Skip to content

Seahawks’ Doug Baldwin inactive vs. Packers

Doug Baldwin AP

Seahawks receiver Doug Baldwin will not play tonight against the Packers.

Baldwin, who was listed as questionable with a shoulder injury, has been declared inactive and won’t play on Monday Night Football. After a breakout season as an undrafted rookie last season, Baldwin hasn’t been able to get going this year, with just three catches for 13 yards.

As he said he would be, Packers receiver Greg Jennings is active and ready to play tonight.

The Packers’ inactives are Jarrett Boykin, Sean Richardson, Davon House, James Starks, Terrell Manning, Jamari Lattimore and Tom Crabtree.

The Seahawks’ inactives are Baldwin, Winston Guy, Danny Gorrer, Byron Maxwell, Lemuel Jeanpierre, James Carpenter and Jaye Howard.

Permalink 13 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Green Bay Packers, Home, Rumor Mill, Seattle Seahawks
13 Responses to “Seahawks’ Doug Baldwin inactive vs. Packers”
  1. sundevils33 says: Sep 24, 2012 7:36 PM

    Who?

    Go Pack Go

  2. thetokyosandblaster says: Sep 24, 2012 7:39 PM

    When he’s your leader in receiving yards, and you’re going up against a team that loves to get after the QB, you know you’re in for a long night.

    I said Packers 27, Seahawks 17 before, but this doesn’t bode well.

    Packers 27, Seahawks 9.

  3. goldrush36 says: Sep 24, 2012 7:49 PM

    Green Bay better not come within a country mile of sleeping on those hawks like the 49ers did the Vikings. Especially at Century Link. I thing GB wins a close one but they are in for a fight

  4. blackfootkiller says: Sep 24, 2012 8:04 PM

    Packers can’t stop the run…Good luck with that.

  5. bangithard says: Sep 24, 2012 8:05 PM

    Green bay will know the meaning of BEING RUN ON after today’s game.

    They can go after the QB all they want – he wont have the ball. This is not CUTLER and the Bears.. Get a clue about the team you are playing before you post.

  6. melsh13 says: Sep 24, 2012 8:13 PM

    He wouldn’t have been the team’s leader in yardage if Sidney Rice had been a contributor in 2011. Missing him definitely hurts, but I’d rather be missing him than Marshawn Lynch.

  7. thetokyosandblaster says: Sep 24, 2012 8:36 PM

    hahahaha

    Packers > Seahawks.

    Know about football before YOU post.

  8. thetokyosandblaster says: Sep 24, 2012 9:34 PM

    Interesting. It seems as though the Seahawks defenders can go hands to the face, but the Packers can’t. That’s a nice little advantage.

    The Seahawks are playing well, though.

  9. jjbadd385 says: Sep 24, 2012 9:58 PM

    At this point 8 sacks! Seattle’s looking very impressive!

  10. brewdogg says: Sep 24, 2012 10:07 PM

    thetokyosandblaster says: Sep 24, 2012 8:36 PM

    hahahaha

    Packers > Seahawks.

    Know about football before YOU post.
    ————————————-
    Are you watching this game?

    Watch football before you post.

  11. dome7786 says: Sep 24, 2012 10:17 PM

    Just another dumb fan who doesn’t thinks the NFC west still sucks.

  12. garza0080 says: Sep 25, 2012 12:01 AM

    If you saw the end of the Monday night game you would know that you have to get this situation resolved, Packers clearly got robed. That was not a Touchdown! Seattle does not deserve that win. Let me ask you a question what if that was a championship game? the winner would not deserve the trophy. Owners if your team lost because of a BS Call would you pay the refs? Pay them after the fact, after losing the ring or the championship. How embarrassing lose a championship over a bad call ridiculous this lock out must be fixed ASAP. Clearly a bad call.

  13. randallflagg52 says: Sep 25, 2012 12:55 AM

    thetokyosandblaster says:
    Sep 24, 2012 8:36 PM
    hahahaha

    Packers > Seahawks.

    Know about football before YOU post.

    ===================================

    Final score says otherwise.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!