Skip to content

Packers’ receiving corps at full strength, feeling “very dangerous”

Green Bay Packers v St Louis Rams Getty Images

We noted this week that the Packers’ receiving corps is as healthy this week as it’s been since the very start of the season. That has them feeling pretty good about themselves.

It makes us very dangerous,” Greg Jennings told the Associated Press. “It’s pretty obvious when we have all four guys healthy, the amount of big plays that we can accumulate goes up. Aaron has a lot more options.”

Jennings missed Week 2 and Weeks 5-12 of the regular season, Jordy Nelson missed Week 8 and Weeks 14-16 and Randall Cobb missed Week 17. Only James Jones played all 16 games of the 2012 season. (Veteran Donald Driver missed Weeks 13, 15 and 17, but when Jennings mentions “all four guys,” he’s subtly acknowledging that the 37-year-old Driver doesn’t have a lot left to contribute.)

Nelson said he doesn’t believe there’s another team in the NFL that can spread the ball around among as many different wide receivers as the Packers can when everyone is healthy.

“I don’t think so,” Nelson said. “I don’t think you can go four and five deep like we can.”

Aaron Rodgers will be happy to have all those weapons at his disposal against the Vikings on Saturday night.

Permalink 69 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Green Bay Packers, Home, Rumor Mill
69 Responses to “Packers’ receiving corps at full strength, feeling “very dangerous””
  1. packersareandwillalwaysbebetterthanthebears says: Jan 5, 2013 11:19 AM

    And Jermichael Finley has been consistent relatively to his earlier season performances as of late. It’s been lost in all the AP attention for the most part of how the stars are aligning. Even the Vikings best corner has a broken hand right now.

  2. golforepar says: Jan 5, 2013 11:19 AM

    25 Degrees and no wind tonight!
    Packers 34 Queens 17 Petersen 150 yards

  3. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 11:22 AM

    It’s nice having 4 guys that would all be the number 1 receiver for the team you’re playing against.

    If the Packers can make sure Ponder doesn’t play his best football ever (like last weekend) the Packers should cover the spread.

    Packers 31, Vikings 21

  4. zanesha26 says: Jan 5, 2013 11:23 AM

    Im loving it im a true hard packers fan and im loving it go packers!

  5. packfaninpackland says: Jan 5, 2013 11:25 AM

    “Veteran Donald Driver missed Weeks 13, 15 and 17, but when Jennings mentions “all four guys,” he’s subtly acknowledging that the 37-year-old Driver doesn’t have a lot left to contribute.”

    Or, he means the 4 WR’s that play about 98% of the snaps !

  6. dkrause71 says: Jan 5, 2013 11:30 AM

    This is where i was surprised Rodgers isn’t getting more MVP consideration. While i would vote for AP, Rodgers to me is #2. In the article you can see that he generally had at least one of his WRs out every game. He has had Benson, Starks, Green out at RB with Benson and Starks missing large chunks. Even if you think they suck, its still your 1-3 RBs missing games. Finley missed time. His RT has been out.

    I feel for a guy to lead in QB rating with so many out is up there with AP for MVP over Brady, Manning, etc. While i think Pro Bowl voting is a joke. Let’s remember Rodgers and Saturday (who isn’t even starting) were the only Packer offensive numbers.

    Lets also note that most the anti Packer talk on this board is about how the defense is horrible. So here is Rodgers with really every skilled offensive player missing time, behind a so-so at best line and according to many of you a crappy defense leading the team to a 11-5 record and leading the league in QB rating.

  7. asublimeday says: Jan 5, 2013 11:32 AM

    Packers are a joke. Can’t believe they laid down for the one-dimensional Vikings. Enjoy watching the next round at home, losers.

  8. metaltark says: Jan 5, 2013 11:32 AM

    Talk like the Jets… play like the Jets.. Just keep talking Packers…

  9. vikingfan1971 says: Jan 5, 2013 11:33 AM

    packers are going down tonight

  10. drillbit19k says: Jan 5, 2013 11:33 AM

    Well as a packer fan I will acknowledge they were dangerous last year this time as well. Dangerous as in dropping eight passes….

