<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patriots, Broncos, Falcons, Texans clinch playoffs, Ravens do not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:24:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2158395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2158395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ahmedbakarr says: Dec 4, 2012 6:47 PM

Why are the patriots the 2nd seed when the ravens beat them and have the same record? I mean shouldn’t that make the ravens the second seed?
-------------------

It&#039;s just the &quot;if the season ended today&quot; scenario. It means nothing now, but because the Patriots have clinched their division and the Ravens have not, they are &quot;technically&quot; the #2 seed. If they both finish with identical records and the Ravens win the AFC North, the Ravens would be the #2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahmedbakarr says: Dec 4, 2012 6:47 PM</p>
<p>Why are the patriots the 2nd seed when the ravens beat them and have the same record? I mean shouldn’t that make the ravens the second seed?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just the &#8220;if the season ended today&#8221; scenario. It means nothing now, but because the Patriots have clinched their division and the Ravens have not, they are &#8220;technically&#8221; the #2 seed. If they both finish with identical records and the Ravens win the AFC North, the Ravens would be the #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahmedbakarr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2158351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahmedbakarr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2158351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Flacco &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Charlie Batch that roughing the passer by paul kruger put the steelers  in position to win that game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Flacco &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Charlie Batch that roughing the passer by paul kruger put the steelers  in position to win that game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahmedbakarr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2158326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahmedbakarr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2158326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are the patriots the 2nd seed when the ravens beat them and have the same record? I mean shouldn&#039;t that make the ravens the second seed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the patriots the 2nd seed when the ravens beat them and have the same record? I mean shouldn&#8217;t that make the ravens the second seed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8to80texansblog</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2155257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8to80texansblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2155257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a question for Broncos fans... what&#039;s your signature win...  They have lost to the really good teams (HOU, NE, ATL) that they&#039;ve played.

HOU has wins over 9-3 Bal(home), 9-3 Den (road), 8-4 Bears (road).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question for Broncos fans&#8230; what&#8217;s your signature win&#8230;  They have lost to the really good teams (HOU, NE, ATL) that they&#8217;ve played.</p>
<p>HOU has wins over 9-3 Bal(home), 9-3 Den (road), 8-4 Bears (road).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richwizl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2155116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richwizl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2155116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also would add that either Houston, Denver or New England will beat any NFC team that goes to the SB, except, maybe, the Giants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also would add that either Houston, Denver or New England will beat any NFC team that goes to the SB, except, maybe, the Giants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richwizl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2155104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richwizl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2155104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all seem to forget that the Patriots are four points short of being undefeated; got ripped off by replacement refs twice and lost on a great, last-second play by Seattle.  Houston has the best record in the AFC and seem to be the real deal; we&#039;re bout to find out Monday.  The Broncos are very impressive, to me, and I think there is a good chance they&#039;ll play NE for the AFC Championship.  I would give Denver the edge at home, but not at NE.  I think the Ravens, Steelers, Bengals and Colts are all a notch under these first three.  Obviously, the road to the Super Bowl goes through Houston this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all seem to forget that the Patriots are four points short of being undefeated; got ripped off by replacement refs twice and lost on a great, last-second play by Seattle.  Houston has the best record in the AFC and seem to be the real deal; we&#8217;re bout to find out Monday.  The Broncos are very impressive, to me, and I think there is a good chance they&#8217;ll play NE for the AFC Championship.  I would give Denver the edge at home, but not at NE.  I think the Ravens, Steelers, Bengals and Colts are all a notch under these first three.  Obviously, the road to the Super Bowl goes through Houston this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avoidtheboyd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2154624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[avoidtheboyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2154624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we get another Patriots/Giants Super Bowl, I&#039;m never watching football again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we get another Patriots/Giants Super Bowl, I&#8217;m never watching football again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ch1ggs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ch1ggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patriots used the Oregon no huddle offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriots used the Oregon no huddle offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rythestunner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rythestunner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we&#039;re going to say the Packers lead the NFC North (even though technically, a 1-0 record in head-to-head will not cut it yet, so it&#039;s still technically tied), then the Seahawks are NOT in the lead for the Wild Card.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we&#8217;re going to say the Packers lead the NFC North (even though technically, a 1-0 record in head-to-head will not cut it yet, so it&#8217;s still technically tied), then the Seahawks are NOT in the lead for the Wild Card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleasefirecam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pleasefirecam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So tired of Steeler fans...Pittsburgh is a dead town filled with morons. Ravens beat themselves and didn&#039;t you guys lose to the Raiders? Go spray some Soul Glo on your Troy wig, ya wankers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So tired of Steeler fans&#8230;Pittsburgh is a dead town filled with morons. Ravens beat themselves and didn&#8217;t you guys lose to the Raiders? Go spray some Soul Glo on your Troy wig, ya wankers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pats1stfan1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pats1stfan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And a Ridley fumble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a Ridley fumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pats1stfan1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pats1stfan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mr Wright 212:

What gimmicks did the Patriots use in that game?

