Skip to content

Reggie McKenzie dismisses idea of moving Darren McFadden

Darren McFadden AP

Raiders General Manager Reggie McKenzie met the media on Thursday for the first time since the end of the regular season and he was greeted with plenty of questions about his team’s offense.

Running back Darren McFadden was a topic of particular interest. McKenzie was asked about whether or not the team would consider moving McFadden before next season, the last one on his current contract.

“I’m confident Darren’s going to play his last season, regardless of what’s out there,” McKenzie said, via Jerry McDonald of the Bay Area News Group. “We have no decision to do anything with Darren.”

McFadden had 707 yards and averaged 3.3 yards per attempt this season, a drop in production that’s been attributed to both an ankle injury and a poor fit in former offensive coordinator Greg Knapp’s zone blocking system. McKenzie seemed to hint at the latter while talking about McFadden’s year.

“It’s obvious Darren is much better on certain types of plays,” McKenzie said. “That goes without saying. That’s how you’ve got to do it.”

McKenzie said the team is closing in on a new offensive coordinator. They spoke to both Marc Trestman and Norv Turner about returning to Oakland before the men took other jobs and have interviewed Mike Martz for the position.

Permalink 34 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Oakland Raiders, Rumor Mill
34 Responses to “Reggie McKenzie dismisses idea of moving Darren McFadden”
  1. mtntrouter says: Jan 17, 2013 6:23 PM

    This is a big mistake. McFadden can;t stay healthy for an entire season, and he is in the last year of his contract. Further, the team doesn’t have a 2nd round pick in the draft so there’s three good reasons to trade him to some willing sucker. This team isn’t one player away from competing. Were it me, I’d try to trade down from the 3 spot in the 1st rd and pick up more picks. Then I’d try to move DMC for a 2nd if I could get it. The cupboard is bare and its time to restock the shelves. Plenty of RB’s can be had in the later rounds or in FA. Sir Pork McKenzie needs to move McFragile while he still can.

  2. calibear831 says: Jan 17, 2013 6:28 PM

    As a fan im glad they at least tried to sign Norv turner and not a no name coach with little to no credited experience. . .but we still have to wait n c who they’re going to get

  3. ukraiders says: Jan 17, 2013 6:29 PM

    well I don’t know who I want. Ken W is gone. just don’t want a retread like Martz or turner. Who knows.

  4. helloanybodyhome says: Jan 17, 2013 6:32 PM

    He’s got 18 rushing td’s in his career…5 years.
    No team is going to give more than a bag of balls for that production.

  5. richiesaurus310 says: Jan 17, 2013 6:32 PM

    I think they should try and move Mcfadden. They can still get good value for him and they need a lot. Mcfadden and Palmer just aren’t what the raiders need right now, move them both for picks and start completely over. Manning and the broncos are gonna rule that division for two more years anyways.

  6. raiderssf says: Jan 17, 2013 6:33 PM

    I will always remember what DMC did to Denver on October 24, 2010 when OAK hung 59 on Denver.

  7. bambamraider says: Jan 17, 2013 6:34 PM

    When it comes to the Raiders, even if McFadden can only stay healthy for 8 games a season…those are games that they couldn’t come close to winning without him. Trade McFadden and this team will have no viable threat on offense.

  8. lorddarkhelmet says: Jan 17, 2013 6:36 PM

    It would be a mistake to totally change the offense AGAIN this off season. They should hire Morninweg (sp?) or Shurmur to try for some continuity. The big issue with this team is talent not coaching.

  9. bambamraider says: Jan 17, 2013 6:46 PM

    Not a coaching issue? As a Raider Fan…I Highly Disagree. This is essentially the same team that swept the division in 2011. Now comes in the new Coaches and new staff and out go the players that made that success happen.

  10. narfmoo12 says: Jan 17, 2013 6:48 PM

    mtntrouter says: Jan 17, 2013 6:23 PM

    This is a big mistake. McFadden can;t stay healthy for an entire season, and he is in the last year of his contract. Further, the team doesn’t have a 2nd round pick in the draft so there’s three good reasons to trade him to some willing sucker. This team isn’t one player away from competing. Were it me, I’d try to trade down from the 3 spot in the 1st rd and pick up more picks. Then I’d try to move DMC for a 2nd if I could get it. The cupboard is bare and its time to restock the shelves. Plenty of RB’s can be had in the later rounds or in FA. Sir Pork McKenzie needs to move McFragile while he still can.