  11. hack0059 says: Jan 5, 2013 11:34 AM

    It is going to be hard for Rodgers to throw to those receivers from his back. skol Vikings…

  12. urcrap says: Jan 5, 2013 11:34 AM

    Play em three times they might win two….not tonight….their time is over!

  13. fredsingleton says: Jan 5, 2013 11:35 AM

    They had this against the 49ers earlier this year. Guess who won that game? Oh, and it was at Lambeau. Even if the Packers win tonight, they’re not going to win in San Fran next week. 49ers offense will have a field day against that dreadful defense.

    Reason why Packers won’t win Superbowl? Offensive line and defense. Both are terrible.

  14. bspuryear says: Jan 5, 2013 11:42 AM

    Yeah but they can’t stay healthy at the same time jordy.. You could say the same thing with the pats weapons

  15. woodyg says: Jan 5, 2013 11:45 AM

    One point the author failed to mention is that if GB sends out 5 or even 4 WRs, AR has next to no time to go through his reads before ending up on his back. —- It’s a problem that GB has failed to fix all season. —- AR is lucky to still be playing this late in the season as opposed to watching from the IR list.

  16. drillbit19k says: Jan 5, 2013 11:46 AM

    asublimeday says:
    Jan 5, 2013 11:32 AM
    Packers are a joke. Can’t believe they laid down for the one-dimensional Vikings. Enjoy watching the next round at home, losers.

    Layed down? As in fought to the bitter end against a divisional rival on the road, who was playing for a playoff berth and their star player who was chasing a historic record and lost by a last second Fg after rallying from a 20-7 deficit? That’s laying down?

    Do go on with more insightful commentary

  17. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 11:49 AM

    asublimeday says:
    Jan 5, 2013 11:32 AM
    Packers are a joke. Can’t believe they laid down for the one-dimensional Vikings. Enjoy watching the next round at home, losers.

    —-

    Bears fan all upset because his team, like usual, couldn’t get things done.

    Jealousy. Just ugly.

  18. icewalker946 says: Jan 5, 2013 11:50 AM

    Too bad they have such an overrated QB in Aaron Rodgers.

    Ain’t that right, Valyncia Jennings?

  19. nananatman says: Jan 5, 2013 11:52 AM

    Packers aren’t playing the Giants this playoff so the wr’s might matter.

  20. wludford says: Jan 5, 2013 11:56 AM

    Packers will get their passing yards, but I’m more concerned about points. Drops, sacks, fumbles, Ints – there all part of the mix when you pass, pass, pass in cold weather.

  21. vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest says: Jan 5, 2013 11:58 AM

    Vikes 52 Pack 7

    Another SB for the Vikes coming soon

  22. packers13xchamps says: Jan 5, 2013 11:59 AM

    Dont forget about Matthews being out for 5 weeks and Woodson being out 9 weeks. Not to mention all the other season-ending injuries. (Perry/Bishop/Worthy/Benson/Bulaga/DJ Smith and a few others).

    Did AP miss any games…or Allen?

    How many interceptions will Ponder throw tonite? He was lucky 3 of them weren’t picked last week.

    Too bad AP fell 9 yards short and will lose tonite.

    GO PACK GO!!

  23. bla bla bla says: Jan 5, 2013 12:02 PM

    Viking fans are funny. Early in the year, they win a few and talk all kinds of smack. Lose a few in a row, and they completely disappear. Now they’ve won a couple again, and here they are, talking smack.

  24. youngs79 says: Jan 5, 2013 12:04 PM

    I’m so glad Green Bay is 100% healthy. That way, when they get beat tonight, there are no excuses.

  25. mantastic54 says: Jan 5, 2013 12:09 PM

    This is where i was surprised Rodgers isn’t getting more MVP consideration. While i would vote for AP, Rodgers to me is #2. In the article you can see that he generally had at least one of his WRs out every game. He has had Benson, Starks, Green out at RB with Benson and Starks missing large chunks. Even if you think they suck, its still your 1-3 RBs missing games. Finley missed time. His RT has been out.

    He is probably a victim of the ridiculous season he had last year. People look at it like this is a down season for him compared to last year. As a Bears fan, I find it amazing what he can do behind that oline. There isn’t another qb in the league that can do what Rodgers can do behind a bad line

  26. hansenbrothers says: Jan 5, 2013 12:10 PM

    If the Packers can block up front & start fast, they win.

