http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Tue, 21 May 2013 22:31:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2353891 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:38:45 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2353891 This pisses me off now you want to be a wide-out to make more money. You came in as a tight end and never complained. Why don’t you produce like a wide-out.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2353135 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:32:08 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2353135 Has he ever sat in a WR meeting, once? Is he listed as a WR or even TE/WR on the depth chart? Just because he’s split out doesn’t automatically qualify the “position” as a WR. They could have easily done the same with any other TE.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352956 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:30:55 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352956 They don’t utilize him to his full potential. I don’t want to lose him, but if he wants WR money, let him walk. Use that money for o-line and defense. Craig Stevens has stepped up his receiving, anyway.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352664 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:32:59 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352664 He’s probably pressing to be tagged as a WR so the Titans don’t tag him.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352483 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:49:29 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352483 He’s not worth it if they franchise him as a WR. Cut him and draft the many talented TE’s in this years draft.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352434 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:20:40 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352434 Titans should argue they would like to keep him in as a TE he sucks at blocking so bad they have no choice but to split him out. He also he drops more balls than a class of 5th graders going through puberty as a Titans fan if he gets his way I’d let him go he’s too much of a baby for me

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352420 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:11:40 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352420 Hope it works out, he is one of the best players we have on either side of the ball.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352416 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:10:58 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352416 So he wants to be paid as the 3rd wr instead of 1st string te?

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352405 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:04:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352405 Tight Ends have to block. I’d switch if I could too.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/24/jared-cook-has-a-strong-case-for-receiver-designation/#comment-2352401 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:03:49 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1765431#comment-2352401 Well now, if he’s a true WR, then his fantasy value just went down!

]]>