<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jags minus Shorts could be short on points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bestjets</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bestjets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[0-0 my guys are 5-7 not 2 and something besides getting beat by the colts and bills 2 teams the jets smoked]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0-0 my guys are 5-7 not 2 and something besides getting beat by the colts and bills 2 teams the jets smoked</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampats</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ampats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the race for the top 5 pick in the NFL draft begins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the race for the top 5 pick in the NFL draft begins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bears0492</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bears0492]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calling a 16-13 victory with the jets winning.


Don&#039;t sleep on Henne, he&#039;s got an arm and nothing to lose]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling a 16-13 victory with the jets winning.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t sleep on Henne, he&#8217;s got an arm and nothing to lose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corchamp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[corchamp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jags are short on points WITH Shorts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jags are short on points WITH Shorts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awhite46</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awhite46]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is a very real chance Sunday’s Jets-Jaguars game ends in a 0-0 tie.&quot;

This is what someones says and then the game ends up 31-28 or some craziness.

It&#039;s worth keeping in mind, the Jags give up an average of 28 points a game and the Jets are only marginally better at 24 points. Also, the Jags and Jets score an average of 17 and 19 per game respectively. It&#039;ll probably be a train wreck but I have to question the &quot;very real chance&quot; you threw out there. We shall see though]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is a very real chance Sunday’s Jets-Jaguars game ends in a 0-0 tie.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is what someones says and then the game ends up 31-28 or some craziness.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth keeping in mind, the Jags give up an average of 28 points a game and the Jets are only marginally better at 24 points. Also, the Jags and Jets score an average of 17 and 19 per game respectively. It&#8217;ll probably be a train wreck but I have to question the &#8220;very real chance&#8221; you threw out there. We shall see though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerben</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jags should at least be able to get into field goal range returning a pick or two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jags should at least be able to get into field goal range returning a pick or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packh8er</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packh8er]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What possible reason could they have to NOT shut MJD down for the season at this point?  Take it from a Vikes fan last year who saw AP go down in a meaningless game that all it did was successfully cause us to lose out on either RGIII or the windfall that could have been retrieved trading that pick away.  Such is the luck of the Vikes...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What possible reason could they have to NOT shut MJD down for the season at this point?  Take it from a Vikes fan last year who saw AP go down in a meaningless game that all it did was successfully cause us to lose out on either RGIII or the windfall that could have been retrieved trading that pick away.  Such is the luck of the Vikes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtheparrothead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/07/jags-minus-shorts-could-be-short-on-points/#comment-2165213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mtheparrothead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1575478#comment-2165213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least us jags are consistent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least us jags are consistent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