  27. luccabrazzi says: Jan 5, 2013 12:11 PM

    Thats all fine, come 7pm cornfields time theyre gonna have to back all that talk up…no excuses (from either team). Jordy Nelson is a WAY overrated speed receiver who lacks lateral movement. Randall Cobb is good but looked better in the ABSENCE of Jennings. Speaking of Jennings, he will be a member of the Vikings next year (seems all the good Packers leave to go to the Purple), but he will def be a factor tonight. And Mr. James Jones is nothing more than a #3 WR on any team in the league (hence the reason he’s been buried on the depth chart behind something called Jordy Nelson). Rodgers is unbelievable and he makes those receivers better than they actually are with the exception of Jennings, who is just a flat out baller. I doubt the WR’s strike much fear in the Vikings secondary, though Rodgers does. The key for the Pack is to get an early lead to neutralize AP on the ground. The key for the Vikings is to hit Rodgers early, often and hard! If they can make him think about the pass rush they MAY be able to contain him. Oh, also they must keep him in the pocket and not allow him to roll out to his right where he is extremely dangerous. Looking forward to wild card weekend…Damn i love football!!!

  28. dikhurtz says: Jan 5, 2013 12:20 PM

    If the Vikings want to have a chance at winning this game they have got to get pressure on Rodgers. Allen, Griffen, Robison have got to step up and prevent Rodgers from getting into a rhythm that could easily put the game out of reach quickly, despite AP putting up big numbers even 200 yds or more may not make a difference. Packers 35 Vikes 17

  29. steelers88 says: Jan 5, 2013 12:33 PM

    Funny how Packers fans think their team is the best. You guys will lose.

  30. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 12:39 PM

    steelers88 says:
    Jan 5, 2013 12:33 PM
    Funny how Packers fans think their team is the best. You guys will lose.

    —-

    Funny how steelers fans think their team is the best.

    Who are they playing this weekend?

  31. purpleman527 says: Jan 5, 2013 12:44 PM

    On Monday, McCarthy and Rodgers said that they will win.

    Matthews guarentees holding AP under 200 yards.

    A packer bar that has a banner,
    “Adrian, this is what 9 yards looks like.”

    And now, the packers talking about how dangerous they are.

    Here comes the UPSET !!!!

  32. nickel2crash says: Jan 5, 2013 12:46 PM

    steelers88 says:
    Jan 5, 2013 12:33 PM
    Funny how Packers fans think their team is the best. You guys will lose.

    =======

    Would be great to face your team in the super bowl…. oh wait.. already did that.. too bad they are already done AGAIN this year..

  33. 7ransponder says: Jan 5, 2013 12:48 PM

    Pride cometh before the fall.

    The Dark Horse breaks free tonight.

  34. aaronitout says: Jan 5, 2013 12:56 PM

    luccabrazzi says:
    Jan 5, 2013 12:11 PM
    Thats all fine, come 7pm cornfields time theyre gonna have to back all that talk up…no excuses (from either team). Jordy Nelson is a WAY overrated speed receiver who lacks lateral movement. Randall Cobb is good but looked better in the ABSENCE of Jennings. Speaking of Jennings, he will be a member of the Vikings next year (seems all the good Packers leave to go to the Purple), but he will def be a factor tonight. And Mr. James Jones is nothing more than a #3 WR on any team in the league (hence the reason he’s been buried on the depth chart behind something called Jordy Nelson). Rodgers is unbelievable and he makes those receivers better than they actually are with the exception of Jennings, who is just a flat out baller. I doubt the WR’s strike much fear in the Vikings secondary, though Rodgers does.
    ———————————————————
    James Jones is nothing more than a number 3? He has 4 less TD receptions than Ponder has TD passes. Jordy Nelson missed 4 entire games and the majority of two others and still had 7 TDs. Let’s not be delusional. There is not a team in the league that can legitimately say their receiving corps is deeper and more talented than GBs.

  35. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 1:06 PM

    Question for Vikings fans. Do you guys use your horns a lot? If you don’t have one, do your friends let you blow theirs?

  36. kennyrogerschicken says: Jan 5, 2013 1:11 PM

    I guess all of those WR’s were overrated when they helped shred the Steelers D enroute to a Super Bowl title.

