<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Jones: Packers can have three 1,000-yard receivers in 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2347987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2347987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gravy says:
Feb 20, 2013 10:40 AM
&quot;The Packers are unstoppable if we can find someone to coach up the O-line to average. MM better decide whether he wants to protect the best QB in the game or, the incompetent James Campen whose O-lines have been at the bottom of the NFL for six years. according to the numbers at Football Outsiders. Rodgers was flat-out beat up this year. If there’s no improvement on the O-line, he’ll be lucky to get through next season.&quot;
------------------------------------------------
Name me another oline that managed to be great when both starting offensive tackles go on IR and are replaced with Newhouse (backup guard) and Barclay (backup guard) ... The guy has been coaching up late round/or undrafted players to play pretty decent in the NFL, our oline was actually 13th in pass blocking efficiency last year (football focus) - give the guy his starting oline guys to work with and tell Rodgers to learn to throw it away if nothings there and you&#039;ll see the sack numbers go down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravy says:<br />
Feb 20, 2013 10:40 AM<br />
&#8220;The Packers are unstoppable if we can find someone to coach up the O-line to average. MM better decide whether he wants to protect the best QB in the game or, the incompetent James Campen whose O-lines have been at the bottom of the NFL for six years. according to the numbers at Football Outsiders. Rodgers was flat-out beat up this year. If there’s no improvement on the O-line, he’ll be lucky to get through next season.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Name me another oline that managed to be great when both starting offensive tackles go on IR and are replaced with Newhouse (backup guard) and Barclay (backup guard) &#8230; The guy has been coaching up late round/or undrafted players to play pretty decent in the NFL, our oline was actually 13th in pass blocking efficiency last year (football focus) &#8211; give the guy his starting oline guys to work with and tell Rodgers to learn to throw it away if nothings there and you&#8217;ll see the sack numbers go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryboodry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2347102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryboodry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2347102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purplepunisher says: Feb 20, 2013 2:32 PM

&quot;The Packers have the best QB in the NFL and good WR tandem, the rest of the team blows.&quot;

(Agreed.)

&quot;2013 record 9-7, good for 2nd place in the NFC North.&quot;

(Thus leaving your team in 3rd., just ahead of Detroit.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purplepunisher says: Feb 20, 2013 2:32 PM</p>
<p>&#8220;The Packers have the best QB in the NFL and good WR tandem, the rest of the team blows.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Agreed.)</p>
<p>&#8220;2013 record 9-7, good for 2nd place in the NFC North.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Thus leaving your team in 3rd., just ahead of Detroit.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deltaoracle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2346465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deltaoracle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2346465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Bishop and Bulaga come back OK and the Packers find one big hitter at LB and another at S, all of a sudden the Packers will be plenty &quot;tough enough.&quot;
And Mini will yet again be saying &quot;Wait &#039;til next year.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bishop and Bulaga come back OK and the Packers find one big hitter at LB and another at S, all of a sudden the Packers will be plenty &#8220;tough enough.&#8221;<br />
And Mini will yet again be saying &#8220;Wait &#8217;til next year.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplepunisher</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2346309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purplepunisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2346309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Packers have the best QB in the NFL and good WR tandem, the rest of the team blows.  

2013 record 9-7, good for 2nd place in the NFC North.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Packers have the best QB in the NFL and good WR tandem, the rest of the team blows.  </p>
<p>2013 record 9-7, good for 2nd place in the NFC North.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judsonjr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2346233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[judsonjr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2346233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate the lamers whining about being &quot;tougher&quot;.    

The game is basically:

- Don&#039;t turn the ball over
- Make the other team turn the ball over
- Don&#039;t give up big plays
- Don&#039;t make mental mistakes

&quot;Tougher&quot; is what the talking heads come up when a team with a conservative or non-high power offense wins a game.    

Example, everyone remembers Brandon Jacobs trucking over  Charles Woodson.  However, everyone forgets that play was only for a marginal gain, and the Giants really didn&#039;t run the ball well in that game.  

Additionally everyone forgets about how the &quot;tough&quot; Ravens used to be the &quot;undisciplined&quot; Ravens when the officials decide to call the game tight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate the lamers whining about being &#8220;tougher&#8221;.    </p>
<p>The game is basically:</p>
<p>- Don&#8217;t turn the ball over<br />
- Make the other team turn the ball over<br />
- Don&#8217;t give up big plays<br />
- Don&#8217;t make mental mistakes</p>
<p>&#8220;Tougher&#8221; is what the talking heads come up when a team with a conservative or non-high power offense wins a game.    </p>
<p>Example, everyone remembers Brandon Jacobs trucking over  Charles Woodson.  However, everyone forgets that play was only for a marginal gain, and the Giants really didn&#8217;t run the ball well in that game.  </p>
<p>Additionally everyone forgets about how the &#8220;tough&#8221; Ravens used to be the &#8220;undisciplined&#8221; Ravens when the officials decide to call the game tight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bangithard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2346200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bangithard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2346200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The window is closed.

Rodgers career will look very similar to #4&#039;s when this is all done.

