<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week Nine power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: klownboy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2109134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klownboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2109134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is NO way you could rank the Giants ahead of the Steelers.  I had the Steelers 6th and the Giants 10th.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is NO way you could rank the Giants ahead of the Steelers.  I had the Steelers 6th and the Giants 10th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzzedlitebeer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2105422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buzzedlitebeer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2105422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ireadpftforthecomments says:
Nov 6, 2012 2:10 PM

steelernationfartsinyourfaceandwinschampionships says:
Nov 6, 2012 1:38 PM
Allow me to correct:

1. Steelers
2-32 Irrelevant

Meet your new world champions ladies and gents.

===================================

Newsflash: There are only 32 teams in the NFL. So by listing 32 teams as Irrelevant, you have included the Steelers in that grouping.

But thanks for playing.

----------------------------------

2-32 equates to 31 teams.
But thanks for being DUMB!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ireadpftforthecomments says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 2:10 PM</p>
<p>steelernationfartsinyourfaceandwinschampionships says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 1:38 PM<br />
Allow me to correct:</p>
<p>1. Steelers<br />
2-32 Irrelevant</p>
<p>Meet your new world champions ladies and gents.</p>
<p>===================================</p>
<p>Newsflash: There are only 32 teams in the NFL. So by listing 32 teams as Irrelevant, you have included the Steelers in that grouping.</p>
<p>But thanks for playing.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>2-32 equates to 31 teams.<br />
But thanks for being DUMB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bears615</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2105062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bears615]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2105062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Chicago wins one out of their next two games I think they&#039;ll hang on to win the NFC North. I think they stand a better chance against Houston with the game being at home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Chicago wins one out of their next two games I think they&#8217;ll hang on to win the NFC North. I think they stand a better chance against Houston with the game being at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiderapologist</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raiderapologist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chargers stay in the top 20 by waiting around for the Chiefs to self-destruct? I love power rankings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chargers stay in the top 20 by waiting around for the Chiefs to self-destruct? I love power rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burkkish</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[burkkish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rise up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rise up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryboodry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryboodry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tutamus says:

&quot;Everyone but Pete Carroll and Golden Tate know the Packers are 7-2.&quot;

Pete Carroll thinks the Seahawks are 9-0.

And if anyone but GB wins the NFC, it&#039;s the replacement refs who done it, and the whining will begin...(And as a Bears fan, I sincerely hope it is &#039;anyone but GB!&#039;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tutamus says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Everyone but Pete Carroll and Golden Tate know the Packers are 7-2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pete Carroll thinks the Seahawks are 9-0.</p>
<p>And if anyone but GB wins the NFC, it&#8217;s the replacement refs who done it, and the whining will begin&#8230;(And as a Bears fan, I sincerely hope it is &#8216;anyone but GB!&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckxx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chuckxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chiefs and Jaqs should have to play each other. Problem is they probably would both find a way to lose the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiefs and Jaqs should have to play each other. Problem is they probably would both find a way to lose the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tutamus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tutamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[larryboodry says:
Nov 6, 2012 6:12 PM

&quot;Gee, I dunno…Maybe because both of them are 7-1, while the Packers are 6-3…Using your logic, GB should be ranked lower than the Colts, right?&quot;

Everyone but Pete Carroll and Golden Tate know the Packers are 7-2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>larryboodry says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 6:12 PM</p>
<p>&#8220;Gee, I dunno…Maybe because both of them are 7-1, while the Packers are 6-3…Using your logic, GB should be ranked lower than the Colts, right?&#8221;</p>
<p>Everyone but Pete Carroll and Golden Tate know the Packers are 7-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doitbigreggiemckenzie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doitbigreggiemckenzie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought the Raider run d was gross against the Bucs, just wait to see how gross the rest of the season is going to turn real fast.

The schedule is now turning against them hard and it&#039;s going to get real ugly over the next 3 or 4 weeks.

