<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Urlacher&#8217;s future in Chicago unclear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilmiddle78</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2275621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lilmiddle78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 07:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2275621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Past six years or so the use of cover two in Chicago has been steady to say the least!! Opposing QBs often stay away from the middle which is supposed to be the weakness of the cover two, is it not?????? So please tell me why if Urlacher is sooooooo average then why is it that NFL Quarterbacks are going away from the weakness of the defense to avoid such an old, slow &amp; below average player?!?!?!

   Guys don&#039;t get to keep their job in the NFL just because of their name or because of what they did a few years ago!!! Ask Mr. Derek Brooks!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Past six years or so the use of cover two in Chicago has been steady to say the least!! Opposing QBs often stay away from the middle which is supposed to be the weakness of the cover two, is it not?????? So please tell me why if Urlacher is sooooooo average then why is it that NFL Quarterbacks are going away from the weakness of the defense to avoid such an old, slow &amp; below average player?!?!?!</p>
<p>   Guys don&#8217;t get to keep their job in the NFL just because of their name or because of what they did a few years ago!!! Ask Mr. Derek Brooks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryboodry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2274280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryboodry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2274280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[filthymcnasty1 says: Jan 18, 2013 2:26 PM

&quot;Urlacher deserves a shot at a championship, and that’s not going to happen in Chicago while they’re rebuilding.&quot;

For once we agree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>filthymcnasty1 says: Jan 18, 2013 2:26 PM</p>
<p>&#8220;Urlacher deserves a shot at a championship, and that’s not going to happen in Chicago while they’re rebuilding.&#8221;</p>
<p>For once we agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vegagreenleaf</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2274075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vegagreenleaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2274075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most overrated defensive player in the NFL, 13 years running.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most overrated defensive player in the NFL, 13 years running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queensnyvegas</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queensnyvegas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[when the nike uniforms  came out he did say he liked the giants blue go giants 2013 nfc east champs book it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when the nike uniforms  came out he did say he liked the giants blue go giants 2013 nfc east champs book it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filthymcnasty1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[filthymcnasty1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher deserves a shot at a championship, and that&#039;s not going to happen in Chicago while they&#039;re rebuilding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher deserves a shot at a championship, and that&#8217;s not going to happen in Chicago while they&#8217;re rebuilding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spartan822</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spartan822]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rest of the NFC North is hoping he stays with the Bears.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rest of the NFC North is hoping he stays with the Bears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chitownjeff</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chitownjeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love Urlacher.. mad respect for the man.. but when he returned the interception for a touchdown against the Titans he looked like an old slowed wounded Bear.. 

 Pep is 33.. Briggs.. 33 this year.. can&#039;t be sentimental.. we did that with the 85 crew and paid the price for it.. Phil E and Marc T have to be able to make the moves they see fit..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love Urlacher.. mad respect for the man.. but when he returned the interception for a touchdown against the Titans he looked like an old slowed wounded Bear.. </p>
<p> Pep is 33.. Briggs.. 33 this year.. can&#8217;t be sentimental.. we did that with the 85 crew and paid the price for it.. Phil E and Marc T have to be able to make the moves they see fit..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmicduster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicduster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian will be a Bear if he chooses the contract offered vs. the money grab.  I don&#039;t blame him if he walks, but he can&#039;t expect the Bears to overpay for him.  That won&#039;t change or tarnish his legacy as a Bear one bit.  The face of the franchise for the better part of a decade and one of the Mount Rushmore of Bears linebackers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian will be a Bear if he chooses the contract offered vs. the money grab.  I don&#8217;t blame him if he walks, but he can&#8217;t expect the Bears to overpay for him.  That won&#8217;t change or tarnish his legacy as a Bear one bit.  The face of the franchise for the better part of a decade and one of the Mount Rushmore of Bears linebackers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlort</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shlort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher played at half speed all season and still looked good. He is an animal on the field.

