<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broncos having &#8220;serious talks&#8221; with Wes Welker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gjeffries</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2396838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gjeffries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2396838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ijahru

Hey genius I will make this simple. It&#039;s reported that they were sending someone to steal the opponents signals before they faced them while that team was playing another team. So they knew what each signal meant before the game. Also if you have someone on your staff designated in the 1st quarter to watch and steal signals then they write them  down and between each play when the coordinator is in QB&#039;s ear he says they are sending an overload blitz here according to there signals. You act like this is impossible. It&#039;s a huge advantage. Also isn&#039;t it funny how all those close super bowl wins since then have turned into close super bowl loses without this advantage. You can&#039;t argue that bc it&#039;s how it has now played out. Without spy gate and tuck rule you have maybe 1 super bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ijahru</p>
<p>Hey genius I will make this simple. It&#8217;s reported that they were sending someone to steal the opponents signals before they faced them while that team was playing another team. So they knew what each signal meant before the game. Also if you have someone on your staff designated in the 1st quarter to watch and steal signals then they write them  down and between each play when the coordinator is in QB&#8217;s ear he says they are sending an overload blitz here according to there signals. You act like this is impossible. It&#8217;s a huge advantage. Also isn&#8217;t it funny how all those close super bowl wins since then have turned into close super bowl loses without this advantage. You can&#8217;t argue that bc it&#8217;s how it has now played out. Without spy gate and tuck rule you have maybe 1 super bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojomagician</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mojomagician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got to hire the Broncos cap genius accountant. Somehow they have signed Manning last year to 5 yrs and $96mil deal, franchised Clady which means he will make around 10 mil minimum for this upcoming season. Signed Vasquez on day 1 of free agency for around $24 mil (5 mil in &#039;13) , resigned Vickerson. Likely to sign Freeney and now Welker?? 

Not sure how that is remotely possible, but I want this guy doing my books (at least until the IRS shows up at the door)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to hire the Broncos cap genius accountant. Somehow they have signed Manning last year to 5 yrs and $96mil deal, franchised Clady which means he will make around 10 mil minimum for this upcoming season. Signed Vasquez on day 1 of free agency for around $24 mil (5 mil in &#8217;13) , resigned Vickerson. Likely to sign Freeney and now Welker?? </p>
<p>Not sure how that is remotely possible, but I want this guy doing my books (at least until the IRS shows up at the door)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rc33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think winning by 3 pts on game winning drives makes the “small advantage” a huge factor in super bowl history now doesn’t it?
-----------------------------
LMAO @ &quot;now doesn&#039;t it?&quot;
According to who?
A jamoke sitting at a keyboard. 
Got it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think winning by 3 pts on game winning drives makes the “small advantage” a huge factor in super bowl history now doesn’t it?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
LMAO @ &#8220;now doesn&#8217;t it?&#8221;<br />
According to who?<br />
A jamoke sitting at a keyboard.<br />
Got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ijahru</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ijahru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gjeffries 

So you are saying that at halftime of the Super Bowl the Patriots were able to go through 30 minutes of tape and find out what the different signals meant? Where were they able to do this, in the middle of the locker room? Don&#039;t you think league officials and security are also in the locker rooms during the Super Bowl. You are a typical hater who can&#039;t grasp what the Patriots were really doing which was using the tapes to figure out the opposing D coordinators tendencies for the next time the Patriots played them. Taping the signals gave no advantage during the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gjeffries </p>
<p>So you are saying that at halftime of the Super Bowl the Patriots were able to go through 30 minutes of tape and find out what the different signals meant? Where were they able to do this, in the middle of the locker room? Don&#8217;t you think league officials and security are also in the locker rooms during the Super Bowl. You are a typical hater who can&#8217;t grasp what the Patriots were really doing which was using the tapes to figure out the opposing D coordinators tendencies for the next time the Patriots played them. Taping the signals gave no advantage during the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBeachBall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigBeachBall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chargers
Chiefs
Broncos
Oakland]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chargers<br />
Chiefs<br />
Broncos<br />
Oakland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boogerhut</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boogerhut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[harrisonhits2 says: Mar 13, 2013 3:12 PM

Manning’s shoulder was clearly shot by halftime in the last playoff game. He’s not the QB he used to be and I doubt he’ll make it through all 16 games this season.

