Comments on: Giants roll out three-safety look http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Sat, 25 May 2013 23:36:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: otrd13 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2144702 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:27:14 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2144702 giants actually even ran a 4 safety look at one point w Will Hill, Brown, Rolle and Phillips… easily my favorite package of theirs, hope they stay healthy enough to use it. Hosley is a sufficient replacement slot defender but those 4 can cover, ball hawk, blitz, tackle well and defend the run inside the box.

]]> By: bigwayne75 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2143526 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:19:52 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2143526 If KP plays the 3 safety D is a good one, just ask GB and they have a better offense then the Skins. This game will be close but in the end the Giants are the better team and they will win.

]]> By: njgiant1982 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2143092 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:03:25 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2143092 The most complete D wins this game. Yes, the Giants could hardly get an arm around Rogers when he was out of the pocket. So Robert will defiantly burn the Giants there, but the Giants corners and safeties are very capable of shutting things down field. If that happens, there is not way the Skins D can keep up with the Giants Offense nor stop the pass rush and run defense.

]]> By: bigblue86 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2143068 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:54:52 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2143068 This isn’t exactly a new thing for the Giants. They played a lot of 3 safety sets the past couple of years both with Rolle filling in covering the slot receiver and Deion Grant as linebacker.

]]> By: bigbluecrew420 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2143023 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:34:37 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2143023 As long as Eli isn’t wearing his SB rings I think his arm will have enough strength to pick apart that horrid foreskins D.
Also JPP Osi And Tuck are going to drill that lil twerp of a QB into the dirt over and over and over just like we do.

]]> By: bigbluecrew420 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2143014 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:30:42 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2143014 Logicalvoices, that may be true but as proven last time the skins defense will find a way to lose.

]]> By: dbones750 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2142960 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:02:26 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2142960 Safeties, WRs, D-Ends, and an ELITE QB baby!

]]> By: logicalvoicesays http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2142956 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:01:56 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2142956 Redskins win 45-28.

RGIII throws for over 400 yds. Throws 5 TDs. Alfred Morris gets 100+yds 1 TD.

]]> By: amaf21 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2142950 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:58:37 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2142950 they are going to need to roll out the twenty-safety look on monday night.

]]> By: fuglyflorio http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/28/giants-roll-out-three-safety-look/#comment-2142933 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:43:50 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1559364#comment-2142933 Could we please get an a-hole Redskins fan in here to comment please. No NFC East article is complete without one.

]]>