Well, it&#039;s already ugly, so I guess uglier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thought the Raider run d was gross against the Bucs, just wait to see how gross the rest of the season is going to turn real fast.</p>
<p>The schedule is now turning against them hard and it&#8217;s going to get real ugly over the next 3 or 4 weeks.</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s already ugly, so I guess uglier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therealhazer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therealhazer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bucs on the fast track to Top 10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bucs on the fast track to Top 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryboodry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryboodry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[packerfan50 says: Nov 6, 2012 4:55 PM

&quot;The packers beat both the texans and the bears why are they behind both of them still&quot;

Gee, I dunno...Maybe because both of them are 7-1, while the Packers are 6-3...Using your logic, GB should be ranked lower than the Colts, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>packerfan50 says: Nov 6, 2012 4:55 PM</p>
<p>&#8220;The packers beat both the texans and the bears why are they behind both of them still&#8221;</p>
<p>Gee, I dunno&#8230;Maybe because both of them are 7-1, while the Packers are 6-3&#8230;Using your logic, GB should be ranked lower than the Colts, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyzers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hyzers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[trollhammer20 says:
Nov 6, 2012 3:17 PM
Thanks for the very fair ranking of the Seahawks. 12 is a great spot for them, since, if the playoffs started today, they’d be the #6 seed in the NFC.
--------------------------------------------------

Didn&#039;t they just lose to the Lions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trollhammer20 says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 3:17 PM<br />
Thanks for the very fair ranking of the Seahawks. 12 is a great spot for them, since, if the playoffs started today, they’d be the #6 seed in the NFC.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t they just lose to the Lions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerfan50</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerfan50]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The packers beat both the texans and the bears why are they behind both of them still]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The packers beat both the texans and the bears why are they behind both of them still</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steeler1nation</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steeler1nation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;7. Patriots:  With Aqib Talib coming to town, it’s probably wise to lock up the muskets.  Allegedly.&quot;

****

ok, now THAT&#039;S funny!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;7. Patriots:  With Aqib Talib coming to town, it’s probably wise to lock up the muskets.  Allegedly.&#8221;</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>ok, now THAT&#8217;S funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr4real</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jr4real]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ravens barely beat the browns who were ranked in the bottom 5. The steelers beat the giants who were ranked in the top 5. Its &quot;what have you done for me lately&quot; in this league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ravens barely beat the browns who were ranked in the bottom 5. The steelers beat the giants who were ranked in the top 5. Its &#8220;what have you done for me lately&#8221; in this league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetokyosandblaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetokyosandblaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It really should be:

Falcons
Niners
Packers
Bears
Giants

Couple garbage afc teams, pats, texans, broncos maybe...

Then every other NFC team and then every other AFC team. 

Not like it matters. Packers won&#039;t lose again until next season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really should be:</p>
<p>Falcons<br />
Niners<br />
Packers<br />
Bears<br />
Giants</p>
<p>Couple garbage afc teams, pats, texans, broncos maybe&#8230;</p>
<p>Then every other NFC team and then every other AFC team. </p>
<p>Not like it matters. Packers won&#8217;t lose again until next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skolvikings2011</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skolvikings2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Vikings fan, but how in the world you put us at #16?  We shouldnt crack the top 20 after the last 2 weeks.

I would trade Ponder for Cleveland&#039;s QB straight-up right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Vikings fan, but how in the world you put us at #16?  We shouldnt crack the top 20 after the last 2 weeks.</p>
<p>I would trade Ponder for Cleveland&#8217;s QB straight-up right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mungman69</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mungman69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cowboys are ranked too high. They don&#039;t even think that they are that good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowboys are ranked too high. They don&#8217;t even think that they are that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last time I checked, Ravens had a better record than the steelers. Crazy what losing to mediocre teams like the raiders and titans will do for your standings. If only the steelers fans could recognize how to count]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I checked, Ravens had a better record than the steelers. Crazy what losing to mediocre teams like the raiders and titans will do for your standings. If only the steelers fans could recognize how to count</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeler's Will-enator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeler's Will-enator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ireadpftforthecomments says:
Nov 6, 2012 2:10 PM

steelernationfartsinyourfaceandwinschampionships says:
Nov 6, 2012 1:38 PM
Allow me to correct:

1. Steelers
2-32 Irrelevant

Meet your new world champions ladies and gents.