He did well coming back from his neck injuries but they cause him a lot more trouble then he lets on
==================================
Did he ever say he was 100% at any point in the season? His shoulder didn&#039;t lose the game. It takes a season just to get back to football shape after a big injury for anyone. Maybe you&#039;ve taken to many (nut) shots to the head to analyze anything more complex than the taste of jello.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>harrisonhits2 says: Mar 13, 2013 3:12 PM</p>
<p>Manning’s shoulder was clearly shot by halftime in the last playoff game. He’s not the QB he used to be and I doubt he’ll make it through all 16 games this season.</p>
<p>He did well coming back from his neck injuries but they cause him a lot more trouble then he lets on<br />
==================================<br />
Did he ever say he was 100% at any point in the season? His shoulder didn&#8217;t lose the game. It takes a season just to get back to football shape after a big injury for anyone. Maybe you&#8217;ve taken to many (nut) shots to the head to analyze anything more complex than the taste of jello.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gjeffries</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gjeffries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[harrisonhits2

So knowing what defense a team is calling by watching there signals, since you have been spying on them, is a small advantage? Having a good idea what play call on offense the team is looking at by watching the signals you have been taping is a small advantage? I think that&#039;s a pretty nice piece of information that gives you a good competitive advantage at the end of games especially. They won there super Bowl&#039;s by 3 pts and were last minute drives. So to me and many others that is not a small thing. Between the spygate and the &quot;tuck rule&quot; I would say that is a very suspect team to call a dynasty. You can&#039;t minimize the competitive advantage a team gets by seeing a signal and knowing exactly what blitz is coming and knowing how to attack it. Even if want to call it a small advantage (I disagree) . then look at the point differential in there super bowl wins. I think winning by 3 pts on game winning drives makes the &quot;small advantage&quot; a huge factor in super bowl history now doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>harrisonhits2</p>
<p>So knowing what defense a team is calling by watching there signals, since you have been spying on them, is a small advantage? Having a good idea what play call on offense the team is looking at by watching the signals you have been taping is a small advantage? I think that&#8217;s a pretty nice piece of information that gives you a good competitive advantage at the end of games especially. They won there super Bowl&#8217;s by 3 pts and were last minute drives. So to me and many others that is not a small thing. Between the spygate and the &#8220;tuck rule&#8221; I would say that is a very suspect team to call a dynasty. You can&#8217;t minimize the competitive advantage a team gets by seeing a signal and knowing exactly what blitz is coming and knowing how to attack it. Even if want to call it a small advantage (I disagree) . then look at the point differential in there super bowl wins. I think winning by 3 pts on game winning drives makes the &#8220;small advantage&#8221; a huge factor in super bowl history now doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azarkhan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azarkhan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wrenches2pipes says: Patriots haven’t won any SB’s with Welker. Let him go.
--

What an amazingly ignorant thing to say. Using your &quot;logic&quot;, the Dolphins should have cut Dan Marino loose long before he retired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrenches2pipes says: Patriots haven’t won any SB’s with Welker. Let him go.<br />
&#8211;</p>
<p>What an amazingly ignorant thing to say. Using your &#8220;logic&#8221;, the Dolphins should have cut Dan Marino loose long before he retired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siknutty</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siknutty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep dreaming scoops1!! Your once vaunted receiving corps is not nearly as talented as it used to be.. 