Is he about done for his career? Yeah, he is past his prime and in decline. What he offers that is priceless is his leadership. The D rallies around him. I would keep him there if I were the Bears. 

He will come cheap, as I doubt there will be much interest in him in FA. He could be a guy they put in for certain packages. They could get a couple more years of good production out of him if he shared duties. Imagine what he could do for a young guy, grooming that player to take the reigns.

It&#039;d be a huge mistake to let him walk away from the team for a peanut contact somewhere else. That is my 2 cents as an Urlacher fan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher played at half speed all season and still looked good. He is an animal on the field.</p>
<p>Is he about done for his career? Yeah, he is past his prime and in decline. What he offers that is priceless is his leadership. The D rallies around him. I would keep him there if I were the Bears. </p>
<p>He will come cheap, as I doubt there will be much interest in him in FA. He could be a guy they put in for certain packages. They could get a couple more years of good production out of him if he shared duties. Imagine what he could do for a young guy, grooming that player to take the reigns.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be a huge mistake to let him walk away from the team for a peanut contact somewhere else. That is my 2 cents as an Urlacher fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSpicoli</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JSpicoli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OAKlacher]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OAKlacher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moeman79</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moeman79]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher’s value is his knowledge of the cover 2 system, on the field shift on the D, pass coverage and tackles, he has never been used in the 3-4 ray lewis role. he can  lose a step or two and still be usefull. he has been the face of the Bears so long it is hard to think about our D without him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher’s value is his knowledge of the cover 2 system, on the field shift on the D, pass coverage and tackles, he has never been used in the 3-4 ray lewis role. he can  lose a step or two and still be usefull. he has been the face of the Bears so long it is hard to think about our D without him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filthymcnasty1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[filthymcnasty1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder is Cutler has any trade value?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder is Cutler has any trade value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themidwaymonsters</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themidwaymonsters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher&#039;s departure or retirement will hinge on 2 things:
1. Type of Defense instilled next year.
2. If he is allowed to be retained.

I feel that he&#039;ll stay IF given the option. And with an offense that should bring more points than last year, this team could authentically be a playoff contender, which might give him JUST enough hope to stay at least one more year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher&#8217;s departure or retirement will hinge on 2 things:<br />
1. Type of Defense instilled next year.<br />
2. If he is allowed to be retained.</p>
<p>I feel that he&#8217;ll stay IF given the option. And with an offense that should bring more points than last year, this team could authentically be a playoff contender, which might give him JUST enough hope to stay at least one more year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgh15212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgh15212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Steelers should sign him in an attempt to get younger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Steelers should sign him in an attempt to get younger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toooverbearing</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toooverbearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess you have to factor in what the 2013 defensive scheme is going to be, what kind of money would be required to resign him, and what the opportunity cost would be in free agency... but all things being equal I&#039;d bring him back.

First, he&#039;s still a defensive quarterback out there.  He does make plays, even with diminished skills.  He&#039;s still a good quarterback.

Second, it would help the coaching transition to have your captains in place this year.  It could keep the locker room together.  Losing Marinelli already puts the defensive cohesiveness at stake, so resigning Urlacher, even for a year, could be a boon.

If all things aren&#039;t equal and the Bears promote Hoke as DC and keep the cover-2, then I think it becomes that much more important to keep him since he&#039;s so good in covering the deep middle.  Or, if we get a 3-4 DC where we have to retool personnel completely, he may be more expendable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you have to factor in what the 2013 defensive scheme is going to be, what kind of money would be required to resign him, and what the opportunity cost would be in free agency&#8230; but all things being equal I&#8217;d bring him back.</p>
<p>First, he&#8217;s still a defensive quarterback out there.  He does make plays, even with diminished skills.  He&#8217;s still a good quarterback.</p>
<p>Second, it would help the coaching transition to have your captains in place this year.  It could keep the locker room together.  Losing Marinelli already puts the defensive cohesiveness at stake, so resigning Urlacher, even for a year, could be a boon.</p>
<p>If all things aren&#8217;t equal and the Bears promote Hoke as DC and keep the cover-2, then I think it becomes that much more important to keep him since he&#8217;s so good in covering the deep middle.  Or, if we get a 3-4 DC where we have to retool personnel completely, he may be more expendable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damadgreek</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damadgreek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, Cutler has a year on his contract.  Urlacher is a free agent. &quot;IF&quot; Emery wanted to go in a different direction it wouldn&#039;t be prudent for the new coach to say he can&#039;t wait to get his hands on the hall of fame linebacker (despite risking injury for saying such a thing)

