Skip to content

Vikings’ Chris Cook: Packers are “definitely vulnerable”

Aaron Rodgers, Scott Tolzien AP

Vikings cornerback Chris Cook, an apparent scholar of the game, has unearthed something that could be important to his team.

It seems that the Packers might be harder to beat with quarterback Aaron Rodgers on the field than Scott Tolzien, and that difference is something opponents might take advantage of.

They’re definitely vulnerable right now,” Cook said, via Chris Tomasson of the St. Paul Pioneer Press. “Rodgers is a key guy for them and he pretty much makes their offense go.”

Do tell.

Cook went on to say: “This is definitely a must-win [game] for us” — establishing that everything is, in fact, relative.

Granted, the Packers have lost three straight since Rogers broke his collarbone.

But if anyone knows about vulnerable quarterback situations, it should be the 2-8 Vikings, who have looked vulnerable with all three of theirs this year.

Permalink 80 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Green Bay Packers, Home, Minnesota Vikings, Rumor Mill
80 Responses to “Vikings’ Chris Cook: Packers are “definitely vulnerable””
  1. 2manyconcussions says: Nov 19, 2013 9:50 AM

    Two teams, and not one starting quarterback between them. Should be memorable.

  2. seahawkgoat says: Nov 19, 2013 9:54 AM

    Vikings are an embarrassment. If anything, this is a must lose game, so they can try to improve that horrid roster. Please continue to send Seattle all the diamonds in the rough.

    #PFTPoet

  3. dublindemonszfl says: Nov 19, 2013 9:55 AM

    They are Chris, but we have no defense followed by no QB. As Vikings fans it is time to face some reality. We have a mix of old vets and newbies with no one in the middle beside Greenway, and he seems to be a lot slower this year, probably because Henderson isn’t a starter and neither is the rest of the LB squad. I hate the packners, but they win this weekend. Fire Spielman.

  4. packfntk says: Nov 19, 2013 9:56 AM

    This man should be a brain surgeon.

  5. iced107 says: Nov 19, 2013 9:57 AM

    I love how you guys act like he just figured it out or it was making a statement when he was more than likely responding to another dumb question from a reporter, that was probably asked multiple times.

  6. filthymcnasty1 says: Nov 19, 2013 9:59 AM

    Nothing gets by these Viking players.

    What Cook really means is that the Vikings have no chance when the Packers are healthy.

  7. arwiv says: Nov 19, 2013 10:02 AM

    As a Giants fan, who has seen my team play against the Freeman-led Vikings and the Tolzien-led Packers, I’d honestly say that the Vikings were the bigger challenge for the Giants. If Freeman had even had a clue in that game, the Giants could have easily lost.

    On this past Sunday, there was absolutely no point in that game that I ever thought the Giants would lose to the Packers.

  8. The Great Ted Thompson the Genius says: Nov 19, 2013 10:04 AM

    This will be the best chance Chris Cook has ever had of getting that first career interception. He only has six more games as a Viking to do it.

  9. contra74 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:07 AM

    Ah, this weeks matchup is considered the Packers Super Bowl as it is against their rivals the Vikings. Those poor souls in Wisconsin still think they have a chance at a win here.

  10. prowler55 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:10 AM

    Wow, taking offense Cook’s comments, Mr. Gantt? It’s true, they’re vulnerable. What’s he supposed to say?

  11. mikey77750 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:11 AM

    A Packer official stated a bit ago that he doesn’t believe Rodgers will be ready for the Lions game on Thanksgiving. I think if they lose the next two to go to 5-7, McCarthy will shut down Rodgers and Cobb for the season and regroup for 2014. That would be sensible, because what would there be to play for at that point?

  12. cutlersmangina says: Nov 19, 2013 10:13 AM

    So, you say the Packers are worse without Rodgers?
    Has this guy been given his Mensa membership card yet?

