<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFLPA asks Tagliabue to address potential conflicts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdd913</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2078545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdd913]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2078545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maddog111 says: Oct 23, 2012 1:29 PM
What makes you think they would honor those statements in the future? They’ve already signed documents giving Goodell the authority to hand out punishments as he saw fit, and they don’t seem to be honoring those vows.

-----------------------------------------------------

The signed a CBA giving that power to Goodell as long as the processes were deemed fair and transparent. 

Again, please answer one question: Why do you think these players should not receive a fair proceeding?

Answer the question please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maddog111 says: Oct 23, 2012 1:29 PM<br />
What makes you think they would honor those statements in the future? They’ve already signed documents giving Goodell the authority to hand out punishments as he saw fit, and they don’t seem to be honoring those vows.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The signed a CBA giving that power to Goodell as long as the processes were deemed fair and transparent. </p>
<p>Again, please answer one question: Why do you think these players should not receive a fair proceeding?</p>
<p>Answer the question please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdd913</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2078535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdd913]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2078535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[conflict of interest would apply to s court proceeding which this is not

--------------------------------------------------

Conflict of interest is not simply a legal term.  You seem to be under the impression that the CBA allows unfairness. It does not. Otherwise none of this would have gone to court in the first place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>conflict of interest would apply to s court proceeding which this is not</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Conflict of interest is not simply a legal term.  You seem to be under the impression that the CBA allows unfairness. It does not. Otherwise none of this would have gone to court in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geniusfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2078143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geniusfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2078143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;let’s pay a fine and be done with it……..neither Vilma nor Fujita will probably be impact players again……….and the league has made its point…….&quot;

I agree. Fujita&#039;s career is probably over and Vilma stinks. Plus the Saints are a dead end 2-4 team with almost no shot at the postseason. Nobody cares about losing teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;let’s pay a fine and be done with it……..neither Vilma nor Fujita will probably be impact players again……….and the league has made its point…….&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree. Fujita&#8217;s career is probably over and Vilma stinks. Plus the Saints are a dead end 2-4 team with almost no shot at the postseason. Nobody cares about losing teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deeppurple23</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deeppurple23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s concerning that the NFLPA is more worried about protecting the rights of players that were suspended, then they are about trying to protect the other members of the union who could have been hurt by these guys... BTW, the smash for cash thing was a player organized system, this was a team organized system.  Does anyone get the difference?

I thought football players were MEN, take your punishment and move one, I mean really Scott your suspension was one game, could have been done and over with a long time ago, you&#039;ve spent more money on attorneys than you would have lost for the game.  And some people might still respect you, I know I don&#039;t any more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s concerning that the NFLPA is more worried about protecting the rights of players that were suspended, then they are about trying to protect the other members of the union who could have been hurt by these guys&#8230; BTW, the smash for cash thing was a player organized system, this was a team organized system.  Does anyone get the difference?</p>
<p>I thought football players were MEN, take your punishment and move one, I mean really Scott your suspension was one game, could have been done and over with a long time ago, you&#8217;ve spent more money on attorneys than you would have lost for the game.  And some people might still respect you, I know I don&#8217;t any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddog111</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maddog111]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[santolonius says: 
Oct 23, 2012 10:29 AM 
dear NFL,
it is not automatically wrong in life to – at times – choose the path of least resistance. you should change tactics and let the bounty players and coaches off with a warning/time served. they can certainly be asked to sign a statement vowing to never participate in a bounty and promising to take maximum punishment if it can ever be proved that they broke that vow.
-----------------------------------------------
What makes you think they would honor those statements in the future?  They&#039;ve already signed documents giving Goodell the authority to hand out punishments as he saw fit, and they don&#039;t seem to be honoring those vows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>santolonius says:<br />
Oct 23, 2012 10:29 AM<br />
dear NFL,<br />
it is not automatically wrong in life to – at times – choose the path of least resistance. you should change tactics and let the bounty players and coaches off with a warning/time served. they can certainly be asked to sign a statement vowing to never participate in a bounty and promising to take maximum punishment if it can ever be proved that they broke that vow.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
What makes you think they would honor those statements in the future?  They&#8217;ve already signed documents giving Goodell the authority to hand out punishments as he saw fit, and they don&#8217;t seem to be honoring those vows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinFan68</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FinFan68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mdd...
conflict of interest would apply to s court proceeding which this is not. it is a company disciplinary appeal. the conflict of interest issue should have been raised before agreement of cba but they did not want to give up anything in the process. the nflpa agenda is more removing goodells power without concessions than righting an injustice for these players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mdd&#8230;<br />
conflict of interest would apply to s court proceeding which this is not. it is a company disciplinary appeal. the conflict of interest issue should have been raised before agreement of cba but they did not want to give up anything in the process. the nflpa agenda is more removing goodells power without concessions than righting an injustice for these players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadindebt6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dadindebt6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goodell has always said that he will never turn the protection of the NFL shield over to an outside arbitor who does not understand the nuances of the NFL brand.

