Skip to content

Chiefs-Broncos get flexed onto Sunday Night Football

Dexter McCluster AP

Going into the season, there were reasons to think the Chiefs would be better, namely because they could barely be worse than in 2012.

But now that they’re perfect, they’re suddenly a prime time draw.

The NFL announced the Week 11 Chiefs-Broncos game on Nov. 17 has been drawn as the first flex-scheduled game of the year, replacing Packers-Giants on Sunday Night Football.

At the moment, the 8-0 Chiefs and 7-1 Broncos are locked in a duel for the top of the AFC West, while the Giants have had to work to get back to 2-6.

But as much as a major market helps, the allure of Peyton Manning against a potential undefeated team was more than the league was willing to pass on.

The Packers-Giants game will move into the 4:25 p.m. spot on FOX, while Chargers-Dolphins will be played at 4:05 p.m. on CBS.

Permalink 70 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Denver Broncos, Green Bay Packers, Home, Kansas City Chiefs, New York Giants, Rumor Mill
70 Responses to “Chiefs-Broncos get flexed onto Sunday Night Football”
  1. blacknole08 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:07 PM

    Good, they should flex the rematch at Arrowhead for Week 13 as well. No one wants to see the Giants – Skins.

  2. fatediesel says: Nov 1, 2013 4:08 PM

    This game was protected by CBS even though it was a late-afternoon game and they don’t have the doubleheader that week. Did the NFL overrule CBS and force them to give up the game?

  3. bennyb82 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:09 PM

    By week 11 the Giants could be playing for first in the NFC East…

  4. forsbergler says: Nov 1, 2013 4:10 PM

    Sweet, who needs NFL SUNDAY TICKET when Manning is on your team. I think I’ve seen every game this year on TV. WooooHooo

  5. somethingsmellsrotten says: Nov 1, 2013 4:11 PM

    Figures…the NFL sure loves them Donkeys. Why don’t they just show all of MegaHead’s games at night…seems like half their games already are.

  6. jakec4 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:11 PM

    I wish they would start flexing games after week 4. Can’t do anything about Monday and Thursday, but I’ve definitely seen enough Vikings games for awhile.

  7. ilovefootball25 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:12 PM

    What happened to the “protection” from CBS? Did the check bounce?

  8. azarkhan says: Nov 1, 2013 4:13 PM

    OUTSTANDING!

  9. tonyugoh says: Nov 1, 2013 4:14 PM

    Why would anyone complain about this, this game will go a long way towards determining the #1 seed in the AFC and the Broncos are clearly the most compelling team in the NFL right now whether you like them or hate them, like the Miami Heat of the NFL.

    Also looking at the rest of the SNF schedule, the only guaranteed game to stay is Broncos-Patriots. Obviously there will be a few others just cause FOX and CBS will protect games as well but there’s some real duds there, like Falcons-Packers, Giants-Redskins, and Bengals-Steelers. Hopefully a game like Colts-Bengals can get flexed into SNF.

  10. sullijo1 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:16 PM

    Early line has Broncos 10 point favorites….not sure this will be much of a game.

  11. jrebar88 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:17 PM

    Broncos get to expose them on national TV!!

  12. jrebar88 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:18 PM

    Next time use a pic of Mile High when talking about a Broncos home game.

  13. sullijo1 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:20 PM

    Chiefs are UDINOs – UnDefeated In Name Only

  14. Rick Spielman is a Magician says: Nov 1, 2013 4:21 PM

    Not surprising. No one wants to see the Packers and their fans.

  15. darkneptune73 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:24 PM

    I’ll be shocked if Vikings vs Seahawks isn’t flexed soon.

  16. therealtrenches says: Nov 1, 2013 4:33 PM

    The Chiefs have a great defense.

    But they also piece-of-cake schedule that the parity police gave them because they sucked so badly last year.

    In fact, they have beaten NO ONE yet.

    The fact that they squeaked by the Texans and Browns, both of whom had back up QB’s, doesn’t say much good about them.

    This game is going to be VERY interesting.

  17. orivar says: Nov 1, 2013 4:35 PM

    “Giants have had to work to get back to 2-6.”

    Get back? You mean recover? Yeah..that would of been a better word.