  13. scoops1 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:14 AM

    Chris Cook is some kind of Genius

  14. ruvelligwebuike says: Nov 19, 2013 10:14 AM

    Tolzien has thrown 5 picks in 2 games, and he was literally on the practive squad 2.5 weeks ago.

    What I’m saying is that if there was ever a time the girlfriend beating, Glock brandishing 2nd round bust was going to record his first career interception, now would be it.

  15. norseyapper says: Nov 19, 2013 10:14 AM

    Note to Chris Cook: 2-8 teams should not talk smack or even offer humble opinions about the “vulnerability” of the opposition. If you can find a way to keep the Packers under 21 points maybe we’ll listen, until then you’ve got nothing to say.

  16. tiredofyoureferringtoateamaswe says: Nov 19, 2013 10:17 AM

    He then continued on to say that water is wet, ice is cold, the sky is blue….and the Vikings are still so bad they won’t be able to beat the Rodgersless Packers.

  17. doorharp11 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:22 AM

    this is what the vikings fans have wanted and asked for time after time after time. most viking fans are vulnerable. it all comes back to firing a winning coach and team in childress. after this evaluation of spielman and frazier it is more proof that childress put the vikings together not spielman. fans wanted change and they got it. in my mouth it tastes bad and i want a coach like childress again… lets get down to business hire jon gruden!

  18. cornernum23 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:22 AM

    Wow! You know, I think you could be more condescending, if you tried.

  19. gbpackersfan12 says: Nov 19, 2013 10:32 AM

    Water is wet.

    Sky is blue.

  20. castleofcheese says: Nov 19, 2013 10:41 AM

    What did you expect him to say?

  21. dwarftosser says: Nov 19, 2013 10:51 AM

    What an amazingly insightful observation. The Viking’s must be football geniuses to see this weakness.

  22. longcutskolvikes says: Nov 19, 2013 10:51 AM

    Can this season be over already? I’m looking forward to the days when Chris Cook can choke on some other team.

  23. emoney826 says: Nov 19, 2013 11:12 AM

    Lol, this is the packers super bowl? Not likely. Unlike the vikings, who consider this their super bowl EVERY year, this is just another game for the packers. The vikings are not a key rival to us. Maybe if you made the games competitive over the past 5years or so, it might be more interesting. But even with our terrible defense and backup QB, it will still be a win for us. Viking fans can’t accept the fact that their team is not relevant to us. Our rival is and always has been Chicago. Minnesota is like Detroit. You two just happen to share a division with Chicago and green bay. You’re not relevant.

  24. irishgary says: Nov 19, 2013 11:14 AM

    I see contra and cook have similar IQs.

  25. valhallarising says: Nov 19, 2013 11:17 AM

    Cook went on to say that “This is definitely a must-win [game] for us”

    Seriously Chris? At 2-8 it’s a “must win game”?

  26. allday28mvpmvp says: Nov 19, 2013 11:22 AM

    Vikes and Pack are both 1-3 the past 4 games.
    I cant help but think that the Vikings get their last win of the season at Lambeau.
    If Rodgers doesn’t get healthy then the Packers already won their last game of the season.

  27. allday28mvpmvp says: Nov 19, 2013 11:24 AM

    The Great Ted Thompson the Genius says: Nov 19, 2013 10:04 AM

    This will be the best chance Chris Cook has ever had of getting that first career interception. He only has six more games as a Viking to do it.

    ——

    Seriously? The Vikings secondary is so awful that Chris Cook is the best CB on the team right now.
    Rhodes will be the best soon.

  28. conormacleod says: Nov 19, 2013 11:27 AM

    You guys make fun, but I know I read right here that many Packer fans insisted their team could go 2-2 without Rodgers, and still be sitting pretty for a run at the division title. Any of those guys still here?

  29. aflightguy says: Nov 19, 2013 11:29 AM

    Cook is a slightly better version of Wasswa Serwanga.
    At least Wasswa could get a pick every now and then

  30. valhallarising says: Nov 19, 2013 11:35 AM

    seahawkgoat says: Nov 19, 2013 9:54 AM

    “Vikings are an embarrassment. If anything, this is a must lose game, so they can try to improve that horrid roster. Please continue to send Seattle all the diamonds in the rough.”