Although Urlacher wasn&#039;t up to his own standards this year, he was still better than a large majority of linebackers in the NFL.  As far as I&#039;m concerned---He is a Bear as long as he wants, he has earned it.  

I only wished the bears would have given him a championship like he deserved.  A waste of a career.  Thanks Dick and Lovie---nice offenses you gave him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, Cutler has a year on his contract.  Urlacher is a free agent. &#8220;IF&#8221; Emery wanted to go in a different direction it wouldn&#8217;t be prudent for the new coach to say he can&#8217;t wait to get his hands on the hall of fame linebacker (despite risking injury for saying such a thing)</p>
<p>Although Urlacher wasn&#8217;t up to his own standards this year, he was still better than a large majority of linebackers in the NFL.  As far as I&#8217;m concerned&#8212;He is a Bear as long as he wants, he has earned it.  </p>
<p>I only wished the bears would have given him a championship like he deserved.  A waste of a career.  Thanks Dick and Lovie&#8212;nice offenses you gave him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stellarperformance</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stellarperformance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jqsmooth says: 
Jan 18, 2013 12:05 PM 
The 49ers are Gold, the Fighting Irish is Gold. The Packers are NOT gold. It is hi-yellow, for as “smart” as Packers fans think they are, they still can’t get one simple thing right.
================================

For the record and by all standardizations, the official Packer colors are 5535C Green and 1235C Gold. 

I would describe the San Francisco version of gold more of a &quot;metallic beige,&quot; kind of like my grandmothers 1968 Buick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jqsmooth says:<br />
Jan 18, 2013 12:05 PM<br />
The 49ers are Gold, the Fighting Irish is Gold. The Packers are NOT gold. It is hi-yellow, for as “smart” as Packers fans think they are, they still can’t get one simple thing right.<br />
================================</p>
<p>For the record and by all standardizations, the official Packer colors are 5535C Green and 1235C Gold. </p>
<p>I would describe the San Francisco version of gold more of a &#8220;metallic beige,&#8221; kind of like my grandmothers 1968 Buick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flapjackdaddy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flapjackdaddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retire if you&#039;re let go. What do you have left to prove?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retire if you&#8217;re let go. What do you have left to prove?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jqsmooth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jqsmooth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green &amp; Gold would fit him well, he may be over the hill but he’s still better than hawk