  18. Mr. Wright 212 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:35 PM

    I’d rather play at 4:25 anyway. My guys STINK in primetime.

  19. orivar says: Nov 1, 2013 4:37 PM

    Also people keep saying the Chiefs haven’t beaten anyways shows just how tunnel vision people are. ..The Broncos have faced the SAME people other than the Browns as they had the Ravens. Broncos and Chiefs have virtually the same schedule so it’s hilarious how one team is getting called lucky and the other treated like its going to the super bowl. That bias!

  20. slugbaitspace says: Nov 1, 2013 4:37 PM

    Assuming the Broncos win, and nothing unexpected happens around other teams over the next few weeks, here’s where I think SNF will go:

    Week 12: Broncos vs Patriots (no flex)
    Week 13: Broncos vs Chiefs (FLEX)
    Week 14: Seahawks vs 49ers (FLEX)
    Week 15: Packers vs Cowboys (FLEX)
    Week 16: Colts vs Chiefs (FLEX)

    I assume Week 13 won’t flex for Broncos/Chiefs if the Chiefs win in Week 11, and I also assume no other contest will be able to flex out Giants vs Redskins that week.

  21. Mr. Wright 212 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:38 PM

    bennyb82 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:09 PM

    By week 11 the Giants could be playing for first in the NFC East…
    —————-

    With Dallas surely losing to New Orleans and possibly losing to Minnesota, when they can’t stop ANYONE, and the rematch in East Rutherford (if the Giants beat the Raiders and Packers) will be for the division lead, and the tiebreaker over Dallas — particularly if they lose to Minnesota — so you aren’t off there.

  22. justintuckrule says: Nov 1, 2013 4:38 PM

    As a Giants’ fan, this makes me happy. We play better when everyone thinks we suck and we’re dead and buried.

  23. jacobk621 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:39 PM

    They need to start flexing the Thursday night games , whoever makes the schedule
    sure thought the Vikings were going to be a contender this year , they have been on prime time the last few weeks

  24. azarkhan says: Nov 1, 2013 4:39 PM

    Nov 10 begins an interesting series of games for the Broncos. They play the Chargers, Chiefs, Patriots and then the Chiefs again. That should determine whether or not they win the AFC West.

  25. dualprime says: Nov 1, 2013 4:41 PM

    How do we flex the Texans out of prime time slots?

  26. contra74isloosbuthole says: Nov 1, 2013 4:42 PM

    As if the AFC mattered at all.

  27. stealthjunk says: Nov 1, 2013 4:42 PM

    “But now that they’re perfect, they’re suddenly a prime time draw.”

    Not to degrade the Chiefs’ accomplishments, but the only “prime time draw” to this game is Peyton Manning. Any team slightly better than the Jags instantly becomes a “prime time draw” when facing Manning.

  28. loyalraven says: Nov 1, 2013 4:43 PM

    It’s just amazing how Payton Manning always chokes. He gets that Forest Gump look in his eyes with that shoulder shrug slump and just stares off into space like “ummm…uhhh..geee I dunno what happended dere”….we do Payton. It’s called ur throat swelled shut and u choked. For someone that is that dominant, that great, that talented to always fall short is pretty remarkable. Doesn’t matter how great ur defense is, if Payton Manning is on u can’t stop him. And for whatever reason the switch always gets flipped off during the Playoffs. Manning should dominate championships like he does MVPs but he doesn’t. And for that I don’t know if she should be crowned the greatest ever.

  29. siennaLilo says: Nov 1, 2013 4:48 PM

    Alex Smith is SO boring. Much rather watch Eli and Aaron on Sunday Night :(

  30. gah05 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:49 PM

    It will be the 8-1 Chiefs once the Bills get to them this Sunday!

  31. forsbergler says: Nov 1, 2013 4:52 PM

    The diffrence is the Chiefs have been winning their games by 3, and my broncos have been winning theirs by 21. If anyone actually thinks the chiefs have a chance in this game they don’t understand football very well. It’s simple math. The chiefs are going to have to score 30 points to win and that’s just not going happening.