    Which “diamonds in the rough” are you referring to? I’ll give you Percy but I wouldn’t call him a “diamond in the rough” as everyone in Minnesota knows he has talent. You must mean Nate Burleson, Tavaris Jackson, Sydney Rice, and Heath Farwell? Diamonds…

  31. johnnyjagfan says: Nov 19, 2013 11:41 AM

    Yo, Cook! Your secondary has given up more TDs than any other team. You’re not competitive. Why’d the Vikes trot out such a weenie to speak on behalf of the team?

  32. purplengold says: Nov 19, 2013 11:51 AM

    The rest of the season consists of must lose games, Chris. You should start and AP should rest.

  33. allday28mvpmvp says: Nov 19, 2013 11:53 AM

    Everybody is hating on Chris Cook like hes a bum.

    I remember the Detroit game where he had Calvin 1 on 1 for most the game. He held him to 40 yds and no TDs. Yeah, he’s a real bum.

  34. thegreatgabbert says: Nov 19, 2013 12:01 PM

    No worries Chris, the Pack is paralyzed by The Curse Of Bob McGinn.

  35. filthymcnasty1 says: Nov 19, 2013 12:02 PM

    So what happens if Tolzien lights up the Vikings?

  36. tokyosandblaster says: Nov 19, 2013 12:03 PM

    Eddie Lacy won the battle of the running games last time, what makes this game any different?

    Don’t worry, afterwards, Peterson will blame his groin.

  37. valhallarising says: Nov 19, 2013 12:05 PM

    allday28mvpmvp says: Nov 19, 2013 11:53 AM

    “Everybody is hating on Chris Cook like hes a bum.

    I remember the Detroit game where he had Calvin 1 on 1 for most the game. He held him to 40 yds and no TDs. Yeah, he’s a real bum.”

    Matt Flynn threw six touchdowns in a game once. Chris Cook is a bum.

  38. cobaltdriver says: Nov 19, 2013 12:09 PM

    Well thank you Captain obvious……it s like Penny on the Big Bang theory,so cute when she tries to be smart

  39. duece5 says: Nov 19, 2013 12:17 PM

    filthymcnasty1 says: Nov 19, 2013 9:59 AM

    Nothing gets by these Viking players.

    What Cook really means is that the Vikings have no chance when the Packers are healthy.

    duece5 says:

    Hey filthy, weren’t you just saying ….”next man up!” not long ago?

    Where has your faith gone in McCarthy’s undeniable ability to coach up??

    It looks like the faith has cracked…….

    The gbay QB graveyard:

    Rubely, Brohm, Harrel, Coleman, Tolzien, Flynn, Wallace…..holy cow, and I know i am forgetting a few…..help me out pack fan…..who else has he developed???

    You silly pack fans……you amuse us, little brother!

  40. facebookfirevicketchman says: Nov 19, 2013 12:23 PM

    This game is going to be so awful, the NFL is going to flex it to Saturday.

  41. shlort says: Nov 19, 2013 12:46 PM

    conormacleod says:Nov 19, 2013 11:27 AM

    You guys make fun, but I know I read right here that many Packer fans insisted their team could go 2-2 without Rodgers, and still be sitting pretty for a run at the division title. Any of those guys still here?
    ________________________

    As it is turning out, GB is still in contention for the division title even though they are losing without Rodgers. If GB misses the playoffs, only one team will go to the post season from the North, and that team will be Detroit. Detroit is not good enough to win in the playoffs, so the North is pretty much a non-issue in post season play. it doesn’t look like anyone in the NFC is powerful enough to beat Seattle anyway. New Orleans is pretty much the only other team in the confrence with any hope, and they must win in Seattle in week 13 to have a chance at a confrence title.

