http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/22/proposed-coordinator-expansion-of-rooney-rule-wouldnt-apply-to-new-head-coaches/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:05:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/22/proposed-coordinator-expansion-of-rooney-rule-wouldnt-apply-to-new-head-coaches/#comment-2286359 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:45:19 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1659169#comment-2286359 I can see how this once would have been beneficial….. But now, when “everyone is created equal”…. Think it is tome to abandon and just hire best person for job.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/22/proposed-coordinator-expansion-of-rooney-rule-wouldnt-apply-to-new-head-coaches/#comment-2285909 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:56:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1659169#comment-2285909 The Rooney Rule is stupid to begin with, so any proposed expansion will only increase the stupidity.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/22/proposed-coordinator-expansion-of-rooney-rule-wouldnt-apply-to-new-head-coaches/#comment-2284708 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:36:17 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1659169#comment-2284708 If even the expansion proponents want an exception and that exception will make the expanded rule almost pointless, shouldn’t that tell you something about the idea in the first place?

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/22/proposed-coordinator-expansion-of-rooney-rule-wouldnt-apply-to-new-head-coaches/#comment-2284704 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:35:20 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1659169#comment-2284704 It’s getting old.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/22/proposed-coordinator-expansion-of-rooney-rule-wouldnt-apply-to-new-head-coaches/#comment-2284699 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:34:36 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1659169#comment-2284699 All hires. Scouts, strength and conditioning coaches, office staff, guys with the water bottles. Everyone, why not?

]]>