Skip to content

Vikings stadium will be losing some bells and whistles

VikingsStadium

To no surprise, the new Vikings stadium will cost more than originally imagined, as envisioned.  So they’ll come up with a way to cover the extra costs, right?

Actually, it’s officially time to start throwing stuff out of the balloon basket.

According to Richard Meryhew of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, features are being trimmed from the new stadium.

Initially at risk are a 400-stall parking garage to be located a block north of the stadium, a skyway linked to a ramp a block south of the stadium, two large escalators, and up to 40 feet from the height of pivoting glass doors to be located at the main entrance.

“We only have $975 million in the budget, and there’s only so many things you can get under that number,” Vikings V.P. of stadium wrangling Lester Bagley said.

The Vikings have advanced $13.1 million to fund the cost overruns, and a $62 million contingency fund exists.  Still, the message is that the powers-that-be won’t find a way to make the right stadium — but to make a stadium at the right cost.

Apparently, those Stadium Builders Licenses don’t go as far as they used to.

Permalink 54 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Minnesota Vikings, Rumor Mill
54 Responses to “Vikings stadium will be losing some bells and whistles”
  1. jwcarlson says: Oct 10, 2013 1:14 PM

    They will be putting in nice deep basement, however, considering that’s where they will be for the next five plus seasons.

  2. mvp43 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:15 PM

    Get rid of the roof and play real football. Like the Bears & Packers.

  3. Rick Spielman is a Magician says: Oct 10, 2013 1:15 PM

    I’m not going to miss any of those features. You really think they aren’t making the right stadium without 40 additional feet added to the glass doors? As long as they’re tall enough to get in without ducking, they should be fine.

  4. trollsetter says: Oct 10, 2013 1:18 PM

    It’s the house that Ponder built. What’s you expect?

  5. jimthebuilder27 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:18 PM

    Make Zygi Wilf pay for it. He defrauded people before, surely can find a way to do it again, right??

  6. tokyosandblaster says: Oct 10, 2013 1:25 PM

    It won’t be living up to expectations? Perfect for Minnesota.

    >

  7. Carl Gerbschmidt says: Oct 10, 2013 1:25 PM

    Why don’t they just fleece the minny taxpayers out of a few extra hundred million?

  8. youvebeenphaneufed says: Oct 10, 2013 1:26 PM

    @mvp

    I agree totally. The highest costs of building a stadium are the steel costs. Obviously, building a roof adds considerably more steel. Scratch the roof, suck it up, and keep all the other amenities.

  9. duwaynebaird says: Oct 10, 2013 1:26 PM

    The process is called value engineering. You can’t scrap the roof to the stadium, because it doesn’t make sense to build a billion dollar stadium for only 10 days worth of events. The roof makes it viable because the project is in Minnesota (duh). Also, you never, ever dip into contingency this early in a project. Won’t even be on the table.

  10. mn1288 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:27 PM

    As long as it means I won’t be hammered anymore than I’m sure we ultimately will be in Hennepin County due to the City’s poor negotiation of the deal, I’m fine.

  11. allnflfan says: Oct 10, 2013 1:29 PM

    “We only have $975 million in the budget, and there’s only so many things you can get under that number,” – It is truly fascinating (and nauseating) how some people live in a radically alternate universe from the rest of us.

  12. wipackman1265 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:30 PM

    Minnesota Vikings do NOTHING the best. Why start now. ??? Losers !!!

  13. floratiotime says: Oct 10, 2013 1:31 PM

    I bet Zygi the billionaire doesn’t lose anything. Thanks taxpayers.

  14. jm91rs says: Oct 10, 2013 1:33 PM

    Are you seriously bashing a team for cutting some of the frills to try and stay under budget? Seems better than most people today that just borrow rather than stay within their means.

  15. jjfuhreck says: Oct 10, 2013 1:34 PM

    Say goodbye to the Superbowl without some of these items. Premium parking and a skyway to keep the big wigs from having to go outside are just the things this stadium must have to compete for that. Time for Zygi to write a check

  16. bsizemore68 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:38 PM

    400 garage spaces with a walk over, who do you think will be able to get one of those slots? Bill

  17. dumptrucked says: Oct 10, 2013 1:39 PM

    who cares. the at home experience is miles ahead of the stadium experience anyway. the best part is that once the Vikings have embarrassed themselves so badly it angers me (usually by half) I can turn the channel and watch real football teams compete.

  18. justintuckrule says: Oct 10, 2013 1:43 PM

    They should cut whatever needs to go in order to pay for a roof that’s retractable. It’s a travesty that two teams from the black and blue division play indoor football.

    Although Metlife Stadium blows and is an ugly tuna can of a stadium, I’m glad they couldn’t afford a roof.

