Skip to content

Report: Packers preparing to release Desmond Bishop

Desmond Bishop AP

Packers linebacker Desmond Bishop racked up 218 tackles and eight sacks in two years as a starter for Green Bay. Now the Packers and Bishop could be going their separate ways.

According to Jason Wilde of ESPNMilwaukee.com, the Packers intend to release Bishop if they can’t restructure his contract or work out a trade.

Bishop has been with the Packers since 2007 and earned a starting job with the team in 2010. He started 25 games over two seasons and posted a career high 115 tackles in 2011. A hamstring injury last preseason forced him to miss all of last year and Bishop has yet to be able to take part in any of the Packers offseason workouts. He was held out of OTAs and the team’s mandatory mini-camp last week.

Bishop said he is close to 100-percent and was looking to get back on the field soon. However, that field may no longer reside in Wisconsin.

It appears unlikely that Bishop would accept a contract restructure. Bishop came out and said he had his sights on being the league’s defensive player of the year. Someone with that belief in their ability isn’t going to accept a contract restructure just because of an injury. It addition to reports the Packers were seeking to trade Bishop before the draft, it appears a parting of ways may have been inevitable.

Permalink 69 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Green Bay Packers, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
69 Responses to “Report: Packers preparing to release Desmond Bishop”
  1. greenpackage says: Jun 11, 2013 10:56 PM

    Brad Jones and AJ Hawk playing inside? No thanks.

  2. jhein23 says: Jun 11, 2013 10:59 PM

    As a Packers fan I’ll never understand their love for AJ Hawk. He’s the guy that should have been released earlier this offseason. I would much rather have the physicality of Desmond Bishop starting at ILB. Brad Jones looked good last season and probably would look even better with Bishop playing next to him.

    Now Bishop will sign with the Giants, Vikings or some other team on Green Bay’s schedule this season and after he makes several huge plays the cameras will zoom in on the dumbfounded look on Mike McCarthy’s face and Ted Thompson owl face in the press box.

  3. getsome636 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:00 PM

    WTF! This guy is a beast. I am not a fan of this move.

  4. gweetarman says: Jun 11, 2013 11:01 PM

    Welcome to Denver. The only weak link on the broncos is the position he plays. This is as obvious as it gets.

  5. GenXJay says: Jun 11, 2013 11:01 PM

    Before these gb trollers say “Vikings will pick him up”…
    …well duh? Why not. The Vikes get him on the cheap now. And they’ll have the cheesy defensive playbook to shut that overpriced fathead blonde chick down.

  6. skittlesareyum says: Jun 11, 2013 11:02 PM

    This is horrible news. Aside from Matthews he’s basically the only guy on the entire defense who can lay a hit on somehow.

  7. mcjon22 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:02 PM

    Um, what?

  8. silentfreedom5 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:04 PM

    have to wonder how healthy he is. should be a good guy to take a flyer on

  9. GenXJay says: Jun 11, 2013 11:07 PM

    p.s.
    Just another mistake from TT. Tasteless as well. Since this player had a ridiculously high goal for helping his declining team get hopefully get better.

  10. skinswillsurprise says: Jun 11, 2013 11:07 PM

    The Washington Football team needs a guy to replace 59. I think it would be worth a shot. HTTR!!

  11. thesteelers says: Jun 11, 2013 11:08 PM

    Who?

  12. vincelombardisghost says: Jun 11, 2013 11:11 PM

    Hope that he will restructure his deal and the Pack can keep him, if indeed he is truly healthy as he says he is.

  13. lambeauphan says: Jun 11, 2013 11:14 PM

    Wow, that’s too bad. Hamstring must be far from recovery. Was looking forward to Bishop/Jones duo and no more TRex arms AJ Hawk with his average tackle being 7.8 yard DOWNFIELD

  14. msu92 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:16 PM

    I’d be more than happy if the Lions got him. With Durant leaving, he could fill one of the linebacker spots.

  15. lostsok says: Jun 11, 2013 11:17 PM

    Sweet! Miami needs a backup LB.

  16. brewcrewfan54 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:20 PM

    Unfortunate it has to end this way, I liked this guy.

  17. searchthedeep says: Jun 11, 2013 11:22 PM

    John Dorsey has already got his plane ticket to Kansas City on reserve.

  18. tramonisland says: Jun 11, 2013 11:25 PM

    Teddy is cold blooded which is what it takes at the top of the organization to stay competitive year in and year out. That being said, Bish will be missed big time.

