<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 14 power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dallascowboysdishingthereal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2178359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dallascowboysdishingthereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2178359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Broncos shouldn&#039;t be ahead of the Texans or Falcons because they lost to both of them this year head to head. 

Cowboys ranked ahead of the Bears? Seriously? Did you see that Monday night game?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Broncos shouldn&#8217;t be ahead of the Texans or Falcons because they lost to both of them this year head to head. </p>
<p>Cowboys ranked ahead of the Bears? Seriously? Did you see that Monday night game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeyd524</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2175869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joeyd524]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2175869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Peterson should be #1 on this list....what he&#039;s doing this year after the knee problems from last December,I think he&#039;s a terminator! I don&#039;t care about the Vikings but on Sundays I find a bar with the nfl package just so I can watch this guy play,who cares about teams that can throw it allover the place(boring) do yourself a favor next Sunday find somewhere to watch the vikes play,you&#039;ll thanks me Monday morning..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Peterson should be #1 on this list&#8230;.what he&#8217;s doing this year after the knee problems from last December,I think he&#8217;s a terminator! I don&#8217;t care about the Vikings but on Sundays I find a bar with the nfl package just so I can watch this guy play,who cares about teams that can throw it allover the place(boring) do yourself a favor next Sunday find somewhere to watch the vikes play,you&#8217;ll thanks me Monday morning..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minimm16</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2175501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[minimm16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2175501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falcons, the worst 11-2 team in NFL history? That&#039;s like saying &quot;the worst looking Swedish swimsuit model&quot; of all time. Doesn&#039;t make a whole bunch of sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcons, the worst 11-2 team in NFL history? That&#8217;s like saying &#8220;the worst looking Swedish swimsuit model&#8221; of all time. Doesn&#8217;t make a whole bunch of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerrygray721</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2175376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerrygray721]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2175376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the pat&#039;s at the #1 spot. i suppose they should be because they always seem to get b.s. calls to keep drives alive and almost never seem to get called on the stuff they do especially the holding they get away with on the o-line and here of late i&#039;ve seen alot of push off&#039;s from thier wr&#039;s that ofcourse dont get called.maybe it&#039;s just me maybe my eye&#039;s are bad maybe my t.v. is bad maybe i am seeing things when i watch the replays over and over or maybe the long history between goodells family and the kraft family has  something to do with it. i&#039;m just stuned everytime i watch a pats game and see the stuff they get by with and the bad calls that go aginst alot of the other teams they are playing.imo the bulk of the pats games need to be reviewed by an independent party frame by frame and some hard questions need to be anwsered btw did i mention they already have a history of cheating- oop&#039;s i shouldn&#039;t say that because i know how in denial pats nation is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the pat&#8217;s at the #1 spot. i suppose they should be because they always seem to get b.s. calls to keep drives alive and almost never seem to get called on the stuff they do especially the holding they get away with on the o-line and here of late i&#8217;ve seen alot of push off&#8217;s from thier wr&#8217;s that ofcourse dont get called.maybe it&#8217;s just me maybe my eye&#8217;s are bad maybe my t.v. is bad maybe i am seeing things when i watch the replays over and over or maybe the long history between goodells family and the kraft family has  something to do with it. i&#8217;m just stuned everytime i watch a pats game and see the stuff they get by with and the bad calls that go aginst alot of the other teams they are playing.imo the bulk of the pats games need to be reviewed by an independent party frame by frame and some hard questions need to be anwsered btw did i mention they already have a history of cheating- oop&#8217;s i shouldn&#8217;t say that because i know how in denial pats nation is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiderapologist</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2175372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raiderapologist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2175372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Raiders have climbed over one 2-10 team. If they lose to the Chiefs this Sunday, they damned well better get that coveted 32 spot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Raiders have climbed over one 2-10 team. If they lose to the Chiefs this Sunday, they damned well better get that coveted 32 spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defscottyb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2175114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defscottyb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2175114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10. Redskins:  George McFly thinks this could be a team of density.
_________________________________
Nice Florio..... Nice! Hahaha. Go Skins!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10. Redskins:  George McFly thinks this could be a team of density.<br />
_________________________________<br />
Nice Florio&#8230;.. Nice! Hahaha. Go Skins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philrat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2175062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[philrat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2175062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texans should be number 2 because they whipped the broncos in denver.  Game was not as close as score.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texans should be number 2 because they whipped the broncos in denver.  Game was not as close as score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagatti</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sagatti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Broncos are NUMBER 2... Hate it if you want...  But either way... IIWII (it is what it is)...lol oh.. and GO BRONCOS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broncos are NUMBER 2&#8230; Hate it if you want&#8230;  But either way&#8230; IIWII (it is what it is)&#8230;lol oh.. and GO BRONCOS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seahawksbmx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seahawksbmx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#7 may be a little too generous for the &#039;Hawks until they prove they can consistently win on the road, but it&#039;s pretty obvious now that the #22 preseason ranking you gave them was ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7 may be a little too generous for the &#8216;Hawks until they prove they can consistently win on the road, but it&#8217;s pretty obvious now that the #22 preseason ranking you gave them was ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jprcox</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jprcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the problem with the ranking is you have teams with a good offense ranked too high.  Sure, they can beat up on teams without a D, but like NE was beat by Seattle, and lets see how they do against 49ers.