Statistically, (Thomas, Decker, and Welker; 297 rec, 3852 yds, 29 tds) had combined better stats than Green Bay&#039;s top 4 receivers (Jones, Cobb, Nelson, Finley; 255 rec, 3150 yds, 31 tds). With the exception of 2tds of course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep dreaming scoops1!! Your once vaunted receiving corps is not nearly as talented as it used to be.. </p>
<p>Statistically, (Thomas, Decker, and Welker; 297 rec, 3852 yds, 29 tds) had combined better stats than Green Bay&#8217;s top 4 receivers (Jones, Cobb, Nelson, Finley; 255 rec, 3150 yds, 31 tds). With the exception of 2tds of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotenvy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotenvy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would put ratings for the Home game against the Broncos through the roof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would put ratings for the Home game against the Broncos through the roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyballgame7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyballgame7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if Manning&#039;s arm isn&#039;t as strong, as some doctors on this site report (same doctors that said he wouldn&#039;t last two games last year), then he can dump the ball to Welker.   The dude tears it up every game.  Can&#039;t wait for the Pat&#039;s vs Broncos Monday night game this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if Manning&#8217;s arm isn&#8217;t as strong, as some doctors on this site report (same doctors that said he wouldn&#8217;t last two games last year), then he can dump the ball to Welker.   The dude tears it up every game.  Can&#8217;t wait for the Pat&#8217;s vs Broncos Monday night game this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harrisonhits2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harrisonhits2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;gjeffries says:
Mar 13, 2013 3:19 PM
wrenches2pipes
They also have not won a super bowl since they were not allowed to spy.&quot;

Fine to criticize but at least know what you&#039;re talking about.

All teams can spy.  There is no nfl rule prohibiting the spying out of other team&#039;s signals.  All coaches keep track of other team&#039;s signals.

There was a rule inserted prior to the 2007 season that made it illegal to shoot video from the sidelines that the Pats broke.  Yes the taping made collating the information regarding other team&#039;s signals easier.  No, it was not a magic telepathic system that gave them some massive advantage that the tinfoil hat and propellor beanie crowd seem to think it was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;gjeffries says:<br />
Mar 13, 2013 3:19 PM<br />
wrenches2pipes<br />
They also have not won a super bowl since they were not allowed to spy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fine to criticize but at least know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>All teams can spy.  There is no nfl rule prohibiting the spying out of other team&#8217;s signals.  All coaches keep track of other team&#8217;s signals.</p>
<p>There was a rule inserted prior to the 2007 season that made it illegal to shoot video from the sidelines that the Pats broke.  Yes the taping made collating the information regarding other team&#8217;s signals easier.  No, it was not a magic telepathic system that gave them some massive advantage that the tinfoil hat and propellor beanie crowd seem to think it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrenches2pipes</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wrenches2pipes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welker 6yds. fall down. Welker 6yds. fall down. Welker 6yds. fall down. Repeat 8 or 9 times a game. Pats ahead by with 7 minutes left. Opponent scores 3 TD&#039;s to tie game. Pats kick field goal and win game in regular season. Repeat 17 times. Playoffs .... Pats looooose. Repeat this 9 years in a row. Patriots recipe for football season. Boring recipe. No thanks honey I&#039;ve had enough. But thanks for cooking dinner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welker 6yds. fall down. Welker 6yds. fall down. Welker 6yds. fall down. Repeat 8 or 9 times a game. Pats ahead by with 7 minutes left. Opponent scores 3 TD&#8217;s to tie game. Pats kick field goal and win game in regular season. Repeat 17 times. Playoffs &#8230;. Pats looooose. Repeat this 9 years in a row. Patriots recipe for football season. Boring recipe. No thanks honey I&#8217;ve had enough. But thanks for cooking dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gcsuk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcsuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seahawksteven777 says:
Mar 13, 2013 3:06 PM
dangernearing says:
Mar 13, 2013 2:57 PM
seahawksteven777 says: Mar 13, 2013 2:55 PM

Broncos vs Seahawks Superbowl. Calling it now if this happens

&gt;&gt;&gt;
Way too much hot air in Seattle. They will crash and burn. Way too many egos brought in

&gt;&gt;&gt;

