10 of the last 13 first round picks for the Dallas Cowboys have been defensive players and Mike Florio believes there is a chance they could make it 11 out of 14 by selecting a defensive lineman, but the Cowboys could also take an offensive lineman to protect Tony Romo.This video is no longer available. Click here to watch more NBC Sports videos!
ProFootballTalk: Will the Cowboys give Romo some protection?
The Giants have announced that kicker Josh Brown will not accompany the team to London for Sunday’s game against the Rams.
The decision comes after the King County, Washington Sheriff released damning documents related to allegations of domestic violence against Brown by his former wife. Brown, who was arrested on related charges, was suspended one game by the NFL, which said Thursday that it is reopening their investigation because they say they were unaware of the information.
The Giants made a similar claim and cited the new information as the reason for leaving Brown in New Jersey. Brown remains on the roster and, per the statement, continue to support Brown.
“In light of the news reports regarding the documents released by the State of Washington yesterday, we think it makes sense to review this newly disclosed information and to revisit this issue following our trip to London. The Giants do not condone or excuse any form of domestic violence. Josh has acknowledged that he has issues in his life and has been working on these issues through therapy and counseling for a long period of time. We remain supportive of Josh and his efforts.”
During a Thursday afternoon appearance on WFAN, Giants owner John Mara said it is “too early to tell” what the team will do regarding Brown’s spot on the roster. The Giants re-signed Brown this offseason and Mara said the team was comfortable with keeping Brown on the team “based on the information we had at the time.” Mara said during the interview that the information they had included NFL security moving Brown’s former wife to a different hotel room after an incident at the Pro Bowl this year and Brown’s own admission of abuse.
The Steelers aren’t happy with what they feel was a dirty play in last week’s game by Dolphins defensive lineman Ndamukong Suh.
Per the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Steelers have filed a formal complaint with the NFL and asked the league office to look into Suh intentionally kicking Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger in the fourth quarter. The report says Roethlisberger told teammates that Suh kicked him, and Steelers guard David DeCastro said the tape backed up his quarterback’s claim.
“I don’t know what [Suh] was thinking,” DeCastro said.
The conversation about Suh’s play and history got Steelers guard Ramon Foster talking about Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict, who’s been involved in dirty plays against the Steelers in the past and was back in the headlines this week for two plays in last week’s Bengals-Patriots game. Foster said the NFL is “absolutely not” doing enough to punish repeat offenders when it comes to player safety.
“[Burfict] has a known history,” Foster said. “[The Bengals] are going to say he’s getting targeted because of his history. But he’s getting new cases against him. What are [NFL Commissioner] Roger Goodell and [his staff] saying about player safety? They’re not saying anything about it. You have a known repeat offender getting a $75,000 fine when he has a $20 million contract. That [fine] doesn’t matter to him. You fine [Antonio Brown] more for freaking dancing in the end zone than you do when you know for sure that he tried to do that. His history showed he tried to do that.
“It just wasn’t the instances in that game…Roger Goodell really needs to come off his high horse and do something about that.”
Foster said he would “live” with Suh’s kick more than he would with plays Burfict has made over the last several seasons. Wednesday, Steelers running back DeAngelo Williams called Burfict “a danger to the game.”
“Burfict is trying to injure guys,” Foster said. “I still think his celebration on the tackle with Le’Veon Bell [last season] shows he’s trying to injure guys. It changed the whole complexion of that game. It’s on film. They see it. But Goodell doesn’t give a [darn] about that. He’s more worried about the ratings dropping and the owners fattening his pockets. He knows that type of attention brings more viewers for a Cincinnati game.”
The NFL and the Giants both said that they had no knowledge of the information included in the release of new documents by the King County, Washington Sheriff regarding Giants kicker Josh Brown’s history of domestic violence, but it appears that’s not quite true.
One of the pieces of information included in those documents, as reported by Ralph Vacchiano of SNY.tv, involved NFL security moving Brown’s ex-wife Molly from her hotel room at the 2016 Pro Bowl after an incident with the kicker. Per Molly Brown, she took the trip with her sons and the daughter she had with Brown while the couple was in the process of getting a divorce at her ex-husband’s request.