Denver is in same boat - lets see how they do against a good D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem with the ranking is you have teams with a good offense ranked too high.  Sure, they can beat up on teams without a D, but like NE was beat by Seattle, and lets see how they do against 49ers.</p>
<p>Denver is in same boat &#8211; lets see how they do against a good D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooterdawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hooterdawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Seahawks:  Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle.&quot;

A 2-5 road record assured you of that??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Seahawks:  Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle.&#8221;</p>
<p>A 2-5 road record assured you of that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoosiercolts</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hoosiercolts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skins SOS : .530
 
RG3: #1 in NFL passer rating, first in turnovers
 
Colts SOS: .420
 
Luck: #31 in NFL passer rating, last in turnovers
______________________________

One team is 9-4 and has a strangle hold on the 5th seed and WILL be playing in the postseason.

The other is 7-6 and on the outside looking in.

You can keep a QB who&#039;s passer rating is inflated by throwing dinks and dunks. I&#039;ll take the QB who has ice water in his veins and throws downfield. RGIII can take that top passer rating to the couch with him come the playoffs. Luck and the Colts will still be playing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skins SOS : .530</p>
<p>RG3: #1 in NFL passer rating, first in turnovers</p>
<p>Colts SOS: .420</p>
<p>Luck: #31 in NFL passer rating, last in turnovers<br />
______________________________</p>
<p>One team is 9-4 and has a strangle hold on the 5th seed and WILL be playing in the postseason.</p>
<p>The other is 7-6 and on the outside looking in.</p>
<p>You can keep a QB who&#8217;s passer rating is inflated by throwing dinks and dunks. I&#8217;ll take the QB who has ice water in his veins and throws downfield. RGIII can take that top passer rating to the couch with him come the playoffs. Luck and the Colts will still be playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pftcensorssuck</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pftcensorssuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Order has been restored to the Universe; the Patriots are back at #1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Order has been restored to the Universe; the Patriots are back at #1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrobinson14</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrobinson14]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just sayin, in Cleveland, the majority believe that shurmur is gone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just sayin, in Cleveland, the majority believe that shurmur is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgavin78</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgavin78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go Jags!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Jags!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linemanguy74</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[linemanguy74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pack gets 150 yards as a team AP gets 210 in 3 quarters also out rushed your whole team this past week 154 to 120]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pack gets 150 yards as a team AP gets 210 in 3 quarters also out rushed your whole team this past week 154 to 120</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vietnambob2473</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vietnambob2473]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all the haters, the falcons and texans beat the broncos very early this season. All three are different teams now and I would expect the broncos to win easily against either of those two teams at this point.  The texans and falcons have peaked while the broncos are still on the rise and have yet to play a complete game, which should be a scary thought for the rest of the league.  I think the broncos and patriots are really in a league of their own in the afc at this point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all the haters, the falcons and texans beat the broncos very early this season. All three are different teams now and I would expect the broncos to win easily against either of those two teams at this point.  The texans and falcons have peaked while the broncos are still on the rise and have yet to play a complete game, which should be a scary thought for the rest of the league.  I think the broncos and patriots are really in a league of their own in the afc at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceschatz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ceschatz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[skins23 says:Dec 11, 2012 1:45 PM 

