Skip to content

Eric Wright challenging voiding of his guaranteed money


So why haven’t the Bucs cut cornerback Eric Wright, whose $7.75 million in guaranteed salary was voided by his 2012 suspension for violation the PED policy?

Because the guarantee hasn’t technically voided yet.

Per a league source, Wright has filed a grievance challenging the voiding of the guaranteed salary.  A ruling is expected Tuesday.

While the 2011 labor deal allows guaranteed money to be voided, there’s a dispute over whether the specific language in Wright’s contract accomplishes that goal.  If the Bucs win, Wright can be cut at any time before Week One of the regular season.  If Wright wins, the Bucs owe him $7.75 million.

A victory by the team could result in Wright eventually being squeezed to take less money in 2013.

The Buccaneers had no comment on the story.

Permalink 16 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Top Stories
16 Responses to “Eric Wright challenging voiding of his guaranteed money”
  1. big007hed says: Mar 11, 2013 2:15 PM

    Wow as a Bucs fan I have to say this was a colossal disaster… One of the worst signings Dominik has made.

    If the Bucs secondary wasn’t so awful I would hope he never comes back. If they get FA CB depth and draft some then he has to be gone regardless.

  2. benroethlisberger7 says: Mar 11, 2013 2:15 PM

    The Bucs are one of those teams that will always be irrelevant.

  3. bucrightoff says: Mar 11, 2013 2:18 PM

    Please God let them get out of that disaster of a contract. Mediocre CB getting paid top dollar…worst signing in recent history.

  4. 808raiderinparadise says: Mar 11, 2013 2:25 PM

    The picure caption ” Wait, Stop! dont take my money!”

  5. brownsfanincali says: Mar 11, 2013 2:27 PM

    Apparently in Wright’s case, the PED’s didn’t do a bit of good anyway… Eric ” Burnt Toast” Wright should have to pay back everything he was ever paid by the Browns, Lions, and Bucs.

  6. mwatts1 says: Mar 11, 2013 2:28 PM

    So you cheated. Earned a contract based off false results… and now you want your money? Good luck with that.

  7. connorchew says: Mar 11, 2013 2:31 PM

    that’s why they hire agents.. every dollar is precious.

  8. ezmoover says: Mar 11, 2013 2:33 PM

    Take it from a lifelong Browns fan that knows. This guy is a major loser!

  9. listerineman says: Mar 11, 2013 2:43 PM

    this guy is garbage

  10. cbreezy80 says: Mar 11, 2013 2:44 PM

    Wow what a loser, this guy is mediocre at best he had an incentive based contract and didn’t live up to it!! So why should we pay him? This guy and Talib ruined our season as bucs fans and then I’ve heard about some comment he made at a fan on twitter! I’m done with this clown and so should the bucs be, he is clearly not a buccaneer man!

  11. justintuckrule says: Mar 11, 2013 2:50 PM

    This is a terrible rule. I know everyone here thinks the NFL and its brass walk around with halos over their heads but with this type of mechanism out there, who’s to say that teams wouldn’t spike an unwanted player’s drink with banned substances, call the NFL to send their lackey drug tester to test the player and then suspend them for a few games ALL under the guise to get out from under bad contracts????

    Isn’t this something you would expect the Jets to do to get out from under the big guaranteed payment they owe Sanchez?

  12. Grinds My Gear says: Mar 11, 2013 2:53 PM

    I’m how Wright was rated at one of the better FA DB that year. Detroit’s secondary was awful with and without Wright. I read on a few forums fans of CB deprived teams thought their team should sign him, I thought what made him so special? Then I google search his name, and there he is on top of every FA list for defensive players etc. It’s like no one took time to even watch him play in Detroit or Cleveland for that matter. He’s another product of those awfully overrated players in a position deprive free agent class.

  13. whyrunbackwardsyoullvomit says: Mar 11, 2013 2:54 PM

    If he hasn’t been cut then what’s the basis for the grievance?

  14. ytownjoe says: Mar 11, 2013 3:11 PM

    The Bucs want to pay him what he’s worth which is substantially less than his contract states.

  15. time4complaints says: Mar 11, 2013 3:25 PM

    The Bucs better win the grievance hearing, otherwise the organization looks totally incompetent. Like signing this dude wasn’t bad enough to begin with….

  16. cuj0 says: Mar 11, 2013 6:36 PM

    Free agent signings fail all the time just ask the Redskins. Dominick was pretty smart to throw in the clause for failed drug tests.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!