Nope. Just the truth bro. Sorry that some of you can’t handle that. You mad bro?
------------------------------------------------------
How is it that EVERY team has that one over-the-top &quot;turd in the punchbowl&quot; fan on this website?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seahawksteven777 says:<br />
Mar 13, 2013 3:06 PM<br />
dangernearing says:<br />
Mar 13, 2013 2:57 PM<br />
seahawksteven777 says: Mar 13, 2013 2:55 PM</p>
<p>Broncos vs Seahawks Superbowl. Calling it now if this happens</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
Way too much hot air in Seattle. They will crash and burn. Way too many egos brought in</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Nope. Just the truth bro. Sorry that some of you can’t handle that. You mad bro?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
How is it that EVERY team has that one over-the-top &#8220;turd in the punchbowl&#8221; fan on this website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rc33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All totalled, Mannings &quot;one and done&#039;s&quot; come to 7 or 8.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All totalled, Mannings &#8220;one and done&#8217;s&#8221; come to 7 or 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: titansbro</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[titansbro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This does not make them the best wr core in the league. I&#039;m taking the Falcons receivers anyday over these guys. Still a good signing but get real.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not make them the best wr core in the league. I&#8217;m taking the Falcons receivers anyday over these guys. Still a good signing but get real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba99m</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bubba99m]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seahawksteven777 says: Mar 13, 2013 2:55 PM

Broncos vs Seahawks Superbowl. Calling it now if this happens

&gt;&gt;&gt;

Way too much hot air in Seattle. They will crash and burn. Way too many egos brought in


Also way too much thin air in Denver.  Broncos will finish 9-7 maybe 10-6 if they&#039;re lucky, especially if they lose Dumerville and anyone else on defense just to make cap space.   Welker to Denver would be a mistake by both parties.  I don&#039;t think BB is going to lose any sleep over this. I know I&#039;m not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seahawksteven777 says: Mar 13, 2013 2:55 PM</p>
<p>Broncos vs Seahawks Superbowl. Calling it now if this happens</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Way too much hot air in Seattle. They will crash and burn. Way too many egos brought in</p>
<p>Also way too much thin air in Denver.  Broncos will finish 9-7 maybe 10-6 if they&#8217;re lucky, especially if they lose Dumerville and anyone else on defense just to make cap space.   Welker to Denver would be a mistake by both parties.  I don&#8217;t think BB is going to lose any sleep over this. I know I&#8217;m not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gogeturshinebox</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gogeturshinebox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Broncos can doo this then they should go for it. Welker would be a great addition and their passing corp would be that much more dangerous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Broncos can doo this then they should go for it. Welker would be a great addition and their passing corp would be that much more dangerous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gjeffries</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gjeffries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[truthfactory 
Look at Manning&#039;s playoff history. He has 5 one and done&#039;s after being a top 3 seed in confrence. 21 points with the weapons he has is not enough. He is getting paid top 3 QB money meaning you can&#039;t lose at home in playoffs after a bye. Watching game you could see Manning was a little off. Also Brady has proven enough times in his career that he is much more clutch than manning. Heck I would take Eli over Payton in the playoffs anytime. 

P.S. I am not a Pats or Broncos fan so just giving an objective perspective]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truthfactory<br />
Look at Manning&#8217;s playoff history. He has 5 one and done&#8217;s after being a top 3 seed in confrence. 21 points with the weapons he has is not enough. He is getting paid top 3 QB money meaning you can&#8217;t lose at home in playoffs after a bye. Watching game you could see Manning was a little off. Also Brady has proven enough times in his career that he is much more clutch than manning. Heck I would take Eli over Payton in the playoffs anytime. </p>
<p>P.S. I am not a Pats or Broncos fan so just giving an objective perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyguru1969</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heyguru1969]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gcsuk says: 
Mar 13, 2013 2:54 PM 
What’s a “slog receiver”?

See Wikipedia under &quot;David Boston&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcsuk says:<br />
Mar 13, 2013 2:54 PM<br />
What’s a “slog receiver”?</p>
<p>See Wikipedia under &#8220;David Boston&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rc33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The talking heads proclaimed the Patriots either dead or in serious trouble after they dumped Randy Moss as well. 
Ask yourselves this: could $9-10M a season be better allocated?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The talking heads proclaimed the Patriots either dead or in serious trouble after they dumped Randy Moss as well.<br />
Ask yourselves this: could $9-10M a season be better allocated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiwizlive</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chiwizlive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Message#2 all this talk about we can&#039;t afford to sign welker because of the ramifications it could cause when it comes time to sign decker&amp;Thomas is understandable but let&#039;s not forget the window to win is small maybe 3 years tops you have to go for it now and when it comes time to resign Thomas or Decker you can always release welker or whomever is under performing this is the NFL,but you gotta get a Super Bowl out of it...

