<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competition Committee proposes scrapping the tuck rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedkills21</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2398761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[speedkills21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 02:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2398761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can hear Al rolling over in his dirt-nap!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hear Al rolling over in his dirt-nap!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullman76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2398351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mullman76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2398351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a fumble.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is just an antagonist looking to get a rise.

Woodson hit Brady clean, ball came out, Raiders recovered.

Phone call was made, Kraft started writing a check and the commish signed off on it.

The NFL hated Al Davis and they still try to kick him even when he&#039;s gone.

RIP Mr. Davis, you were one of the greats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a fumble.</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks otherwise is just an antagonist looking to get a rise.</p>
<p>Woodson hit Brady clean, ball came out, Raiders recovered.</p>
<p>Phone call was made, Kraft started writing a check and the commish signed off on it.</p>
<p>The NFL hated Al Davis and they still try to kick him even when he&#8217;s gone.</p>
<p>RIP Mr. Davis, you were one of the greats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swagger52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2398030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swagger52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2398030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing how things have changed....

During that play, Tom Brady was on the sideline already off the field, resolved to the fact that the tuck rule game was over and they were not advancing.   

Fast forward to 10 years later and all the rules that have been created to have the refs insert themselves into the game...And what has happened?

Take that same play and Cindy Brady fumbles...Now...Cindy Brady throws all kind of tantrums on the field, yelling about tuck rule, demanding his way....and then the Refs giving it to him and CBX defends the undefensible.

Thank you Tom Brady, thank you Walt Coleman, and thank you whoever paid for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how things have changed&#8230;.</p>
<p>During that play, Tom Brady was on the sideline already off the field, resolved to the fact that the tuck rule game was over and they were not advancing.   </p>
<p>Fast forward to 10 years later and all the rules that have been created to have the refs insert themselves into the game&#8230;And what has happened?</p>
<p>Take that same play and Cindy Brady fumbles&#8230;Now&#8230;Cindy Brady throws all kind of tantrums on the field, yelling about tuck rule, demanding his way&#8230;.and then the Refs giving it to him and CBX defends the undefensible.</p>
<p>Thank you Tom Brady, thank you Walt Coleman, and thank you whoever paid for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swagger52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2398015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swagger52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2398015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What fan of another team is extremely jealous of the Patriots and shows it by posting the same lame comments about the Patriots all the time?

Answer: Swagger52

Crysohard University

Oh and it’s funny how Ravens fans will try so hard to dis Brady but defend a scumbag like Suggs. You know the guy the beat his soon to be wife and threatened to pour bleach on her and there child.

Oh please..

I am not defending Suggs off the field any more than I would defend Cindy Brady.   Lets not diffuse the issue to something you think you can win...The issue is the integrity of the NFL.  The issue is can you just sit down on Sunday and not worry about what the Refs are going to do to help Cindy Brady this week.   This is not about Suggs, what you think of Suggs, or what I think of Suggs.  This is about having the NFL be the game that everybody can enjoy on Sunday and debate on Monday, without being reminded of things like Las Vegas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What fan of another team is extremely jealous of the Patriots and shows it by posting the same lame comments about the Patriots all the time?</p>
<p>Answer: Swagger52</p>
<p>Crysohard University</p>
<p>Oh and it’s funny how Ravens fans will try so hard to dis Brady but defend a scumbag like Suggs. You know the guy the beat his soon to be wife and threatened to pour bleach on her and there child.</p>
<p>Oh please..</p>
<p>I am not defending Suggs off the field any more than I would defend Cindy Brady.   Lets not diffuse the issue to something you think you can win&#8230;The issue is the integrity of the NFL.  The issue is can you just sit down on Sunday and not worry about what the Refs are going to do to help Cindy Brady this week.   This is not about Suggs, what you think of Suggs, or what I think of Suggs.  This is about having the NFL be the game that everybody can enjoy on Sunday and debate on Monday, without being reminded of things like Las Vegas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadunicorn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deadunicorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patriots don&#039;t cheat!!!!!!