  32. returntoexcellence says: Nov 1, 2013 4:54 PM

    orivar says:
    Nov 1, 2013 4:37 PM
    Also people keep saying the Chiefs haven’t beaten anyways shows just how tunnel vision people are. ..The Broncos have faced the SAME people other than the Browns as they had the Ravens. Broncos and Chiefs have virtually the same schedule so it’s hilarious how one team is getting called lucky and the other treated like its going to the super bowl. That bias!
    _____________________________

    That’s because the Chiefs have “squeaked by” that schedule and the Broncos have just about blown every one out. And for the record, I’m a Raider fan… so I hate both these teams.

  33. Rick Spielman is a Magician says: Nov 1, 2013 4:55 PM

    darkneptune73 says:Nov 1, 2013 4:24 PM

    I’ll be shocked if Vikings vs Seahawks isn’t flexed soon.
    _____

    I would be very surprised, because that game is scheduled for a Sunday afternoon and the score will be 45-0.

  34. champsb3233 says: Nov 1, 2013 4:58 PM

    This will ensure the second Broncos-Chiefs game won’t be flexed in since the week after the first one, Broncos-Patriots are on Sunday night and they won’t have the Broncos on three straight Sunday nights. CBS has got to be ticked off since it protected the game.

  35. mataug says: Nov 1, 2013 5:01 PM

    People who are coming up with flex scheduling predictions definitely don’t work for FOX & CBS. I wish somebody at PFT could clarify how this game was flexed when 3 weeks it was reported that CBS had protected both of the Broncos-Chiefs games.

  36. dwarftosser says: Nov 1, 2013 5:04 PM

    Hard to argue that. The Packers offense is fun to watch, but that game should be put away before the 4th quarter.

  37. BED MAN OKC says: Nov 1, 2013 5:12 PM

    Did I see someone say: Who have the Chiefs beaten this year? Onlym every single team they have faced !

  38. Mr. Wright 212 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:12 PM

    dwarftosser says: Nov 1, 2013 5:04 PM

    Hard to argue that. The Packers offense is fun to watch, but that game should be put away before the 4th quarter.
    —————

    Doubtful, but then again, what do I know?

    They’ve said that the last four times the Packers have played the Giants. How’d those games turn out?

    The only thing they’ve done to change their philosophy is draft Lacy.

    The Giants stuff the run very well.

    That’s why they play the games.

  39. repmochief50 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:12 PM

    forsbergler says:
    Nov 1, 2013 4:52 PM
    The diffrence is the Chiefs have been winning their games by 3, and my broncos have been winning theirs by 21. If anyone actually thinks the chiefs have a chance in this game they don’t understand football very well. It’s simple math. The chiefs are going to have to score 30 points to win and that’s just not going happening.
    ……………………………………………………………………….
    Should check before you make uniformed comments, here’s common opponents:

    Jags- Chiefs by 26, Broncos by 16
    Cowboys- Chiefs by 1, Broncos by 3
    Eagles- Chiefs by 10, Broncos by 32
    Giants- Chiefs by 24, Broncos by 17
    Raiders- Chiefs by 17, Broncos by 16

    I see ONE blowout by Denver there, 3 of 5 we won by bigger margin…….

  40. footballviewer says: Nov 1, 2013 5:15 PM

    therealtrenches says: Nov 1, 2013 4:33 PM

    The Chiefs have a great defense.

    But they also piece-of-cake schedule that the parity police gave them because they sucked so badly last year.

    ====================

    You don’t know what you’re talking about.

    Of the 16 games an NFL team plays every year, only 2 are determined by the team’s record the prior year. For example, the Chiefs play the Browns (whom they just defeated) and the Bill (whom they play next week) because of their record last year. Otherwise, the Chiefs schedule is the same as the Broncos, Chargers, and Raiders. In other words, the Chiefs are 7-0 against the same set of teams that the Broncos play.

    The 2 games against teams that finished in the same position in their division the previous year are not even about favoring the weak teams over the strong teams. It is about making all teams have roughly equal schedules in theory. For example, the Chiefs finished last in the AFC West last year, so they get to play the Browns and the Bills this year. But the Chiefs have to play two games this year against the Broncos, the first place team in the AFC West last year. Similarly, the Broncos have to play the Patriots and the Ravens because all three of those teams finished first in their divisions last year. However, the Broncos also get two games against the Chiefs who finished last in the AFC West last year.

