<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherman would pursue his appeal in court, if he could</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: berni50</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2207352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[berni50]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2207352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve taken monthly UA&#039;s in order to participate in a program that I&#039;ve been attending for the past 13 years and believe me, this one is &#039;monitored&#039;, ie, a UA tech is in there with me every step of the way, just like in this case.  When a cup has a leak or ANY seal is broken, the test is invalid - no questions asked by anyone!  Why should it be different for Richard Sherman?  I firmly believe that since our Hawks creamed the 49ers last Sunday,  some folks are jealous of Richard Sherman&#039;s &amp; the entire team&#039;s great performances in our games!  The West Coast does not get enough credit where credit is due, normally ... so suck it up, whiners &amp; know-it-alls!!  Hopefully persistence will pay off in this case!  Good Luck to Richard Sherman!  GO HAWKS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken monthly UA&#8217;s in order to participate in a program that I&#8217;ve been attending for the past 13 years and believe me, this one is &#8216;monitored&#8217;, ie, a UA tech is in there with me every step of the way, just like in this case.  When a cup has a leak or ANY seal is broken, the test is invalid &#8211; no questions asked by anyone!  Why should it be different for Richard Sherman?  I firmly believe that since our Hawks creamed the 49ers last Sunday,  some folks are jealous of Richard Sherman&#8217;s &amp; the entire team&#8217;s great performances in our games!  The West Coast does not get enough credit where credit is due, normally &#8230; so suck it up, whiners &amp; know-it-alls!!  Hopefully persistence will pay off in this case!  Good Luck to Richard Sherman!  GO HAWKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate773</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2206764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kate773]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2206764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll echo what a couple have already said. It sounds like he&#039;s pressing to get off on a technicality. How can a broken seal on the second cup lead to a positive result?  If they used a cup that had been used by someone else, then of course. But I haven&#039;t heard that to be the case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll echo what a couple have already said. It sounds like he&#8217;s pressing to get off on a technicality. How can a broken seal on the second cup lead to a positive result?  If they used a cup that had been used by someone else, then of course. But I haven&#8217;t heard that to be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txnative61</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2205942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[txnative61]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 07:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2205942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask the Bountygate players, no semblance of Due Process in the NFL---no matter how his appeal goes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask the Bountygate players, no semblance of Due Process in the NFL&#8212;no matter how his appeal goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2204028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2204028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He he played for the Redskins he&#039;d be suspended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He he played for the Redskins he&#8217;d be suspended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cromags</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cromags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’d win in a neutral court&quot; This is kind of irrelevant any only acknowledges that the he&#039;d exploit a legal loophole available there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d win in a neutral court&#8221; This is kind of irrelevant any only acknowledges that the he&#8217;d exploit a legal loophole available there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfech</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kfech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m all for strictly regulated testing procedures, but it seems kind of telling that there is not even an attempt to deny the offense.  When his suspension is ultimately upheld,  I&#039;m not going to feel like an innocent man was somehow screwed over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for strictly regulated testing procedures, but it seems kind of telling that there is not even an attempt to deny the offense.  When his suspension is ultimately upheld,  I&#8217;m not going to feel like an innocent man was somehow screwed over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electionconfidential</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[electionconfidential]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former football players negotiating contracts with billionaires...  What could go wrong?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former football players negotiating contracts with billionaires&#8230;  What could go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swaz22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swaz22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man up you filthy animal and serve your suspension. You know you are guilty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man up you filthy animal and serve your suspension. You know you are guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockthered1286</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rockthered1286]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This type of thing just frustrates me as a fan. Some Joe Schmoe&#039;s carelessness can be the difference in a player that is using a ban substance being suspended and held accountable for their actions, or getting off on the Braun-technicality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This type of thing just frustrates me as a fan. Some Joe Schmoe&#8217;s carelessness can be the difference in a player that is using a ban substance being suspended and held accountable for their actions, or getting off on the Braun-technicality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joetoronto</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joetoronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see his suspension getting longer and longer, the more he squawks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see his suspension getting longer and longer, the more he squawks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawyermalloy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lawyermalloy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How hard would it have been to actually LOOK at MLBs  CBA, which is the best in the business, and  demand what they have? Once again the NFLPA dropped the ball.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How hard would it have been to actually LOOK at MLBs  CBA, which is the best in the business, and  demand what they have? Once again the NFLPA dropped the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor123698</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trevor123698]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richard sherman is insane. just own up dude.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richard sherman is insane. just own up dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xplicitpits</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xplicitpits]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s it feel like being so good Richard Sherman?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s it feel like being so good Richard Sherman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No way the suspension will stand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way the suspension will stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ketch20too</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/24/sherman-would-pursue-his-appeal-in-court-if-he-could/#comment-2203607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ketch20too]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1615318#comment-2203607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Way to go DeSmith...you sure had the players best interests in mind when you negotiated that pile of garbage.  Players have no one to blame but DeSmith and themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go DeSmith&#8230;you sure had the players best interests in mind when you negotiated that pile of garbage.  Players have no one to blame but DeSmith and themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
