<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ponder&#8217;s status remains unclear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediasloppy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mediasloppy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys are not  doctors. It has nothing to do with pain. Well, it does, but  mostly it&#039;s the swelling of fluid and loss of  flexibility that messes up the throws. If you can&#039;t pass the ball 20 yards forget about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are not  doctors. It has nothing to do with pain. Well, it does, but  mostly it&#8217;s the swelling of fluid and loss of  flexibility that messes up the throws. If you can&#8217;t pass the ball 20 yards forget about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerrykill4pres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerrykill4pres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pakfan1982 says:Jan 5, 2013 3:47 PM 

Yes Webb can make plays to but he’s a second string quarterback, Second string quarterbacks are second string for a reason… and that reason is they aren’t the caliber quarterback that starters are especially big name starters such as Ponders and Rodgers… should still be a very close and great game… Packers are still a better all around team though, The Pack will win 40-37

-------------------------------------------------------------

I&#039;m a Vikings fan, and i do have to say... How in the world can you even say  &quot;they aren&#039;t the caliber quarterback that starts are especially big name starters such as Ponders and Rodgers&quot;... Ponder couldn&#039;t carry Rodgers jock on Rodgers worst day and Ponders best day. He has a long long way to go to even be mentioned in the same sentance as Rodgers. I do like Ponder, and believe he has potential. But Rodgers is in a class all by himself. 

If Ponder starts, he is going to need another game like last week. AP needs another good game as well. But the main thing is, don&#039;t let the Pack start fast! They start fast and we get behind, and it&#039;s over.

But with Webb, it&#039;s a whole different story. He has pure athleticism. He might not be near as accurate as Ponder, (which sounds pathetic) but Webb has speed. Webb and AP, you could see the Vikings rush for 350 yards or more!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pakfan1982 says:Jan 5, 2013 3:47 PM </p>
<p>Yes Webb can make plays to but he’s a second string quarterback, Second string quarterbacks are second string for a reason… and that reason is they aren’t the caliber quarterback that starters are especially big name starters such as Ponders and Rodgers… should still be a very close and great game… Packers are still a better all around team though, The Pack will win 40-37</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Vikings fan, and i do have to say&#8230; How in the world can you even say  &#8220;they aren&#8217;t the caliber quarterback that starts are especially big name starters such as Ponders and Rodgers&#8221;&#8230; Ponder couldn&#8217;t carry Rodgers jock on Rodgers worst day and Ponders best day. He has a long long way to go to even be mentioned in the same sentance as Rodgers. I do like Ponder, and believe he has potential. But Rodgers is in a class all by himself. </p>
<p>If Ponder starts, he is going to need another game like last week. AP needs another good game as well. But the main thing is, don&#8217;t let the Pack start fast! They start fast and we get behind, and it&#8217;s over.</p>
<p>But with Webb, it&#8217;s a whole different story. He has pure athleticism. He might not be near as accurate as Ponder, (which sounds pathetic) but Webb has speed. Webb and AP, you could see the Vikings rush for 350 yards or more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceofrealism</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voiceofrealism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest says: Jan 5, 2013 4:00 PM