The Packers simply DO not want to spend on free agents. My case:

in the 90&#039;s the Pack went and got Reggie - 2 trips to the big game

in the 2000&#039;s, Woodson came to town - 1 trip to the dance

Both these  players made an impact, both put them over the top. the formula to WIN in the NFL is draft well and SUPPLEMENT your roster with a DIFFERENCE MAKER in Free Agency.

Thompson has not been active in Free Agency in 4 years and now is depleted of impact players!

Very simple formula (haha)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The window is closed.</p>
<p>Rodgers career will look very similar to #4&#8242;s when this is all done.</p>
<p>The Packers simply DO not want to spend on free agents. My case:</p>
<p>in the 90&#8242;s the Pack went and got Reggie &#8211; 2 trips to the big game</p>
<p>in the 2000&#8242;s, Woodson came to town &#8211; 1 trip to the dance</p>
<p>Both these  players made an impact, both put them over the top. the formula to WIN in the NFL is draft well and SUPPLEMENT your roster with a DIFFERENCE MAKER in Free Agency.</p>
<p>Thompson has not been active in Free Agency in 4 years and now is depleted of impact players!</p>
<p>Very simple formula (haha)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBeachBall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigBeachBall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rodgers could turn me and you into 1000 yard recievers in the nfl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodgers could turn me and you into 1000 yard recievers in the nfl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packmangamble</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packmangamble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look for the Packers to pickup a WR in the early rounds of the draft.  They seem to have a knack of being successful with those kinds of picks, i.e., Cobb and Nelson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look for the Packers to pickup a WR in the early rounds of the draft.  They seem to have a knack of being successful with those kinds of picks, i.e., Cobb and Nelson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gravy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Packers are unstoppable if we can find someone to coach up the O-line to average.  MM better decide whether he wants to protect the best QB in the game or, the incompetent James Campen whose O-lines have been at the bottom of the NFL for six years. according to the numbers at Football Outsiders. Rodgers was flat-out beat up this year.  If there&#039;s no improvement on the O-line, he&#039;ll be lucky to get through next season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Packers are unstoppable if we can find someone to coach up the O-line to average.  MM better decide whether he wants to protect the best QB in the game or, the incompetent James Campen whose O-lines have been at the bottom of the NFL for six years. according to the numbers at Football Outsiders. Rodgers was flat-out beat up this year.  If there&#8217;s no improvement on the O-line, he&#8217;ll be lucky to get through next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beedubyatoo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beedubyatoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He didn&#039;t mention Jermichael Finley.  If you combine the catches he will make, plus the balls he&#039;ll drop, voila, 1000 yards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#8217;t mention Jermichael Finley.  If you combine the catches he will make, plus the balls he&#8217;ll drop, voila, 1000 yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkostela</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bkostela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jones has turned from a drop-machine into a very reliable receiver. but i don&#039;t see the trio getting 1,000 each since jordy cant stay on the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jones has turned from a drop-machine into a very reliable receiver. but i don&#8217;t see the trio getting 1,000 each since jordy cant stay on the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampats</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ampats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Jones whined on NFLN how he doesn&#039;t like to play in the cold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Jones whined on NFLN how he doesn&#8217;t like to play in the cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beardinals</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beardinals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They could all probably have 1500 if they didn&#039;t drop so many perfectly thrown passes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could all probably have 1500 if they didn&#8217;t drop so many perfectly thrown passes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packman331</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packman331]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This does not address the biggest problem. This team needs to get tougher and more physical. I hope that is the primary focus of offseason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not address the biggest problem. This team needs to get tougher and more physical. I hope that is the primary focus of offseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpiotr01</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpiotr01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I give Jones a ton of credit for working hard and staying focused over his career, and I hope to see him continue to improve and produce and stay with GB for a long time.

However, when contract time comes around, he would do well to remember the guy throwing him the ball when making his list of demands. He wouldn&#039;t be the first Packer WR in the past 20 years to forget to do so, but he would do well to remember it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Jones a ton of credit for working hard and staying focused over his career, and I hope to see him continue to improve and produce and stay with GB for a long time.</p>
<p>However, when contract time comes around, he would do well to remember the guy throwing him the ball when making his list of demands. He wouldn&#8217;t be the first Packer WR in the past 20 years to forget to do so, but he would do well to remember it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frogmantm</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frogmantm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They could also have zero if they can&#039;t keep AR upright...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could also have zero if they can&#8217;t keep AR upright&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killface4prez</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killface4prez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;ll probably have three receivers go over 1000 yards apiece, and three running backs combine for 1000 yards total.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll probably have three receivers go over 1000 yards apiece, and three running backs combine for 1000 yards total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glac1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glac1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the fun began.... if we can keep Rodgers upright! A healthy line with more depth and a featured back will make this offense dynamic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the fun began&#8230;. if we can keep Rodgers upright! A healthy line with more depth and a featured back will make this offense dynamic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhein23</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/20/james-jones-packers-can-have-three-1000-yard-receivers-in-2013/#comment-2345720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jhein23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1746134#comment-2345720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Randall Cobb and Jordy Nelson can have a 1,000 yards next season but for some reason I only see James Jones in the 800 yd area unless Jordy&#039;s hurt again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Randall Cobb and Jordy Nelson can have a 1,000 yards next season but for some reason I only see James Jones in the 800 yd area unless Jordy&#8217;s hurt again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