  42. snowlock2013 says: Nov 19, 2013 12:46 PM

    What Cook meant to say is, without Rodgers, the Packers are even worse than we are!!! Thank cheddar A-Rodg started the season so they can’t pick higher than us in the draft.

  43. vikesfansteve says: Nov 19, 2013 12:49 PM

    They are vulnerable unless they target Cook then they’ll throw for a thousand yards and 10 TD’s.

  44. Carl Gerbschmidt says: Nov 19, 2013 12:55 PM

    I for one would rather see Chris giving interviews about how vulnerable the Packers are instead of using that time to beat his girlfriend. I’m sure most Minnesota women would agree with me.

  45. conormacleod says: Nov 19, 2013 1:10 PM

    filthymcnasty1 says:
    Nov 19, 2013 12:02 PM
    So what happens if Tolzien lights up the Vikings?
    ————————————
    He becomes Aaron Rodgers back-up next season? He gets another 2 starts while Rodgers is injured, putting his record at 1-4, and the Packers out of the playoffs? I give up…what happens?

  46. conormacleod says: Nov 19, 2013 1:13 PM

    shlort says:
    Nov 19, 2013 12:46 PM
    conormacleod says:Nov 19, 2013 11:27 AM

    You guys make fun, but I know I read right here that many Packer fans insisted their team could go 2-2 without Rodgers, and still be sitting pretty for a run at the division title. Any of those guys still here?
    ________________________

    As it is turning out, GB is still in contention for the division title even though they are losing without Rodgers.
    ————————————-
    You can’t possibly be serious. I would actually respect a Packer fan if one of you would just come out and say your team is horrible without Rodgers. He’s your whole team, which is ok, because he can carry your team to the playoffs each year. But you guys need to stop pretending you have a rushing game and that your defense does not stink. You have zero chance at the playoffs, let alone a division title, without Rodgers.

  47. jusford says: Nov 19, 2013 1:20 PM

    So the girlfriend beater has some insight? Well here’s one for ya:
    1) The Packers 3rd string QB is better than the Vikings 1st string QB.
    2) The Packers 4th and 5th string WR’s are better than the Vikings 1st string CB’s and Saftey’s.
    3) The Packers coaching staff is (minus the Def. Cord.) is far more superior than the Vikings coaching staff.

    I could go on (e.g. the GM, stadium,…). The Vikings have Peterson, that’s it! And Lacy is proving to be a top 10 back.
    Just start telling everyone (KFAN) how great the Vikings will be next year and how they’ll go 12-4 like you did this year!

  48. katoelf75 says: Nov 19, 2013 1:29 PM

    Looking at the schedule this is probably the Vikings best chance at a win to close the year. Watch them screw up their current #2 overall draft selection by winning.

  49. contra74 says: Nov 19, 2013 1:38 PM

    I love seeing all the false sense of hope for the Packers. These packer rubes will never get it will they? Its unfortunate that no one has slapped the kool aid out of their hands. Funny, yet sad at the same time.

  50. conormacleod says: Nov 19, 2013 1:57 PM

    jusford says:
    Nov 19, 2013 1:20 PM
    The Vikings have Peterson, that’s it!
    ——————————————-
    It should have been obvious, but nothing ever is to Packer fans. How many wins does your team have without Rodgers?

  51. beerbratscheese says: Nov 19, 2013 2:09 PM

    contra74 says: Nov 19, 2013 1:38 PM

    I love seeing all the false sense of hope for the Packers. These packer rubes will never get it will they? Its unfortunate that no one has slapped the kool aid out of their hands. Funny, yet sad at the same time.
    ————————————-

    Yea, and at the beginning of the season, Vikings fans were saying they were the team to beat in the North.

    It took several key injuries for the Packers fans to be delusional. It simply took the season to start to show the Vikings fans were delusional.

  52. stellarperformance says: Nov 19, 2013 2:21 PM

    The season is not over for the Packers until it’s over. Right now, today, the Packers are one game out of first place. They need a decent game out of Tolzien and they are right back in it.