  19. ninefingers9 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:29 PM

    Just one more reason the Packers should be spending this offseason interviewing interior decorators for their new basement pad in the north! ;)

  20. milkcan44 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:30 PM

    Hate to see it. Bishop had a long road to becoming a starter, and was a vital cog in Super Bowl season. Still, it’s had to believe that a player with a need for mobility can play effectively after a snapped hamstring. The medical people must have expressed doubts to GM and coaches.

  21. hotketchup99 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:33 PM

    Wow nice move! -Rest of NFC North
    but in all honesty is AJ Hawk really that much better than this guy, he has talent.

  22. packfaninvikeland says: Jun 11, 2013 11:39 PM

    Don’t like it. He is a fearless tackler. IMO We need to keep that on the inside.

  23. vfan76 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:49 PM

    Anyone on the Packers D would be happy to be let go. This team sucks.

  24. taintedsaints2009 says: Jun 11, 2013 11:49 PM

    I won’t believe this until it happens. I thought bishop was a better all around linebacker than Matthews.

  25. granadafan says: Jun 12, 2013 12:06 AM

    Terrible move. Bishop flies around the field and just makes play after play. He’s coming into his prime and was on the cusp of a great year if he can stay healthy.

  26. packerswin96 says: Jun 12, 2013 12:06 AM

    The only way this makes sense is if he is not as healthy as he says he is! 2nd best linebacker on the team.

  27. war27 says: Jun 12, 2013 12:08 AM

    Tired of hearing just how great Ted Thompson and that staff is.

    The reality of it is they are 9.75-6.25 on average while having two of the better QB’s in the league during his time.

    That’s pretty average for this “spectacular” group.

  28. flvikesfan says: Jun 12, 2013 12:25 AM

    Hey who needs a defense or a running game or a kicking game when you have St. Arron to run around airing it out 60 times a game like some poo flinging monkey. Talk about a house of cards built on one guy!! No Aaron, Green Bay = Jacksonville.

  29. lnfinite says: Jun 12, 2013 12:34 AM

    Say hello to Minnesota, only the best packers ever become Vikings…………………..

  30. sdemp says: Jun 12, 2013 12:41 AM

    Why is anyone surprised by this move. . . this is a typical Ted move. Hopefully the fanbase, might take a few more stupid decisions from Ted, but hopefully they realize he is not as good of a GM as people think. He might be a great scout and talent evalulater, but that doesn’t a good GM.

  31. mcjon22 says: Jun 12, 2013 12:47 AM

    He’d be a lot better than Koa Misi. Kick the tires Miami

  32. greenmeattruck says: Jun 12, 2013 12:48 AM

    Neither Brad Jones nor AJ Hawk are starting caliber ILB’s, and now they let go of the only good one they have. UH-OH… We’ll have a hole in the middle of this D again this year:(

  33. mullman76 says: Jun 12, 2013 12:51 AM

    Bishop to the Raiders.

    Book it.

  34. chi01town says: Jun 12, 2013 1:10 AM

    Emery is watching! and great LB’s find there way to Chicago. this guy can play. what ever hurts greenbay makes my day.

  35. aldavis4president says: Jun 12, 2013 1:32 AM

    If the raiders managed to pull this off that’d be SWEET!! this guy is a beast when healthy!! Clay and aj are overrated !

  36. jimnsota says: Jun 12, 2013 1:47 AM

    I’m impressed, actual realistic Pack fans have spoken. Good to see the uncertainty creeping in.
    I’m sure Jennings and RS have opened the lines of communication. He would be a gift for the Purple to fill the middle.
    Make it happen TT your the best.

  37. gweetarman says: Jun 12, 2013 1:54 AM

    Broncos.

  38. callahan9119 says: Jun 12, 2013 1:55 AM

    Well, the Browns could use him, and we have cap room. They have nothing at ILB besides Jackson since they switched to the 3-4.

  39. bobnelsonjr says: Jun 12, 2013 2:17 AM

    Don’t jump the gun on this. Perhaps Jason is incorrect or his source is incorrect.

    Somebody could be doing some underhanded stuff here.

    When DJ Smith was cut he was immediately snapped up on the market. Cutting Smith would not have happened if Bishop was not coming back.

    Matthews, Perry, Bishop, Hawk, Jones, Moses, plus whoever else can somehow manage to make the team. That is a good group that was down both Bishop and Perry last season.

    I don’t trust anything on Twitter.

  40. sas2323 says: Jun 12, 2013 2:31 AM

    I’m also mystified, but you gotta trust the decisions so far. Not all have been hits, but only one team is consistently wearing the division champ hat. TT and MM must have confidence in Manning and the draft. They seem to be shy suddenly about keeping guys >30 with injuries.
    GB fans: stay classy…quit stooping to Vikes Cheap shots. (Same goes to you, Purple.). Respect the NFC North. There is great tradition in every team. No other division in football can boast as much.

