind and not tackle him. What upset me and for sure him is they ran off the field immediately after the call was made and would not give ol Belly a talk. Like, we made the call, end of game, we go home now.  </p>
<p>I understand the field goal cannot be reviewed unless its between the uprights? Why would you review it if its between the uprights and went over the cross bar? Ones you need to review were the ones that happened last night that were maybe outside the crossbars? </p>
<p>Oh, and get rid of Collins, he really sucks and the Jerk at the Saints game &#8221; you can go anywhere in the country and not find more loyal fans that those of the Saints&#8221;. What an idiot. Has he ever been to Green Bay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aljack88</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aljack88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I were a season ticket holder,  I would want a refund.  As @holysmole writes,  &quot;we can&#039;t even tell who&#039;s the better team at the end of the game&quot;.  
This was total B.S. and the fans in the stands did the right thing.  Hopefully this catches on at other stadiums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a season ticket holder,  I would want a refund.  As @holysmole writes,  &#8220;we can&#8217;t even tell who&#8217;s the better team at the end of the game&#8221;.<br />
This was total B.S. and the fans in the stands did the right thing.  Hopefully this catches on at other stadiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laxgolie19</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laxgolie19]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh - and the no call on the Reed-Edelman hit was the right call as well.  Point of contact was the chest, and his should pad slid up after the contact and grazed his helmet.  Good clean hit, and if you think otherwise then you have clearly never played a down of football in your life and are a couch warrior.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh &#8211; and the no call on the Reed-Edelman hit was the right call as well.  Point of contact was the chest, and his should pad slid up after the contact and grazed his helmet.  Good clean hit, and if you think otherwise then you have clearly never played a down of football in your life and are a couch warrior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laxgolie19</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laxgolie19]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ravens Fan here -

The saddest part of all of this is the only thing being talked about after a great game is the refs.  The storylines of Reed/Lewis v. Brady, Torrey Smith, and the Ravens revenge after the Cundiff miss are all being overshadowed by this.  That being said, here are my thoughts:

The Patriots definitely had some pretty important bad calls against them.  The holding on McCourty was an awful call and the PI on Spikes was an awful call.  The PI on McCourty on Jones near the end was 100% correct, and the OPI on Edelman was also correct by the letter of the law.  Tough calls like the holding call really make a team feel like that cost them the game, but the bottom line is that they had 90+ other plays where they could have won the game and didn&#039;t.

On the other side, there were horrible calls as well.  The Ngata unnecessary roughing was awful.  Brady slid in front of him and Ngata tried to stop but fell on him.  Joke of a call.  The Webb illegal contact could have been holding, but even that would have been ticky tack as he didn&#039;t really affect the route.

Lastly, that FG was good, and even if it wasn&#039;t - it&#039;s not reviewable.  After the screw jobs we have gotten against the Pats in the past (think the undefeated year and 2 years ago when Brady asked for flags on Suggs and Ngata when they 1. got blocked into his leg and barely grazed him and 2. barely grazed the side of his helmet), this is merely karmic justice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravens Fan here -</p>
<p>The saddest part of all of this is the only thing being talked about after a great game is the refs.  The storylines of Reed/Lewis v. Brady, Torrey Smith, and the Ravens revenge after the Cundiff miss are all being overshadowed by this.  That being said, here are my thoughts:</p>
<p>The Patriots definitely had some pretty important bad calls against them.  The holding on McCourty was an awful call and the PI on Spikes was an awful call.  The PI on McCourty on Jones near the end was 100% correct, and the OPI on Edelman was also correct by the letter of the law.  Tough calls like the holding call really make a team feel like that cost them the game, but the bottom line is that they had 90+ other plays where they could have won the game and didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>On the other side, there were horrible calls as well.  The Ngata unnecessary roughing was awful.  Brady slid in front of him and Ngata tried to stop but fell on him.  Joke of a call.  The Webb illegal contact could have been holding, but even that would have been ticky tack as he didn&#8217;t really affect the route.</p>
<p>Lastly, that FG was good, and even if it wasn&#8217;t &#8211; it&#8217;s not reviewable.  After the screw jobs we have gotten against the Pats in the past (think the undefeated year and 2 years ago when Brady asked for flags on Suggs and Ngata when they 1. got blocked into his leg and barely grazed him and 2. barely grazed the side of his helmet), this is merely karmic justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlb10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/24/report-league-will-review-belichick-incident/#comment-2016363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlb10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1314768#comment-2016363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the refs were terrible. all night. but that give bill no excuse to touch any of the officiating crew. it doesn&#039;t matter if he was attacking him or just trying to get his attention.
i say $100,000 and 1 game suspension is what he should get. that will get his attention and i would think set the tone for future games]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the refs were terrible. all night. but that give bill no excuse to touch any of the officiating crew. it doesn&#8217;t matter if he was attacking him or just trying to get his attention.<br />
i say $100,000 and 1 game suspension is what he should get. that will get his attention and i would think set the tone for future games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