O wait, yes they do...multiple ways and all the time...lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriots don&#8217;t cheat!!!!!!</p>
<p>O wait, yes they do&#8230;multiple ways and all the time&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiwizlive</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chiwizlive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuck the Tuck Rule or should I say &quot;The Brady Only Rule&quot; hence they only call it for him,cause I could&#039;ve sworn that rule didn&#039;t work for Manning against the ravens in the playoffs,but the pats can thank the league for spearheading there title run by cheating the raiders with that bogus rule!!!!

#BroncoNation]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuck the Tuck Rule or should I say &#8220;The Brady Only Rule&#8221; hence they only call it for him,cause I could&#8217;ve sworn that rule didn&#8217;t work for Manning against the ravens in the playoffs,but the pats can thank the league for spearheading there title run by cheating the raiders with that bogus rule!!!!</p>
<p>#BroncoNation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j0esixpack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j0esixpack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t they just change the rule so it applies to all other teams EXCEPT the Patriots.

That&#039;s what Raiders fans have been demanding for more than a decade -

Even though everyone agrees it was correctly applied, and the competition committee has kept it on the books for another 12 years, Raiders fans are still convinced that the Patriots &quot;cheated&quot; because the officials called the rule as it was intended to be called.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just change the rule so it applies to all other teams EXCEPT the Patriots.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Raiders fans have been demanding for more than a decade -</p>
<p>Even though everyone agrees it was correctly applied, and the competition committee has kept it on the books for another 12 years, Raiders fans are still convinced that the Patriots &#8220;cheated&#8221; because the officials called the rule as it was intended to be called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rayguyreturns</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rayguyreturns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;a quarterback who has pumped the ball and who loses possession while bringing the ball back into his torso will be deemed to have fumbled &quot;
_____________________________
Wow.  What a revelation (sarcasm).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a quarterback who has pumped the ball and who loses possession while bringing the ball back into his torso will be deemed to have fumbled &#8221;<br />
_____________________________<br />
Wow.  What a revelation (sarcasm).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tooz72</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tooz72]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Refs have always had it out for Al Davis and the Raiders]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refs have always had it out for Al Davis and the Raiders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesleyt4</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wesleyt4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you pump fake and drop the ball. That&#039;s a fumble? Huh, who would have thought of that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you pump fake and drop the ball. That&#8217;s a fumble? Huh, who would have thought of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeesfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monkeesfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it wasn&#039;t.   The objective truth is it was an incomplete pass and the call was correct.   

Why the competition committee wants this change is baffling, because the Tuck Rule exists for a reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it wasn&#8217;t.   The objective truth is it was an incomplete pass and the call was correct.   </p>
<p>Why the competition committee wants this change is baffling, because the Tuck Rule exists for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radrntn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radrntn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it was and always will be a fumble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was and always will be a fumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flash1283</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flash1283]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[swagger52 says:
Mar 14, 2013 4:34 PM
This will be like the illegal chuck rule that Brady and Bellichek used to win a Superbowl against the Rams. Patriots were doing that all the way down the field. So they changed the rule to be illegal contact, so the Patriots couldn’t get away with that again. Hmmm..How did that work out?

Okay..somebody look up..

Question: Which QB has had the most 3rd down by illegal contact penalty the last ten years?

Answer: Tom Brady

Question: Which team has been the least penalized for illegal contact downfield?

Answer: New England Patriots

RefsoHard University

 -----

What fan of another team is extremely jealous of the Patriots and shows it by posting the same lame comments about the Patriots all the time?