  41. spiderperv says: Jun 12, 2013 2:35 AM

    A who’s who of puber commenters.

    Terrell Manning will be starting in the middle for the Packers and with the addition of Datone Jones you will likely be seeing less 4 LB sets.

    Mike Neal being tried out at a LB. Some of those packages are going to have some serious beef. Datone Jones throwing a hump move only to have Nick Perry right behind him with the same kind of strength and athleticism?

    You silly ESPN pubers don’t know what’s coming.

  42. tangysizzl says: Jun 12, 2013 2:40 AM

    This news saddens me, unless his career is over like Nick Collins than its a dumb move now especially. I guess if it happens it happens, I don’t own “Stock” so can’t do anything about it.

  43. zbigern says: Jun 12, 2013 3:53 AM

    Im curious how anyone can say the Packers suck? 15-1 2 years ago, Champs 3 years ago, & the most recent Norris Division champs…thats sucking?

    Any argument starting with “they’re nobody without Rodgers” immediately gets eye rolling & whatevs…why? BECAUSE THEY HAVE RODGERS!!!

    Packers are gonna be 12-4 at the very WORST CASE SCENARIO…Vegas odds believe it to be true, & even with a tough schedule, I see no reason to think otherwise.

    If “if” was a 5th we’d all be drunk…Rodgers+possible run game+a defense that shouldnt be worse than last years 11th ranked D=a team I would hate to share a division with…

  44. SAV says: Jun 12, 2013 4:30 AM

    Ravens just cleared a ton of cap space…

    Would they sign this man?

  45. oldbyrd says: Jun 12, 2013 7:03 AM

    I just don’t get that move and Im a Eagles. I just don’t think Hawk is that good.

  46. bballnut50 says: Jun 12, 2013 7:05 AM

    Vikes will take him, nice backup.

  47. gbfan says: Jun 12, 2013 7:11 AM

    I’m enjoying all the GMs that have apparently been posting comments to this article. Seriously people, put some thought in your posts. Mini camps and OTAs have already started and Bishop has been a part of those. Obviously they aren’t liking what they are seeing with him coming off a major injury. All Ted Thompson has done since he’s came to GB is make tough decisions that have been in the best interest of the long term success of the team.

  48. rundmc81 says: Jun 12, 2013 8:01 AM

    Reggie, I know you might not be awake yet in Oakland. But when you do wake up, make the call. Get it done. Raider Nation!!

  49. getsome636 says: Jun 12, 2013 8:19 AM

    Although I am unhappy, there must be a reason. And to all of you clowns slamming TT, who has he let go that went on to great success elswhere? Point is, he usually gets it right. Other than not pulling the trigger on Marshawn Lynce a few years ago anyway.

  50. bigblackanvil says: Jun 12, 2013 8:47 AM

    I miss the days when a player was with a team their entire career. Free agency was cool at first but I hate the ” here today gone tomorrow” NFL of today….HTTR !!!!

  51. longhairdontcare66 says: Jun 12, 2013 8:50 AM

    Makes no sense we keep Sherrod for a season when broke his leg, he never proved himself. Bishop is a beast and was a monster the year we won the Super Bowl- and we’re cutting him. AJ and Brad Jones at MLB sounds horrible. AJ is slower than most DL and Brad Jones is about as physical as an average CB. TT please think of something so we can keep him.

  52. Troll_toll says: Jun 12, 2013 8:57 AM

    If this truly does happen I am confident that Bishop simply isn’t healthy. The training staff has a very good record on letting guys go when the injuries have taken their toll.

    I remember watching him his rookie year in preseason-first game dished out two violent, beautiful hits knocking the helmet off 2 Jaguars. Knew right then he was going to be a beast. He is the best ILB by far on our roster if healthy.

    Also a really good dude, actually played COD with him a few times. Great person was very cool.

    Hope this report is false but if it turns out to be true best of luck to Desmond. Packer nation will forever be grateful, if it weren’t for his shoe lace tackle on Vick in 2010 SB run, chances are we would not have been able to claim our 4th lombardi.

  53. jimfix says: Jun 12, 2013 8:58 AM

    maybe the colts can trade them erik walden back for bishop… ha

  54. uwsptke says: Jun 12, 2013 8:59 AM

    Do not like. This is the second time they’ve kept Hawk over the better player (Nick Barnett).

    That being said, if it frees up cash to get deals done with Shields, James Jones, and Raji, I can’t complain. But still, Desmond Bishop > Kevin Costner > AJ Hawk.