    —————–

    If so many RBs can be had in later rounds, who would pay a 2nd round pick for “McFragile”? Remember, if you think he should be traded, why do you think anyone else wants him?

  11. mtntrouter says: Jan 17, 2013 6:51 PM

    @bambamraider

    I guess you forgot about Marcel Reece. Reece had MUCH better production in Knapp’s offense than McFragile. Long-term, Reece will have a more productive career than McFragile.

    @helloanybodyhome

    You forgot to add McFragile’s receiving touchdowns into the mix. He’s a pretty good pass catcher out of the backfield nowemasayin?

  12. mtntrouter says: Jan 17, 2013 6:56 PM

    @narfm0012

    I qualified my response by saying “if” they could get a 2nd round pick for him. Someone will give up more than they should for him simply because they will *think* that they can get more out of him than the Raiders did. Admittedly, he is explosive and is effective when he is healthy and in the right system. That being said, there ARE plenty of stud RB’s in the later rounds of the draft, and were I a GM, I’d steer clear of him. As you know, Al Davis frequently gave up high draft picks for washed-up players, and he isn’t alone in doing so.

  13. schmitty2 says: Jan 17, 2013 6:56 PM

    Many teams would be sucked into wanting McFadden and would be willing to give up high draft picks. Marcel Reece is no slouch

  14. stuartscottslazyeyeball says: Jan 17, 2013 7:06 PM

    McFadden is the Raiders best player but he is made of glass.

  15. raideralex says: Jan 17, 2013 7:09 PM

    No, it’s not a coaching issue. The reason they won more AFC West division games last year is the empty QB spot in Denver filled by some guy named Manning.

    Furthermore, going 6-0 in a weak division one time and 2-8 outside of it doesn’t point to incredible coaching. Just shows you have a weak division.

    ——-bambamraider says:
    Jan 17, 2013 6:46 PM
    Not a coaching issue? As a Raider Fan…I Highly Disagree. This is essentially the same team that swept the division in 2011. Now comes in the new Coaches and new staff and out go the players that made that success happen.-

  16. socalraider909 says: Jan 17, 2013 7:19 PM

    Yeah he’s made out of glass but sadly he’s our best running back so if Reg can find a decent OC that will fit our players then we should just play out the year.. That’s just my opinion

  17. der6495 says: Jan 17, 2013 7:42 PM

    Everyone’s replaceable, especially running backs in today’s NFL. Get what you can for him while you can, at best he has 4 years left as a starter.

    New England let Benjarvus Green-Ellis walk and the younger guys have filled the void quite nicely.

  18. open1337 says: Jan 17, 2013 7:48 PM

    The o line and the secondary is suspect. Hurry and fix it people. Its not that hard to build a well oiled machine.

  19. ckinthekc99 says: Jan 17, 2013 7:53 PM

    The Patriots have Tom Brady, anyone else on the team, coach or players look better when you have a great qb. Notice how the teams with great quarterbacks always have the smartest coaches and executives & every player they draft must be a great player….?

  20. jprcox says: Jan 17, 2013 8:54 PM

    Coming off a 700 yrd season isn’t going to exite many teams to give much for him. I don’t think Oakland could get enough to make it worthwhile.

  21. radrntn says: Jan 17, 2013 9:07 PM

    In reality if Star, and Luke are off the board when we draft, we should take Warmack. Probably by far the safest pick in the draft. Nothing sexy about it, but if we get a first and goal on the one again , we won’t be settling for field goals, or have the inability to convert on 3rd down , and 4th down plays with one to go. This guy can move the pile. DMC will benefit with a new LG, and RT.

    Another consideration, since we have 22 UFA’s, is to place the tag on Lechler. Instead of paying him 4 million per season, a tag would save a couple million per season.. He is still one of the best.

  22. otto00 says: Jan 17, 2013 9:14 PM

    You gotta buy low and sell high

    Trading DMac now would be selling low. Who is going to give more than a 4th or 5th rounder for his contract and injury history?