    Congrats to the Vikings for nutting up and making the playoffs, but let’s be real – the Vikings are still the Vikings, which usually ends up in playoff futility.

  37. pakfan1982 says: Jan 5, 2013 1:18 PM

    Now that Aaron Rodgers has his full receiving Corp back and at full strength we are gonna see a much different GreenBay Packers team… Their offense is as strong as they ever have been (defense still lacks a bit) but hey this is the NFL… Greenbay and Minnesota have had a long rivalry (which to my knowledge the Packers have came out on top 54-49-1) and last weeks game was a close one (37-34) I think this weeks game will be as close if not closer, I’m gonna go with my Packers 40-37

  38. chi01town says: Jan 5, 2013 1:27 PM

    The Packers WR’s are not dangerous when they are on the sidelines watching AP running for
    250 yards. the Vikings will WIN this
    game

  39. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 1:45 PM

    chi01town says:
    Jan 5, 2013 1:27 PM
    The Packers WR’s are not dangerous when they are on the sidelines watching AP running for
    250 yards. the Vikings will WIN this
    game
    —–

    This guy also said the bears would have home field advantage and win the NFC north.

    I’m glad he’s predicting against the packers. It’s almost a sure thing that the packers will win, then.

  40. luccabrazzi says: Jan 5, 2013 1:46 PM

    aaronitout says: Jan 5, 2013 12:56 PM

    luccabrazzi says:
    Jan 5, 2013 12:11 PM
    Thats all fine, come 7pm cornfields time theyre gonna have to back all that talk up…no excuses (from either team). Jordy Nelson is a WAY overrated speed receiver who lacks lateral movement. Randall Cobb is good but looked better in the ABSENCE of Jennings. Speaking of Jennings, he will be a member of the Vikings next year (seems all the good Packers leave to go to the Purple), but he will def be a factor tonight. And Mr. James Jones is nothing more than a #3 WR on any team in the league (hence the reason he’s been buried on the depth chart behind something called Jordy Nelson). Rodgers is unbelievable and he makes those receivers better than they actually are with the exception of Jennings, who is just a flat out baller. I doubt the WR’s strike much fear in the Vikings secondary, though Rodgers does.
    ———————————————————
    James Jones is nothing more than a number 3? He has 4 less TD receptions than Ponder has TD passes. Jordy Nelson missed 4 entire games and the majority of two others and still had 7 TDs. Let’s not be delusional. There is not a team in the league that can legitimately say their receiving corps is deeper and more talented than GBs.

    No delusions here, just stating the obvious. I’m indifferent to both teams since neither will win the SB, so I’m playing no favorites. This thread isn’t about Ponder, he’s average at best. It’s about the GB WR’s. James Jones has been BURIED on the Pack depth chart for 5 or 6 years now. if he hasnt developed in to a starter yet, then he never will. Am i right or wrong? Jordy Nelson is a straight line runner who lacks lateral movement, not to mention he’s NEVER healthy which last I checked plays a large part in “how good” a player can be considered to be (all the greats have historically remained healthy or been able to play relatively well through pain). Again, am i right or wrong? I do agree its hard to find a receiving corps whose talent runs as deep as GB’s, but I never stated they werent talented, just that i dont think they strike fear in the Vikings secondary. The Pack scored 21 in the first game and 34 in the second game. Jennings played great in the second , but where were any of those great WR’s in the first game? oh thats right, they were injured. See my first point above. You Packer fans are so sensitive in titletown, calm down. Thats why the play the game, cuz nothing is won on paper. That said, i’d rather have the the group that the falcons have over your precious Packers WR’s. Enjoy the game sir…

  41. eaststsfb says: Jan 5, 2013 1:47 PM

    I find it funny that fans of other teams find it necessary to comment on the Pack when their pathetic teams are home “punching the clown”. You’d think they would have better things to do.

  42. jjh1982 says: Jan 5, 2013 1:51 PM

    This is easy if pack score first and make the Vikings play catch-up you take ap out of the game, and um you can’t take arod out of a game unless you have a bounty on him good luck Vikings your gonna need it

  43. imaginesuperbowlwin says: Jan 5, 2013 1:53 PM

    Rodgers won’t have time to throw. He will spend the evening as the main ingredient in a Griffen/Allen sandwich. Pass the cheese, please!

