<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking a look at the questionable Week Six calls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: texansfan13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2067626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[texansfan13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2067626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the play in the same game when the offensive lineman ripped JJ Watts helmet off as he tried to get to the QB?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the play in the same game when the offensive lineman ripped JJ Watts helmet off as he tried to get to the QB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dallascowboysdishingthereal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2066168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dallascowboysdishingthereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2066168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought bringing back the real refs was going to fix it all but here we are discussing blown calls. 

Replays for baseball? All baseball doesn&#039;t need is more delays!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought bringing back the real refs was going to fix it all but here we are discussing blown calls. </p>
<p>Replays for baseball? All baseball doesn&#8217;t need is more delays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhein23</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2065646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jhein23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2065646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought no one was supposed to talk about the refs at all? That&#039;s being a whiny crybaby. Thats what Packers fans have been told for weeks just shut up and quit crying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought no one was supposed to talk about the refs at all? That&#8217;s being a whiny crybaby. Thats what Packers fans have been told for weeks just shut up and quit crying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2065138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2065138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[judsonjr says:
Oct 16, 2012 1:53 PM
I am a Packer fan, but the Watt play is a tough call. Based on how everything has been called in the past, that seems like it should have been a flag. However, if a defender comes in at chest height and the QB ducks at the last second, it seems like a recipe for getting hit in the head that is little fault of the defender.

To me if the QB is ducking, leaning back, or doing something unnatural, the defender should be given some leeway.
-------------------

I&#039;m ok with the hit right up until he yanked Rodgers helmet off. At that point it becomes a penalty and a fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>judsonjr says:<br />
Oct 16, 2012 1:53 PM<br />
I am a Packer fan, but the Watt play is a tough call. Based on how everything has been called in the past, that seems like it should have been a flag. However, if a defender comes in at chest height and the QB ducks at the last second, it seems like a recipe for getting hit in the head that is little fault of the defender.</p>
<p>To me if the QB is ducking, leaning back, or doing something unnatural, the defender should be given some leeway.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m ok with the hit right up until he yanked Rodgers helmet off. At that point it becomes a penalty and a fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judsonjr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2065094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[judsonjr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2065094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a Packer fan, but the Watt play is a tough call.  Based on how everything has been called in the past, that seems like it should have been a flag.  However, if a defender comes in at chest height and the QB ducks at the last second, it seems like a recipe for getting hit in the head that is little fault of the defender.   

