Bengals to tag Michael Johnson, opening a big door

AP

The Bengals had a choice to make, and they’re going to make sure they keep the pass-rusher instead of the protector.

According to multiple reports, the Bengals have chosen to use the franchise tag on defensive end Michael Johnson prior to the March 4 deadline, and not right tackle Andre Smith.

The tag on Johnson will require a one-year deal worth $11.175 million, and means they’ll have to expose Smith to the market if they can’t get a deal done between now and March 12 (which Smith has no motivation to pursue at the moment).

The moves makes sense, given the relative glut of starting-grade tackles relative to guys who can sack the quarterback.

Johnson broke through with 11.5 sacks last year, his first season in double-digits.

19 responses to “Bengals to tag Michael Johnson, opening a big door

  1. I’ve liked Michael Johnson since we drafted him but 11.5 mil is too steep. Even with our cap space. We have Geno and Dunlap due up next year and Green able to extend next year. I would like to see a front loaded Geno deal more then anything this off season

  2. Smith went from being the laugh stock of the draft, to being one of the best offensive linemen (if not THE best) to come out of that draft. So hopefully the Bengals are able to work out a deal with him.

  3. Smart move..tag has been steady and has improved every year. Smith though just had a good season. Where was he last couple of years? And oh he just got in trouble with the law at the airport. So the bengals can now negotiate with Smith and will try to get him cheap. Who knows they might let him walk

  4. bengalsstillsuck – They don’t live there.. they just work there.

    Benglas will have probably already worked out a deal with Smith (for 2/3 what he’s worth). We’ll see but they won’t pay him big bucks. Won’t happen. Only time the Bengals pay a player what he’s worth is when they use the franchise tag.

  5. You are not as wise as you think bengalsstillsuck. You gave a description of Cleveland, D. Stallworth was everything that you just said plus a murderer… B. Edwards was a drunk, atleast our draft picks in the last few years have panned out… The Cavs, Indians and Browns are hopless

  6. No my enemy the Browns are, Edwards also attacked LBJ friend while there, every anaylst laughs while speaking of Cleveland, your team also has no expectations. We are expected to have good drafts and go to the playoffs, while the Browns on the other hand are expected to draft in the top 5 and fail EVERY year!!!! FACT

  7. NFL Players Vote New England Patriots Best Franchise; Cleveland …

    Lol, Sucks to have that reputation… Please come back with something recent and not 4 years ago!!

  8. Just like i said look up sports worst franchise voted by America Bengals are number 1 im not makin it up they will give u the reasons why sorry bud but the truth hurts how bout the Bengals win a playoff game for once instead of getting blown out my worthless Browns have a more recent playoff win than the Bengals an we were out the league for 4 yrs.

  9. Dude stop speaking of the past, I put up recent facts and you did not, America wouldn’t vote us THE worst if we have constanly been in the Playoffs 3 of 4 years.

    And please stop with what your team HAS done because you guys have only had one winning season since coming back.

    As of LAST year you guys were voted by peers to be THE worse.. You’ve got the wrong Bengals fan because everytime you say something stupid on our Posts, Im going to help you remember how painful it is to be a Browns fan..

    Hold off on the banter, until you guys have ONE winning season and are among the top two in AFCN standings. LOL we have more division titles than your sorry team can dream of.

    Oh and since we’re speaking of the past, we’ve been to a Super Bowl more recently than you… Enjoy the TOILET bowl stain fan!!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!