  44. luccabrazzi says: Jan 5, 2013 2:00 PM

    And I might add, those Giant WR’s looked really good when they were hanging 37 pts on you in the playoffs last year, while your greta WR’s mustered up what was it again?? oh, yea 20. So they might be better than your WR’s too.

  45. billbrasky72 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:01 PM

    The Packers receivers feel pretty dangerous when they have their sisters do the trash talking for them,

  46. conormacleod says: Jan 5, 2013 2:02 PM

    Vikings fan here. I’m hoping for a really close game tonight. Vikings obviously won’t blow out the Packers, but could win a close one. Rodgers needs to be kept on sideline. Not too worried about explosive plays from him against the cover 2. More worried about the 8-12 yard constant passes in the middle of the zone. Vikings are in a win/win situation. If they lose nobody is shocked and they still had a great season in year 1 of the rebuild. If they win, Packers fans will only be able to bring out the cliche “well, um, how many trophys do you have?”

  47. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 2:10 PM

    @luccabrazzi

    Before this year, I’d have said that you were right on James Jones.

    This year, however, he has made ridiculous catches and has had minimal drops, which plagued his early career.

    Assuming the packers run at least three receiver sets the majority of the time (which they do), Jones is one of our starters. He may be 3 on the depth chart, but Randall Cobb is 4, and if your 4th receiver is Randall Cobb, with the year he is having, you know your squad is pretty deep.

    You said that the Vikings aren’t afraid of the Packers wideouts. I guess I would agree. I don’t know that any wideouts scare any defenses. Calvin Johnson, maybe?

    Jennings is at his best in the slot, and only when you have line runners and speedsters like jones and Nelson on the outside. Same with Cobb. Throw Finley into the mix (if he can continue to just catch the ball), and you have an passing attack 2nd to none.

    You give most of the kudos to Rodgers, and to some extent, I’d agree. But many of those routes (back shoulder, especially) take precision timing. Rodgers has shown that he can make lots of receivers look great, but at the same time, it’s almost impossible to tell how good they are until they play with someone else, and I’m not anxious to find out.

  48. gpack22 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:14 PM

    Hahaha. Gotta love Viking fans, they’re so good at talking trash yet the team is equally as bad at backing it up on the field. Tell ya what, if you really want to see what a Lombardi trophy looks like come on up to Lambeau and we’ll show you 4 of them. Until then…”Shut you’re mouths and act like you’ve been there before”

  49. kodatrout says: Jan 5, 2013 2:17 PM

    It’s funny how the Steelers didn’t even make playoffs.

  50. steelers88 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:19 PM

    Don’t worry packers fans will be back next year!

  51. emoney826 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:27 PM

    It’s funny how last year, all the haters were saying that Aaron Rodgers is just a system quarterback. And now, I’m hearing that its all him making these no name receivers look good. You guys need to make up your minds.

  52. steelers88 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:30 PM

    I’m not like a normal Steelers fan truth is the Steelers were a mediocre team. I refuse to blame it on the injuries. It was stupid mental errors and coaching that did the team in. Also old age. That being said see you next year GB!

  53. gergie1957 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:49 PM

    I’m sure they’ll try to “Hold” on.

  54. gergie1957 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:54 PM

    “gpack22 says:
    Jan 5, 2013 2:14 PM
    Hahaha. Gotta love Viking fans, they’re so good at talking trash yet the team is equally as bad at backing it up on the field.”

    Where were you last week?

  55. icewalker946 says: Jan 5, 2013 2:54 PM

    steelers88 says: Jan 5, 2013 12:33 PM

    Funny how Packers fans think their team is the best. You guys will lose.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    We don’t think they are the best as much as we think–no, we know– that the Packers are better than the Vikings.

    It all has to be proven on the field, however. The Vikings can play well enough to win.

    Here’s to hoping the Packers don’t join the Steelers on the links next weekend.