  55. getsome636 says: Jun 12, 2013 9:10 AM

    Yeah, but Barnett has not done squat since the Pack let him go…

  56. godofwine330 says: Jun 12, 2013 9:12 AM

    Never understood the love of Hawk when he supremely underperforms to his draft status, but they pay him as if he is a star, and then resigned him as if he was as good as they thought he’d be when they drafted him. Bishop is a beast and when he was healthy he laid it all out on the line. This is further reason why players should have more guaranteed contracts. He didn’t play last year because he was injured, and now they want to force a pay cut or cut him, four months after free agency when all of the big money is dried up.

  57. whatjusthapped says: Jun 12, 2013 9:15 AM

    I think AJ Hawk must have photos of TT in a compromising position because this doesn’t make any sense.

    Hawk is average at best and remember, he was picked #5 overall. TT’s pride is such that he can never seem to let him go but I would cut Hawk in a NY minute to keep Bishop.

  58. mykelane says: Jun 12, 2013 9:17 AM

    Philly, get on the phone!

  59. munny10 says: Jun 12, 2013 10:47 AM

    If it is due to injury, TT blew it by not getting an ILB in here via FA or trade. Hawk and Jones don’t have the talent needed for the Pack to go anywhere in the playoffs this year. Wow, hope AR and the offense can put up 70 points pretty regularly.

  60. bearsoxass says: Jun 12, 2013 11:12 AM

    Are you out of your mind TT?

  61. stellarperformance says: Jun 12, 2013 11:53 AM

    Maybe Bishop isn’t going anywhere. We’ll see. It is easy for us to judge talent from our couches. The decision-makers do this for a living. They probably have information which is unavailable to us….don’t you think?

  62. chi01town says: Jun 12, 2013 12:53 PM

    @ stellarperformance
    Bishop is gone because the packers cant pay him. He’s not going to take the kind of pay cut that the packers want him too. that already weak defense just got weaker

  63. axespray says: Jun 12, 2013 1:49 PM

    James Jones, BJ Raji, and Sam Shields – got contracts up in the air, may as well clear some cap space and sign ‘em.

    Rob Francois/Sam Barrington/Terrell Manning have talent – maybe one of them step up the way Bishop did when Barnett went down, AJ is mediocre… Brad Jones did alright considering he’s a 7th round Outside Linebacker that was moved inside during the middle of the season last year.

  64. axespray says: Jun 12, 2013 1:53 PM

    chi01town says:
    Jun 12, 2013 12:53 PM
    @ stellarperformance
    “Bishop is gone because the packers cant pay him. He’s not going to take the kind of pay cut that the packers want him too. that already weak defense just got weaker”
    ———————————————–
    So losing Bishop makes our defense weaker? Even thou he didn’t play last year – we were still ranked 11th in spite of the injuries/rookies, now we’ve got some more youth-depth-experience, but we’re gonna somehow be weaker?

    Makes about as much sense as saying our offense is gonna be more anemic cause of the loss of Driver/Jennings/Cedric.

    By the way, how about your team tries scoring more than 15 points on a team’s defense before calling ‘em weak.

  65. filthymcnasty1 says: Jun 12, 2013 2:12 PM

    I suspect there is a little more to this story than meets the eye. I have a lot of confidence in Ted’s ability to field enough talent to contend. After all, he’s got the hardware.

    Unlike those other hapless, tasteless teams.

  66. deltaoracle says: Jun 12, 2013 4:24 PM

    I assume all the posters bashing Thompson (for something he hasn’t done yet) have attended all of the OTAs like Thompson and McCarthy have and have seen that Bishop is running as well as before – right? Sure.
    Everyone would want Bishop back if he can be the player he was. If he has lost a step due to the injury (I don’t know and neither do you) then it’s a different story. Maybe we should wait and see.

  67. gbpakrfan says: Jun 12, 2013 10:40 PM

    GOTTA BE KIDDING!!!!

    A.J. Hawk is the turd in the punch bowl and should have been gone before Bishop….

  68. dragonflypack says: Jun 14, 2013 4:45 PM

    This will be Bishop’s 7th year. This is the last year of his 4 year deal. He got paid for all 3 years (with one year off with pay for being hurt). He’s coming off major injury for the last year of the contract. Questions about him are many. Yes, good move by the Packers. He should take a pay cut. If he plays well, offer him a new contract next year and make up the money he was cut. This is not a unreasonable offer to Bishop by the Packers.

  69. Dennis Lohr says: Jun 15, 2013 12:39 PM

    Trusting TT on this.

    I don’t believe GPB wouldn’t let Bishop go if they felt Desmond was able to contribute at his 2010 & 2011 levels.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!