SO Goodell will not ever pick someone that does not have NFL ties and the NFLPA will not accept anyone who has NFL ties.  I guess this will have to be settled by reading the agreement between the NFL and the NFLPA.  

Looks like Goodell wins in that case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodell has always said that he will never turn the protection of the NFL shield over to an outside arbitor who does not understand the nuances of the NFL brand.</p>
<p>SO Goodell will not ever pick someone that does not have NFL ties and the NFLPA will not accept anyone who has NFL ties.  I guess this will have to be settled by reading the agreement between the NFL and the NFLPA.  </p>
<p>Looks like Goodell wins in that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the players pushing this are just doing it to delay things in the court system until it&#039;s a moot point a la the Starcaps thing why not? They still get paid while it drags out and they are mostly near the end of their careers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the players pushing this are just doing it to delay things in the court system until it&#8217;s a moot point a la the Starcaps thing why not? They still get paid while it drags out and they are mostly near the end of their careers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newlydead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newlydead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kozinsky says:
Oct 23, 2012 12:31 PM
I have a theory that Goodell is methodically turning his authority to punish players into a major non-revenue related CBA issue. If he’s intentionally throwing out big punishments, possibly crossing the line over the limits of his jurisdiction and then taking a hard stances during appeals in order to not only stem the tide of potential injury/safety-related lawsuits from players, but also to make players want to give major revenue-related concessions to the owners to lessen the commissioners power, then Goodell is a genius.

If this keeps up, by the time the current CBA is up, the players may give anything to take some of the commissioners power away. And if they give up enough, the owners would do it.

-----------------

this actually makes a lot of sense. i can see something like this coming out in a book that is written in about 30 years or so, one of those ...&quot;remember back in the early 2010s? let me tell you why all of that happened ... &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kozinsky says:<br />
Oct 23, 2012 12:31 PM<br />
I have a theory that Goodell is methodically turning his authority to punish players into a major non-revenue related CBA issue. If he’s intentionally throwing out big punishments, possibly crossing the line over the limits of his jurisdiction and then taking a hard stances during appeals in order to not only stem the tide of potential injury/safety-related lawsuits from players, but also to make players want to give major revenue-related concessions to the owners to lessen the commissioners power, then Goodell is a genius.</p>
<p>If this keeps up, by the time the current CBA is up, the players may give anything to take some of the commissioners power away. And if they give up enough, the owners would do it.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>this actually makes a lot of sense. i can see something like this coming out in a book that is written in about 30 years or so, one of those &#8230;&#8221;remember back in the early 2010s? let me tell you why all of that happened &#8230; &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgrab1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bgrab1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is the NFL resisting having The witnesses (Williams and Cerullo) be cross examined? Why? Because then the truth might get out that all of this is a total sham frame job to make the NFL look like it cares about the players enough to go to these extremes. Hoping that the PR will help them in the concussion lawsuits. I guess they just thought the players would stand there and be falsely accused of a Bounty System that never happened. Goodell picked the wrong players to mess with. This wont be over until the court decides it is over. Goodell himself will have to testify under oath like the players already have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the NFL resisting having The witnesses (Williams and Cerullo) be cross examined? Why? Because then the truth might get out that all of this is a total sham frame job to make the NFL look like it cares about the players enough to go to these extremes. Hoping that the PR will help them in the concussion lawsuits. I guess they just thought the players would stand there and be falsely accused of a Bounty System that never happened. Goodell picked the wrong players to mess with. This wont be over until the court decides it is over. Goodell himself will have to testify under oath like the players already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TxGrown</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TxGrown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The questions, we’re told, arise from the fact that Tagliabue works for Covington &amp; Burling, the law firm that represents the NFL in the bounty litigation.&quot;
=============================================================
Enough said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The questions, we’re told, arise from the fact that Tagliabue works for Covington &amp; Burling, the law firm that represents the NFL in the bounty litigation.&#8221;<br />
=============================================================<br />
Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kozinsky</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kozinsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a theory that Goodell is methodically turning his authority to punish players into a major non-revenue related CBA issue. If he&#039;s intentionally throwing out big punishments, possibly crossing the line over the limits of his jurisdiction and then taking a hard stances during appeals  in order to not only stem the tide of potential injury/safety-related lawsuits from players, but also to make players want to give major revenue-related concessions to the owners to lessen the commissioners power, then Goodell is a genius. 