Once there, she said she was subjected to “cutting comments” and had her phone taken by Brown so he could search her texts before pounding on her door (they had separate rooms) while drunk until NFL and hotel security intervened. She said NFL security eventually moved her to a new room on the Friday night before the game, something that Albert Breer of TheMMQB.com confirmed with the league, and the family had no further incidents over the course of the weekend.
That information raises further questions about why the league cited “insufficient information” about the issues between Brown and his ex-wife when they opted to suspend Brown for one game earlier this year.
One of the lead storylines for Monday night’s game is Texans quarterback Brock Osweiler’s return to Denver to face the team he played for during his first four NFL seasons.
The Texans issued their first practice report ahead of that game on Thursday and Osweiler’s name is among the most notable on it. Osweiler is listed with a foot issue, although there doesn’t seem to be a high likelihood that he’ll miss the game as he is listed as a full participant.
Another name that catches the eye on the injury report is wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins. Hopkins is listed as limited with a hamstring injury, but there’s no word from Houston at this point to indicate that he’s in danger of missing the game.
The Texans are expected to get Will Fuller back in the lineup after he didn’t play in Week Six due to his own hamstring injury. Fuller was also limited in practice along with defensive end Jadeveon Clowney and right tackle Derek Newton.
In a league where, at the most important position, supply doesn’t match demand, Steelers quarterback Landry Jones now has an important opportunity, for anywhere from one to five games.
Jones, who appeared in five games last year with two starts, will be starting at least one game in his contract year. If he can play like he did when he replaced Mike Vick against the Cardinals a year ago, completing eight of 12 passes for 168 yards and two touchdowns in a 25-13 win, Jones could position himself for a chance to be a starter elsewhere next year.
Jones lost at Kansas City in his first start last year, a tough spot for any quarterback to thrive. For the years, he had three touchdowns and four interceptions, but an impressive per-attempt average of 9.3 yards.
He gets a chance to build on that starting Sunday against the Patriots, with possible future chances against the Ravens, Cowboys, Browns, and Colts. If he passes the eyeball test, he could be getting his fingers on plenty of cash come March.
On Wednesday, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said that he expected the reduction of practice time negotiated as part of the last Collective Bargaining Agreement will “undoubtedly” come up again during negotiations for the next CBA.
Count Packers coach Mike McCarthy among those who would like to see those reductions go away. McCarthy’s team has been hit by enough injuries that they ruled seven players out for Thursday night’s game against the Bears and he said that he believes the “outrageous” amount of injuries around the league are a result of the limits placed on practice time.
“I think it’s clearly a reflection of the training part of it. People don’t want to hear coaches say that, but how can you not be in tune to the fact you have a younger football league than pre-2011 and now you’re spending five less weeks with the players?” McCarthy said, via Mike Garafolo of NFL Media. “I mean, that’s not the best formula. I think it’s been proven since then.”
McCarthy also bemoaned the impact of less practice time on the quality of play around the league, a notion that Goodell rejected on Wednesday but has come up with other coaches since the new regulations were put in place in 2011.
As with anything in the CBA, negotiating a change would require the league to give the players something else they want in return for increasing the amount of time players spend with the team. That’s not an impossibility, but it will be up to owners to decide what’s worth giving up to put practice time back on the table.
Bills running back LeSean McCoy hurt his hamstring in Wednesday’s practice and didn’t take part in Thursday’s session, which appears to be a prelude to him missing Sunday’s game against the Dolphins.
Josina Anderson of ESPN reports that McCoy will not play this weekend. Anderson adds that McCoy could miss more time, which would put him at risk of missing Buffalo’s home game against the Patriots in Week Eight. The rate that McCoy heals would determine that, however, and that won’t be known until some point next week.
McCoy has a history of hamstring issues, something that will likely factor into the decision as the Bills would like to avoid aggravating the injury in a way that leads to an extended absence.
The Bears have activated linebacker Pernell McPhee ahead of their Thursday night game in Green Bay.
McPhee had been on the team’s physically unable to perform list. He had missed the team’s offseason program and preseason while recovering from knee surgery, and the Bears kept him on PUP to start the regular season to give him extra time to heal.
McPhee, who’s probably the team’s best pass rusher, had six sacks and one interception last season, his first with the Bears.
Fullback Paul Lasike was waived to make room on the roster for McPhee.
Chip Kelly is not going to be the Oregon coach. Again.