  19. stlluna7 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:43 PM

    Sports world meet reality. Unlike those reps and senators who sit in sound proof booths, the rest of reel and deal while veterans prepare for their next election.

    So pols kiss those babies and dupe us, because here it is being manifested in sports and at least you will get your backpay.

  20. golforepar says: Oct 10, 2013 1:50 PM

    One way to cut costs is not needing to build a trophy cabinet.

  21. mrlaloosh says: Oct 10, 2013 1:52 PM

    Looks like the worlds biggest bread box. Except its crooked. Straighten it up! I guess that’s “architectural elements”. Those seat licenses will be very expensive. SKOAL LOSERS!

  22. linemanguy74 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:52 PM

    Maybe they should sell worthless stock

  23. smokingconch says: Oct 10, 2013 1:55 PM

    Have the Vikings looked at their team lately?

    They have average wideouts, a bad defensive backfield, and three average to below average quarterbacks.

    They also have an above average pass rush and d-line and one of the greatest running backs in NFL history…

    Why the hell would they want to play in a dome?

  24. thep1553doff1 says: Oct 10, 2013 1:56 PM

    wipackman1265 says:
    Oct 10, 2013 1:30 PM
    Minnesota Vikings do NOTHING the best. Why start now. ??? Losers !!!

    —————————————————-

    The one thing da peckers do best is find ways to blame anything except themselves when they lose a game. One example: Favre’s playoff game with a season’s worth of INTs (in STL) was the result of the refs cheating….

  25. whatjusthapped says: Oct 10, 2013 1:58 PM

    I got an idea, they could sell pull tabs at the local bars to raise the additional revenue. Oh that’s right, it didn’t work the first time.

    I have a hard time believing that the Vikings can’t come up with the extra cash. Look at all the money they are saving; no trophy case needs to get built, they won’t need to add on to the hall of fame, and they can host the Superbowl in 2018 without any fear of the possibility of home field advantage.

  26. purpleguy says: Oct 10, 2013 1:58 PM

    Yeah, we lose a parking ramp and skyway — I think the sky is certainly falling. Of course, it’s not convenient or as near attention-grabbing to mention the huge ramp going up in the adjacent development a block away that will serve the same purpose.

  27. stevent92 says: Oct 10, 2013 2:04 PM

    “We only have $975 million in the budget, and there’s only so many things you can get under that number,”

    EXACTLY what I said when I bought my first house. Word. For. Word.

  28. iamthorny says: Oct 10, 2013 2:06 PM

    Short on cash? Sell the naming rights to Spielman and Leslie’s Three Ringless Circus. Problem solved.

  29. dowhatifeellike says: Oct 10, 2013 2:12 PM

    I can’t remember the last time any of these stadium projects attempted to stay on budget by cutting down the wish list. Kind of refreshing to see. Usually the budget number is seen as a minimum.

  30. darkneptune73 says: Oct 10, 2013 2:16 PM

    Anytime there’s stadium news, Packer trolls come out of hiding. When the Packers lose, they go back into hiding.

    Bunch of cowards, I tell you.

  31. stellarperformance says: Oct 10, 2013 2:21 PM

    Offer three seat width options at increasing price ranges…..XL….XXL…and XXXL. All their fans will have to get the XXXL or they will have no place to sit. Done deal.

    They can also save several million dollars by eliminating the phoney pumped-in crowd noise audio equipment. It is a luxury they’ll have to live without. The Viking fans have enjoyed the ability to eat their three or four footlongs and slurp their 84 OZ “diet” sodas while the audio did their cheering for them. They didn’t have to stop or put anything down. They called it …”livin’ large.” It’ll be a big change, but anything for the team…right?

  32. conormacleod says: Oct 10, 2013 2:25 PM

    Always refreshing to hear Packer fans comment. Almost as refreshing as hearing people that will never spend a penny on professional sports complain how they’re being “forced” to pay for professional sports.

  33. tmntguy86 says: Oct 10, 2013 2:27 PM

    It’s not that the Vikings want a stadium with a roof, it’s that the government here wants a roof so this stadium can be a year round venue for other activities as the dome has been for years. They Vikings loved the idea of no roof, they used to have one back in the day. It’s the local government that was adamant about making sure the stadium has a roof or they wouldn’t have approved the building of it anyways.

  34. tjacks7 says: Oct 10, 2013 2:33 PM

    Might as well scrap it if you’re not going to have the extra 40 feet of glass at the entrance. Now it’s just gonna look cheap.

  35. mn1288 says: Oct 10, 2013 2:34 PM

    PurpleGuy – it’ll make a difference to the high-rollers that demand special treatment.

