Comments on: Belichick: Danny Woodhead could have returned http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/14/belichick-danny-woodhead-could-have-returned/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Fri, 24 May 2013 01:00:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: richwizl http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/14/belichick-danny-woodhead-could-have-returned/#comment-2261857 Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:59:22 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1645048#comment-2261857 Chandler Jones would be a big loss, too; I hope both guys will not be too limited if they play Sunday. We’ll need a lot of bullets to beat Baltimore and I hope they bring “no weapons”.

]]> By: 6ball http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/14/belichick-danny-woodhead-could-have-returned/#comment-2261776 Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:37:50 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1645048#comment-2261776 .

@bucfan4lyfe

Lol…. Kinda like hitting powerball…. on consecutive weeks.

.

]]> By: bucfan4lyfe http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/14/belichick-danny-woodhead-could-have-returned/#comment-2261688 Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:10:04 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1645048#comment-2261688 Woodhead has got to be continuously thanking God that the Jets cut him in favor of Joe McKnight.

]]> By: mpnieland http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/14/belichick-danny-woodhead-could-have-returned/#comment-2261663 Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:00:18 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1645048#comment-2261663 That’s good news…Danny would’ve been a bigger loss than Gronk is. Danny is the best pass rush blocker in the backfield. Vereen stepped up, and Watt was not much of a factor. But against the Ravens and potentially the 49ers, they need Danny as an option if the O-line isn’t holding up.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d also love to have Gronkowski…but they are 5-1 without him, and scored 42 last night. Not hurting for options in the passing game.

]]>