To me if the QB is ducking, leaning back, or doing something unnatural, the defender should be given some leeway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Packer fan, but the Watt play is a tough call.  Based on how everything has been called in the past, that seems like it should have been a flag.  However, if a defender comes in at chest height and the QB ducks at the last second, it seems like a recipe for getting hit in the head that is little fault of the defender.   </p>
<p>To me if the QB is ducking, leaning back, or doing something unnatural, the defender should be given some leeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabidbillsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2065082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabidbillsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2065082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way the JJ Watt &quot;Foul&quot; was enforced is the way all hits on the QB should be enforced. There was no malicious intent, Rodgers was leaning back into him, or trying to duck him, and Watt just got his arm around his neck instead of his shoulders. Again, this is still football, and bang-bang plays still happen, but the use of common sense needs to prevail when making judgement calls like these. What was missed in the Ravens game, was on the Romo incompletion, a Ravens defender punted the ball after the ball skipped off the turf. Intentional or not, thats a penalty, plain and simple. This video just goes to show that no official truely knows how to enforece any rule, and they are open to interpretation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the JJ Watt &#8220;Foul&#8221; was enforced is the way all hits on the QB should be enforced. There was no malicious intent, Rodgers was leaning back into him, or trying to duck him, and Watt just got his arm around his neck instead of his shoulders. Again, this is still football, and bang-bang plays still happen, but the use of common sense needs to prevail when making judgement calls like these. What was missed in the Ravens game, was on the Romo incompletion, a Ravens defender punted the ball after the ball skipped off the turf. Intentional or not, thats a penalty, plain and simple. This video just goes to show that no official truely knows how to enforece any rule, and they are open to interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clayjayhawk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2065039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clayjayhawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2065039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is everyone talking about. I thought we were all supposed to stop crying and makeing excuses. Oh that&#039;s right ....that was just for the Packers fans that had a legit beef. Take note shut up everyone, don&#039;t try to climb on the wagon now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is everyone talking about. I thought we were all supposed to stop crying and makeing excuses. Oh that&#8217;s right &#8230;.that was just for the Packers fans that had a legit beef. Take note shut up everyone, don&#8217;t try to climb on the wagon now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2064303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2064303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see if JJ Watt loses that Sack stat and gets fined this week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see if JJ Watt loses that Sack stat and gets fined this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theandy59</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2064054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theandy59]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2064054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PI call on Patriots CB Alfonzo Dennard on Braylon Edwards TD catch was atrocious.  When the flag came out I thought it HAD to be offensive PI as Edwards clearly initiated contact, then pushed off before turning for a back-shoulder catch.  In the game last night, I couldn&#039;t believe they didn&#039;t call offensive PI on Gates on the Leonhard pick; before the ball arrived, he went over Leonhard&#039;s back, pulled his shoulder back and hit his helmet.  Fortunately, Leonhard caught it anyhow.  While both players were looking for the ball, I&#039;m certain that if the roles were reversed it would have been an obvious defensive PI call.  PI in the NFL is like charge/block foul calls in the NBA - the officials have no idea how to call it so it&#039;s anybody&#039;s guess on every play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PI call on Patriots CB Alfonzo Dennard on Braylon Edwards TD catch was atrocious.  When the flag came out I thought it HAD to be offensive PI as Edwards clearly initiated contact, then pushed off before turning for a back-shoulder catch.  In the game last night, I couldn&#8217;t believe they didn&#8217;t call offensive PI on Gates on the Leonhard pick; before the ball arrived, he went over Leonhard&#8217;s back, pulled his shoulder back and hit his helmet.  Fortunately, Leonhard caught it anyhow.  While both players were looking for the ball, I&#8217;m certain that if the roles were reversed it would have been an obvious defensive PI call.  PI in the NFL is like charge/block foul calls in the NBA &#8211; the officials have no idea how to call it so it&#8217;s anybody&#8217;s guess on every play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: japmen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2064045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[japmen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2064045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least someone is reviewing the bad calls. They&#039;ve been almost as bad as the replacements were and no one is saying a word. I thought these guys have done this before?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least someone is reviewing the bad calls. They&#8217;ve been almost as bad as the replacements were and no one is saying a word. I thought these guys have done this before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwhat32</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2064044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cwhat32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2064044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think everybody&#039;s realizing the real refs aren&#039;t actually making better calls, just managing the game better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everybody&#8217;s realizing the real refs aren&#8217;t actually making better calls, just managing the game better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hehateme2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2063922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hehateme2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2063922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pull up the film on the last two Dolphins games. They&#039;re plenty to see there. pathetic]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pull up the film on the last two Dolphins games. They&#8217;re plenty to see there. pathetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulsmith107</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2063905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulsmith107]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2063905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week six questionable calls? When will we get these regular refs back? What we did you say oh lord when are we bringing the replacements back]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Week six questionable calls? When will we get these regular refs back? What we did you say oh lord when are we bringing the replacements back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerrod777</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/15/taking-a-look-at-the-questionable-week-six-calls/#comment-2063779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerrod777]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1416074#comment-2063779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The call on Felix Jones was flat out wrong by the officials.  There was not two players engaged on a blocker per the rules.
#1 - Felix Jones wasn&#039;t below the waist.
#2 - The offensive guard didn&#039;t engage the player.  If anything he barely touched him.

Why can&#039;t the refs (or league) acknowledge when a penalty is blatantly wrong.  There have been lots of bad calls even since the regular refs came back.  They manage the game better, but bad calls are still a part of the game.  Please refs, let the players play at the end and don&#039;t get caught up in the ticky-tack penalties.  Don&#039;t make your calls change the outcomes of games unless the penalties are obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The call on Felix Jones was flat out wrong by the officials.  There was not two players engaged on a blocker per the rules.<br />
#1 &#8211; Felix Jones wasn&#8217;t below the waist.<br />
#2 &#8211; The offensive guard didn&#8217;t engage the player.  If anything he barely touched him.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t the refs (or league) acknowledge when a penalty is blatantly wrong.  There have been lots of bad calls even since the regular refs came back.  They manage the game better, but bad calls are still a part of the game.  Please refs, let the players play at the end and don&#8217;t get caught up in the ticky-tack penalties.  Don&#8217;t make your calls change the outcomes of games unless the penalties are obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