  Denver made it look close only because it was garbage time !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mr Wright 212:</p>
<p>What gimmicks did the Patriots use in that game?</p>
<p>  Denver made it look close only because it was garbage time !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc5000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sc5000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened in that first Patriots/Broncos game is totally irrelevant. It wasn&#039;t just the McGahee fumble inside the pats 10 yard line, he also dropped a would be first down to keep a drive going in Patriots territory, and D Thomas also fumbled after a long gainer from Manning in the first half.  Its pretty foolish to think that will happen again.

That game is also irrelevant because Joe Mays got abused by Brady at MLB and he is now gone.  Ever since he got injured the Broncos defense has went from bad to amazingly good!  

You also have to factor that was what, only Peyton&#039;s 4th game with Fox and company in Denver and it was what, Brady&#039;s 200th plus game with his team and coach.  Those things matter a lot.  I&#039;m not gonna take anything away from the Pats for winning that game, but if you think that a whole year of playing together hasn&#039;t helped Manning and the rest of the Broncos your crazy.  Any rematch with the Pats/Broncos or Broncos/Texans isn&#039;t going to play out exactly the same, it never does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened in that first Patriots/Broncos game is totally irrelevant. It wasn&#8217;t just the McGahee fumble inside the pats 10 yard line, he also dropped a would be first down to keep a drive going in Patriots territory, and D Thomas also fumbled after a long gainer from Manning in the first half.  Its pretty foolish to think that will happen again.</p>
<p>That game is also irrelevant because Joe Mays got abused by Brady at MLB and he is now gone.  Ever since he got injured the Broncos defense has went from bad to amazingly good!  </p>
<p>You also have to factor that was what, only Peyton&#8217;s 4th game with Fox and company in Denver and it was what, Brady&#8217;s 200th plus game with his team and coach.  Those things matter a lot.  I&#8217;m not gonna take anything away from the Pats for winning that game, but if you think that a whole year of playing together hasn&#8217;t helped Manning and the rest of the Broncos your crazy.  Any rematch with the Pats/Broncos or Broncos/Texans isn&#8217;t going to play out exactly the same, it never does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivyleaf98</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivyleaf98]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 06:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steelers are 2 games behind Ravens, 8 turn overs in a loss to Cleveland and they talk trash? Give me a break. Ravens are garbage? Wow!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steelers are 2 games behind Ravens, 8 turn overs in a loss to Cleveland and they talk trash? Give me a break. Ravens are garbage? Wow!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikingfan1971</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikingfan1971]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 05:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the vikings are still in the hunt from what I understand]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the vikings are still in the hunt from what I understand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: friscokid49</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[friscokid49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 05:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IF the playoffs started TODAY, the Pats would be #2 seed because the three teams have NOT played each other. So next step is Conf Record.

2.Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF the playoffs started TODAY, the Pats would be #2 seed because the three teams have NOT played each other. So next step is Conf Record.</p>
<p>2.Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedmurph</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tedmurph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eessppnn says:Dec 2, 2012 10:58 PM 

The Patriots, now 9-3, currently share an identical record to both the Broncos and Ravens. Despite the fact that the Patriots were beaten by Baltimore earlier this season, they own the second seed in the current AFC playoff picture by virtue of the NFL’s three-way tie breaking system (click here for all of the tiebreaker rules). The Patriots own the best conference record (8-1) of the three teams, meaning that if the playoffs started today, they would earn a first-round bye via a top two seed.
 Educated!
----------------------------------------------------------
Three way tie:
First tiebreaker: Head to head. Balti(1-0), Denver(0-1), Pats(1-1). Denver out (Balti/Denv play later this yr).  Denver out.

Second tiebreaker: Balti/ Pats head to head. Pats out. Balti #2 seed.