    The Viking fans keep proclaiming that the Packers are finished. Granted, the Vikings and their fans know losing…they are the resident experts.

    But wishing and hoping is not the same as truth and facts.

    If anyone is delusional, it’s the Viking fans….with their fingers crossed..ready for their second annual SuperBowl coming up on Sunday.

  53. qoojo says: Nov 19, 2013 2:25 PM

    “Rodgers is a key guy for them and he pretty much makes their offense go.”

    and Newhouse makes the opposing teams defense go. I think the vikings win because they will score more than 13 points, and MM will still try to go against the defense’s strength (i.e. running the ball against 8 man fronts). MM’s true talent is winning the QB lottery.

  54. duece5 says: Nov 19, 2013 2:28 PM

    emoney826 says: Nov 19, 2013 11:12 AM

    Lol, this is the packers super bowl? Not likely. Unlike the vikings, who consider this their super bowl EVERY year, this is just another game for the packers. The vikings are not a key rival to us. Maybe if you made the games competitive over the past 5years or so, it might be more interesting. But even with our terrible defense and backup QB, it will still be a win for us. Viking fans can’t accept the fact that their team is not relevant to us. Our rival is and always has been Chicago. Minnesota is like Detroit. You two just happen to share a division with Chicago and green bay. You’re not relevant.

    duece 5 says:

    Interesting…..the 25 years of irrelevancy from the late 60s, 70s, to the 80s DISAGREE with you.

    Vikings DOMINATED the division and won 10 of 12 division titles in the late 60s/70s while the packers garnered exactly 0.

    We also had had many winning seasons in between.

    Not since favre came along, and recently Rodgers, have you won some division titles, but even in that time, we didn’t have the putrid DECADES of losing that the packers “enjoyed” for about 25 years!!!!!

    Look up the stats dude…….VIKINGS have won more division titles since we became a franchise, than any team in the NFC Central/North.

    More than the pukes, and more than the Bears.

    There endeth the lesson.

    Know your facts about the division before you spew junk.

    Remember the Lynn Dickey era……..whew…..stinky!!!!

    Move along, little brother!!!!

  55. filthymcnasty1 says: Nov 19, 2013 2:52 PM

    Division championships?

    Why don’t we compare pre season records while were at it. It’s loser talk.

    Successful teams measure themselves with legitimate World Championships.

  56. filthymcnasty1 says: Nov 19, 2013 3:02 PM

    The “successful” Vikings have a losing record and history dating all the way back to beginning of this century.

    And they’ve never won a legitimate World Championship.

    Some would say that their degenerate fans deserve it, and I would have to agree.

  57. contra74 says: Nov 19, 2013 3:12 PM

    duece5 says:
    Nov 19, 2013 2:28 PM
    emoney826 says: Nov 19, 2013 11:12 AM

    Lol, this is the packers super bowl? Not likely. Unlike the vikings, who consider this their super bowl EVERY year, this is just another game for the packers. The vikings are not a key rival to us. Maybe if you made the games competitive over the past 5years or so, it might be more interesting. But even with our terrible defense and backup QB, it will still be a win for us. Viking fans can’t accept the fact that their team is not relevant to us. Our rival is and always has been Chicago. Minnesota is like Detroit. You two just happen to share a division with Chicago and green bay. You’re not relevant.

    duece 5 says:

    Interesting…..the 25 years of irrelevancy from the late 60s, 70s, to the 80s DISAGREE with you.

    Vikings DOMINATED the division and won 10 of 12 division titles in the late 60s/70s while the packers garnered exactly 0.

    We also had had many winning seasons in between.

    Not since favre came along, and recently Rodgers, have you won some division titles, but even in that time, we didn’t have the putrid DECADES of losing that the packers “enjoyed” for about 25 years!!!!!

    Look up the stats dude…….VIKINGS have won more division titles since we became a franchise, than any team in the NFC Central/North.

    More than the pukes, and more than the Bears.

    There endeth the lesson.