    If he had stayed healthy last year and looked dominant in the 2nd half then it may have been possible to get someone like Jerry Jones to bite for a high pick.

  23. lorddarkhelmet says: Jan 17, 2013 9:16 PM

    @bambamraider: You can highly disagree until you are blue in the face but the fact is that this years team had significantly less talent than last years. Last years team was full of bloated contract given to talented (but not THAT talented) players. The first thing Reggie did was to gut the roster of those players …and there was a lot of them. There is no quick fix for this team. Your best option is to have some continuity, draft well and stop giving out ridiculous contract. Give it three years and you may actually have a decent rebuild but until then you can’t just churn coaches constantly, it doesn’t help players develop.

  24. lorddarkhelmet says: Jan 17, 2013 9:18 PM

    @raideralex: THANK YOU!

  25. radrntn says: Jan 17, 2013 9:22 PM

    If both the DT from Utah, and the OT from A7M are off the board we should take the OG from Alabama. DMC would benefit from an improved O-line .

    Also with 22 UFA’s that the raiders have this year, they might want to consider placing the tag on Lechler. Raiders would save a couple million, and also keep one of the if not the best punter in the nfl.

  26. raiderapologist says: Jan 17, 2013 9:25 PM

    Goodson didn’t have a lot of carries, but can tote the rock. His yards after contact are stout. Reece proved that he can also do that job. If they could get something for McFadden they should-and probably would-move him, but they can’t trade him for a second day pick. He can run, block, and catch, and if they give him away and he has a good season somewhere else, McKenzie will never hear the end of it.

  27. justwinbaby29 says: Jan 17, 2013 9:26 PM

    McFadden and DHB and a 6th round pick 2013 to the Jets for a 1st round pick in 2013. Jets need offensive help and might be crazy enough to do it.

  28. slickster35 says: Jan 17, 2013 10:22 PM

    No one will give anything for this bust.

    May as well keep him and enjoy his 5 or 6 games a season of marginal production.

    I remember faid fans thought he was better than Jamaal Charles. lol

  29. ern215 says: Jan 17, 2013 10:52 PM

    mcfadden aint goin nowhere, watch him return to prominence next season!

  30. radrntn says: Jan 18, 2013 11:27 AM

    slickster35 says:
    Jan 17, 2013 10:22 PM

    I remember faid fans thought he was better than Jamaal Charles. lol
    – – – – – – – – – –

    Jamaal who?

  31. raiderapologist says: Jan 18, 2013 5:14 PM

    slickster35 says: Jan 17, 2013 10:22 PM

    No one will give anything for this bust.
    May as well keep him and enjoy his 5 or 6 games a season of marginal production.
    I remember faid fans thought he was better than Jamaal Charles. lol
    ———-
    In two games against the Raiders this season Charles had 14 carries for 14 yards. Now that’s funny!

  32. araidersfan says: Jan 18, 2013 5:28 PM

    McFadden has shown that he’s basically useless. Occasionally he looks like Bo Jackson but mostly he’s looked like Harvey Williams.

    This would be a non-issue if our 2012 salary cap situation hadn’t forced the Raiders to let Michael Bush to move last spring. Bush was the best RB on the team and I always thought he was superior to McFadden.

  33. nmrdr795 says: Jan 18, 2013 8:57 PM

    Greg Knapp is a Bronco hahhahah. Mcfadden is our best player why would we trade him? Hopefully AL Saunders is calling the players next season and All the DMAC haters will go back in there holes. “Mcfragile” its cause he runs downhill like a bull. And he s a little bigger and willing to rake a hit for more yardage unlike these other guys who get down right away. Marcel is good but hes more of a A3rs down back. Big reg knows what he s doing i trust in reg

  34. raiderapologist says: Jan 18, 2013 9:03 PM

    slickster35 says: Jan 17, 2013 10:22 PM

    I remember faid fans thought he was better than Jamaal Charles. lol
    ———-
    We remember you running your mouth early about how good the Queefs were going to be. And we remember when you went running into your bedroom to hide before the season was half over. And now you’re back, pretending that 2-14 embarrassment never happened. You should change your handle to “chknsht”.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!