    Every NFL team’s schedule has the following games:

    4 games against teams that finished first in their division the previous year.
    4 games against teams that finished second in their division the previous year.
    4 games against teams that finished third in their division the previous year.
    4 games against teams that finished fourth in their division the previous year.

    So good teams are not penalized the following year by having a tough schedule, and bad teams are not rewarded the following year by having an easy schedule. All teams theoretically play the same quality schedule every year.

  41. nickynick04 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:24 PM

    The Vikings should not be anywhere near a national audience,
    Seriously, they are so pathetic in so so many ways

  42. bert1913 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:29 PM

    the chiefs have one the easiest schedules this year due to their 2012 2-14 record. let’s see how they do against a quality opponent. too bad they aren’t facing manning in really bad weather.

  43. omystyles says: Nov 1, 2013 5:40 PM

    repmochief50 says:
    Nov 1, 2013 5:12 PM
    forsbergler says:
    Nov 1, 2013 4:52 PM
    The diffrence is the Chiefs have been winning their games by 3, and my broncos have been winning theirs by 21. If anyone actually thinks the chiefs have a chance in this game they don’t understand football very well. It’s simple math. The chiefs are going to have to score 30 points to win and that’s just not going happening.
    ……………………………………………………………………….
    Should check before you make uniformed comments, here’s common opponents:

    Jags- Chiefs by 26, Broncos by 16
    Cowboys- Chiefs by 1, Broncos by 3
    Eagles- Chiefs by 10, Broncos by 32
    Giants- Chiefs by 24, Broncos by 17
    Raiders- Chiefs by 17, Broncos by 16

    I see ONE blowout by Denver there, 3 of 5 we won by bigger margin…….
    ————————————————–

    Well said. These are the simple facts that many fans and media members simply ignore when they claim that the Chiefs haven’t played anyone, and the Broncos have been dominant. LOOK AT THE FACTS PEOPLE. I am a diehard Chiefs fan and have no idea how the game will turn out, but my god stop with the uninformed inaccurate comments about the schedules the teams have played and results to date.

    LETS GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  44. onbucky96 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:45 PM

    AWESOME! As a Packers fan, I love this. Now just move the game to a noon start. To hell w/Primetime football!

  45. jredshoes says: Nov 1, 2013 5:47 PM

    The delusional broncos fans need to look at reality. They may score 40 points a game but their defense gives up 39 (that’s sarcasm) Modt people that belittle the Chiefs don’t realize they average 24 points on offense and give up less than 12 on defense. The good thing is we get to actually play 2 games against each other so the winner or loser can’t complain. As of right now 8-0. #1 AFC and the NFL!

  46. johninthewest says: Nov 1, 2013 5:49 PM

    Yes the Chiefs played everyone Denver has and barely won each of those games. Denver played the same teams and won by massive margins. I get a chuckle when people continually compare these two teams. Denver is easily 2 1/2 steps ahead of the Chiefs hands down. Comparing defenses, Denver gave up stupid points to teams who were trying to remotely catch up the points that Denver put up. Offensively, well.. we won’t go there..

  47. 84smooninlambeaunevergetsold says: Nov 1, 2013 5:50 PM

    Awesome, thank you SNF.

    A better game, plus I don’t have to watch more of Rodgers on the sidelines, with his little towel around his neck, and that stupid arrogant smirk on his face.

    Plus Peyton is more funner to watch.
    He’s also actually funny in his commercials.
    He’s also a better QB than Rodgers.

  48. johninthewest says: Nov 1, 2013 5:53 PM

    Campare the offensive stats folks.

  49. gb4mn0 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:53 PM

    I wish they’d flex every vikqueen game into SNF. It makes me all warm and fuzzy watching the lavender Larry toads get steamrolled.

  50. dolphinsfan231990 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:54 PM

    If you’re undefeated at this point in the season, you’re a very good team. The Broncos have been the class of the nfl so far this year, though. I don’t believe that the chiefs will beat the Broncos, or advance past the first round of the playoffs until they get better playmakers on the perimeter.