Looks like Frasier is getting wise, we only beat GB if Webb plays. Ponder’s game last week was a flook. I don’t care if we win another game or ever win a SB, just beat Green Bay! SKOAL!!
-------------------------------------------------
See, that&#039;s the big difference. For the Vikes, playing GB is the &quot;big game&quot;. For GB, the Vikes are just a stepping stone to the real &quot;big game&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest says: Jan 5, 2013 4:00 PM</p>
<p>Looks like Frasier is getting wise, we only beat GB if Webb plays. Ponder’s game last week was a flook. I don’t care if we win another game or ever win a SB, just beat Green Bay! SKOAL!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
See, that&#8217;s the big difference. For the Vikes, playing GB is the &#8220;big game&#8221;. For GB, the Vikes are just a stepping stone to the real &#8220;big game&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikesfansteve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikesfansteve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blessing in disguise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blessing in disguise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlyopinionthatmatters</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onlyopinionthatmatters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i never understood why nobody made a big deal about webb..he stepped in and played good. matt flynn steps in and plays 1 good game and hes the next montana, kolb plays 2 good games and gets a crazy deal, joe webb plays multiple good games and shows hes a good qb and goes right back to backup qb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i never understood why nobody made a big deal about webb..he stepped in and played good. matt flynn steps in and plays 1 good game and hes the next montana, kolb plays 2 good games and gets a crazy deal, joe webb plays multiple good games and shows hes a good qb and goes right back to backup qb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conormacleod</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[conormacleod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ponder has played very well as of late. But, for one game Webb could get the job done. Guaranteed play action fake and a QB run by Webb could result in a 60 yard TD. No matter who plays, it&#039;s still the AP show anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponder has played very well as of late. But, for one game Webb could get the job done. Guaranteed play action fake and a QB run by Webb could result in a 60 yard TD. No matter who plays, it&#8217;s still the AP show anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mungman69</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mungman69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Green Bay can mail this one in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Green Bay can mail this one in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billbrasky72</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billbrasky72]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really, really like Joe Webb.  He&#039;s the first guy to congratulate Christian and everybody else when they come off the field.  He&#039;s a great guy and a great athlete.  They really need to get him on the field.  But, he just is not an accurate enough passer to be a starting QB.  With their lack of receivers, especially big receivers, I don&#039;t know why they don&#039;t give him some reps at receiver.  He is a good enough passer to throw the ball from the receiver position every once in a while too.  Randy Moss threw quite a few TD&#039;s as a Viking, and he can&#039;t pass nearly as well as Webb.  Why can&#039;t he be both a receiver and a #2 or #3 QB?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really, really like Joe Webb.  He&#8217;s the first guy to congratulate Christian and everybody else when they come off the field.  He&#8217;s a great guy and a great athlete.  They really need to get him on the field.  But, he just is not an accurate enough passer to be a starting QB.  With their lack of receivers, especially big receivers, I don&#8217;t know why they don&#8217;t give him some reps at receiver.  He is a good enough passer to throw the ball from the receiver position every once in a while too.  Randy Moss threw quite a few TD&#8217;s as a Viking, and he can&#8217;t pass nearly as well as Webb.  Why can&#8217;t he be both a receiver and a #2 or #3 QB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlk47823</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dlk47823]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who forget, go watch the tape of Webb&#039;s last start in the NFL. It was the most horrific event in television history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who forget, go watch the tape of Webb&#8217;s last start in the NFL. It was the most horrific event in television history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weareluckytohavemikeflorio</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weareluckytohavemikeflorio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if Joe Webb was that good the Vikes wouldnt have spent a 1st round draft pick on Ponder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if Joe Webb was that good the Vikes wouldnt have spent a 1st round draft pick on Ponder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wludford</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wludford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Either Ponder or Webb can deliver the type of performance the Vikings need from the QB position.  Ponder would be better recognizing the Packer defenses.  Webb has more athleticism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either Ponder or Webb can deliver the type of performance the Vikings need from the QB position.  Ponder would be better recognizing the Packer defenses.  Webb has more athleticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packhawk04</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packhawk04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really smart by frazier. He knows the vikes are not winning this game straight up. He has to manufacture some kind of gimmick like this to steal a win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really smart by frazier. He knows the vikes are not winning this game straight up. He has to manufacture some kind of gimmick like this to steal a win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicnocal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vicnocal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Bears fan, of course this is happening now.  Where was this last week?  

Packers will roll today by 17+ points.

I guess the good news is Lovie&#039;s finally gone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Bears fan, of course this is happening now.  Where was this last week?  </p>
<p>Packers will roll today by 17+ points.</p>
<p>I guess the good news is Lovie&#8217;s finally gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harrisbarton</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harrisbarton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having to choose between Ponder and Webb is like having to choose your favorite Menendez brother.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having to choose between Ponder and Webb is like having to choose your favorite Menendez brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trbowman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trbowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should be music to the ears of Viking fans. Ponder is terrible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be music to the ears of Viking fans. Ponder is terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikingsgohard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikingsgohard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think people forgot what Webb did against the Eagles an Vick a few years ago an there was Detroit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people forgot what Webb did against the Eagles an Vick a few years ago an there was Detroit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares who starts? Minn. will win. Rodgers 5 INT 0 TD. Simple as that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares who starts? Minn. will win. Rodgers 5 INT 0 TD. Simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsitlikehere</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatsitlikehere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Webb and AP run for 200 a piece. Skol!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webb and AP run for 200 a piece. Skol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obamareallysucks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[obamareallysucks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[webb is a joke]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>webb is a joke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discosucs2005</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[discosucs2005]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one downside for the Packers is, there isn&#039;t much film on Webb and he&#039;s a totally different QB than Ponder. 

As a 49er fan I have no idea who to root for with this game coming before Seahawks/Redskins. Technically we beat the Packers, but that was a long time ago. Although this game wouldn&#039;t be in Wisconsin. The Vikings beat us in Minnesota, but that too seems like ages ago. 

I guess I&#039;m hoping for good long game; like 8 rounds over OT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one downside for the Packers is, there isn&#8217;t much film on Webb and he&#8217;s a totally different QB than Ponder. </p>
<p>As a 49er fan I have no idea who to root for with this game coming before Seahawks/Redskins. Technically we beat the Packers, but that was a long time ago. Although this game wouldn&#8217;t be in Wisconsin. The Vikings beat us in Minnesota, but that too seems like ages ago. </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m hoping for good long game; like 8 rounds over OT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepvyharvin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thepvyharvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is reliable,,,Webb is going to see playing time. Give em hell Joe! You don&#039;t get nervous, why you can do it! Webb just has fun!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is reliable,,,Webb is going to see playing time. Give em hell Joe! You don&#8217;t get nervous, why you can do it! Webb just has fun!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anyonebutbrady</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anyonebutbrady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pakfan-did I miss the memo promoting ponder to &quot;big name starter&quot;??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pakfan-did I miss the memo promoting ponder to &#8220;big name starter&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biggappa03</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[biggappa03]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Annnnnnd there it is folks.  #1 excuse for the Vikings now.

