<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nate Burleson wants Reggie Bush in Detroit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dab415217</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2343374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dab415217]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2343374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bush had a nice 2 years in Miami. NICE. Not great. Its a mere technicality, but he didn&#039;t post two 1000 yard seasons here. He fell just short this year.

The problem? When Bush is on the field for the first 2 downs trying to be THE guy, he ends up waving himself off the field on 3rd down way too many times which, I believe, helped account for his paltry receiving production. If you want him on the field on 3rd down, he&#039;s going to have to be willing to give up a good chunk of those rushing yards. Is HE willing to do that? I don&#039;t think so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bush had a nice 2 years in Miami. NICE. Not great. Its a mere technicality, but he didn&#8217;t post two 1000 yard seasons here. He fell just short this year.</p>
<p>The problem? When Bush is on the field for the first 2 downs trying to be THE guy, he ends up waving himself off the field on 3rd down way too many times which, I believe, helped account for his paltry receiving production. If you want him on the field on 3rd down, he&#8217;s going to have to be willing to give up a good chunk of those rushing yards. Is HE willing to do that? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manilovethepftcensors</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2343031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manilovethepftcensors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2343031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purpleguy-since you can type I have to assume that you can also read. If I&#039;m correct about this it shouldn&#039;t be too hard for you to figure out that Burleson was doing an interview on the NFL network. Therefore Detroit reporters have absolutely nothing to do with it and since he was the only Lions player being interviewed he would be the only player from whom a quote would be available.
You seem very obsessed with Burleson and his media interviews for some strange reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purpleguy-since you can type I have to assume that you can also read. If I&#8217;m correct about this it shouldn&#8217;t be too hard for you to figure out that Burleson was doing an interview on the NFL network. Therefore Detroit reporters have absolutely nothing to do with it and since he was the only Lions player being interviewed he would be the only player from whom a quote would be available.<br />
You seem very obsessed with Burleson and his media interviews for some strange reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbmickey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gbmickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no way the Lions can afford what he wants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way the Lions can afford what he wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerbackernj</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerbackernj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reggie will be out by week 2 like their other top 2 injury prone running backs leshoure and best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reggie will be out by week 2 like their other top 2 injury prone running backs leshoure and best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleguy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is Nate Burleson the only player that ever seems to be quoted for the Lions?  Are the other players hiding or are Detroit reporters just lazily contacting the one player whose lips are always flapping?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Nate Burleson the only player that ever seems to be quoted for the Lions?  Are the other players hiding or are Detroit reporters just lazily contacting the one player whose lips are always flapping?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lionshawk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lionshawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BEST to BUSH.....cut Jahvid and give Reggie #44 so I can make two letter changes and salvage my jersey!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEST to BUSH&#8230;..cut Jahvid and give Reggie #44 so I can make two letter changes and salvage my jersey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thejuddstir</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thejuddstir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burleson might want to be careful what he wishes for.....Bush might take his spot on the roster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burleson might want to be careful what he wishes for&#8230;..Bush might take his spot on the roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nothinbutathang</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nothinbutathang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush is not a full time RB. Proved that in New Orleans and Miami. Saints got better use out of Darren Sproles, cost them less, got just as much output.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is not a full time RB. Proved that in New Orleans and Miami. Saints got better use out of Darren Sproles, cost them less, got just as much output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studio26seattle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[studio26seattle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does Javid Best think about this endorsement?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Javid Best think about this endorsement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksiner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ksiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s funny, from South Beach and Kardashians to the bankrupt slums of Detroit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny, from South Beach and Kardashians to the bankrupt slums of Detroit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelardi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No idea why the Dolphins would let him go, which it looks like they are going to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea why the Dolphins would let him go, which it looks like they are going to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgwelsh1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lgwelsh1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There isn&#039;t a more perfect fit than Detroit for Bush.

He would give Stafford the screen game and make life in the pocket a lot easier knowing Bush is right there if he needs to dump it off in a hurry.

Prediction&quot; 1500 yards rushing and receiving for Bush in 2013 if he goes to Detroit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t a more perfect fit than Detroit for Bush.</p>
<p>He would give Stafford the screen game and make life in the pocket a lot easier knowing Bush is right there if he needs to dump it off in a hurry.</p>
<p>Prediction&#8221; 1500 yards rushing and receiving for Bush in 2013 if he goes to Detroit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blitzinc43</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blitzinc43]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These guys need to sign Houston and Delmas before thinking about upgrading the RB position with such a high-salaried player. Furthermore, they need to add to the Secondary with some solid and dependable veterans or else they&#039;ll continue to lose games 60-57]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys need to sign Houston and Delmas before thinking about upgrading the RB position with such a high-salaried player. Furthermore, they need to add to the Secondary with some solid and dependable veterans or else they&#8217;ll continue to lose games 60-57</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cags777</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cags777]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Vikings fan, I like this move. It keeps our entire division competitive. I only hope Packers and Bears fans feel the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Vikings fan, I like this move. It keeps our entire division competitive. I only hope Packers and Bears fans feel the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0ffsides</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[0ffsides]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come to Motown Reggie!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to Motown Reggie!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kgun80</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kgun80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a bad idea... If this team had a running game they would be dangerous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad idea&#8230; If this team had a running game they would be dangerous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrismgillis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrismgillis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. He is a fast and capable HB. He could get some attention off CJ once in awhile and open up a lot offensively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. He is a fast and capable HB. He could get some attention off CJ once in awhile and open up a lot offensively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meytonpanning</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meytonpanning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t think of a better RB for them. I&#039;d still hang on to a few backups cause Bush has been known to be injury prone. 

I also see no reason why the Lions shouldn&#039;t draft at least 2 offensive linemen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t think of a better RB for them. I&#8217;d still hang on to a few backups cause Bush has been known to be injury prone. </p>
<p>I also see no reason why the Lions shouldn&#8217;t draft at least 2 offensive linemen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler4richardson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyler4richardson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the attention that Johnson and Pettigrew can get from linebackers and corners, signing Reggie Bush might be a genius move and make their screen game one of the leagues best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the attention that Johnson and Pettigrew can get from linebackers and corners, signing Reggie Bush might be a genius move and make their screen game one of the leagues best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatesycophants</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hatesycophants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like it. I like it a lot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. I like it a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coltzfan166</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coltzfan166]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt the feeling is mutual.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the feeling is mutual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noeffinway</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/18/nate-burleson-wants-reggie-bush-in-detroit/#comment-2342685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noeffinway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1740860#comment-2342685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before you all start yelling &quot;tampering&quot;.....a player CAN talk about or to any other player on any team without it being considered tampering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you all start yelling &#8220;tampering&#8221;&#8230;..a player CAN talk about or to any other player on any team without it being considered tampering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
