Skip to content

DeAndre Hopkins named September’s top offensive rookie

Tennessee Titans v Houston Texans Getty Images

The Texans drafted wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins to take some pressure off Andre Johnson in their passing game and the first month of the season has made them look smart for doing so.

Hopkins finished the first month of the season with 20 catches for 270 yards and a touchdown. Those numbers are good enough to put Hopkins ahead of all the other rookies in the league in receiving yards and total yards from scrimmage while leaving him in a tie for the most catches. They are the second-most yards and catches of any Texans rookie through his first four games, trailing only Johnson.

Hopkins’ biggest day came in Week Two when he became the youngest player in NFL history to catch a game-winning touchdown pass in overtime. It was also the first 100-yard receiving game for any Texans wideout other than Johnson since the 2010 season, underscoring the reason why Hopkins is in Houston in the first place.

He’s the first Texan to take home rookie honors since linebacker Brian Cushing in 2009 and joins running backs Domanick Williams and Steve Slaton as the only offensive winners in team history.

Permalink 12 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Houston Texans, Rumor Mill
12 Responses to “DeAndre Hopkins named September’s top offensive rookie”
  1. damcmp says: Oct 3, 2013 12:02 PM

    Wow…we are going to close down Houston and have a DeAndre Hopkins DAY! after all he is a great Texan!! legendary!! brag brag!! that’s all the Texans do!!!!!

  2. thejabronisayz says: Oct 3, 2013 12:03 PM

    *Team history.

  3. thegreatgabbert says: Oct 3, 2013 12:06 PM

    Hopkins is a special talent. I said it before the draft, and he hasn’t disappointed. Now for Damontre Moore to show that he was the best defensive prospect.

  4. craggt says: Oct 3, 2013 12:15 PM

    Should have been Larry Warford for the Lions. Playing every snap, Stafford has been sacked a league low 3 times and opening up huge holes for Reggie Bush. But he’s a guard so of course he won’t attract attention.

  5. essentialsausage says: Oct 3, 2013 12:17 PM

    Do offensive linemen ever win these monthly/weekly awards? I’m pretty sure that offensive linemen are more important than wide receivers.

  6. wjmoffatt says: Oct 3, 2013 12:42 PM

    Thompkins has about the same receiving yards and more TDs. EJ Manuel lead his team to that incredible comeback against the Panthers and has had a direct effect on winning multiple ball games.
    This is a joke!

  7. 8to80texansblog says: Oct 3, 2013 12:47 PM

    Nuk has been great. He didn;t play particularly well against Seattle, but was outstanding against Tennessee, especially in the 4th qtr and OT when Dre was out.

    He gets to be mentored by one of the greatest receivers of all time, and a guy who is a pro’s pro.

  8. kleppnasty says: Oct 3, 2013 12:59 PM

    Before the draft I thought Hopkins was hands down the best WR and Lattimore was hands down the best RB in this draft class. So far Hopkins is living up to that status, I still think Lattimore will in the coming years… though I wiffed on thinking Wilson would show something after leaving Arkansas.

  9. chaseutley says: Oct 3, 2013 1:27 PM

    Taking nothing away from Hopkins, I would have leaned toward voting for Giovani Bernard.

  10. htowntexan says: Oct 3, 2013 2:17 PM

    Now if only our quarterback would think to look at him occasionally. . . .

  11. xfactor0103 says: Oct 3, 2013 2:20 PM

    I truely believed the Texans picked the best receiver in the draft last year in Hopkins. Cannot imagine the numbers he would have if the Texans had an elite QB as well as a coach who would take more chances in letting him lose more often. For sure this Texan team have a number one receiver who will dominate the league in years to come!
    Go Texans!

  12. rc2catch says: Oct 3, 2013 4:42 PM

    I actually thought it should of went to Robert Woods, 2 great TD grabs and 200 plus yards. But the Texans get a little more national media coverage so it’s understood.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!