ceschatz says:
 Dec 11, 2012 11:01 AM
 Redskins above the Colts? Somebody’s blowing RG3
 
_______________________________
 
Skins SOS : .530
 
RG3: #1 in NFL passer rating, first in turnovers
 
Colts SOS: .420
 
Luck: #31 in NFL passer rating, last in turnovers
__________________________________

Colts 9-4
Redskins 7-6

Football is a team sport and the Colts are obviously a better team]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skins23 says:Dec 11, 2012 1:45 PM </p>
<p>ceschatz says:<br />
 Dec 11, 2012 11:01 AM<br />
 Redskins above the Colts? Somebody’s blowing RG3</p>
<p>_______________________________</p>
<p>Skins SOS : .530</p>
<p>RG3: #1 in NFL passer rating, first in turnovers</p>
<p>Colts SOS: .420</p>
<p>Luck: #31 in NFL passer rating, last in turnovers<br />
__________________________________</p>
<p>Colts 9-4<br />
Redskins 7-6</p>
<p>Football is a team sport and the Colts are obviously a better team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8to80texansblog</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8to80texansblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7. Seahawks:  Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle.

+++++++++++++++

Not a really a Seattle fan or hater but hard to ignore Florio touting this teams ability to win on the road...  2-5 road record doesn&#039;t really strike me as a team that can win big games on the road...  they are 1 game away from being only able to win A game on the road...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7. Seahawks:  Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle.</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Not a really a Seattle fan or hater but hard to ignore Florio touting this teams ability to win on the road&#8230;  2-5 road record doesn&#8217;t really strike me as a team that can win big games on the road&#8230;  they are 1 game away from being only able to win A game on the road&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackandbluedivision</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackandbluedivision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dawgsafety13 says:
Dec 11, 2012 11:16 AM
The Lions have had as disappointing season as one can imagine but 28?
__________________________


That team is so dysfunctional it&#039;s crazy! The only thing stopping people from laughing at you like the other teams that surround them in this ranking is Megatron and the season he&#039;s having.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dawgsafety13 says:<br />
Dec 11, 2012 11:16 AM<br />
The Lions have had as disappointing season as one can imagine but 28?<br />
__________________________</p>
<p>That team is so dysfunctional it&#8217;s crazy! The only thing stopping people from laughing at you like the other teams that surround them in this ranking is Megatron and the season he&#8217;s having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaMrHand</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AlohaMrHand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prediction:The Chiefs beat the Raiders Sunday]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prediction:The Chiefs beat the Raiders Sunday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normdogg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normdogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dawgsafety13 says:
Dec 11, 2012 11:16 AM
The Lions have had as disappointing season as one can imagine but 28?
----------------------------------------------------

21 would be more appropriate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dawgsafety13 says:<br />
Dec 11, 2012 11:16 AM<br />
The Lions have had as disappointing season as one can imagine but 28?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>21 would be more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravens4fr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravens4fr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could NOT find where the Stillers are rated .... oops, sorry, they are Down at 14 - too bad!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could NOT find where the Stillers are rated &#8230;. oops, sorry, they are Down at 14 &#8211; too bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackandbluedivision</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackandbluedivision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thingamajig says:
Dec 11, 2012 1:11 PM
The Cardinals beat New England in Foxboro earlier this year so why aren’t they ranked #1???
____________________________

Because your starting quarterback averages a QB rating of 7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thingamajig says:<br />
Dec 11, 2012 1:11 PM<br />
The Cardinals beat New England in Foxboro earlier this year so why aren’t they ranked #1???<br />
____________________________</p>
<p>Because your starting quarterback averages a QB rating of 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godofwine330</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[godofwine330]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ 10. Redskins:  George McFly thinks this could be a team of density.