Answer: Swagger52

Crysohard University

Oh and it&#039;s funny how Ravens fans will try so hard to dis Brady but defend a scumbag like Suggs. You know the guy the beat his soon to be wife and threatened to pour bleach on her and there child.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swagger52 says:<br />
Mar 14, 2013 4:34 PM<br />
This will be like the illegal chuck rule that Brady and Bellichek used to win a Superbowl against the Rams. Patriots were doing that all the way down the field. So they changed the rule to be illegal contact, so the Patriots couldn’t get away with that again. Hmmm..How did that work out?</p>
<p>Okay..somebody look up..</p>
<p>Question: Which QB has had the most 3rd down by illegal contact penalty the last ten years?</p>
<p>Answer: Tom Brady</p>
<p>Question: Which team has been the least penalized for illegal contact downfield?</p>
<p>Answer: New England Patriots</p>
<p>RefsoHard University</p>
<p> &#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>What fan of another team is extremely jealous of the Patriots and shows it by posting the same lame comments about the Patriots all the time?</p>
<p>Answer: Swagger52</p>
<p>Crysohard University</p>
<p>Oh and it&#8217;s funny how Ravens fans will try so hard to dis Brady but defend a scumbag like Suggs. You know the guy the beat his soon to be wife and threatened to pour bleach on her and there child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micknangold</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[micknangold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teddy Bruschi is the only Patriot I&#039;ve ever respected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teddy Bruschi is the only Patriot I&#8217;ve ever respected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbaltimore</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sbaltimore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s about time. Worse. Rule. Ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time. Worse. Rule. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefiesty1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thefiesty1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the ONLY reason the Pats won that game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the ONLY reason the Pats won that game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deacon85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deacon85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steelerben says:
Mar 14, 2013 3:52 PM
Just to be clear, it is still a fumble if you drop the ball after running into your lineman’s butt, right?
_______________________

Hilarious, steelerben, I couldn&#039;t stop laughing!

But on the rule itself: It was 12 years ago folks, if you haven&#039;t gotten over it yet, I guess you never will. So live in perpetual rage, if you want, but the Patriots and their fans (like me) live in the present. Thanks Wes, now let&#039;s turn the page and reload for next season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steelerben says:<br />
Mar 14, 2013 3:52 PM<br />
Just to be clear, it is still a fumble if you drop the ball after running into your lineman’s butt, right?<br />
_______________________</p>
<p>Hilarious, steelerben, I couldn&#8217;t stop laughing!</p>
<p>But on the rule itself: It was 12 years ago folks, if you haven&#8217;t gotten over it yet, I guess you never will. So live in perpetual rage, if you want, but the Patriots and their fans (like me) live in the present. Thanks Wes, now let&#8217;s turn the page and reload for next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phinfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phinfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will happen when Tom Brady retires]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will happen when Tom Brady retires</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noringcircus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noringcircus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a fumble and the Raiders got rob of a chance to go the Super Bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a fumble and the Raiders got rob of a chance to go the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swagger52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swagger52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cindy Brady has updated his facebook page to NOT like Wes Welker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy Brady has updated his facebook page to NOT like Wes Welker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetooloftools</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetooloftools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fumble is a fumble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fumble is a fumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetsjetsjetsnow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jetsjetsjetsnow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a QB is holding the ball he has possession, if he losses possession it is a fumble... Duh &amp; Duh. Enough of this is the arm going forward or arm going backward stuff!! Enough Enough... does he has possession or not, simple!!! This is by gar the most retarded rule ever created in the history of the game &amp; it goes against the most basics of football fundamentals!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a QB is holding the ball he has possession, if he losses possession it is a fumble&#8230; Duh &amp; Duh. Enough of this is the arm going forward or arm going backward stuff!! Enough Enough&#8230; does he has possession or not, simple!!! This is by gar the most retarded rule ever created in the history of the game &amp; it goes against the most basics of football fundamentals!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nofoolnodrool</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nofoolnodrool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[swagger52 &#124; Mar 14, 2013, 4:39 PM EDT
The NFL decided to protect Tom Brady’s legacy.

Twenty Years from now, if the Tuck rule were still in place, all fans would say..Tuck Rule, that was a fumble, where did that come from? Then CBX would have to say..that was called when Tom Brady fumbled in the Raider playoff game.

Ooops…we can’t have that. Lets get rid of it now so nobody remembers how Tom stole his first Superbowl.

