Skip to content

Clay Matthews ruled out for Sunday

Arizona Cardinals v Green Bay Packers Getty Images

The Lions won’t have to worry about blocking Clay Matthews this Sunday.

Packers coach Mike McCarthy ruled Matthews out for this weekend’s matchup with Detroit. Matthews hurt his hamstring in the team’s last game, a 31-17 win against the Cardinals in Week Nine. McCarthy said at the time that it would be a couple of weeks before Matthews was healthy enough to return and this is the second week. Tom Silverstein of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports McCarthy said the team knew Matthews would be out and has planned for this game with his absence in mind.

McCarthy said that they’d see what happens next week, but it wouldn’t be surprising if the team proceeds cautiously with Matthews. He’s had hamstring issues earlier in his career with the Packers and the team has seen Greg Jennings and Jordy Nelson aggravate a previous injury by returning quicker than may have been prudent this season.

Jennings also won’t play this week, but Nelson sounds set to be in the lineup. McCarthy said, via Dave Birkett of the Detroit Free Press, that Nelson has looked like his old self this week and should play on Sunday.

Permalink 32 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Home, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
32 Responses to “Clay Matthews ruled out for Sunday”
  1. shaggytoodle says: Nov 14, 2012 3:20 PM

    Hopefully the Packers can rely on the depth that TT has attempted to stock.They are still going to be missing one of the best on Sunday.

    The silver lining is that MM had the bye week to come up with a plan with Matthews out.

  2. themagicfanguy says: Nov 14, 2012 3:21 PM

    Next man up x5,128,927!

  3. dino2997 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:24 PM

    Ripe for an upset. Wouldn’t surprise me if the Lions pulled it off.

  4. cjallday81 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:24 PM

    Lions fans approve this message.

  5. szwhtsup123 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:27 PM

    Just to be safe, just to be absolutely sure that hammy is healed, wait till week 13 to let him play again.

    Signed

    Giants Nation

  6. cooklynn17 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:32 PM

    The Packers should definitely blame the officials for this.

  7. minnesconsin says: Nov 14, 2012 3:35 PM

    Two points.

    1. They can’t afford to be as cautious at OLB as they can be at WR, they just don’t have the depth — particularly w/ Nick Perry going to IR.

    2. Nelson didn’t re-aggravate anything. Two separate injuries. The second one just happened to happen on the first ball thrown his way after coming back from the first.

  8. packownsu says: Nov 14, 2012 3:35 PM

    Along with Rodgers, Matthews is a player where it’s impossible to say “Next man up” without it being a joke statement. Never the less it is what it is.

  9. dv5454 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:37 PM

    He is our only consistent source of a pass rush. Without him, it’s going to be a high scoring affair.

  10. Josh Alper says: Nov 14, 2012 3:38 PM

    You’re right about Nelson, bad memory on my part.

  11. lks311 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:46 PM

    4-5 Lions vs. Packers without Perry, Matthews and Woodson. Playing in a controlled environment of 75 degrees on a fast rug. Rodgers and Nelson on one side, Stafford and Megatron on the other…

    This has all the makings of a old, new-wave NFL shoot-out. As Bart Scott would say, “Can’t Wait”.

  12. wttoolman says: Nov 14, 2012 3:48 PM

    Soooooooooo over-rated!! Where was this guy last year??

  13. thepvyharvin says: Nov 14, 2012 3:50 PM

    So is he getting his hair done?

  14. muskyhunter2542 says: Nov 14, 2012 3:51 PM

    dino2997 says:
    Nov 14, 2012 3:24 PM
    Ripe for an upset. Wouldn’t surprise me if the Lions pulled it off.

    ———————————————————

    I hate to say this because Im a Packer fan… I think that the upset would be if The Packers won this game… I know Detroit sucks, but I think that there are just to many people down this week.

  15. shaggytoodle says: Nov 14, 2012 4:05 PM

    wttoolman says:Nov 14, 2012 3:48 PM

    Soooooooooo over-rated!! Where was this guy last year??
    __________________

    He didn’t have a good year, that happens.

    They also didn’t generate much of a pass rush outside of Matthews when he was getting double teamed. Thats deffinetly not the case so far this season.

  16. gbpshareholder says: Nov 14, 2012 4:11 PM

    as long as the Pack play as good or better than the Vikings, which is more than a possibility, the Lions will lose another game this week!!!