If this keeps up, by the time the current CBA is up, the players may give anything to take some of the commissioners power away. And if they give up enough, the owners would do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a theory that Goodell is methodically turning his authority to punish players into a major non-revenue related CBA issue. If he&#8217;s intentionally throwing out big punishments, possibly crossing the line over the limits of his jurisdiction and then taking a hard stances during appeals  in order to not only stem the tide of potential injury/safety-related lawsuits from players, but also to make players want to give major revenue-related concessions to the owners to lessen the commissioners power, then Goodell is a genius. </p>
<p>If this keeps up, by the time the current CBA is up, the players may give anything to take some of the commissioners power away. And if they give up enough, the owners would do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robf2010</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robf2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Last time I got in trouble at work&quot;

Did you have a contract that is not being fulfilled for reasons only known to your boss?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last time I got in trouble at work&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you have a contract that is not being fulfilled for reasons only known to your boss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdd913</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdd913]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bigjdve says: Oct 23, 2012 11:26 AM

Goodell has every right to judge the appeal himself, however he recused himself, and in doing that he has every right to pick who he wants to judge that appeal.

This is what was agreed upon in the CBA.

----------------------------------------------------
The CBA is null and void if the process is deemed unfair.

Besides that, you people keep invoking the CBA as an end run around the whole &quot;fairness&quot; issue. I would like you to answer this simple question: Why do you believe these players don&#039;t deserve a fair process?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bigjdve says: Oct 23, 2012 11:26 AM</p>
<p>Goodell has every right to judge the appeal himself, however he recused himself, and in doing that he has every right to pick who he wants to judge that appeal.</p>
<p>This is what was agreed upon in the CBA.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
The CBA is null and void if the process is deemed unfair.</p>
<p>Besides that, you people keep invoking the CBA as an end run around the whole &#8220;fairness&#8221; issue. I would like you to answer this simple question: Why do you believe these players don&#8217;t deserve a fair process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willardj</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[willardj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tags was the best commish back in his day. Good for Goodell to get him back in the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tags was the best commish back in his day. Good for Goodell to get him back in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newlydead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newlydead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what i think should happen is the NFL should say ... ok NFLPA, you are not happy with the decision handed down my the commissioner and now you are not happy with the commissioner stepping aside and appointing someone else to over see the appeals and since both the power to hand down this decision and the right to step aside and appoint whomever he chooses to over see the process comes from the CBA that you as the NFLPA signed we are going to rip that CBA up, lock out the players and call the season .....

then we will see how many &quot;fans&quot; agree with the players or if they will final realize that  what is happening right now was allowed to happen when the PLAYERS, THROUGH THE NFLPA SIGNED THE CBA ... it&#039;s a simple as that. when this CBA expires then fight to take some power back but until then just play by the rules that you agreed to. I&#039;m sure if the NFL came out and said &quot;you know what, in the CBA we agreed to pay the players a certain percentage but we just don&#039;t feel thats in our best interest right now so we are going to overlook that little piece of the SIGNED/SEALED/DELIVERED CBA and pay less now&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i think should happen is the NFL should say &#8230; ok NFLPA, you are not happy with the decision handed down my the commissioner and now you are not happy with the commissioner stepping aside and appointing someone else to over see the appeals and since both the power to hand down this decision and the right to step aside and appoint whomever he chooses to over see the process comes from the CBA that you as the NFLPA signed we are going to rip that CBA up, lock out the players and call the season &#8230;..</p>
<p>then we will see how many &#8220;fans&#8221; agree with the players or if they will final realize that  what is happening right now was allowed to happen when the PLAYERS, THROUGH THE NFLPA SIGNED THE CBA &#8230; it&#8217;s a simple as that. when this CBA expires then fight to take some power back but until then just play by the rules that you agreed to. I&#8217;m sure if the NFL came out and said &#8220;you know what, in the CBA we agreed to pay the players a certain percentage but we just don&#8217;t feel thats in our best interest right now so we are going to overlook that little piece of the SIGNED/SEALED/DELIVERED CBA and pay less now&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilovefoolsball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ilovefoolsball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if back in March they thought it was going to be so simple:
Send a press release to ESPN
Get all the radio talk show hosts to blast the Saints
Suspend the coach for an entire year and take some other coaches and the GM with him,
Suspend the players