  56. thetokyosandblaster says: Jan 5, 2013 2:58 PM

    conormacleod says:
    Jan 5, 2013 2:02 PM
    Vikings fan here. I’m hoping for a really close game tonight. Vikings obviously won’t blow out the Packers, but could win a close one. Rodgers needs to be kept on sideline. Not too worried about explosive plays from him against the cover 2. More worried about the 8-12 yard constant passes in the middle of the zone. Vikings are in a win/win situation. If they lose nobody is shocked and they still had a great season in year 1 of the rebuild. If they win, Packers fans will only be able to bring out the cliche “well, um, how many trophys do you have?”

    —-

    I’m sure some will, but in all honesty, if the Vikings win, I’ll be cheering for them to take it all. Peterson deserves at least one.

  57. linemanguy74 says: Jan 5, 2013 3:01 PM

    Does that same bar showing a sign what 400yards looks like !!!!!

  58. vikesfansteve says: Jan 5, 2013 3:04 PM

    The Packers are too overconfident, when Rodgers faces a heavy pass rush it throws off his timing which he doesn’t have with all his receivers. Balls are going to bounce off hands and be intercepted. The Pakcers are going to focus everything on AD and the Vikes are going to get a lot of wide open passes for huge gains. The Vikings are going to win.

  59. steelers88 says: Jan 5, 2013 3:04 PM

    Well at least I have the Penguins. Oh wait. I forgot there is a stupid lockout.

  60. nickkiphuth says: Jan 5, 2013 3:05 PM

    Rodgers has to be top notch. Ponder just needs to be average.

    We all know what Peterson will bring.

    I think the Vikes will pull this one out.

  61. zzr600guy says: Jan 5, 2013 3:10 PM

    GB’s wrs and Rodgers will torch that lousy secondary. AP will still get his but he won’t get more than 150. GB wins 31-17.

  62. thepvyharvin says: Jan 5, 2013 3:17 PM

    Can’t wait for you Packer dolts to go bye bye,,,,just a few more hours!!

  63. 7ransponder says: Jan 5, 2013 3:18 PM

    gergie1957 says:
    Jan 5, 2013 2:54 PM
    “gpack22 says:
    Jan 5, 2013 2:14 PM
    Hahaha. Gotta love Viking fans, they’re so good at talking trash yet the team is equally as bad at backing it up on the field.”

    Where were you last week?

    ——————-

    According to a quick Google search, gpack22 did not post in a Vikings or Packers story since 12/21. Just ignore hypocrites, they’re not worth it.

  64. vikingfan1971 says: Jan 5, 2013 3:24 PM

    so until the vikings win a super bowl us fans need to shut up I dont think so, we can brag about the vikings if we want, You packer fans are so pathetic just cause you have trophys you can talk and no one else can, come tonight you will be out of the playoffs

  65. tschwilly876 says: Jan 5, 2013 3:35 PM

    Im pretty sure the pats can go 5 wide with more production than the pack….just saying that nfl offensive records were made to be broken….. by us.

  66. lambeauandlombardi says: Jan 5, 2013 3:45 PM

    nickkiphuth says:Jan 5, 2013 3:05 PM

    Rodgers has to be top notch. Ponder just needs to be average.

    We all know what Peterson will bring.

    I think the Vikes will pull this one out.
    ………………………………………………………………………
    Peterson has to be top notch. Harris/Green/Grant just need to be average.

    We all know what Rodgers will bring.

    I know the Packers will win.

  67. mnjoemama says: Jan 5, 2013 3:46 PM

    . Gb got physically dominated last week, same will happen tonight! Skol vikes

  68. deltaoracle says: Jan 5, 2013 4:08 PM

    Vikings’ DLine last week had the benefit of a fast track and crowd noise. Caused one big fumble, but hardly terrorized Rodgers. This week they don’t have the field and noise help. And I think Rodgers will do more scrambling, putting even more pressure on their D.
    Pack would do well to have Woodson shadow Rudolph. If Ponder really does have a weak arm – well, weaker than usual – Rudolph will be about all he’s looking for.
    Vikings have come miles farther than I would ever have expected or believed. Peterson is unbelievable. They have a chance, but beating the Packers two weeks in a row? Can’t see it. Certainly hope I don’t see it. Could cause permanent blindness.

  69. trapshoot says: Jan 5, 2013 7:22 PM

    Packer chances should be darn good with Ponder out.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!