In his first year with the 49ers after three-and-out in Philly, rumors of a return to college football already are percolating regarding Kelly, fueled by his 1-5 record. Meeting with reporters on Thursday, Kelly was asked whether he is committed to remaining in San Francisco.
“Unless the media has an opportunity for me somewhere, I’ll always explore those opportunities,” Kelly told reporters. “But, I’m not going anywhere.”
He may not be going anywhere, voluntarily. A full-blown free fall could, in theory, result in the 49ers making a change after only one season. It’s not nearly as uncommon a phenomenon as many believe; indeed, the 49ers did it only one year ago, firing Jim Tomsula after a single year on the job — and he won five games.
At a time when evidence of family discord has emerged and fans are still trying to figure out precisely how to hold Jed York accountable (beyond, you know, getting stuck “in traffic” — for three hours), York may feel compelled to press the reset button if 1-5 becomes anything worse that Tomsula’s 5-11, firing everyone and starting over again, rolling the dice in search of his own personal Bill Walsh.
So, yes, there’s a chance Chip Kelly will be back in the ranks of college football next year. Whether he wants to be or not.
Once again, P.R. as in public relations for the NFL will trump P.R. as in player rights.
The league had its chance to develop any and all information that it could regarding the conduct of Giants kicker Josh Brown. The league failed to get the information that it needed in order to make a proper decision as to the discipline to be imposed on Brown, because the league couldn’t get Brown’s ex-wife or the relevant law-enforcement authorities to cooperate.
Instead of telling Josh Brown that the inability to get all the information about his conduct won’t count as a mitigating circumstance that reduces the standard six-game suspension for committing an act of domestic violence or that the NFL simply won’t allow him to play until Brown persuades his ex-wife and/or the authorities to provide the needed information, the league imposed a one-game suspension on Brown and closed the books.
Now, with the information the NFL failed to obtain regarding Brown’s misconduct obtained and published, the NFL apparently plans to do precisely what it tried to do to Ray Rice after the video the NFL should have obtained became available to the public: Punish Brown a second time for the same behavior.
This is no longer about whether Brown should have been suspended for more than one game; obviously, he should have been. This is now about whether the NFL can reach back and fix a mistake borne of negligence, incompetence, and/or extending a courtesy to an extremely influential owner by imposing a second penalty on Brown for the same misconduct.
Like the Ray Rice case, the league will likely argue that Brown lied during the original investigation. Unlike the Rice case, the league likely will argue that Brown is being punished not for the incident that occurred in May 2015 but for separate conduct described in the materials obtained by SNY.
Because the Josh Brown case won’t be generating the intense focus and criticism that the Ray Rice case did (which was exacerbated by the AP report that the league had the critical video before TMZ published it), Commissioner Roger Goodell most likely won’t be delegating his authority over the internal disciplinary process to a retired judge or any other independent party. Instead, buoyed by the federal appeals court decisions in litigation arising from suspensions imposed on Tom Brady and Adrian Peterson, the league office will do what it wants with Brown, stickhandling its way through the contours of the relevant precedent and engineering a way to take action against Brown.
The end result? The NFL will as a practical matter acquire the ability to punish a player twice for the same general misbehavior.
And if the Giants decide to cut Brown and not pay the balance of his salary, the Giants could face a grievance of their own, like the Ravens did when they cut Rice. The player may be in better position to get a fair shake on that one, since resolving it likely wouldn’t fall under the NFL’s authority.
Regardless, even though Brown never should have been re-signed by the Giants, the Giants knew or should have known all about his conduct before bringing him back. They shouldn’t be allowed to slide out of Hell’s Kitchen now that their potentially willful ignorance has been confirmed.
Bottom line? The NFL and the Giants had their chance to do the right thing. For whatever reason(s), they failed. It now would be unfair to Brown and all other players for the league and the Giants to say or do anything other than, “We blew it the first time, and we have no legal right to a second bite at the apple.”
Colts owner Jim Irsay said he disagrees with the players who are protesting the national anthem. The Colts cut cornerback Antonio Cromartie two weeks after he began kneeling during the national anthem. Cromartie’s wife says those two things are more than a coincidence.
Terricka Cromartie wrote on her private Instagram account that taking a knee during the anthem is what led to Antonio losing his job in Indianapolis.
“One things for sure I know my husband was told Not to take a Knee and he went with his heart and he took one. And that cost him his Job,” she wrote, according to the Indianapolis Star.