#2....Refs.

&quot;There&#039;s always next year....&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annnnnnd there it is folks.  #1 excuse for the Vikings now.</p>
<p>#2&#8230;.Refs.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s always next year&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan702nelson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nathan702nelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the Packers fans bash Webb let me remind you something:

It was Webb that beat the Eagles 2 seasons ago, in freezing weather, at the opponents stadium, as a rookie in a game that everyone thought the Vikings would get thrashed in. He ran all over their defense and ended one linemans career with a literal ankle-breaking juke. 
I&#039;d rather have Ponder playing tonight, but don&#039;t count out Webbs ability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the Packers fans bash Webb let me remind you something:</p>
<p>It was Webb that beat the Eagles 2 seasons ago, in freezing weather, at the opponents stadium, as a rookie in a game that everyone thought the Vikings would get thrashed in. He ran all over their defense and ended one linemans career with a literal ankle-breaking juke.<br />
I&#8217;d rather have Ponder playing tonight, but don&#8217;t count out Webbs ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikingshavefoursuperbowlappearancesandarethebest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Frasier is getting wise, we only beat GB if Webb plays. Ponder&#039;s game last week was a flook. I don&#039;t care if we win another game or ever win a SB, just beat Green Bay! SKOAL!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Frasier is getting wise, we only beat GB if Webb plays. Ponder&#8217;s game last week was a flook. I don&#8217;t care if we win another game or ever win a SB, just beat Green Bay! SKOAL!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geogibso</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geogibso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bethel-Thompson Time!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bethel-Thompson Time!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dangernearing</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dangernearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pakfan1982 says:
Jan 5, 2013 3:47 PM
Yes Webb can make plays to but he’s a second string quarterback, Second string quarterbacks are second string for a reason… and that reason is they aren’t the caliber quarterback that starters are….

———

Hmm, or the one other reason you forgot-the team spent a high draft choice and big contract on them and is reluctant to think they may have dropped the ball. See Mark Sanchez, Jake Locker, and possiby Ponder. Just because tht are second string does not mean the starter is heads above the guy who starts.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

Great point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pakfan1982 says:<br />
Jan 5, 2013 3:47 PM<br />
Yes Webb can make plays to but he’s a second string quarterback, Second string quarterbacks are second string for a reason… and that reason is they aren’t the caliber quarterback that starters are….</p>
<p>———</p>
<p>Hmm, or the one other reason you forgot-the team spent a high draft choice and big contract on them and is reluctant to think they may have dropped the ball. See Mark Sanchez, Jake Locker, and possiby Ponder. Just because tht are second string does not mean the starter is heads above the guy who starts.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Great point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packattack1967</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packattack1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All he needs to do is hand off--I can do that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All he needs to do is hand off&#8211;I can do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shieldsisland37</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shieldsisland37]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Ponder is playing well, ie, last week, the Vikings are hard to beat.

When Webb is playing, well, he can make some plays.  But, I am not sure he can make some of those tight clutch throws that Ponder made last week.

Bottom line.  The Vikes need Ponder to play, and play well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Ponder is playing well, ie, last week, the Vikings are hard to beat.</p>
<p>When Webb is playing, well, he can make some plays.  But, I am not sure he can make some of those tight clutch throws that Ponder made last week.</p>
<p>Bottom line.  The Vikes need Ponder to play, and play well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo75025</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/05/ponder-status-remains-unclear/#comment-2233515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimbo75025]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1639757#comment-2233515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pakfan1982 says: 
Jan 5, 2013 3:47 PM 
Yes Webb can make plays to but he’s a second string quarterback, Second string quarterbacks are second string for a reason… and that reason is they aren’t the caliber quarterback that starters are....

---------

Hmm, or the one other reason you forgot-the team spent a high draft choice and big contract on them and is reluctant to think they may have dropped the ball.   See Mark Sanchez, Jake Locker, and possiby Ponder.   Just because tht are second string does not mean the starter is heads above the guy who starts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pakfan1982 says:<br />
Jan 5, 2013 3:47 PM<br />
Yes Webb can make plays to but he’s a second string quarterback, Second string quarterbacks are second string for a reason… and that reason is they aren’t the caliber quarterback that starters are&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Hmm, or the one other reason you forgot-the team spent a high draft choice and big contract on them and is reluctant to think they may have dropped the ball.   See Mark Sanchez, Jake Locker, and possiby Ponder.   Just because tht are second string does not mean the starter is heads above the guy who starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