#BroncoNation]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message#2 all this talk about we can&#8217;t afford to sign welker because of the ramifications it could cause when it comes time to sign decker&amp;Thomas is understandable but let&#8217;s not forget the window to win is small maybe 3 years tops you have to go for it now and when it comes time to resign Thomas or Decker you can always release welker or whomever is under performing this is the NFL,but you gotta get a Super Bowl out of it&#8230;</p>
<p>#BroncoNation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffalomafia</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buffalomafia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look out for Denver if they land Welker?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look out for Denver if they land Welker?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenswillalwaysbeourbitch</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenswillalwaysbeourbitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, They are the Yankees of the NFL. The only thing the do every year is buy a Super Bowl championship. They can no longer CHEAT to get them. The only problem for them now is they are not acting fast enough to get who they want. The other team that has not won anything in 20 years is beating them to it (Bolden and Reed). So keep it up Winers, keep moving faster…… It’s EGO time, enjoy it Billicheat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, They are the Yankees of the NFL. The only thing the do every year is buy a Super Bowl championship. They can no longer CHEAT to get them. The only problem for them now is they are not acting fast enough to get who they want. The other team that has not won anything in 20 years is beating them to it (Bolden and Reed). So keep it up Winers, keep moving faster…… It’s EGO time, enjoy it Billicheat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajbais</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rajbais]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just go there Wes!!!

They have $ &amp; a QB!!!

You wanted both and there you&#039;ll be set!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just go there Wes!!!</p>
<p>They have $ &amp; a QB!!!</p>
<p>You wanted both and there you&#8217;ll be set!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthfactory</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthfactory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny how everyone says manning choked in the playoffs this year. He put up 21 points (should have been 24 if not for missed fg). While Brady and company put up a measely 13 points against the same team. 

Broncos had the Ravens beat had it not been for a miracle hail mary, while &quot;mr clutch&quot; tom bradys team wasnt even close to winning their game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how everyone says manning choked in the playoffs this year. He put up 21 points (should have been 24 if not for missed fg). While Brady and company put up a measely 13 points against the same team. </p>
<p>Broncos had the Ravens beat had it not been for a miracle hail mary, while &#8220;mr clutch&#8221; tom bradys team wasnt even close to winning their game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charleythedinosaur</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charleythedinosaur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pats have been way too quiet in free agency so far. Maybe there actually is something to the story of them flirting with the idea of going after Victor Cruz. Brandon Lloyd has Tom Condon as an agent too and they managed to work out a deal last year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pats have been way too quiet in free agency so far. Maybe there actually is something to the story of them flirting with the idea of going after Victor Cruz. Brandon Lloyd has Tom Condon as an agent too and they managed to work out a deal last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckinthekc99</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ckinthekc99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a rival fan you are full of shiznut]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a rival fan you are full of shiznut</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gjeffries</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gjeffries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wrenches2pipes
They also have not won a super bowl since they were not allowed to spy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrenches2pipes<br />
They also have not won a super bowl since they were not allowed to spy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capslockkey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/broncos-having-serious-talks-with-wes-welker/#comment-2391623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[capslockkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816327#comment-2391623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do the Broncos have the space to sign Welker to a market deal?  This would certainly mean Dumerville is gone.  As a rival fan, I&#039;d much prefer facing a team that thought an aging WR who&#039;d be third on the depth chart was more important than one of the better pass rushers in the league in the middle of his prime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do the Broncos have the space to sign Welker to a market deal?  This would certainly mean Dumerville is gone.  As a rival fan, I&#8217;d much prefer facing a team that thought an aging WR who&#8217;d be third on the depth chart was more important than one of the better pass rushers in the league in the middle of his prime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
