<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week Three power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tebowtime34</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2029436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tebowtime34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2029436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nfc west looks pretty solid, ...even the rams have been in every game this year, ...Niners will thump the jets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nfc west looks pretty solid, &#8230;even the rams have been in every game this year, &#8230;Niners will thump the jets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba9er</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2028792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba9er]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2028792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad loss for the 49ers.  NFC West doesn&#039;t look so wimpy this year though, does it?  What other division has 3 teams in the top 10?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad loss for the 49ers.  NFC West doesn&#8217;t look so wimpy this year though, does it?  What other division has 3 teams in the top 10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tpa43</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2026191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tpa43]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2026191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bucs are a little high, but thanks anyways!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bucs are a little high, but thanks anyways!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtylert</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2025969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jtylert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2025969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3 teams in the top ten...

does that mean the NFC west is the best division in football?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 teams in the top ten&#8230;</p>
<p>does that mean the NFC west is the best division in football?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delius1967</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2025659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[delius1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2025659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you crying about the Eagles comment, consider their two victories.  Both were by one point, both were late comebacks, and both had obvious plays at the end that would changed the result.  First one it was an easy dropped interception, and the second one was the non-called intentional grounding on Vick while the refs sorted out if he fumbled or not.  (He didn&#039;t, but he &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; throw it away to avoid the sack.)  Now, what do both those things have in common?  Hmm, I wonder...

Philadelphia could, and maybe &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt;, be 0-3.  Enjoy the winning record while it lasts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you crying about the Eagles comment, consider their two victories.  Both were by one point, both were late comebacks, and both had obvious plays at the end that would changed the result.  First one it was an easy dropped interception, and the second one was the non-called intentional grounding on Vick while the refs sorted out if he fumbled or not.  (He didn&#8217;t, but he <i>did</i> throw it away to avoid the sack.)  Now, what do both those things have in common?  Hmm, I wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>Philadelphia could, and maybe <i>should</i>, be 0-3.  Enjoy the winning record while it lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meytonpanning</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2024821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meytonpanning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2024821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also I&#039;d like to point out something about SEA vs GB. 

The officiating was bad for both teams. You can&#039;t just say they lost because of one call, because there were plenty of missed calls against the Packers as well that could have taken away their touchdown. Particularly on 3rd downs with Sam Shields. That kid is getting away with so much. 

On another note, the rookie GB defenders look REALLY good. GB should still win the division this year, but they&#039;ll be amazing 2-3 years down the road. I predict them going undefeated in one of the next 5 seasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I&#8217;d like to point out something about SEA vs GB. </p>
<p>The officiating was bad for both teams. You can&#8217;t just say they lost because of one call, because there were plenty of missed calls against the Packers as well that could have taken away their touchdown. Particularly on 3rd downs with Sam Shields. That kid is getting away with so much. </p>
<p>On another note, the rookie GB defenders look REALLY good. GB should still win the division this year, but they&#8217;ll be amazing 2-3 years down the road. I predict them going undefeated in one of the next 5 seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixjak</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2024154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sixjak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2024154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[logicalthinkersays says:
Sep 25, 2012 2:06 PM
After WK3, I think it goes..
1. Redskins
2. Texans
3. Falcons
4. Cardinals
5. Steelers

 __________

Same idiot, different name.  LOL. It&#039;s what happens after a few weeks of game tape.  ROY will be awarded someplace else. I fixed your power poll.

1. RG3
2. Redskins
3. Justin Beiber
4. My Pretty Pony
5. Rainbows]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>logicalthinkersays says:<br />
Sep 25, 2012 2:06 PM<br />
After WK3, I think it goes..<br />
1. Redskins<br />
2. Texans<br />
3. Falcons<br />
4. Cardinals<br />
5. Steelers</p>
<p> __________</p>
<p>Same idiot, different name.  LOL. It&#8217;s what happens after a few weeks of game tape.  ROY will be awarded someplace else. I fixed your power poll.</p>
<p>1. RG3<br />
2. Redskins<br />
3. Justin Beiber<br />
4. My Pretty Pony<br />
5. Rainbows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphannn83</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2024094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphannn83]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2024094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tigerphins says: Sep 25, 2012 3:54 PM

ame123 says:

“Eagles are top 5 in offense and defense. Worst 2-1 in history? please.” ————————————————-Hey Homer, take off the glasses! Philly is currently tied for the NFL’s worst offense at 15.7 ppg. Meanwhile the defense is 13th at 22 ppg….. not to mention your QB is the 4th worst rated passer who throws 2 picks per every 1 TD
_________________________
Hate to burst your bubble pal but the official NFL offensive and defensive rankings are done according to yards per game, not points per game, which I&#039;ve never understood because at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the scoreboard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tigerphins says: Sep 25, 2012 3:54 PM</p>
<p>ame123 says:</p>
<p>“Eagles are top 5 in offense and defense. Worst 2-1 in history? please.” ————————————————-Hey Homer, take off the glasses! Philly is currently tied for the NFL’s worst offense at 15.7 ppg. Meanwhile the defense is 13th at 22 ppg….. not to mention your QB is the 4th worst rated passer who throws 2 picks per every 1 TD<br />
_________________________<br />
Hate to burst your bubble pal but the official NFL offensive and defensive rankings are done according to yards per game, not points per game, which I&#8217;ve never understood because at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the scoreboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 513guy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2024039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[513guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2024039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browns are too high.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browns are too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomsd1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2023910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomsd1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 01:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2023910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Chiefs beat the Boltless ones on Sunday - how high will you bump them up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Chiefs beat the Boltless ones on Sunday &#8211; how high will you bump them up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lp0320</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2023559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lp0320]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2023559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, Steelers Fan here and wholeheartedly agree with their #11 ranking.  That being said - no way on God&#039;s green Earth should the Packers be ranked #6.  For a supposedly elite QB in Rodgers they only put 12 points on the board - at least the Steelers put the points up on the board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Steelers Fan here and wholeheartedly agree with their #11 ranking.  That being said &#8211; no way on God&#8217;s green Earth should the Packers be ranked #6.  For a supposedly elite QB in Rodgers they only put 12 points on the board &#8211; at least the Steelers put the points up on the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spfripp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2023343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spfripp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2023343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This ranking must have been done by replacement sports writers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ranking must have been done by replacement sports writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dallascowboysdishingthereal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2023129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dallascowboysdishingthereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2023129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ranked the Falcons #1 since they won on the road against an undefeated Chargers team. The Texans have benefited from a softer schedule (opponents a combined 3-6) so far. Not their fault and they have taken care of business but just sayin&#039;.

Don&#039;t understand why Giants keep getting ranked ahead of Dallas who beat them week 1 in NY. The Giants barely came from behind to beat the Bucs and then beat a weak Panthers team. They have major issues in the secondary. Based on 2011 I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ranked the Falcons #1 since they won on the road against an undefeated Chargers team. The Texans have benefited from a softer schedule (opponents a combined 3-6) so far. Not their fault and they have taken care of business but just sayin&#8217;.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand why Giants keep getting ranked ahead of Dallas who beat them week 1 in NY. The Giants barely came from behind to beat the Bucs and then beat a weak Panthers team. They have major issues in the secondary. Based on 2011 I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2023058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2023058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ravens and 49ers have no business being ahead of the Giants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravens and 49ers have no business being ahead of the Giants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 13fitzj</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[13fitzj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Jets fan, they&#039;re too high. That said, if you feel that they should be at 15 (the upper half of the league, mind you) then how is it that the only thing you have to say about them is negative?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Jets fan, they&#8217;re too high. That said, if you feel that they should be at 15 (the upper half of the league, mind you) then how is it that the only thing you have to say about them is negative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmorefalcon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmorefalcon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inthearex:

The falcons and eagles are the biggest frauds in the nfl.

--------------------------------------------------

I could absolutely see why you would say that about the Falcons.  

-They are only averaging 33 points per game
-They have only played teams with that were   undefeated
-They have not trailed in a game this season
-They have forced 10 takeaways in 3 games

