<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packers could be short on running backs Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mineallmine001</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2198271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mineallmine001]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2198271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kick out throws and a few cobb runs will take some of the load off the rb&#039;s]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kick out throws and a few cobb runs will take some of the load off the rb&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wafflestomp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2195377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wafflestomp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2195377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dujaun Harris is a small, change of pace kind of back.
Though I&#039;ve enjoyed watching him carry the rock in a few spot runs here and there, I wouldn&#039;t expect him to have the same kind of production with a heavier workload.
Look to see a lot of Ryan Grant, holding on to the football (Please!). And working himself into game shape. 
With a few Harris and Kuhn runs sprinkled in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dujaun Harris is a small, change of pace kind of back.<br />
Though I&#8217;ve enjoyed watching him carry the rock in a few spot runs here and there, I wouldn&#8217;t expect him to have the same kind of production with a heavier workload.<br />
Look to see a lot of Ryan Grant, holding on to the football (Please!). And working himself into game shape.<br />
With a few Harris and Kuhn runs sprinkled in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joewilliesshnoz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2195344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joewilliesshnoz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2195344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they don&#039;t mind a few fumbles, Mendenhall can probably be had for close to nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they don&#8217;t mind a few fumbles, Mendenhall can probably be had for close to nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmstrick</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2195097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cmstrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2195097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harris is capable, and this game is a good chance to show what he&#039;s got.

That said, the Packers could play the whole game with an empty backfield and it&#039;d still be a blowout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harris is capable, and this game is a good chance to show what he&#8217;s got.</p>
<p>That said, the Packers could play the whole game with an empty backfield and it&#8217;d still be a blowout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, Culpepper had a couple of pretty good seasons (heck of a season in 04) ...
shame his knees got messed up and his work ethic wasn&#039;t as strong as Brees/McNabb/Peyton.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, Culpepper had a couple of pretty good seasons (heck of a season in 04) &#8230;<br />
shame his knees got messed up and his work ethic wasn&#8217;t as strong as Brees/McNabb/Peyton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: houndog50</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[houndog50]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[immafubared says:Dec 19, 2012 3:19 PM

I’m not sure Woodson – who is one of my favorite all time players, is racing to get back. At some point you got to figure he’s decided hey this is the last year, why go out and get beat up again when I pretty much missed the biggest part of the season.
I think he is hoping to hold out until playoff time and then that will be his swanson as they say.
---------------------------------------------------
A &quot;swanson&quot; is a TV dinner, a Swan Song is for quitters ready to walk away from it all, Charles Woodson is neither!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>immafubared says:Dec 19, 2012 3:19 PM</p>
<p>I’m not sure Woodson – who is one of my favorite all time players, is racing to get back. At some point you got to figure he’s decided hey this is the last year, why go out and get beat up again when I pretty much missed the biggest part of the season.<br />
I think he is hoping to hold out until playoff time and then that will be his swanson as they say.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
A &#8220;swanson&#8221; is a TV dinner, a Swan Song is for quitters ready to walk away from it all, Charles Woodson is neither!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: houndog50</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[houndog50]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purpleguy says: Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM

It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.
---------------------------------------------------
You forgot MacArthur Lane! 
Eddie Lee Ivory and Gary Ellis were a pretty good pair with Eric &quot;Rubber Legs&quot; Torkelson sprinkled in.  Edgar Bennett and Dorsey Levins were damned good!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purpleguy says: Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM</p>
<p>It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
You forgot MacArthur Lane!<br />
Eddie Lee Ivory and Gary Ellis were a pretty good pair with Eric &#8220;Rubber Legs&#8221; Torkelson sprinkled in.  Edgar Bennett and Dorsey Levins were damned good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnarlswoodson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gnarlswoodson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[immafubared says:Dec 19, 2012 3:19 PM 

I’m not sure Woodson – who is one of my favorite all time players, is racing to get back. At some point you got to figure he’s decided hey this is the last year, why go out and get beat up again when I pretty much missed the biggest part of the season.
 I think he is hoping to hold out until playoff time and then that will be his swanson as they say.
 