all based on hearsay and no proof that anything actually took place on the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if back in March they thought it was going to be so simple:<br />
Send a press release to ESPN<br />
Get all the radio talk show hosts to blast the Saints<br />
Suspend the coach for an entire year and take some other coaches and the GM with him,<br />
Suspend the players</p>
<p>all based on hearsay and no proof that anything actually took place on the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kellij666</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kellij666]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, Goodell is at it again.  His actions have done nothing to bolster the nfl&#039;s case.  it seems more and more like he&#039;s got something to hide.  why can&#039;t everything be above board and out in the open?  he&#039;s definitely hiding something....... he needs to go]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, Goodell is at it again.  His actions have done nothing to bolster the nfl&#8217;s case.  it seems more and more like he&#8217;s got something to hide.  why can&#8217;t everything be above board and out in the open?  he&#8217;s definitely hiding something&#8230;&#8230;. he needs to go</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisbntx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisbntx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last time I got in trouble at work I asked for an independant arbitrator to hear my case. In the end I was punished based on the very &quot;biased&quot; opinion of my upper managment. I know how the poor Saints players feel. I too was a victim of my boss making a decision affecting my career. What is the world coming to?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I got in trouble at work I asked for an independant arbitrator to hear my case. In the end I was punished based on the very &#8220;biased&#8221; opinion of my upper managment. I know how the poor Saints players feel. I too was a victim of my boss making a decision affecting my career. What is the world coming to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sb44champs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sb44champs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thecashcartel says: 
Oct 23, 2012 10:06 AM 
What a freakin mess…Goodell trying to pull another fast on
=====================
Surprise, surprise!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thecashcartel says:<br />
Oct 23, 2012 10:06 AM<br />
What a freakin mess…Goodell trying to pull another fast on<br />
=====================<br />
Surprise, surprise!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrp2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scrp2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to punish somebody reinstate Coach Payton and end his year long vacation in the Bahamas with his hot new girlfriend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to punish somebody reinstate Coach Payton and end his year long vacation in the Bahamas with his hot new girlfriend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjdve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjdve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goodell has every right to judge the appeal himself, however he recused himself, and in doing that he has every right to pick who he wants to judge that appeal. 

This is what was agreed upon in the CBA. For those of you that are talking about fairness, that is why there was negotiations last year. Last year 31 teams signed the agreement that stated that this process is/was fair. 

Now a couple players are crying foul at every turn. Even if I believed them innocent, I would be starting to believe them guilty as they keep trying to change the game so to speak to favor themselves. 

This needs to be over, they need to shut up and go through the appeals process and then see where they are instead of crying about everything that hasn&#039;t happened yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodell has every right to judge the appeal himself, however he recused himself, and in doing that he has every right to pick who he wants to judge that appeal. </p>
<p>This is what was agreed upon in the CBA. For those of you that are talking about fairness, that is why there was negotiations last year. Last year 31 teams signed the agreement that stated that this process is/was fair. </p>
<p>Now a couple players are crying foul at every turn. Even if I believed them innocent, I would be starting to believe them guilty as they keep trying to change the game so to speak to favor themselves. </p>
<p>This needs to be over, they need to shut up and go through the appeals process and then see where they are instead of crying about everything that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdd913</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdd913]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FinFan68 says: Oct 23, 2012 10:19 AM

The NFLPA: We want somebody other than Goodell…but not Tagliabue. The players agreed to the CBA which gives Goodell the option to retain appeal authority or appoint whomever he chooses. Goodell did not need to step aside but he did. These guys will whine about anything. Now they want somebody else. Are they expecting the league to appoint some union hack to serve the NFLPA in this? The union will cry no matter who is picked. If they find somebody acceptable and the decision remains the same, they will still cry foul. It is ridiculous. Three players may be able to get their punishment reduced but not Vilma. Even his hand-picked judge, Berrigan, said in open court that Vilma essentially admitted to exactly what Goodell has accused him of. Just get this mess over with already. The more the NFLPA whines, the more I can’t stand these particular players.