 You are right.  Total frauds.....Idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inthearex:</p>
<p>The falcons and eagles are the biggest frauds in the nfl.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I could absolutely see why you would say that about the Falcons.  </p>
<p>-They are only averaging 33 points per game<br />
-They have only played teams with that were   undefeated<br />
-They have not trailed in a game this season<br />
-They have forced 10 takeaways in 3 games</p>
<p> You are right.  Total frauds&#8230;..Idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grandpoopah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grandpoopah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#29 is awesome! Well played, sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#29 is awesome! Well played, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pettytom</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pettytom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Saints fan we should be 32 until our D decides to actually want to stop an opposing offense. It&#039;s looking like losing Carl Nicks/Robert Meachem (as much as I hated him)/Tracy Porter is turning out to be a big deal. O-line play is horrible, receivers can&#039;t get open, and DB&#039;s can&#039;t cover but I guess it doesn&#039;t help that the D-line can&#039;t rush the passer. It&#039;s starting to look like that 2nd round pick Goodell took for next years draft will be huge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Saints fan we should be 32 until our D decides to actually want to stop an opposing offense. It&#8217;s looking like losing Carl Nicks/Robert Meachem (as much as I hated him)/Tracy Porter is turning out to be a big deal. O-line play is horrible, receivers can&#8217;t get open, and DB&#8217;s can&#8217;t cover but I guess it doesn&#8217;t help that the D-line can&#8217;t rush the passer. It&#8217;s starting to look like that 2nd round pick Goodell took for next years draft will be huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wludford</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wludford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1-2 Packers should not be in the top 10, bad call or not.   That was not a top 10 team in Seattle.

Anyway, I think its clear who the top 5 or so teams are, and which 5 or so teams are the worst, but the rest of the teams in the middle, there is really no basis for ranking them.   

A better system of ranking might be A-D grading system, where &#039;A&#039; teams are considered playoff teams, &#039;B&#039; teams are on the bubble, &#039;C&#039; teams are also rans, and &#039;D&#039; teams are looking to next year&#039;s draft.   8 teams in each group.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1-2 Packers should not be in the top 10, bad call or not.   That was not a top 10 team in Seattle.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think its clear who the top 5 or so teams are, and which 5 or so teams are the worst, but the rest of the teams in the middle, there is really no basis for ranking them.   </p>
<p>A better system of ranking might be A-D grading system, where &#8216;A&#8217; teams are considered playoff teams, &#8216;B&#8217; teams are on the bubble, &#8216;C&#8217; teams are also rans, and &#8216;D&#8217; teams are looking to next year&#8217;s draft.   8 teams in each group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotsdefense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotsdefense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; The last time the Pats had a losing season, they won the Super Bowl.&quot;

You must mean losing record, otherwise that statement doesn&#039;t makes much sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The last time the Pats had a losing season, they won the Super Bowl.&#8221;</p>
<p>You must mean losing record, otherwise that statement doesn&#8217;t makes much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whodeyinpa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whodeyinpa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jim Irsay jab for the colts comment was hilarious!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jim Irsay jab for the colts comment was hilarious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jher0407</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jher0407]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Packers score 12pts and are ranked this high, this is a power ranking not homer ranking these guys need to come out of Rodgers ass and accept he&#039;s no where near where he was last year]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packers score 12pts and are ranked this high, this is a power ranking not homer ranking these guys need to come out of Rodgers ass and accept he&#8217;s no where near where he was last year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvdman123</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvdman123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess when the Packers lose next week they&#039;ll move up to No. 3 and the Saints will drop to 32.  You gotta love these rankings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess when the Packers lose next week they&#8217;ll move up to No. 3 and the Saints will drop to 32.  You gotta love these rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riverhorsey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[riverhorsey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biggest jokes of the bunch are Seahawks at 9, Vikings at 16 and Jets 15. all are way to high.

Eagles, Bills, Chargers and Lions should all be ahead of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biggest jokes of the bunch are Seahawks at 9, Vikings at 16 and Jets 15. all are way to high.</p>
<p>Eagles, Bills, Chargers and Lions should all be ahead of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigerphins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tigerphins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ame123 says:

&quot;Eagles are top 5 in offense and defense. Worst 2-1 in history? please.&quot;
-------------------------------------------------
Hey Homer, take off the glasses!  Philly is currently tied for the NFL&#039;s worst offense at 15.7 ppg.  Meanwhile the defense is 13th at 22 ppg..... not to mention your QB is the 4th worst rated passer who throws 2 picks per every 1 TD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ame123 says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Eagles are top 5 in offense and defense. Worst 2-1 in history? please.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Hey Homer, take off the glasses!  Philly is currently tied for the NFL&#8217;s worst offense at 15.7 ppg.  Meanwhile the defense is 13th at 22 ppg&#8230;.. not to mention your QB is the 4th worst rated passer who throws 2 picks per every 1 TD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kreedos</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kreedos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back to the Cards, ESPN got it right with their ranking #5 is a solid ranking for a team thats whipped up on 3 quality teams ...say what you want about Philly, but they will smash some teams this season.  AZ&#039;s D is just that elite. 