That&#039;s how it works. If Balti beats Denver later this year and there is a 3 way tie, Balti wins by virtue of 2-0.  If Denver beats Balti, they all go 1-1. Then conf record comes into play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eessppnn says:Dec 2, 2012 10:58 PM </p>
<p>The Patriots, now 9-3, currently share an identical record to both the Broncos and Ravens. Despite the fact that the Patriots were beaten by Baltimore earlier this season, they own the second seed in the current AFC playoff picture by virtue of the NFL’s three-way tie breaking system (click here for all of the tiebreaker rules). The Patriots own the best conference record (8-1) of the three teams, meaning that if the playoffs started today, they would earn a first-round bye via a top two seed.<br />
 Educated!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Three way tie:<br />
First tiebreaker: Head to head. Balti(1-0), Denver(0-1), Pats(1-1). Denver out (Balti/Denv play later this yr).  Denver out.</p>
<p>Second tiebreaker: Balti/ Pats head to head. Pats out. Balti #2 seed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how it works. If Balti beats Denver later this year and there is a 3 way tie, Balti wins by virtue of 2-0.  If Denver beats Balti, they all go 1-1. Then conf record comes into play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtainclosed</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curtainclosed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ha ha ravens suk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha ravens suk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikidpissah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wikidpissah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[elrock7 says: Dec 2, 2012 10:44 PM

And the Pats wont be playing the Bills, Jets or Phins either.
--------------------------------------------------
Hahaha.... says the fan of a team who plays the Chargers, Chiefs and Raiders twice each]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elrock7 says: Dec 2, 2012 10:44 PM</p>
<p>And the Pats wont be playing the Bills, Jets or Phins either.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Hahaha&#8230;. says the fan of a team who plays the Chargers, Chiefs and Raiders twice each</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golonger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[golonger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, Broncos are on and done in the playoofs..per usual under Manning!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, Broncos are on and done in the playoofs..per usual under Manning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themagicman1223</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themagicman1223]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see the Ponder&#039;s noodle arm beating out Seattle for the wild card spot at the end of the season. Tampa Bay is too talented to be 6-6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see the Ponder&#8217;s noodle arm beating out Seattle for the wild card spot at the end of the season. Tampa Bay is too talented to be 6-6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billharford31</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billharford31]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Pats and Broncos matchup is highly likely and would probably come down to the wire. One thing is sure, Manning doesn&#039;t want to go to Foxborough in January given his history playing there under rough weather.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Pats and Broncos matchup is highly likely and would probably come down to the wire. One thing is sure, Manning doesn&#8217;t want to go to Foxborough in January given his history playing there under rough weather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eessppnn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eessppnn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patriots, now 9-3, currently share an identical record to both the Broncos and Ravens. Despite the fact that the Patriots were beaten by Baltimore earlier this season, they own the second seed in the current AFC playoff picture by virtue of the NFL&#039;s three-way tie breaking system (click here for all of the tiebreaker rules). The Patriots own the best conference record (8-1) of the three teams, meaning that if the playoffs started today, they would earn a first-round bye via a top two seed. 
Educated!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriots, now 9-3, currently share an identical record to both the Broncos and Ravens. Despite the fact that the Patriots were beaten by Baltimore earlier this season, they own the second seed in the current AFC playoff picture by virtue of the NFL&#8217;s three-way tie breaking system (click here for all of the tiebreaker rules). The Patriots own the best conference record (8-1) of the three teams, meaning that if the playoffs started today, they would earn a first-round bye via a top two seed.<br />
Educated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsfan22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patsfan22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ch1ggs says: Dec 2, 2012 9:44 PM

“tedmurph says: Dec 2, 2012 9:38 PM”

What game were you watching? Pats led Denver 31-7 with 4 mins left in the 3rd qtr before garbage time. That’s after Denver’s defense couldn’t stop the Pats in last years playoff game(35-7 @halftime). Real scared. As for the Giants, although it would probably bore America, I’d love to see a rematch. Like the Pats chances. Can’t get lucky 3 games in a row.”
——————————-

I was watching the game that was about to be 31-28 with a few minutes left and Broncos team that was getting extremely hot.

But then Willis McGahee screwed that all up nice and good.
———–

How convenient of you guys to forget the only reason Manning had a chance to come back is because Ridley fumbled on the drive before. Pats had been going up and down on your D all day up until that point. McGahee just evened out the fumbles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ch1ggs says: Dec 2, 2012 9:44 PM</p>
<p>“tedmurph says: Dec 2, 2012 9:38 PM”</p>
<p>What game were you watching? Pats led Denver 31-7 with 4 mins left in the 3rd qtr before garbage time. That’s after Denver’s defense couldn’t stop the Pats in last years playoff game(35-7 @halftime). Real scared. As for the Giants, although it would probably bore America, I’d love to see a rematch. Like the Pats chances. Can’t get lucky 3 games in a row.”<br />
——————————-</p>
<p>I was watching the game that was about to be 31-28 with a few minutes left and Broncos team that was getting extremely hot.</p>
<p>But then Willis McGahee screwed that all up nice and good.<br />
———–</p>
<p>How convenient of you guys to forget the only reason Manning had a chance to come back is because Ridley fumbled on the drive before. Pats had been going up and down on your D all day up until that point. McGahee just evened out the fumbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elrock7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elrock7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the Pats wont be playing the Bills, Jets or Phins either.