------------------------------------------------

You seriously cannot see that there is an inherent conflict of interest with Tagliabue&#039;s appointment to this case???? Seriously???

Personally I think Tag will rise above all the chaff and potential bias and hand down a fair ruling. But that doesn&#039;t mean that he should&#039;ve been appointed in the first place.

Some of you seem to confuse &quot;whining&quot; and &quot;legal loopholes&quot; with you know, actual fairness. Our country&#039;s system of justice is constructed around fairness, and you can talk about the CBA all you want, but at the end of the day the NFL, like any other business, has the responsibility to provide fairness to its employees. It&#039;s very a simple concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FinFan68 says: Oct 23, 2012 10:19 AM</p>
<p>The NFLPA: We want somebody other than Goodell…but not Tagliabue. The players agreed to the CBA which gives Goodell the option to retain appeal authority or appoint whomever he chooses. Goodell did not need to step aside but he did. These guys will whine about anything. Now they want somebody else. Are they expecting the league to appoint some union hack to serve the NFLPA in this? The union will cry no matter who is picked. If they find somebody acceptable and the decision remains the same, they will still cry foul. It is ridiculous. Three players may be able to get their punishment reduced but not Vilma. Even his hand-picked judge, Berrigan, said in open court that Vilma essentially admitted to exactly what Goodell has accused him of. Just get this mess over with already. The more the NFLPA whines, the more I can’t stand these particular players.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>You seriously cannot see that there is an inherent conflict of interest with Tagliabue&#8217;s appointment to this case???? Seriously???</p>
<p>Personally I think Tag will rise above all the chaff and potential bias and hand down a fair ruling. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that he should&#8217;ve been appointed in the first place.</p>
<p>Some of you seem to confuse &#8220;whining&#8221; and &#8220;legal loopholes&#8221; with you know, actual fairness. Our country&#8217;s system of justice is constructed around fairness, and you can talk about the CBA all you want, but at the end of the day the NFL, like any other business, has the responsibility to provide fairness to its employees. It&#8217;s very a simple concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pobreezy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pobreezy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait for this to happen to some of your teams. 
Everyone saying the saints and the nflpa are whining, good luck finding pity when you get dragged through the mud, have your season suffer and uninformed trash talkers jump on the NFL bandwagon rubbing every new article, revelation and (even worse than that) game lost thanks to this witch hunt in your face. Trust me, it won&#039;t be fun at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for this to happen to some of your teams.<br />
Everyone saying the saints and the nflpa are whining, good luck finding pity when you get dragged through the mud, have your season suffer and uninformed trash talkers jump on the NFL bandwagon rubbing every new article, revelation and (even worse than that) game lost thanks to this witch hunt in your face. Trust me, it won&#8217;t be fun at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelastpieceofcheese</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thelastpieceofcheese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nothing more terrifying than receiving an NFLPA letter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing more terrifying than receiving an NFLPA letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thejuddstir</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thejuddstir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The union has asked for a response within one business day (i.e., by today), before a final decision is made on filing a formal request for recusal.&quot;
============================
and Vilma, Ginsberg and the NFLPA asked for room service within the hour !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The union has asked for a response within one business day (i.e., by today), before a final decision is made on filing a formal request for recusal.&#8221;<br />
============================<br />
and Vilma, Ginsberg and the NFLPA asked for room service within the hour !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miles58a</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miles58a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FinFan68 says: 
Oct 23, 2012 10:19 AM 
The NFLPA: We want somebody other than Goodell…but not Tagliabue. The players agreed to the CBA which gives Goodell the option to retain appeal authority or appoint whomever he chooses. Goodell did not need to step aside but he did. These guys will whine about anything. Now they want somebody else. Are they expecting the league to appoint some union hack to serve the NFLPA in this? The union will cry no matter who is picked. If they find somebody acceptable and the decision remains the same, they will still cry foul. It is ridiculous. Three players may be able to get their punishment reduced but not Vilma. Even his hand-picked judge, Berrigan, said in open court that Vilma essentially admitted to exactly what Goodell has accused him of. Just get this mess over with already. The more the NFLPA whines, the more I can’t stand these particular players.


