<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Munchak&#8217;s job appears safe in Tennessee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/30/mike-munchaks-job-appears-safe-in-tennessee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/30/mike-munchaks-job-appears-safe-in-tennessee/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmysee</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/30/mike-munchaks-job-appears-safe-in-tennessee/#comment-2215965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmysee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1632374#comment-2215965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dang that&#039;s bad for the Packers reputation as coach killers.  

First Chilly; then Wade Phillips in Dallas; but we expected Munchak to go, too!

Crumbs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang that&#8217;s bad for the Packers reputation as coach killers.  </p>
<p>First Chilly; then Wade Phillips in Dallas; but we expected Munchak to go, too!</p>
<p>Crumbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/30/mike-munchaks-job-appears-safe-in-tennessee/#comment-2215843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1632374#comment-2215843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know everyone&#039;s impatient these days because there have been quick turnarounds all over the place, but unless a regime/HC is a total disaster in the first 1-3 years, I think giving them 4-5 years is fairly reasonable, especially if the prior regime left the team in bad shape. It still takes time to change the culture AND get the players needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know everyone&#8217;s impatient these days because there have been quick turnarounds all over the place, but unless a regime/HC is a total disaster in the first 1-3 years, I think giving them 4-5 years is fairly reasonable, especially if the prior regime left the team in bad shape. It still takes time to change the culture AND get the players needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatesycophants</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/30/mike-munchaks-job-appears-safe-in-tennessee/#comment-2215703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hatesycophants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1632374#comment-2215703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I work closely with the Frail Elder population and their families. No one who is 90 should be in charge of anything. Ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work closely with the Frail Elder population and their families. No one who is 90 should be in charge of anything. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howiefeltersnatch</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/30/mike-munchaks-job-appears-safe-in-tennessee/#comment-2215701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howiefeltersnatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1632374#comment-2215701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say he deserves another year just based on his loyalty to the organization over the past three decades alone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say he deserves another year just based on his loyalty to the organization over the past three decades alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