Broncos defence was getting used to Del Rio, and manning and the offense were getting used to each other.

I would love to see a rematch.  Broncos are only team Brady has a losing record against.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Pats wont be playing the Bills, Jets or Phins either.</p>
<p>Broncos defence was getting used to Del Rio, and manning and the offense were getting used to each other.</p>
<p>I would love to see a rematch.  Broncos are only team Brady has a losing record against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ch1ggs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ch1ggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pats defense force assemble! 

And the nerve to talk about the Broncos schedule...because the Pats sure have been playing good teams all season long, right?

Broncos aren&#039;t a good team to Pats fans until they talk about wins over quality opponents, then Beantown runs their mouths about beating the 9-3 Broncos. 

But I thought we weren&#039;t good?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pats defense force assemble! </p>
<p>And the nerve to talk about the Broncos schedule&#8230;because the Pats sure have been playing good teams all season long, right?</p>
<p>Broncos aren&#8217;t a good team to Pats fans until they talk about wins over quality opponents, then Beantown runs their mouths about beating the 9-3 Broncos. </p>
<p>But I thought we weren&#8217;t good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtx1992</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mtx1992]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How are you guys so sure that the broncos are such a great team? They built their record by beating awful teams like the ones in their division. Sorry broncos, but you wont play the raiders, chiefs or the chargers in the playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are you guys so sure that the broncos are such a great team? They built their record by beating awful teams like the ones in their division. Sorry broncos, but you wont play the raiders, chiefs or the chargers in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeley McBeam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeley McBeam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ravens still have to play both Mannings so hand them a couple more L&#039;s. 

Just thank everyone you can that the Pats, Cheifs and Bolts handed you a W Ravens...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravens still have to play both Mannings so hand them a couple more L&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Just thank everyone you can that the Pats, Cheifs and Bolts handed you a W Ravens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikidpissah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wikidpissah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212 says: Dec 2, 2012 8:56 PM

So what if the Patriots do? They better hope they don’t run into the Broncos (and if they manage to evade them), then the Giants, in the Super Bowl, or it won’t matter at the end of the day.
------------------------------------------------
They already ran into, I mean OVER the Broncos.

Remember, as great as Peyton is playing, and has played in the regular season, he is under .500 in the playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Wright 212 says: Dec 2, 2012 8:56 PM</p>
<p>So what if the Patriots do? They better hope they don’t run into the Broncos (and if they manage to evade them), then the Giants, in the Super Bowl, or it won’t matter at the end of the day.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
They already ran into, I mean OVER the Broncos.</p>
<p>Remember, as great as Peyton is playing, and has played in the regular season, he is under .500 in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedmurph</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/patriots-broncos-falcons-texans-clinch-playoffs-ravens-do-not/#comment-2153120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tedmurph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1568701#comment-2153120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one where the Broncos were about to score and had been shutting the Patriots down in the 2nd half, while they got hot offensively — which they haven’t stopped doing since. 

And the Giants have beaten the Patriots 3 straight times already. You do not match up well with us at all. Period.
 
Packer fans were touting that “can’t happen again” nonsense last week. Certain teams just own other teams.
----------------------------------------------------------
The Broncos may have been about to score but they didn&#039;t. I won&#039;t get into the Pats record against Manning. The Broncos are the ones that don&#039;t want this matchup, not the Pats.

As for the Giants, saying the Pats don&#039;t match up with them ignores the facts. GB doesn&#039;t match up well with the Giants, they get blown out every time. The last 3 games NE v Giants have been close battles that went down to the wire, not blowouts. The first SB(07), the Giants made a series of improbable plays to catch the Pats from behind. The 2nd SB, they just made more plays at the end, again, to catch them from behind. Love to see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one where the Broncos were about to score and had been shutting the Patriots down in the 2nd half, while they got hot offensively — which they haven’t stopped doing since. </p>
<p>And the Giants have beaten the Patriots 3 straight times already. You do not match up well with us at all. Period.</p>
<p>Packer fans were touting that “can’t happen again” nonsense last week. Certain teams just own other teams.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
The Broncos may have been about to score but they didn&#8217;t. I won&#8217;t get into the Pats record against Manning. The Broncos are the ones that don&#8217;t want this matchup, not the Pats.</p>
<p>As for the Giants, saying the Pats don&#8217;t match up with them ignores the facts. GB doesn&#8217;t match up well with the Giants, they get blown out every time. The last 3 games NE v Giants have been close battles that went down to the wire, not blowouts. The first SB(07), the Giants made a series of improbable plays to catch the Pats from behind. The 2nd SB, they just made more plays at the end, again, to catch them from behind. Love to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