CLASSIC!!! - Oh to be a child of the 80&#039;s (or be alive and aware during that time)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 10. Redskins:  George McFly thinks this could be a team of density.</p>
<p>CLASSIC!!! &#8211; Oh to be a child of the 80&#8242;s (or be alive and aware during that time)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwttww</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wwttww]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falcons 3-0 vs top 12, beat #2 Denver, play #8 this week. Could be 4-0 and worst 12-2 team in history? Keep hatin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcons 3-0 vs top 12, beat #2 Denver, play #8 this week. Could be 4-0 and worst 12-2 team in history? Keep hatin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffalodave10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buffalodave10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Spiller becomes another disgruntled Buffalo RB, because Chan doesn&#039;t want to play him, never mind, not trying to get arrested for threats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Spiller becomes another disgruntled Buffalo RB, because Chan doesn&#8217;t want to play him, never mind, not trying to get arrested for threats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sliceanddic3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sliceanddic3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Ravens fan, and why does it make sense to have the Ravens at 9 and Skins at 10? Shouldn&#039;t it be flipped?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Ravens fan, and why does it make sense to have the Ravens at 9 and Skins at 10? Shouldn&#8217;t it be flipped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aljack88</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aljack88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[garonm says: 
Dec 11, 2012 12:53 PM 

… Not to mention that Seattle beat Brady. 

----------------------------------------------

Teams change a lot from week 6 to week 14,  some for the better and others for the worse.  
The big failure then was the Pats&#039; D not holding the lead - a too familiar story.

Playing now at this point in the season and with the Pats&#039; D is starting to play at it&#039;s best level in years;  if Seattle were to allow the Pats to run 85 plays on offense (30 more than the hawks) with almost 500 total yards like they did back in early October the result would be a bit different. 
 
  Seattle&#039;s D has 1 key player on a 4 game suspension for ped violation and will be losing another shortly.  Perhaps there should be some more testing done?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>garonm says:<br />
Dec 11, 2012 12:53 PM </p>
<p>… Not to mention that Seattle beat Brady. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Teams change a lot from week 6 to week 14,  some for the better and others for the worse.<br />
The big failure then was the Pats&#8217; D not holding the lead &#8211; a too familiar story.</p>
<p>Playing now at this point in the season and with the Pats&#8217; D is starting to play at it&#8217;s best level in years;  if Seattle were to allow the Pats to run 85 plays on offense (30 more than the hawks) with almost 500 total yards like they did back in early October the result would be a bit different. </p>
<p>  Seattle&#8217;s D has 1 key player on a 4 game suspension for ped violation and will be losing another shortly.  Perhaps there should be some more testing done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skins23</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/11/week-14-power-rankings-3/#comment-2174266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skins23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1577415#comment-2174266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ceschatz says: 
Dec 11, 2012 11:01 AM 
Redskins above the Colts? Somebody’s blowing RG3

_______________________________

Skins SOS : .530

RG3: #1 in NFL passer rating, first in turnovers

Colts SOS: .420

Luck: #31 in NFL passer rating, last in turnovers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ceschatz says:<br />
Dec 11, 2012 11:01 AM<br />
Redskins above the Colts? Somebody’s blowing RG3</p>
<p>_______________________________</p>
<p>Skins SOS : .530</p>
<p>RG3: #1 in NFL passer rating, first in turnovers</p>
<p>Colts SOS: .420</p>
<p>Luck: #31 in NFL passer rating, last in turnovers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