--------------------------------------------
The 49ers are Gold, the Fighting Irish is Gold. The Packers are NOT gold. It is hi-yellow, for as &quot;smart&quot; as Packers fans think they are, they still can&#039;t get one simple thing right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green &amp; Gold would fit him well, he may be over the hill but he’s still better than hawk</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
The 49ers are Gold, the Fighting Irish is Gold. The Packers are NOT gold. It is hi-yellow, for as &#8220;smart&#8221; as Packers fans think they are, they still can&#8217;t get one simple thing right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jutts</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jutts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s all about the money.  Urlacher has clearly lost a step or two,  but still a great leader.   The guy wants to be paid like he was 25 not 35.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about the money.  Urlacher has clearly lost a step or two,  but still a great leader.   The guy wants to be paid like he was 25 not 35.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinFan68</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FinFan68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s pretty clear he believes that Urlacher will NOT be a Bear next season.  He said &quot;has meant&quot; rather than means.  Sad to see but it seems Brian Urlacher will be playing football for another team or retiring this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty clear he believes that Urlacher will NOT be a Bear next season.  He said &#8220;has meant&#8221; rather than means.  Sad to see but it seems Brian Urlacher will be playing football for another team or retiring this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjzaky</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mjzaky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how Urlacher would do running Perry Fewell&#039;s defense in East Rutherford? Chase Blackburn is not a starter in this league, and Herzlich was not ready as of the end of this season. Who better to teach him and transition the Giants into the Herzlich era than Urlacher?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Urlacher would do running Perry Fewell&#8217;s defense in East Rutherford? Chase Blackburn is not a starter in this league, and Herzlich was not ready as of the end of this season. Who better to teach him and transition the Giants into the Herzlich era than Urlacher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregalynch</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gregalynch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems like jumping to conclusions a little.  There&#039;s a key difference between Urlacher and Cutler that would explain why he&#039;s willing to talk about coaching the one and not the other  -- Cutler is under contract for next season and Urlacher isn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like jumping to conclusions a little.  There&#8217;s a key difference between Urlacher and Cutler that would explain why he&#8217;s willing to talk about coaching the one and not the other  &#8212; Cutler is under contract for next season and Urlacher isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canesfan56</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[canesfan56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always been a fan of Brian&#039;s. Unfortunately nobody can outrun father time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been a fan of Brian&#8217;s. Unfortunately nobody can outrun father time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfatconservative</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bfatconservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dude needs to retire and make the same amount of money doing commercials in the Chicago area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dude needs to retire and make the same amount of money doing commercials in the Chicago area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgava19</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jgava19]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading articles that Colts may be very much interested in him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading articles that Colts may be very much interested in him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leovsmith</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leovsmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Packers Fan/Owner it has been good to see Brian&#039;s playing days decrease due to injury and age. I would just as soon da bears keep him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Packers Fan/Owner it has been good to see Brian&#8217;s playing days decrease due to injury and age. I would just as soon da bears keep him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randolph32</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randolph32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t think Phil is making the call on Urlacher?  With help from whomever is hired for DC?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t think Phil is making the call on Urlacher?  With help from whomever is hired for DC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jphavig</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jphavig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come to Oakland (at the right price).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to Oakland (at the right price).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackandbluedivision</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/18/brian-urlachers-future-in-chicago-unclear/#comment-2273083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackandbluedivision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1647517#comment-2273083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tylerchristopher says:
Jan 18, 2013 11:26 AM
An aging and slow Urlacher is still an above average MLB. He’s also the leader of a top 5 defense. Bringing him back in no way hurts the team.
_____________________________

Not really. He&#039;s not above average. He&#039;s in all reality playing average. If you  ever watch a game. You saw guys like Lynch and A. Foster avoid running to the outside and run straight up the middle, towards Urlacher and get big gains. I&#039;ve seen Urlacher get out of position more times than he&#039;s made tackles. 

If he wants to lead, he can be a linebackers coach. But, we need an upgrade at the position. I&#039;ve seen him get blocked too many times and be a liability in coverage. 

You&#039;re letting his reputation cloud your judgement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tylerchristopher says:<br />
Jan 18, 2013 11:26 AM<br />
An aging and slow Urlacher is still an above average MLB. He’s also the leader of a top 5 defense. Bringing him back in no way hurts the team.<br />
_____________________________</p>
<p>Not really. He&#8217;s not above average. He&#8217;s in all reality playing average. If you  ever watch a game. You saw guys like Lynch and A. Foster avoid running to the outside and run straight up the middle, towards Urlacher and get big gains. I&#8217;ve seen Urlacher get out of position more times than he&#8217;s made tackles. </p>
<p>If he wants to lead, he can be a linebackers coach. But, we need an upgrade at the position. I&#8217;ve seen him get blocked too many times and be a liability in coverage. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re letting his reputation cloud your judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