No, all they want is a non-bias arbitrator, is that so much to ask. The NFLPA represents all players and is made up of players from all teams and they believe the Saints players are innocent. No player in the league believes they are guilty. Goodell and fans of other teams are the only ones that believe they are guilty. When I say they are not guilty I mean they did not play dirty, if you take the money out of it they did nothing wrong and that is why the players are fighting. Yea they did get caught and they do deserve a suspension but league needs to get it right. Until then they will keep fighting. Y’all keep bringing up Greg Williams statement saying it proved they did it. His statement said that he DID NOT institute a bounty program and he never put money in one but he says, yea Vilma offered $10,000. He also says he has never seen the money, now that someone you can trust.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FinFan68 says:<br />
Oct 23, 2012 10:19 AM<br />
The NFLPA: We want somebody other than Goodell…but not Tagliabue. The players agreed to the CBA which gives Goodell the option to retain appeal authority or appoint whomever he chooses. Goodell did not need to step aside but he did. These guys will whine about anything. Now they want somebody else. Are they expecting the league to appoint some union hack to serve the NFLPA in this? The union will cry no matter who is picked. If they find somebody acceptable and the decision remains the same, they will still cry foul. It is ridiculous. Three players may be able to get their punishment reduced but not Vilma. Even his hand-picked judge, Berrigan, said in open court that Vilma essentially admitted to exactly what Goodell has accused him of. Just get this mess over with already. The more the NFLPA whines, the more I can’t stand these particular players.</p>
<p>No, all they want is a non-bias arbitrator, is that so much to ask. The NFLPA represents all players and is made up of players from all teams and they believe the Saints players are innocent. No player in the league believes they are guilty. Goodell and fans of other teams are the only ones that believe they are guilty. When I say they are not guilty I mean they did not play dirty, if you take the money out of it they did nothing wrong and that is why the players are fighting. Yea they did get caught and they do deserve a suspension but league needs to get it right. Until then they will keep fighting. Y’all keep bringing up Greg Williams statement saying it proved they did it. His statement said that he DID NOT institute a bounty program and he never put money in one but he says, yea Vilma offered $10,000. He also says he has never seen the money, now that someone you can trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2sausage11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2sausage11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they want Sean Payton to hear the case]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they want Sean Payton to hear the case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisalwaysnextyear</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisalwaysnextyear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t the NFL still paying Tags MILLIONS and MILLIONS per year even now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the NFL still paying Tags MILLIONS and MILLIONS per year even now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santolonius</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/23/nflpa-asks-tagliabue-to-address-potential-conflicts/#comment-2077609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[santolonius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1466167#comment-2077609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dear NFL, 
it is not automatically wrong in life to - at times - choose the path of least resistance. you should change tactics and let the bounty players and coaches off with a warning/time served. they can certainly be asked to sign a statement vowing to never participate in a bounty and promising to take maximum punishment if it can ever be proved that they broke that vow. furthermore you can have the nflpa, the owners, head coaches, and g.m.s jointly sign a letter of understanding that - for the sake of player safety - there will be no bounties tolerated ever going forward. you say the past is the past, but the future is something different. you close this ugly and distracting chapter. you change the headlines from scandal and distrust to great games, great plays, great players. what on earth do you have to lose? something to think about, right?
xoxo
santolonius]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear NFL,<br />
it is not automatically wrong in life to &#8211; at times &#8211; choose the path of least resistance. you should change tactics and let the bounty players and coaches off with a warning/time served. they can certainly be asked to sign a statement vowing to never participate in a bounty and promising to take maximum punishment if it can ever be proved that they broke that vow. furthermore you can have the nflpa, the owners, head coaches, and g.m.s jointly sign a letter of understanding that &#8211; for the sake of player safety &#8211; there will be no bounties tolerated ever going forward. you say the past is the past, but the future is something different. you close this ugly and distracting chapter. you change the headlines from scandal and distrust to great games, great plays, great players. what on earth do you have to lose? something to think about, right?<br />
xoxo<br />
santolonius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