    Know your facts about the division before you spew junk.

    Remember the Lynn Dickey era……..whew…..stinky!!!!

    Move along, little brother!!!!

    Hmm. Packer fans submit blind opinions while Viking fans submit stone cold facts. Interesting.

  58. ruvelligwebuike says: Nov 19, 2013 3:13 PM

    It’s amazing how forward the 2-8, championship-less Viking “fans” are. Especially considering that when they aren’t behind a computer screen, they write anonymous letters to their neighbors asking them to have their dog stop barking. Facing them is too difficult.

    They are truly the most cowardly folks on Earth. Fargo and Feeling Minnesota were no accident.

  59. ruvelligwebuike says: Nov 19, 2013 3:21 PM

    Some brain busters for you all…

    Which is greater? 5 or 2?
    Which is greater? 13 or 0?
    Which is better? Mogadishu, Somalia or Minnesota?

  60. dcviking says: Nov 19, 2013 3:26 PM

    Whereas Wisconsin actually is an “accident”

  61. ruvelligwebuike says: Nov 19, 2013 3:50 PM

    That’s true, DC. God/Nature was trying to make a barren prairie land of passive-aggressive, pale, boring, insecure, neurotic folks that failed at everything they did.

    But it only worked on the west side…the rest came out Wisconsin.

  62. qoojo says: Nov 19, 2013 3:54 PM

    It’s true. The vikings have the 4 superbowl loses to prove their dominance from ’69-’76. Us poor packers fans only have the dynasty of the 60s, then of course the superbowl wins in 96 and 2010, and the loss in 97.

    So what was the point with your “facts” again? lol

  63. deltaoracle says: Nov 19, 2013 4:01 PM

    Personally I’m impressed that a Viking player could use a 4 syllable word other than “margarita.”
    The Packers obviously aren’t very good right now, but it’s not just because Rodgers is out. So is Cobb. And Shields and Hayward and Barclay and Perry and others. That’s a lot of “next man up”s. Yeah, #12 is by far the most important, but all the other missing pieces count too.
    At least the Wisconsin – Minnesota game should be good. Go Bucky! And yeah, a good effort would be appreciated by you as well, Pack.

  64. dcviking says: Nov 19, 2013 4:02 PM

    Yup, much like what happened when my kids gets the stomach flu…some of the food digests, the rest comes out Wisconsin…

  65. stellarperformance says: Nov 19, 2013 4:03 PM

    There seems to be quite a few Viking fans hanging their hats on the successes from the seventies and eighties.

    These are the same people that screamed at Packer fans to stop living in the past.

    Run around in circles much up there?

  66. tokyosandblaster says: Nov 19, 2013 4:09 PM

    I just don’t understand how Vikings fans think they’re so clever saying the Packers aren’t good without Rodgers. These are the same people that say he is only a product of the system.

    They also say that they haven’t mated with their own cousins, so I guess we all know they’re liars.

  67. valhallarising says: Nov 19, 2013 4:19 PM

    stellarperformance says: Nov 19, 2013 4:03 PM

    “There seems to be quite a few Viking fans hanging their hats on the successes from the seventies and eighties.

    These are the same people that screamed at Packer fans to stop living in the past.

    Run around in circles much up there?”

    Nobody is “hanging their hat” on the success of the seventies and eighties. I think they were just pointing out the fact that the Packers haven’t always been the success that you’ve come so much to love and pretend they have always been.

  68. deltaoracle says: Nov 19, 2013 4:33 PM

    Finding an NFL fan (who isn’t a Viking fan) who agrees that the Vikings have ever won a World Championship is probably no easier than finding a member of Congress who admits he’s part of what’s wrong with the country.

  69. valhallarising says: Nov 19, 2013 4:34 PM

    By the way ruvelligwebuike, you are the only person on here who has actually watched the movie Feeling Minnesota. And for the record, yes, that movie IS an accident.

