<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cap could now be above $123 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vernonbasketball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vernonbasketball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[then the jets have a little more room thank god]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then the jets have a little more room thank god</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kidcreatine</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kidcreatine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Musicman495
 
Except the cap deals with the overall spending not the individual contracts. Individual league approval does not constitute a free pass to outspend the rest of the league, nice try.
 
-------------------------------------------------------

Individual contracts make up the overall cap.  When it is a UNcap year, every team can spend any amount they want.  That why is was call an UNCAPPED year which was put in place from the last CBA.

john mara colluted with other owners.  Do you know what collusion mean??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Musicman495</p>
<p>Except the cap deals with the overall spending not the individual contracts. Individual league approval does not constitute a free pass to outspend the rest of the league, nice try.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Individual contracts make up the overall cap.  When it is a UNcap year, every team can spend any amount they want.  That why is was call an UNCAPPED year which was put in place from the last CBA.</p>
<p>john mara colluted with other owners.  Do you know what collusion mean??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belgaron</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belgaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Musicman495

Except the cap deals with the overall spending not the individual contracts. Individual league approval does not constitute a free pass to outspend the rest of the league, nice try.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Musicman495</p>
<p>Except the cap deals with the overall spending not the individual contracts. Individual league approval does not constitute a free pass to outspend the rest of the league, nice try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegenoatkinsdiet</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thegenoatkinsdiet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$124M? Do I hear $124M?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$124M? Do I hear $124M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musicman495</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musicman495]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[belgaron says: Feb 26, 2013 5:55 PM

In a related story, the Washington Redskins have asked if 2013 can be another uncapped year so they can “outmaneuver” the rest of the league by paying players big for one year and then spend the money again later in capped years. Oh, and if they aren’t allowed, they will sue.
-------------------------
Very clever.  If it weren&#039;t that the owner&#039;s colluded to cap salaries in an uncapped year, and the league approved every contract the Redskins gave out, you&#039;d be right on the money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>belgaron says: Feb 26, 2013 5:55 PM</p>
<p>In a related story, the Washington Redskins have asked if 2013 can be another uncapped year so they can “outmaneuver” the rest of the league by paying players big for one year and then spend the money again later in capped years. Oh, and if they aren’t allowed, they will sue.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Very clever.  If it weren&#8217;t that the owner&#8217;s colluded to cap salaries in an uncapped year, and the league approved every contract the Redskins gave out, you&#8217;d be right on the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butthatmakestoomuchsense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[butthatmakestoomuchsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;tastethejace says: When the cap goes up… guess who gets passed on the expenses.&lt;/i&gt;

If you guessed &quot;no one&quot;, you&#039;re correct.

A lot of people have it backwards. The league owners charge whatever they want to charge, keep the first $2 Billion, and then allocate 50% to player salaries.

Prices do not- I repeat, do not- rise to support a salary cap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>tastethejace says: When the cap goes up… guess who gets passed on the expenses.</i></p>
<p>If you guessed &#8220;no one&#8221;, you&#8217;re correct.</p>
<p>A lot of people have it backwards. The league owners charge whatever they want to charge, keep the first $2 Billion, and then allocate 50% to player salaries.</p>
<p>Prices do not- I repeat, do not- rise to support a salary cap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j98me2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j98me2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@dennisatunity
How do you take a family of 4 to an NFL game for only $400]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dennisatunity<br />
How do you take a family of 4 to an NFL game for only $400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belgaron</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belgaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a related story, the Washington Redskins have asked if 2013 can be another uncapped year so they can &quot;outmaneuver&quot; the rest of the league by paying players big for one year and then spend the money again later in capped years. Oh, and if they aren&#039;t allowed, they will sue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a related story, the Washington Redskins have asked if 2013 can be another uncapped year so they can &#8220;outmaneuver&#8221; the rest of the league by paying players big for one year and then spend the money again later in capped years. Oh, and if they aren&#8217;t allowed, they will sue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darknessspreads</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darknessspreads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@dennisatunity

I agree with you in spirit, but personally, I don&#039;t like to think of it as &quot;billionaire owners and millionaire players.&quot;

I like to think of it like so:

&quot;Workers who have busted their asses to get this opportunity, who place their health on the line to entertain us, and who are the actual reason that I cut on my TV and watch the NFL&quot; 

VS.

&quot;Suits that are completely interchangeable because there will always be someone ready and willing to own one of the biggest cash cows in the known universe, an NFL team, waiting in the wings to replace them&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dennisatunity</p>
<p>I agree with you in spirit, but personally, I don&#8217;t like to think of it as &#8220;billionaire owners and millionaire players.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like to think of it like so:</p>
<p>&#8220;Workers who have busted their asses to get this opportunity, who place their health on the line to entertain us, and who are the actual reason that I cut on my TV and watch the NFL&#8221; </p>
<p>VS.</p>
<p>&#8220;Suits that are completely interchangeable because there will always be someone ready and willing to own one of the biggest cash cows in the known universe, an NFL team, waiting in the wings to replace them&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peytonsneck18</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peytonsneck18]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Colts are sitting pretty with their freed up money]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Colts are sitting pretty with their freed up money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chawk12thman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chawk12thman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the Cap Floor?  Does it raise as well and are any teams close to that number?  Just wondering.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the Cap Floor?  Does it raise as well and are any teams close to that number?  Just wondering&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tastethejace</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tastethejace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the cap goes up... guess who gets passed on the expenses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the cap goes up&#8230; guess who gets passed on the expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrpowers88</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrpowers88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call me cynical, but...

