Comments on: Watt loses a sack, Ben picks up a score

By: thapurrinlion

thapurrinlion — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:44:49 +0000

I wonder if they’ll go back and credit him for his fumble recovery at the end of the Titans game too.

By: kurly00

kurly00 — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:44:47 +0000

So Watt!
5 w’s is all he should care about.

By: kcflake

kcflake — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:56:17 +0000

Take That JJ Watt!

By: shlort

shlort — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:27:43 +0000

Watt will probably pick up 3 or 4 sacks Sunday night against GB. Green Bay’s Offensive line is.. well.. Offensive!

Should be a a game handily won by Houston regardless. Green Bay is a 6-10 or 7-9 team this year, So teams shouldnt think they did something by beating Green Bay.

By: therealhook

therealhook — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:14:53 +0000

Haha! Ended up winning the week by 0.07 of a point thanks to the Big Ben stay change

By: johnnycash19

johnnycash19 — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:09:18 +0000

As a fantasy owner of the Texans defense. Thank God this didn’t happen after the first week. It would have turned a Tie into a Loss for me.

By: ben444

ben444 — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:50:26 +0000

Won’t even make a difference for this guy he play the Packers this week. He will 14 total sacks by the end of the game becuase Mike won’t bother to even try to run the ball.
I am a huge Packer fan but man does the oline suck and coach sucks as well.
15-1 to 6-10 who would have thought that.

By: rajbais

rajbais — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:48:48 +0000

How about the interception that MD Jennings had in Week 3 when the Packers clearly beat the Seahawks????

Come on Commish, you do what’s on top of your head anyways!!!

You’re the Brett Favre of commissioners!!!

By: Andre's Johnson

Andre's Johnson — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:45:36 +0000

Defensive players do not like losing stats because of numbers geeks. Look for Watt to be in Rodgers’ business all freaking night long.

By: thegreatgabbert

thegreatgabbert — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:44:52 +0000

Elias also determined that Roethlisberger actually was guilty of rape in the Georgia incident. He is due to be released on parole in 2015.

By: scotchrocks

scotchrocks — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:29:56 +0000

The league was too busy worrying about Bounty Gate and the replacement refs.

By: gochargersgo

gochargersgo — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:53:49 +0000

Why did it take them 4 weeks to correct the non-sack?

By: tjjohnson98

tjjohnson98 — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:48:54 +0000

Ouch! I’m among the ones that got a retroactive fantasy football loss because of the Big Ben TD. Sucks for me. :/

By: ialwayswantedtobeabanker

ialwayswantedtobeabanker — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:41:49 +0000

I saw both of these plays live. In each one, I was listening throughout the game to hear them re-correct how each play was categorized. In both cases, the announcers never questioned the original categorization(s) of the play(s). At least, they figured out eventually.

By: blackandbluedivision

blackandbluedivision — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:17:38 +0000

The play in question happened in Week One against the Dolphins, concluding that a tackle behind the line of quarterback Ryan Tannehill actually was tackle for loss on a designed running play.
————–
So if someone were to tackle a Punter on a designed punt fake would that be a sack? A WR or RB in a wildcat formation? If it was a designed pass.