  51. lances59 says: Nov 1, 2013 5:55 PM

    You people don’t have a clue that don’t give the chiefs a chance to win and say the chiefs haven’t played anybody the broncos ave played the same teams the diff. is the broncos defense has given up way more points then the chiefs so go chiefs

  52. greg2geez says: Nov 1, 2013 5:57 PM

    This is easy money. Peyton will pants this “vaunted” defense and Alex Smith won’t be able to do a thing about it.

  53. jrebar88 says: Nov 1, 2013 6:00 PM

    jredshoes says:
    Nov 1, 2013 5:47 PM
    The delusional broncos fans need to look at reality. They may score 40 points a game but their defense gives up 39 (that’s sarcasm) Modt people that belittle the Chiefs don’t realize they average 24 points on offense and give up less than 12 on defense. The good thing is we get to actually play 2 games against each other so the winner or loser can’t complain. As of right now 8-0. #1 AFC and the NFL!
    —————-

    Funny how you try to be serious but cant even bring facts to the table.

  54. mathomp3 says: Nov 1, 2013 6:04 PM

    Chiefs have a scary good defense. Cant wait to see them face off against the Broncos who have what at the end of the season might be the most prolific offense of all time. This game is what PRIME TIME football is all about!

  55. rcpecook says: Nov 1, 2013 6:09 PM

    Call me old fashioned but this is good news. As a Packers fan I like my games on Sunday during the day (preferably noon).

    It keeps them off of prime time where the band wagon “fans” live. Under the radar is the best place to live until you cannot avoid it.

    I’d rather be half asleep watching later games where I don’t have anything emotionally invested.

    GO PACK!

  56. cospgsmadman says: Nov 1, 2013 6:22 PM

    BUMMER…I like to drink in the afternoon then sleep at night.lol

  57. 84smooninlambeaunevergetsold says: Nov 1, 2013 6:24 PM

    Just to clarify one more time-

    Peyton Manning is and will always be better than Aaron Rodgers.

  58. jakec4 says: Nov 1, 2013 6:38 PM

    All this back and forth about the Chiefs schedule is ridiculous.

    1. The Chiefs can only play who is on their schedule.

    2. Chiefs-Broncos was put on the big stage for good reason. KC is deserving, and frankly a team I want to watch.

    3. If KC are frauds it will show itself in the playoffs, so what are you worried about now?

    4. Defense and a running game travels well. Nobody will figure KC to be an easy out except for insignificant fans.

  59. filthymcnasty1 says: Nov 1, 2013 6:50 PM

    The Vikings are being flexed onto the Lifetime Channel.

  60. roadtrip3500 says: Nov 1, 2013 8:11 PM

    fatediesel says: Nov 1, 2013 4:08 PM

    This game was protected by CBS even though it was a late-afternoon game and they don’t have the doubleheader that week. Did the NFL overrule CBS and force them to give up the game?
    ——————-
    In a CBS statement posted by SI.com, CBS acknowledged that very few people would see the game on CBS since it was a western regional broadcast that week (Fox has the doubleheader that day), and moving to NBC would give the matchup more viewers. Had it been a CBS doubleheader day and the game shown to most of the country at 4:25, they would have kept the protection on it.

  61. dualprime says: Nov 1, 2013 8:56 PM

    repmochief50 says:
    Nov 1, 2013 5:12 PM
    forsbergler says:
    Nov 1, 2013 4:52 PM
    The diffrence is the Chiefs have been winning their games by 3, and my broncos have been winning theirs by 21. If anyone actually thinks the chiefs have a chance in this game they don’t understand football very well. It’s simple math. The chiefs are going to have to score 30 points to win and that’s just not going happening.
    ……………………………………………………………………….
    Should check before you make uniformed comments, here’s common opponents:

    Jags- Chiefs by 26, Broncos by 16
    Cowboys- Chiefs by 1, Broncos by 3
    Eagles- Chiefs by 10, Broncos by 32
    Giants- Chiefs by 24, Broncos by 17
    Raiders- Chiefs by 17, Broncos by 16

    I see ONE blowout by Denver there, 3 of 5 we won by bigger margin…….
    ————————————————
    Broncos beat Cowboys by only 3 but the did score 51 points. Romo handed a winnable game to the Chiefs. You didn’t mention the Chiefs one point win over the Texans playing with an undrafted, practice squad QB. None of this really matters though. We’ll know if the Chiefs are for real soon enough based on games played, not opinions.