  17. lionsdraftguy says: Nov 14, 2012 4:12 PM

    This is coming from myself, probably the biggest Lions fan in the world, but some of you are knocking Clay Mathews. Let me tell you, hes a heck of a lot better than our linebackers.

  18. spawnsacs says: Nov 14, 2012 4:21 PM

    Funny, Mathews, Woodson, Williams, Nelson, Rodgers, Jennings, Raji didn’t play last year in the last game against Detroit.

    How did that turn out Lions fans?

  19. drillbit19k says: Nov 14, 2012 4:30 PM

    Week 17 last year…..I think the packers sat the entire team and started the practice squad and won. A game the lions had a reason to win. That being said a Detroit win if an upset wouldn’t be that big of one

  20. packfaninchitown says: Nov 14, 2012 4:31 PM

    This will make the Lions’ loss to the Pack all the more humiliating…

  21. hyzers says: Nov 14, 2012 4:35 PM

    lks311 says:
    Nov 14, 2012 3:46 PM
    4-5 Lions vs. Packers without Perry, Matthews and Woodson. Playing in a controlled environment of 75 degrees on a fast rug. Rodgers and Nelson on one side, Stafford and Megatron on the other…

    ————————————–

    Lions without Best, Delmas, Houston, Spivey, Burleson, Bentley, Lacey, Corey Williams, etc.

  22. fuglyflorio says: Nov 14, 2012 5:05 PM

    Roids make for short, injury-filled careers.

  23. bordner says: Nov 14, 2012 5:23 PM

    The Packers better win this game. Lions fans have been pretty quiet this year, which is a welcome change to last year. A win over Green Bay might bring them back out of the woodwork and start them yapping again, and I don’t know if anybody really wants that.

  24. bougin89 says: Nov 14, 2012 5:46 PM

    Anyone that says Matthews had a bad year last year clearly didn’t watch him play.

  25. krustylaugh says: Nov 14, 2012 5:49 PM

    Well this game soars over 51

  26. hyzers says: Nov 14, 2012 5:51 PM

    spawnsacs says:
    Nov 14, 2012 4:21 PM
    Funny, Mathews, Woodson, Williams, Nelson, Rodgers, Jennings, Raji didn’t play last year in the last game against Detroit.

    How did that turn out Lions fans?
    —————————————————-
    You realize the Lions were playing with less starters than the Packers in that game, yes?

  27. bougin89 says: Nov 14, 2012 6:59 PM

    spawnsacs says:
    Nov 14, 2012 4:21 PM
    Funny, Mathews, Woodson, Williams, Nelson, Rodgers, Jennings, Raji didn’t play last year in the last game against Detroit.

    How did that turn out Lions fans?
    —————————————————-
    You realize the Lions were playing with less starters than the Packers in that game, yes?

    ———————————–

    The big difference was 7 out of our top 10 players didn’t play. The Lion’s were depleted as well but not like the Packers. Bottom line is Stafford should have been able to beat us with our top 4 defensive players out and a backup quarterback lead offense without our #1 WR.

  28. taintedsaints2009 says: Nov 14, 2012 7:06 PM

    Hamstring injuries only come back quickly if they were not rested for months. Not smart for the packers to rush jordy Nelson back.

  29. 19lions57 says: Nov 14, 2012 7:06 PM

    Come on McCarthy, sit Nelson for one more week. Really, it doesn’t matter who is injured for the Pack, the Lions let Ponder have his way with them, what do you think Rodgers is going to do. That D line needs to start earning its pay and all of the hype they get.

  30. 91devinhester23 says: Nov 14, 2012 7:17 PM

    one of two times this year that I get to root for the lions

  31. vikefan says: Nov 14, 2012 8:18 PM

    mmm……..roids not working?

  32. lks311 says: Nov 14, 2012 8:22 PM

    bougin89 says:
    Nov 14, 2012 6:59 PM

    The big difference was 7 out of our top 10 players didn’t play. The Lion’s were depleted as well but not like the Packers. Bottom line is Stafford should have been able to beat us with our top 4 defensive players out and a backup quarterback lead offense without our #1 WR.
    ————————————-
    Stafford did (do enough to) beat you. It was the Defense that lost.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!