Comments on: Report: Eagles have “no plans to trade” Nick Foles

By: hor2012

hor2012 — Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:19:26 +0000

I think he’s going to be traded. He jus doesn’t fit the system Kelly wants to run. Now, I’m a Saints fan. But, I’d love to see him come and back up Drew for a few years and when the time comes hand him the keys to the car. I watched in a couple of games. And, I believe that if he would have be the starting the entire year he would have put up some wow numbers. He has a presence about him the put in mind of Roger
Starbauch. And, I’m being totally serious. I think he’s going to be a special player. And

By: mojosmagic

mojosmagic — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:17:52 +0000

I would trade Foles for a 3rd rounder then sign Tebow.

By: thraiderskin

thraiderskin — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:12:30 +0000

Might as well keep Foles for the next Head Coach to evaluate.

By: greymares

greymares — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:12:01 +0000

Nick Foles doubters his small window of work (6 starts) were better than the likes of Eli Manning, Drew Brees, Jay Cutler, Phillip Rivers and Sam Bradford’s first 6 and I’M sure there were many others. I’m not ready to let this guy go to run a gimmick offense.

By: radrhatr

radrhatr — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:06:46 +0000

The Eagles need o-linemen. The Chiefs want Foles. Swap first round picks. The Eagles get Joekel and the Chiefs get Foles and Jarvis Jones with the 4th pick.

By: jessethegreat

jessethegreat — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:31:48 +0000

Report, “none of the other 31 teams believe foles has any potential worth trading for”.

By: justintuckrule

justintuckrule — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:31:46 +0000

I must say that is one dream lineup of qbs. I wouldn’t expect nothing less from the dream team!

By: smalltownqb

smalltownqb — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:26:39 +0000

Posturing. Chances are the Iggles knew this was coming (if it really did). Andy should not think he is immune to the fleecing this organization has become known for.

By: 16x8equal49ers

16x8equal49ers — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:09:36 +0000

“Eagles fleece Reid for a quarterback” Would be an ironic future headline.

By: dallascowboysdishingthereal

dallascowboysdishingthereal — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:03:17 +0000

Kelly’s college offense will feature a QB that can run the ball which leaves Foles out of the picture. And Vick has a lot of mileage so he will not hold up in the offense.

Good luck with that offense Eagles.

By: ez0682

ez0682 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:40:27 +0000

God please trade these fool i cant stand him over hyped fool n y is everybody saying this kid played good… what r u talking bout did u c the games last year picks fumbles ect open ur eyes

By: smokingto

smokingto — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:36:15 +0000

They say they have no plans, what they didn’t say is they are NOT trading Nick Foles.

By: kwickett85

kwickett85 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:34:32 +0000

“mackcarrington says: Feb 15, 2013 12:44 AM

Trent Edwards has done a nice job of staying in the league long enough to qualify for the minimum NFL pension. That’s better than J.P. Losman has done.”

—————————

Losman lasted 8 years. Edwards has made it 6… he won’t last much longer after the Eagles cut him.

By: kmatic1

kmatic1 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:22:35 +0000

Andy,Andy,Andy,..Reid saw this as an opportunity because of the Dixon deal to stir the pot….He’s a little bitter and taking shots..

By: EJ

EJ — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:22:08 +0000

This 2012 class of Quarterbacks is one of the most promising looking groups since Marino, Elway, Kelly and O’Brien in 1983. Before the draft most scouts and Draft guru’s were saying that besides Luck and Griffin, the QB class wasn’t very strong. Boy were they wrong!

By: mbhockey13

mbhockey13 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:17:14 +0000

As a Bills fan, I’m like “um, you really think they are going to make a trade to make room to keep Trent Edwards?”

By: bobbybudnick

bobbybudnick — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:03:40 +0000

Who needs him? — We now have a QB with two superbowl rings in …dennis…..dixon…..

By: coys10

coys10 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:29:00 +0000

For a team that has not won a playoff game since 2008, and have only won 3 playoff games since 04, they get a lot of attention. Why is every off season filled with the Eagles made the greatest move since the Hershel Walker trade, and every season seem to be how they have failed to reach their objectives.

By: allday28mvp

allday28mvp — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:06:26 +0000

kelly is looking like a one and done

By: greymares

greymares — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:32:23 +0000

It also doesn’t make sense to trade your BEST quarterback either

By: nitro276

nitro276 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:28:57 +0000

As an Eagles fan, it is frustrating that Nick Foles seems to be being pushed right out of the starting job in Philly because he “doesn’t fit the system.” Running, gadget QBs don’t win championships. But, big-body QBs like Manning(s), Brady, Roethlisberger, and Flacco do.

By: nesby2

nesby2 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:15:59 +0000

This has Matt Cassel written all over it.. Stay away from Foles for those who think he’s the 2nd coming of Tom Brady I say “Buyer Beware”.. The kid has tons of hype from Philly fans due to their unjust hatred for Vick or anybody else for that matter that plays for this POS franchise. Philly always roots for the unknown underdog don’t drink the kool-aid & regret the obvious next year.

By: reidstinks

reidstinks — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:15:38 +0000

If Reid offers the 1st pick in the 2nd round – which Reid is dumb enough to do – the Eagles better trade Foles.

By: ncs115

ncs115 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:14:32 +0000

Foles already has his bags packed. This sucks that we have to get rid of the best quarterback on our roster because this inept coach has to run his inept system. This Chip Kelly project is such a disaster and training camp hasn’t even started yet.

By: tmatic74

tmatic74 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:48:06 +0000

Translation we want a 2nd round pick for Foles.

By: eaglesfanalways

eaglesfanalways — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:08:05 +0000

I have at all been impressed by Kelly’s move to date…I guess not having NFL experience does make a difference. Keep Foles because you can’t depend on Vick and Dixon is worthless as a backup.

By: benroethlisberger7

benroethlisberger7 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:57:59 +0000

I don’t think anyone has plans to trade for him either.

By: tjadeterborg

tjadeterborg — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:05:26 +0000

This used to mean “Eagles 100% certain to trade Nick Foles” in the AR days. Not sure how to interpret it now..

By: MTLighthouse69

MTLighthouse69 — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:22:54 +0000

Given Vick’s injury history, keeping Foles around shouldn’t surprise anyone.

What is surprising, is that the Eagles decided to bring Vick back.

By: attyken

attyken — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:22:53 +0000

Another Eagles quarterback trade. However, this one would be interesting to see who gets screwed this time. AR usually does the screwing for the Eagles. Would the Eagles come out on top against AR?