  62. kimbo71006 says: Nov 1, 2013 9:26 PM

    The delusional broncos fans need to look at reality. They may score 40 points a game but their defense gives up 39 (that’s sarcasm) Modt people that belittle the Chiefs don’t realize they average 24 points on offense and give up less than 12 on defense. The good thing is we get to actually play 2 games against each other so the winner or loser can’t complain. As of right now 8-0. #1 AFC and the NFL!

    —————————————————-
    I’m not a fan of either the Broncos or the Chiefs, but here is an ACTUAL FACT.

    The Chiefs have not played ANYONE ranked in the Top Ten in the NFL as of Week #8–NO ONE.

    The Broncos have played ONE team ranked in the Top Ten (Colts).

    So in my humble opinion–neither team has really played anyone that is ranked period. They have both played bottom dweller teams (lower ranked teams, out of the top ten ranked NFL teams).

    Now, when the Chiefs/Broncos play the Seahawks, Colts, Saints, and/or 49ers and WIN, then let’s chat.

    Until then…move on.

  63. mjjames82 says: Nov 1, 2013 10:29 PM

    The Broncos and Chiefs have not faced the same schedule. There are quite a few differences actually.

    The Broncos have faced the Ravens, Colts and Redskins while the Chiefs have faced the Texans, Titans and Browns.

    The other MAJOR difference is the Chiefs have had a very fortunate string of games against teams with 2nd or 3rd string QBs.

    Week 5 – Titans – 2nd string QB (Fitzpatrick)
    Week 7 – Texans – 3rd String QB (Keenum)
    Week 8 – Browns – 3rd string QB – (Campbell)
    Week 9 – Bills – Likely the 3rd straight game vs a 3rd sting QB (Tuel or Flynn)

    They also played Jax without Blackmon because he was suspended.

    The Broncos schedule hasn’t exactly been very tough either, but lets not make comparisons without telling the whole story.

    Broncos margin of victory is 4 ppg greater.

    None of this is really going to matter when they play each other though, so its pointless to argue about it.

  64. kcgranddad says: Nov 2, 2013 2:08 AM

    True — he didn’t mention a close win by the Chiefs. But he also didn’t mention a loss by the Broncos. The point was, he compared margins of victory against common opponents.
    It seems pretty straight forward to me.

  65. joetoronto says: Nov 2, 2013 6:09 AM

    Both teams are incomplete and going nowhere.

    It’s Indy in the AFC.

  66. babyfarkmcgeezax says: Nov 2, 2013 9:10 AM

    Funny reading all these comments from Broncos fans about KC barely beating bad teams. Wasn’t that Denver’s preferred method with their mediocre “all he does is win” QB a few years ago?

  67. jameskcfanz says: Nov 2, 2013 12:26 PM

    Funny thing about all your Bronco fans, maybe you don’t realize that you’re going to need some fastest Masons in the world and build a block wall on every down, to try to stop the left side from pounding your quarterback. Don’t get me wrong I like Peyton Manning a lot I just hope he survives.

  68. jacksoncountysumoclub says: Nov 11, 2013 4:29 PM

    The Chiefs and the Broncos have played almost the exact same schedule to date. The only difference being the Colts and Chargers. The Chargers are on the same level as Dallas, and Philidelphia. KC should beat them at arrowhead, and it should be a close game in San Diego. Indy got hammered by the Rams yesterday, WHAT!!! That should not happen should it? If you think that the Chiefs are not a good team based on their Schedule why don’t you feel the same about the Seahawks and the Broncos?

  69. jacksoncountysumoclub says: Nov 11, 2013 4:30 PM

    I love the comment about both teams being incomplete and going nowhere it is Indy in the AFC…Until Andrew Luck throws 4 ints

  70. dandoylekc says: Nov 15, 2013 8:12 PM

    The Broncos are an average team if Manning is taken out of the formula. Look for the Chiefs to knock him out of the game by half time. Then the Chiefs have a good chance to win. If Manning is protected look for a blow out.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!