===================================

Newsflash: There are only 32 teams in the NFL. So by listing 32 teams as Irrelevant, you have included the Steelers in that grouping.

But thanks for playing.

----------------------------------
lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ireadpftforthecomments says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 2:10 PM</p>
<p>steelernationfartsinyourfaceandwinschampionships says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 1:38 PM<br />
Allow me to correct:</p>
<p>1. Steelers<br />
2-32 Irrelevant</p>
<p>Meet your new world champions ladies and gents.</p>
<p>===================================</p>
<p>Newsflash: There are only 32 teams in the NFL. So by listing 32 teams as Irrelevant, you have included the Steelers in that grouping.</p>
<p>But thanks for playing.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joemammy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joemammy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steelernationfartsinyourfaceandwinschampionships says:

Allow me to correct:
 
1. Steelers
 2-32 Irrelevant
 
Meet your new world champions ladies and gents.
--------------------------------

Congratulations to you for spelling every word correctly.   I do believe that is the first time...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steelernationfartsinyourfaceandwinschampionships says:</p>
<p>Allow me to correct:</p>
<p>1. Steelers<br />
 2-32 Irrelevant</p>
<p>Meet your new world champions ladies and gents.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Congratulations to you for spelling every word correctly.   I do believe that is the first time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getyourownname</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[getyourownname]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mazblast says:Nov 6, 2012 3:05 PM 
 
I can’t speak for the other teams in the league, but the relative rankings of the AFC North teams looks about right (and before you start with your rants, Ravens fans, remember what happened to your team in Houston).
******************************** 
Yes, it was bad. But Houston is good.  

And was it worse than losing to BOTH the Titans and Raiders?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mazblast says:Nov 6, 2012 3:05 PM </p>
<p>I can’t speak for the other teams in the league, but the relative rankings of the AFC North teams looks about right (and before you start with your rants, Ravens fans, remember what happened to your team in Houston).<br />
********************************<br />
Yes, it was bad. But Houston is good.  </p>
<p>And was it worse than losing to BOTH the Titans and Raiders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[qbofthenever says:
Nov 6, 2012 3:12 PM
This year’s MVP is Matt Ryan
----------------------------

Aaron Rodgers would throw for 6000 yards and 65 TDs with Julio Jones, Roddy White, Tony Gonzalez, to throw to, and Michael Turner in the backfield.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qbofthenever says:<br />
Nov 6, 2012 3:12 PM<br />
This year’s MVP is Matt Ryan<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Aaron Rodgers would throw for 6000 yards and 65 TDs with Julio Jones, Roddy White, Tony Gonzalez, to throw to, and Michael Turner in the backfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdaddy7777</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[csdaddy7777]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[27. Raiders:  Doug Martin already has become more than Darren McFadden ever was.
________________________________________________
Even though I have given up on McFadden this statement is utterly ridiculous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>27. Raiders:  Doug Martin already has become more than Darren McFadden ever was.<br />
________________________________________________<br />
Even though I have given up on McFadden this statement is utterly ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dallascowboysdishingthereal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dallascowboysdishingthereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cowboys ranked lower than Panthers who they recently defeated at Carolina. Come on man. Dallas had a tough loss at the undefeated Falcons but they are still better than #23. Have Cowboys at #17 in my poll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowboys ranked lower than Panthers who they recently defeated at Carolina. Come on man. Dallas had a tough loss at the undefeated Falcons but they are still better than #23. Have Cowboys at #17 in my poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shorttracknews</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shorttracknews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[htowntexan says: Nov 6, 2012 2:34 PM

bears are way too high. they have only beaten one team with a winning record, and that was Luck’s first game ever. texans will roll them.