  36. vikingfan1971 says: Oct 10, 2013 2:38 PM

    the dome in the cities is not up to standard, they are not getting a stadium due to there standings in the nfl, enough already about maybe they should win a super bowl first, cause the state of MN would lose the team, which us Viking fans dont want,

  37. allday420ap says: Oct 10, 2013 2:38 PM

    So how bout that china doll clay matthews? the gal just cant stay on the field.

  38. tokyosandblaster says: Oct 10, 2013 3:20 PM

    This is all well and good, but let’s face it:

    The Vikings suck.

  39. brimab says: Oct 10, 2013 3:24 PM

    So what you’re saying is that now they’ll “need” a new stadium in 15 years instead of 25?

  40. Burritto says: Oct 10, 2013 3:38 PM

    It’s so cute to see the trolls and simps fighting over the wisdom behind $1B decisions. Yes, this entire project should be based around either A)the 2013 Minnesota Vikings, as represented in Madden 25 or B) their number of Super Bowl wins. What other factors could there be?

  41. granadafan says: Oct 10, 2013 3:44 PM

    “jm91rs says: Oct 10, 2013 1:33 PM
    Are you seriously bashing a team for cutting some of the frills to try and stay under budget? Seems better than most people today that just borrow rather than stay within their means.”
    ==============================================

    Most don’t fleece and extort the taxpayers to build their lavish homes or businesses like the Wilfs did. That’s why they deserve the scorn they’re getting.

  42. bears160 says: Oct 10, 2013 3:45 PM

    Damn…..I was willing to pay the extra tax for those two extra windows…..

  43. dirtydrew says: Oct 10, 2013 3:48 PM

    I got an idea. Let’s make it less cool. We’ll save a few bucks.

  44. rcali says: Oct 10, 2013 3:58 PM

    Shouldn’t they be asking the taxpayers what they would like to cut out of the budget? Although I have a feeling Wilfy would be losing his 4000 sq ft owners box complete with its own steakhouse and casino.

  45. freebledsoe says: Oct 10, 2013 4:14 PM

    Why are they cutting “extras” to stay under budget instead of letting the cost overruns ride?

    Because the stadium deal specifies that cost overruns are the responsibility of the Vikings organization and the ownership group.

    I won’t miss the 400 stall premium ramp with skyway, or the 40 feet of glass. However the Vikings were bragging up the incredibly huge pivoting glass doors as a distinguishing feature of their new stadium.

  46. pack13queens0 says: Oct 10, 2013 4:21 PM

    I have a better idea, forget the groundbreaking and move to Los Angeles. Minnesota is full of Packer fans anyway. The Vikings phony sellout streak is the result of corporations buying over 5,000 tickets for every game except when the Packers are there. Hopefully then I’ll be able to see every Packer game on TV for free like it should be. Minnesota stations discriminate against the Packers & would rather show infomercials.

  47. jsally430 says: Oct 10, 2013 4:25 PM

    that’s what happens when you rip people off and then have to pay them 85 million dollars

  48. golforepar says: Oct 10, 2013 5:01 PM

    The Vikings want fans to be comfortable watching a QB that was 3rd string on his Pop Warner team.

  49. toes110 says: Oct 10, 2013 5:15 PM

    Thats a great idea to have the vikings sell worthless stocks, just like another NFCN team has done it, I just hope it wont take multiple generations for the stock holders to realize that they are infact holding to the equivalent of toilet paper… but I guess if i was living that that joke of a state, I would feel the need to buy “stock” in Wisconsin’s only profitable company.

  50. tokyosandblaster says: Oct 10, 2013 6:03 PM

    toes110 says:
    Oct 10, 2013 5:15 PM
    Thats a great idea to have the vikings sell worthless stocks, just like another NFCN team has done it, I just hope it wont take multiple generations for the stock holders to realize that they are infact holding to the equivalent of toilet paper… but I guess if i was living that that joke of a state, I would feel the need to buy “stock” in Wisconsin’s only profitable company.

    —-

    We know you all wish you were us. Unfortunately, someone has to be unpopular, uneducated state. At least you guys win those distinctions.

  51. filthymcnasty1 says: Oct 10, 2013 6:36 PM

    It’s MN. They can save money on the hardware that supports the roof, and nobody will ever know the difference.

  52. toes110 says: Oct 10, 2013 7:37 PM

    Wish we were you? Yeah if I was hoping to go to a tractor pull, or a ho down.. How is the economy doing over there in that wasteland? I’m guessing still ranked well behind the great state of Minnesota.

  53. koreystringerswidow says: Oct 10, 2013 8:21 PM

    Please don’t cut any corners when it comes to safety.

  54. axespray says: Oct 10, 2013 10:52 PM

    “Initially at risk are a 400-stall parking garage to be located a block north of the stadium.”
    ———————–
    Might be a really good idea…
    I don’t wanna get jumped in a parking garage by people who refer to Minneapolis as murder-apolis.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!