Skip to content

Litigation hurdles cleared for Farmers Field

Getty Images

Last month, the L.A. City Council approved the proposed NFL stadium that has a name but no team.  Now, any potential litigation aimed at derailing the project has been resolved.

AEG and the Play Fair Coalition have announced that recent litigation challenging the project has been settled.

“This began as a legal negotiation but soon evolved into a cooperative dialogue about how we could work together to achieve the common goal of serving the needs of all segments of the community on important issues such as affordable housing,” AEG president and CEO Tim Leiweke said in a release.  “We are excited about the opportunity for our foundations, our corporate partners and the rest of the philanthropic community to play an active role in leveraging the goodwill of AEG and Farmers Field to help deliver even greater benefits to those most in need.  With this important milestone, for the first time in almost two decades the City of Los Angeles is finally poised to see the return of the NFL.  With this settlement in place, the project can move forward to spur job creation and offer an even more robust package of measures benefiting the community.”

The project can move forward only if a team, or two, will move there.  That’s the far bigger hurdle than any litigation that was or could have been filed during the limited window for filing suit against the proposed stadium.

Permalink 26 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Buffalo Bills, Los Angeles Chargers, Los Angeles Rams, Oakland Raiders, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
26 Responses to “Litigation hurdles cleared for Farmers Field”
  1. cali49er707 says: Nov 1, 2012 3:41 PM


  2. thegreatgabbert says: Nov 1, 2012 3:43 PM

    “O.K. folks, the hurdles have been set up out here on Farmer’s Field, and we’re about ready to go with the twice daily Running Of The Lawyers. It’s a cool day, the track is dry, and all the shysters look to be in top form…..”.

  3. 7swag7 says: Nov 1, 2012 3:45 PM

    They are calling the place Farmers Field? I’m already picturing rows of corn growing on each sideline. If you build it, they will come.

  4. profootballwalk says: Nov 1, 2012 3:46 PM

    “Affordable housing.” In other words, the parasites got hold of these people and used the threat of bogus legal action to extort money out of them.

  5. jjb0811 says: Nov 1, 2012 3:57 PM

    Goodell is such a jerk. He’s now forcing a team or two to relocate. He has no honor or integrity.

  6. maddenisfordorks says: Nov 1, 2012 3:57 PM

    LA is awful.

    Why reward them?

    Give them 24hrs of Jersey Shore instead of the NFL and we’d have a similar result.

  7. savocabol1 says: Nov 1, 2012 3:58 PM

    I just dont understand what city would approve a stadium being built with ZERO guarantee that a team will occupy it.

  8. ambitoos says: Nov 1, 2012 3:59 PM

    They need two teams in this new stadium. How about the Chargers and the Raiders. LAPD would have to start hiring.

  9. rcali says: Nov 1, 2012 3:59 PM

    They should move the London team to Los Angeles.

  10. purplengold says: Nov 1, 2012 4:01 PM

    They’re knee deep in Farmers Field now.

  11. scrapingthefloorioforstorios says: Nov 1, 2012 4:04 PM

    i hope the call the team the “hollywood stars”.

  12. Robert says: Nov 1, 2012 4:06 PM

    1. Rams 2. Raiders

  13. SparkyGump says: Nov 1, 2012 4:24 PM

    Cannabis Farmers Field: Hemp for Victory!

  14. niubears says: Nov 1, 2012 4:28 PM

    Did the Rams ever get a stadium deal yet? If not, bye bye St. Louis.

  15. NoHomeTeam says: Nov 1, 2012 5:21 PM

    Robert says: 1. Rams 2. Raiders

    1. Rams
    2. Any team but the Raiders.

  16. patsfiend says: Nov 1, 2012 5:40 PM

    L.A. Chargers. I’m sure they’ll keep Norv until the end of the season, so keep costs as low as possible, and ensure plenty of empty seats at the Q. Then they’ll make a big splash with Cowher, Gruden, or someone else, can A.J. Smith, and move to L.A.

    Hey San Diego Chargers fans, buy your Amtrak season passes now!

  17. denverdude7 says: Nov 1, 2012 5:58 PM

    Maybe they can get the Browns to move again. It would be kinder than Cleveland having to watch them any longer than they already have.

  18. misterdreamer119 says: Nov 1, 2012 6:33 PM

    Raiders, Rams. Afc and nfc west. If Not Jaguars and Bills.

  19. jrbdmb says: Nov 1, 2012 6:54 PM

    Time to plan the next NFL expansion:

    AFC East: London Fog
    NFC West: Los Angeles Smog

  20. bjenks10 says: Nov 1, 2012 6:57 PM

    I think the bigger question is what are they going to do with that field when they have to move a team out of LA…. again.

  21. NoHomeTeam says: Nov 1, 2012 7:20 PM

    patsfiend says: L.A. Chargers. I’m sure they’ll keep Norv until the end of the season, so keep costs as low as possible, and ensure plenty of empty seats at the Q. Then they’ll make a big splash with Cowher, Gruden, or someone else, can A.J. Smith, and move to L.A.

    I really wish this didn’t sound quite so plausible. Saw the whole “Bad Team => No Fans => Justification for Relocation” scheme play out with the Rams the first time around.

    I suspect that if the Chargers do wind up in L.A., the Spanos family will discover in short order that they have overestimated a) the number of Charger fans in this area, and b) the number of San Diego fans that will continue to support the team.

    I don’t think I could embrace the Chargers as my Home Team; I like San Diego too much. Never been to St. Louis, though.

  22. thermalito says: Nov 2, 2012 12:21 AM

    Hello Los Angeles Rams. If the St. Louis CVC does not get a favorable arbitration ruling next month I’d expect a buyout and the Rams back in LA next year. Playing in Farmer Field in the nation’s second largest media market is too good an opportunity to pass up.

  23. joetoronto says: Nov 2, 2012 5:29 AM

    It’s obviously the Chargers, both of their fans will be upset, but it’s business.

  24. kane337 says: Nov 2, 2012 12:12 PM

    Moving the Rams back West makes sense.

  25. tdk24 says: Nov 2, 2012 5:05 PM

    Why is it I invision AEG building a stadium, with no team, and then turn around and sue the NFL for not moving a team there. They want ownership of said team as well right? This could get real ugly folks.

  26. drew1969 says: Nov 3, 2012 12:44 AM

    @thermalito…The only team that does not have a stadium lease for next year is the chargers.Rams and the CVC will announce their deal in January.Sorry to burst your bubble.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!