The last few teams to win the Super Bowl had punishing defenses that carried them through the playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the Cards, ESPN got it right with their ranking #5 is a solid ranking for a team thats whipped up on 3 quality teams &#8230;say what you want about Philly, but they will smash some teams this season.  AZ&#8217;s D is just that elite. </p>
<p>The last few teams to win the Super Bowl had punishing defenses that carried them through the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themackstrong</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themackstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone talking about the last call and not the D that shut out the Packer in the first half and hit him with 8 sacks. Browner,Sherman, Thomas and Big Kam are no joke, Rogers held onto the ball forever to take sacks because nobody was open. 

Green Bay wouldn&#039;t have even scored the touchdown if the PI wasn&#039;t called on Chancellor on the 47 yard line on 3rd down. One thing I know is this Bevelle offense and Russell Wilson need to start making consistent plays when the box is stacked against Lynch every down. Pete Carroll keep Sweezy on the bench until he learns pass protection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone talking about the last call and not the D that shut out the Packer in the first half and hit him with 8 sacks. Browner,Sherman, Thomas and Big Kam are no joke, Rogers held onto the ball forever to take sacks because nobody was open. </p>
<p>Green Bay wouldn&#8217;t have even scored the touchdown if the PI wasn&#8217;t called on Chancellor on the 47 yard line on 3rd down. One thing I know is this Bevelle offense and Russell Wilson need to start making consistent plays when the box is stacked against Lynch every down. Pete Carroll keep Sweezy on the bench until he learns pass protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swagger52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swagger52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Ryan couldn&#039;t last half a season in the AFC North.  Falcons play in a division that thinks that Tampa Bay is not a Pretender.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Ryan couldn&#8217;t last half a season in the AFC North.  Falcons play in a division that thinks that Tampa Bay is not a Pretender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahostiletakeover</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahostiletakeover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Ravens fan but Atlanta and Baltimore should be flip-flopped, both offenses have been excellent but the Falcons d has been just as good if not better at times than my vaunted Ravens&#039; defense through 3 weeks, plus they&#039;re actually 3-0. I&#039;d flip flop Arizona and Green Bay as well. While Green Bayput together a pretty good defensive effort last night, the Cards defense is a legitimate top 5 unit and have showed it in every game.

As for all of the crybabies still mad about the Ravens - Pats game, here are some FACTS for you. If the ball crosses directly over the upright, the FG is considered good, period. The Patriots had 10 accepted penalties for 83 yds but also received EIGHT first downs via Raven penalty. The Ravens had 14 accepted penalties for almost 130-some yards but only received FIVE first downs via Patriot penalty. Cry all you want about the refs &quot;giving the game to Baltimore I&#039;ll just continue laughing at your ignorant opinion every time I see the penalties clearly skewed in the Patriots&#039; favor. All the Patriots had to do was get a first down and milk the clock but they failed on 3rd and 8, and the Ravens offensively and defensively stepped up when absolutely neccessary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Ravens fan but Atlanta and Baltimore should be flip-flopped, both offenses have been excellent but the Falcons d has been just as good if not better at times than my vaunted Ravens&#8217; defense through 3 weeks, plus they&#8217;re actually 3-0. I&#8217;d flip flop Arizona and Green Bay as well. While Green Bayput together a pretty good defensive effort last night, the Cards defense is a legitimate top 5 unit and have showed it in every game.</p>
<p>As for all of the crybabies still mad about the Ravens &#8211; Pats game, here are some FACTS for you. If the ball crosses directly over the upright, the FG is considered good, period. The Patriots had 10 accepted penalties for 83 yds but also received EIGHT first downs via Raven penalty. The Ravens had 14 accepted penalties for almost 130-some yards but only received FIVE first downs via Patriot penalty. Cry all you want about the refs &#8220;giving the game to Baltimore I&#8217;ll just continue laughing at your ignorant opinion every time I see the penalties clearly skewed in the Patriots&#8217; favor. All the Patriots had to do was get a first down and milk the clock but they failed on 3rd and 8, and the Ravens offensively and defensively stepped up when absolutely neccessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rxv5854</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/25/week-three-power-rankings-3/#comment-2022563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rxv5854]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1316510#comment-2022563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What idiot thought the Bills would go winless?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What idiot thought the Bills would go winless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