Ok we got it you have a stiffy for the Pats and Brady. Quit crying you can&#039;t change it and your whining like a child....sssshhh go polish your Lombardi and quit crying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swagger52 | Mar 14, 2013, 4:39 PM EDT<br />
The NFL decided to protect Tom Brady’s legacy.</p>
<p>Twenty Years from now, if the Tuck rule were still in place, all fans would say..Tuck Rule, that was a fumble, where did that come from? Then CBX would have to say..that was called when Tom Brady fumbled in the Raider playoff game.</p>
<p>Ooops…we can’t have that. Lets get rid of it now so nobody remembers how Tom stole his first Superbowl.</p>
<p>Ok we got it you have a stiffy for the Pats and Brady. Quit crying you can&#8217;t change it and your whining like a child&#8230;.sssshhh go polish your Lombardi and quit crying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FoozieGrooler</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FoozieGrooler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea.

It was only used ONCE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea.</p>
<p>It was only used ONCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skleech22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skleech22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel bad for the Raiders, they could have won the Super Bowl that year legitimately!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel bad for the Raiders, they could have won the Super Bowl that year legitimately!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swagger52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swagger52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NFL decided to protect Tom Brady&#039;s legacy.

Twenty Years from now, if the Tuck rule were still in place, all fans would say..Tuck Rule, that was a fumble, where did that come from? Then CBX would have to say..that was called when Tom Brady fumbled in the Raider playoff game.  

Ooops...we can&#039;t have that.  Lets get rid of it now so nobody remembers how Tom stole his first Superbowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NFL decided to protect Tom Brady&#8217;s legacy.</p>
<p>Twenty Years from now, if the Tuck rule were still in place, all fans would say..Tuck Rule, that was a fumble, where did that come from? Then CBX would have to say..that was called when Tom Brady fumbled in the Raider playoff game.  </p>
<p>Ooops&#8230;we can&#8217;t have that.  Lets get rid of it now so nobody remembers how Tom stole his first Superbowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skleech22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skleech22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats why the Patriots should have an asterisk by their first Super Bowl win! Worst call ever in Professional sports!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats why the Patriots should have an asterisk by their first Super Bowl win! Worst call ever in Professional sports!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swagger52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swagger52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be like the illegal chuck rule that Brady and Bellichek used to win a Superbowl against the Rams.   Patriots were doing that all the way down the field.  So they changed the rule to be illegal contact, so the Patriots couldn&#039;t get away with that again.  Hmmm..How did that work out?

Okay..somebody look up..

Question: Which QB has had the most 3rd down by illegal contact penalty the last ten years?

Answer: Tom Brady

Question: Which team has been the least penalized for illegal contact downfield?

Answer: New England Patriots

RefsoHard University]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be like the illegal chuck rule that Brady and Bellichek used to win a Superbowl against the Rams.   Patriots were doing that all the way down the field.  So they changed the rule to be illegal contact, so the Patriots couldn&#8217;t get away with that again.  Hmmm..How did that work out?</p>
<p>Okay..somebody look up..</p>
<p>Question: Which QB has had the most 3rd down by illegal contact penalty the last ten years?</p>
<p>Answer: Tom Brady</p>
<p>Question: Which team has been the least penalized for illegal contact downfield?</p>
<p>Answer: New England Patriots</p>
<p>RefsoHard University</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luckyarmpit</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[luckyarmpit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No kidding.  Glad to see the Tom Brady rule be eliminated.  Doesn&#039;t really matter now to you, Tommy Boy, since it&#039;s served its purpose, eh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding.  Glad to see the Tom Brady rule be eliminated.  Doesn&#8217;t really matter now to you, Tommy Boy, since it&#8217;s served its purpose, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/14/competition-committee-proposes-scrapping-the-tuck-rule/#comment-2397278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1816920#comment-2397278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Raiders fan who witnessed the best team of my youth get robbed by a bad call in one of the most famous playoff games ever, I can say a lot of things about the Tuck Rule.

What bothers me the most about all of this is that the league never even considered revising the rule until after Al Davis died. 

Change came a year too late. Shame on you, NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Raiders fan who witnessed the best team of my youth get robbed by a bad call in one of the most famous playoff games ever, I can say a lot of things about the Tuck Rule.</p>
<p>What bothers me the most about all of this is that the league never even considered revising the rule until after Al Davis died. </p>
<p>Change came a year too late. Shame on you, NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