------------------------------------------------

Hate people like this. Bears can only play who is on the schedule. The Falcons are 8-0 and have only beaten 1 team with a winning record as well. Are they ranked to high??? The Texans have beaten only 2 teams with a winning record.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>htowntexan says: Nov 6, 2012 2:34 PM</p>
<p>bears are way too high. they have only beaten one team with a winning record, and that was Luck’s first game ever. texans will roll them.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Hate people like this. Bears can only play who is on the schedule. The Falcons are 8-0 and have only beaten 1 team with a winning record as well. Are they ranked to high??? The Texans have beaten only 2 teams with a winning record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: listenupcupcake</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[listenupcupcake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eagles will lose to the hated cowgirls and loathed skins the next 2 weeks, so #25 is certainly not too low.  Question is, which teams rated #26-32 could this Eagles team beat now?  Maybe the Chiefs, maybe the Jags.  I see the Eagles at #30 in the week 11 PR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eagles will lose to the hated cowgirls and loathed skins the next 2 weeks, so #25 is certainly not too low.  Question is, which teams rated #26-32 could this Eagles team beat now?  Maybe the Chiefs, maybe the Jags.  I see the Eagles at #30 in the week 11 PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trollhammer20</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trollhammer20]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the very fair ranking of the Seahawks.  12 is a great spot for them, since, if the playoffs started today, they&#039;d be the #6 seed in the NFC.

Of course, it would be a road game, which no one thinks they can win.  I think they have to win one more road game to make the playoffs this year.  They still play at Miami (tough), Chicago (really tough), and against Buffalo in Toronto (home crowd edge will be reduced, and it&#039;s indoors, removing December weather as a factor - this is the easiest one of the three).  

If they can win one more road game, and win out at home (Jets, Rams, Cardinals....and the rematch against the Niners), that&#039;s 10-6 and almost certainly a Wild Card berth.  9-7 probably won&#039;t do it, since all of their losses thus far are in the conference, and they&#039;d probably lose out on a tiebreaker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the very fair ranking of the Seahawks.  12 is a great spot for them, since, if the playoffs started today, they&#8217;d be the #6 seed in the NFC.</p>
<p>Of course, it would be a road game, which no one thinks they can win.  I think they have to win one more road game to make the playoffs this year.  They still play at Miami (tough), Chicago (really tough), and against Buffalo in Toronto (home crowd edge will be reduced, and it&#8217;s indoors, removing December weather as a factor &#8211; this is the easiest one of the three).  </p>
<p>If they can win one more road game, and win out at home (Jets, Rams, Cardinals&#8230;.and the rematch against the Niners), that&#8217;s 10-6 and almost certainly a Wild Card berth.  9-7 probably won&#8217;t do it, since all of their losses thus far are in the conference, and they&#8217;d probably lose out on a tiebreaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: florioisahack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[florioisahack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@htowntexan

I&#039;m not saying Chicago wins, but absolutely no chance Bears get rolled. You don&#039;t get rolled with a defense like that. Good luck Sunday night. I think all you Texan fans beating your chest are in for a rude awakening. 
If this Bears offense ever gets rolling...look out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@htowntexan</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Chicago wins, but absolutely no chance Bears get rolled. You don&#8217;t get rolled with a defense like that. Good luck Sunday night. I think all you Texan fans beating your chest are in for a rude awakening.<br />
If this Bears offense ever gets rolling&#8230;look out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qbofthenever</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/06/week-nine-power-rankings-3/#comment-2104149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qbofthenever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1505209#comment-2104149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year&#039;s MVP is Matt Ryan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year&#8217;s MVP is Matt Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