-Could the league be leaking these increases just so that when the actual cap number is announced and isn&#039;t as high as believed, the players do what they didn&#039;t last year and oust De Smith? (Not sure about this, mainly because I&#039;m pretty sure the league loves outmaneuvering Smith at pretty much every turn.)

or

-Is the union applying the the second year of cap penalties to the Cowboys and Redskins to the rest of the league right now, so that the &quot;effective&quot; cap might be $123M for the un-penalized teams, but the &quot;actual&quot; cap -the one for a regular, 32-team league- would actually be a lower number? (More likely in my opinion.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me cynical, but&#8230;</p>
<p>-Could the league be leaking these increases just so that when the actual cap number is announced and isn&#8217;t as high as believed, the players do what they didn&#8217;t last year and oust De Smith? (Not sure about this, mainly because I&#8217;m pretty sure the league loves outmaneuvering Smith at pretty much every turn.)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>-Is the union applying the the second year of cap penalties to the Cowboys and Redskins to the rest of the league right now, so that the &#8220;effective&#8221; cap might be $123M for the un-penalized teams, but the &#8220;actual&#8221; cap -the one for a regular, 32-team league- would actually be a lower number? (More likely in my opinion.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennisatunity</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennisatunity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maximusprime107
It&#039;s not a stupid question at all. What you are doing is asking exactly the right question.  The answer comes in two parts:  First the easy answer is that the  union reps for the players agreed to it in collective bargaining.  The more complex answer is that it&#039;s an attempt to hold down the salaries that players are making.  Is it right to hold down salaries?  That answer depends on whether you support the millionaire players or the billionaire owners. (Apparently no answer supports the fans who must now put out an average of $400 a game for a family of 4 to attend a game.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maximusprime107<br />
It&#8217;s not a stupid question at all. What you are doing is asking exactly the right question.  The answer comes in two parts:  First the easy answer is that the  union reps for the players agreed to it in collective bargaining.  The more complex answer is that it&#8217;s an attempt to hold down the salaries that players are making.  Is it right to hold down salaries?  That answer depends on whether you support the millionaire players or the billionaire owners. (Apparently no answer supports the fans who must now put out an average of $400 a game for a family of 4 to attend a game.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddavis83</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ddavis83]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what? 

- Mike Brown]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what? </p>
<p>- Mike Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobymo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobymo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still wondering how John Mara got Goddell to take $18M away from the Redskins this year for not breaking any rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still wondering how John Mara got Goddell to take $18M away from the Redskins this year for not breaking any rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donnymacjack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[donnymacjack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m convined no one has a clue how much the cap will be.  One week it&#039;s up, the next it&#039;s down, then it&#039;s flat, then it&#039;s flat for the forseeable future, now it&#039;s up.  

The cap math is right up there with tax-math.  Only the rich can figure it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convined no one has a clue how much the cap will be.  One week it&#8217;s up, the next it&#8217;s down, then it&#8217;s flat, then it&#8217;s flat for the forseeable future, now it&#8217;s up.  </p>
<p>The cap math is right up there with tax-math.  Only the rich can figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nineroutsider</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nineroutsider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multi-culturalskins and Cowboys fans please remember to apply the appropriate penalty to that number to determine your true cap number...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multi-culturalskins and Cowboys fans please remember to apply the appropriate penalty to that number to determine your true cap number&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilrob10201</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lilrob10201]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that the NFL should raise the salary cap anymore,because each year if it keeps increasing before you know it every football team in the NFL will have enough salary to blow on every FA on the market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that the NFL should raise the salary cap anymore,because each year if it keeps increasing before you know it every football team in the NFL will have enough salary to blow on every FA on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakkispeed</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jakkispeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While they&#039;re at it, how about giving the Redskins and Cowboys their cap space back that they stole before that whole thing ends up in court?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they&#8217;re at it, how about giving the Redskins and Cowboys their cap space back that they stole before that whole thing ends up in court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tundey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tundey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much of the increase is the $36M stolen from the Redskins by John Mara?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of the increase is the $36M stolen from the Redskins by John Mara?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radrhatr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radrhatr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does it matter? Everyone is gonna &quot;massage&quot; the numbers to suit themselves anyway. The cap is about as real as OZ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it matter? Everyone is gonna &#8220;massage&#8221; the numbers to suit themselves anyway. The cap is about as real as OZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad504boy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chad504boy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mickey Loomis making magic happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mickey Loomis making magic happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maximusprime107</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maximusprime107]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this might be a stupid question but whatever, if almost every team has to drastically shuffle around their cap why doesn&#039;t the NFL just increase it more? lord knows they can afford to do it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this might be a stupid question but whatever, if almost every team has to drastically shuffle around their cap why doesn&#8217;t the NFL just increase it more? lord knows they can afford to do it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longhairdontcare66</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/26/cap-could-now-be-above-123-million/#comment-2356405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[longhairdontcare66]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1773394#comment-2356405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goodell must have sent his charitable donations to the NFL instead of the &quot;heads up football&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodell must have sent his charitable donations to the NFL instead of the &#8220;heads up football&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