That may be Cromartie’s wife’s perception, but that doesn’t make it accurate. Cromartie played badly early in the season, and he was cut after an ugly game against the Jaguars that saw the Colts make several changes on defense that involved people who hadn’t knelt for the anthem, including cutting Sio Moore. The Colts also got two cornerbacks back from injuries around the time they cut Cromartie, which suggests that he was released because he no longer had a place on the defense.
Cromartie himself has not said whether he thinks his anthem protest was related to his departure from Indianapolis.
It’s starting to look like the initial explanation might have had some credence. Palmer was listed as a non-participant in practice on Wednesday due to a hamstring issue and Thursday is shaping up the same way.
Darren Urban of the team’s website reports that Palmer came out to the field without a helmet and is working on the side with a trainer. Urban adds that he doesn’t expect the team to provide much of an update on Palmer’s condition as coach Bruce Arians isn’t scheduled to address the media on Thursday and offensive coordinator Harold Goodwin, who will speak to reporters, doesn’t discuss injuries.
Whether through Arians’ comments or Palmer’s practice status, Friday should bring some more clarity about whether the hamstring will have any impact on the quarterback’s readiness for Sunday night’s game against the Seahawks.
It’s looking like Reed is going to miss another game for the Redskins this weekend. Reed was able to practice in a limited fashion on Wednesday while wearing a non-contact jersey, but he took a step in the other direction on Thursday.
Reed didn’t participate in practice at all, which isn’t the best of signs about his ability to get cleared through the league’s concussion protocol in time to face the Lions on Sunday. Vernon Davis would continue to see an expanded role in the event that Reed is out of the lineup.
Going without Reed would be a major blow to the Redskins passing game and it’s not the only injury concern on that front heading into the matchup with Detroit. Wide receiver DeSean Jackson missed a second straight day of practice with a shoulder injury, which makes it easier to be skeptical about his Wednesday vow of confidence that he’ll be on the field.
Reports emerged on Thursday that Packers running back Eddie Lacy will have surgery on his ankle and miss at least the next eight weeks of the season while on injured reserve.
The Packers made it official later in the day. The team has announced that Lacy has been placed on injured reserve while he deals with his ankle injury.
Green Bay also announced that they have promoted running back Don Jackson from the practice squad, a move that’s been talked about as a possibility all week given Lacy’s injury and James Starks‘ knee surgery. Jackson signed as an undrafted free agent out of Nevada in May and didn’t play in the preseason because of an injury, which means his next snap will be his first one in an NFL game.
The release of new documents by the King County, Washington Sheriff regarding Giants kicker Josh Brown’s admissions of domestic violence had many people wondering why the NFL didn’t come up with a punishment more severe than a one-game suspension.
The NFL has joined the Giants, who re-signed Brown as a free agent and boasted they had done due diligence into Brown’s past, in saying that they were unaware of the existence of documents featuring Brown, who explained his arrest as one moment before evidence of more than 20 incidents came to light, admitting to abusing his then-wife and referring to her as “his slave.” The league issued a statement on Thursday saying that the release of these new documents will lead to Brown’s case being re-opened with the potential for further discipline.
“NFL investigators made repeated attempts — both orally and in writing — to obtain any and all evidence and relevant information in this case from the King County Sheriff’s Office. Each of those requests was denied and the Sheriff’s Office declined to provide any of the requested information, which ultimately limited our ability to fully investigate this matter. We concluded our own investigation, more than a year after the initial incident, based on the facts and evidence available to us at the time and after making exhaustive attempts to obtain information in a timely fashion. It is unfortunate that we did not have the benefit or knowledge of these materials at the time.”
“In light of the release of these documents yesterday, we will thoroughly review the additional information and determine next steps in the context of the NFL Personal Conduct Policy. We will not be making any comments on potential discipline until that time.”
Given all that was already known about Brown’s behavior, including his ex-wife telling police about a letter he wrote to friends admitting abuse in a report that was previously available, there will still be questions about the initial response of the league and the Giants to Brown’s actions.
There may also be questions about why the Commissioner’s exempt list, used in the Greg Hardy and Adrian Peterson cases, wasn’t used as a way for Brown to be removed from the roster while still being paid and under investigation if the league was unsatisfied with the information available to them in their investigation.