  70. stellarperformance says: Nov 19, 2013 4:40 PM

    valhallarising says:
    Nov 19, 2013 4:19 PM
    Nobody is “hanging their hat” on the success of the seventies and eighties. I think they were just pointing out the fact that the Packers haven’t always been the success that you’ve come so much to love and pretend they have always been.
    ////////////////////////////////////

    OK. But I can assure you no true Packer fan is pretending anything. We know how bad it was. Many of us were there during the bad times.

    What makes it special is; Many of us were there during the bad times! Week after dismal week, we never gave up. Continued to fill the stadium. Never, never gave up……even f it took thirty years…which it did.

    Great grandparents instilled that determination in the grandparents, and them in the parents, and down the line to the fans of today….and the fans of tomorrow.

    The unshakeable is unimaginable to many Viking fans. That’s why they fight back with the only ammunition they can get their hands on; anonymous insults….weak-minded stuff.

    We have more history in our memories than they can ever hope to have in their dreams. There’s no pretending that, and it creates a lot of jealous resentment.

  71. tokyosandblaster says: Nov 19, 2013 5:26 PM

    Chris Cook is *vulnerable* against any QB, including Pop Warner.

  72. whatjusthapped says: Nov 19, 2013 5:53 PM

    First, Chris Cook has to avoid arrest and weekend jail time to play the game, that hasn’t always been the case in his sterling Viking career. Second, why would you poke a sleeping giant with such idiotic commentary, let’s see if Peterson gets his easy 100 yards or if Jennings can muster over 2 catches this week before the Vikings start bragging.

    And there is no such thing as a must win game when your team is 2-8. It might be nice to win, hope we win, but no must win.

    Idiot.

  73. contra74 says: Nov 19, 2013 6:02 PM

    tokyosandblaster says:
    Nov 19, 2013 5:26 PM
    Chris Cook is *vulnerable* against any QB, including Pop Warner.
    —-
    Pop Warner was a guard. Wow…seriously?

  74. qckappa says: Nov 19, 2013 6:33 PM

    Shut up and get some interceptions!

  75. ihateyoujeff says: Nov 19, 2013 7:26 PM

    Packers lose three in a row and they’re still only 1 game behind the Lions and Bears with a game versus each left on the schedule….could be worse.

    If the Packers can get a win vs the Vikings Sunday and Rodgers returns against the Lions on Thanksgiving, I’ll still be confident they’ll win the division.

    Lose to the Vikings on Sunday and the best they can hope for is a outside shot at the last wildcard IMO.

  76. larryboodry says: Nov 19, 2013 7:50 PM

    And a guy whose team is 2-8 really should not be talking about anyone else’s vulnerability.

  77. qoojo says: Nov 19, 2013 9:03 PM

    stellarperformance says: Nov 19, 2013 4:40 PM

    What makes it special is; Many of us were there during the bad times! Week after dismal week, we never gave up. Continued to fill the stadium. Never, never gave up……even f it took thirty years…which it did.

    ———————

    Randy Wright. Need I say more?

  78. packfanaj12 says: Nov 20, 2013 2:29 PM

    Congrats Cook! You figured out when a team doesnt have their best player playing… they are not as good as they are when their best player is playing… Rocket Science… whats next… I bet he solves world hunger.

  79. pootytang66 says: Nov 21, 2013 1:03 AM

    …Yes Chris, Vulnerable to Better Teams.

  80. vikescry1 says: Nov 21, 2013 8:10 PM

    arwiv says:
    Nov 19, 2013 10:02 AM
    As a Giants fan, who has seen my team play against the Freeman-led Vikings and the Tolzien-led Packers, I’d honestly say that the Vikings were the bigger challenge for the Giants. If Freeman had even had a clue in that game, the Giants could have easily lost.

    On this past Sunday, there was absolutely no point in that game that I ever thought the Giants would lose to the Packers.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————— your team played against a 3rd string qb? i guarantee the giants lose if rodgers was healthy. as a packers fan at no point did i ever think we were gonna win that game, again the best qb in the game was on the sidelines…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!