------------------------------------

You just described the exact opposite of Charles Woodson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>immafubared says:Dec 19, 2012 3:19 PM </p>
<p>I’m not sure Woodson – who is one of my favorite all time players, is racing to get back. At some point you got to figure he’s decided hey this is the last year, why go out and get beat up again when I pretty much missed the biggest part of the season.<br />
 I think he is hoping to hold out until playoff time and then that will be his swanson as they say.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>You just described the exact opposite of Charles Woodson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contra74</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[contra74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[beedubyatoo says:Dec 19, 2012 4:00 PM 

purpleguy says:Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM 

It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.
 —————————
 
This is from a Vikings’ fan, a team who hasn’t had a qb since Tarkington and a SB never? Yes, I know, Favre, but he was a one year wonder rental. 

Ever hear of Ahman Green, Edgar Bennett or Dorsey Levens?
---------
I thought the subject was RBs but you went ahead and took a jab at QBs. Anywho...Daunte Culpepper rings a bell. At least when he had Randy Moss as a target.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beedubyatoo says:Dec 19, 2012 4:00 PM </p>
<p>purpleguy says:Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM </p>
<p>It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.<br />
 —————————</p>
<p>This is from a Vikings’ fan, a team who hasn’t had a qb since Tarkington and a SB never? Yes, I know, Favre, but he was a one year wonder rental. </p>
<p>Ever hear of Ahman Green, Edgar Bennett or Dorsey Levens?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I thought the subject was RBs but you went ahead and took a jab at QBs. Anywho&#8230;Daunte Culpepper rings a bell. At least when he had Randy Moss as a target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerben</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luckily, the Packers are also short on running plays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, the Packers are also short on running plays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackandbluedivision</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackandbluedivision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost in all this...Why does Mason Crosby still have a job?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost in all this&#8230;Why does Mason Crosby still have a job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbpackfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lbpackfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purpleguy says: Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM

It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.
-----------------------------------------------------------

You&#039;re so right.  I wasn&#039;t alive then, but Brockington and McCarthur Lane were pretty solid...other than Ahman Green, Packers had pretty weak running games since then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purpleguy says: Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM</p>
<p>It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re so right.  I wasn&#8217;t alive then, but Brockington and McCarthur Lane were pretty solid&#8230;other than Ahman Green, Packers had pretty weak running games since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beedubyatoo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beedubyatoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purpleguy says:Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM 

It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.
---------------------------

This is from a Vikings&#039; fan, a team who hasn&#039;t had a qb since Tarkington and a SB never?  Yes, I know, Favre, but he was a one year wonder rental. 

 Ever hear of Ahman Green, Edgar Bennett or Dorsey Levens?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purpleguy says:Dec 19, 2012 3:34 PM </p>
<p>It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>This is from a Vikings&#8217; fan, a team who hasn&#8217;t had a qb since Tarkington and a SB never?  Yes, I know, Favre, but he was a one year wonder rental. </p>
<p> Ever hear of Ahman Green, Edgar Bennett or Dorsey Levens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wicky888</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wicky888]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Packers have been short on RBs since Ahman Green]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Packers have been short on RBs since Ahman Green</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleguy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the Packers have been short on running backs since the days of Brockington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Alex, but DuJuan has shown something in the past couple of weeks - I&#039;m ok with him getting a majority of the early carries and them having Grant and Kuhn hammer away at them in the 4th Qtr.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Alex, but DuJuan has shown something in the past couple of weeks &#8211; I&#8217;m ok with him getting a majority of the early carries and them having Grant and Kuhn hammer away at them in the 4th Qtr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Gerbschmidt</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Gerbschmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No problem. Next man up, that happens to be DuJuan. He should have been getting more carries any way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem. Next man up, that happens to be DuJuan. He should have been getting more carries any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: immafubared</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[immafubared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure Woodson - who is one of my favorite all time players, is racing to get back. At some point you got to figure he&#039;s decided hey this is the last year, why go out and get beat up again when I pretty much missed the biggest part of the season.
I think he is hoping to hold out until playoff time and then that will be his swanson as they say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure Woodson &#8211; who is one of my favorite all time players, is racing to get back. At some point you got to figure he&#8217;s decided hey this is the last year, why go out and get beat up again when I pretty much missed the biggest part of the season.<br />
I think he is hoping to hold out until playoff time and then that will be his swanson as they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kja22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/19/packers-could-be-short-on-running-backs-sunday/#comment-2194324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kja22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1594098#comment-2194324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DuJuan Harris has some talent. We&#039;ll be fine!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DuJuan Harris has some talent. We&#8217;ll be fine!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
