Skip to content

Team-by-team look at who could be tagged

Hardy Getty Images

Last year, only eight teams used the franchise tag, down from a record high of 21 the year before.  It was a surprise — until the free-agency market opened and the big money simply wasn’t there.

This year, conflicting opinions exist regarding the amount of money that will flow into the market.  Ultimately, each team must ask itself whether there’s one potential free agent who merits the franchise tender, a one-year guaranteed salary that necessarily becomes the starting point for a multi-year deal that could significantly outpace the overall market for players at that position.

Here’s a look at the potential candidates for the tag in each NFL city, based on the unofficial (but likely close to accurate) list of AFC and NFC free agents we compiled over the weekend.

Arizona Cardinals:  While the Larry Fitzgerald restructuring freed up more than $9 million in cap space, no Cardinals free agent becomes an obvious candidate for the tag — except perhaps for kicker Jay Feely, given the relatively low franchise tender for specialists.

Atlanta Falcons:  The Falcons avoided a Flacco-style tag dilemma with Matt Ryan by signing him last year.  (That possibly doesn’t qualify as good news, given the outcome to the 2013 season.)  There’s no one else worthy of the tag.

Baltimore Ravens:  A year after the Ravens were backed into a $20.1-million-a-year corner by Joe Flacco, who very well may have drawn an unmatchable offer sheet if given the non-exclusive tag, the Ravens have a less expensive decision to make regarding tight end Dennis Pitta.  Apart from any lingering concerns about his hip injury (which his performance late in 2013 should have alleviated), the Ravens risk an argument that Pitta is actually a receiver, driving his tender up by more than $4.5 million.  Another candidate for the tag would be left tackle Eugene Monroe; defensive end Arthur Jones is believed to be an unlikely subject of the franchise tag.

Buffalo Bills:  The Bills used the franchise tag on safety Jairus Byrd in 2014.  He’d be entitled to a 20-percent raise over his $6.916 million franchise-tag salary, which equates to $8.2992 million for 2014.  Which equates to way too much on a one-year deal for a safety.  This year’s tag ultimately could go to kicker Dan Carpenter, given that the tag for specialists is very affordable — and in light of the fact that Carpenter tied a franchise record for field goals made in a season (33), with four coming beyond 50 yards.

Carolina Panthers:  Defensive end Greg Hardy (pictured) has emerged as the most likely candidate for the tag, but cap realities could make it hard to justify the expenditure, with Cam Newton now eligible for a new deal, Luke Kuechly a year away, and then Star Lotulelei a year behind Kuechly.  If Newton won’t push for a big-money deal this offseason, the Panthers could get away with one more year with Hardy.  Beyond 2014, it will be difficult to keep all of the Panthers’ great young players around.

Chicago Bears:  Defensive tackle Henry Melton is recovering from a torn ACL, and he’d be entitled to a 20-percent raise over his $8.45 million franchise-tag salary in 2013.  With quarterback Jay Cutler signed to a long-term deal, there’s really no one else who merits the big payday — especially with Cutler’s 2014 cap number exceeding $20 million.

Cincinnati Bengals:  Defensive end Michael Johnson was tagged last year; there’s no way the Bengals will give him a 20-percent bump for a second franchise-tag season — especially not after paying Carlos Dunlap and Geno Atkins.  Tackle Anthony Collins could be a candidate for the tag.

Cleveland Browns:  The Browns have one candidate on each side of the ball:  center Alex Mack and safety T.J. Ward.  As to Mack, the challenge comes from the reality that all offensive linemen are lumped into one category for purposes of the tag, which means that the tender is driven by the salaries paid to elite left tackles.  Safeties have their own slot, which would make it a smarter investment to negotiate a long-term deal with Mack based on the market for centers, and to tag Ward.

Dallas Cowboys:  After two straight years with the tag, there’s no way the Cowboys will use it on defensive end Anthony Spencer for a third year.  Under the CBA, the price would skyrocket.  Even if Spencer weren’t recovering from a torn ACL, it wouldn’t make sense for the cap-strapped franchise to tag Spencer again.  With kicker Dan Bailey signed, the Cowboys have said they don’t anticipate using the tag.  (Which means that defensive lineman Jason Hatcher could be walking away.)

Denver Broncos:  Receiver Eric Decker presents the biggest dilemma for the Broncos.  How much of his performance comes from Decker’s abilities, and how much comes from the skills of his quarterback?  And can the Broncos afford to devote more than $10 million to Decker, when quarterback Peyton Manning is making $20 million guaranteed?  Running back Knowshon Moreno likely isn’t a candidate for the tag; dollar-for-dollar, Montee Ball would be a much more prudent investment.

Detroit Lions:  Last month, Lions G.M. Martin Mayhew said he wasn’t sure whether tight end Brandon Pettigrew will be tagged.  Before making a final decision, Mayhew may want to calculate the total snaps in which Pettigrew lined up tight to the tackle, along with the snaps in which he lined up in the slot or split wide.  The final count could be a huge factor in the final determination.  While the Lions have plenty of other free agents, none of them merit the franchise tag.

Green Bay Packers:  Two years ago, the Packers planned to tag tight end Jermichael Finley, with a two-year deal emerging from the anticipated fight over whether he’s a receiver.  Even if he weren’t recovering from neck surgery, there’s a good chance they wouldn’t do it again.  There’s otherwise no one who merits the restriction.

Houston Texans:  None of the names on the list of potential Texans’ free agents screams out for the franchise tag, in large part because the team was 2-14 in 2013.  Running back Ben Tate could be a candidate, if the Texans opt to move on from Arian Foster.  But with plenty of young running backs available in all rounds of the draft (and after the draft ends), the tag should only be used for a truly special talent at the position.  Defensive end Antonio Smith won’t get serious consideration for the tag, primarily because the Texans eventually will be making a gigantic investment in the other guy who plays that specific position for the Texans.

Indianapolis Colts:  Punter Pat McAfee was tagged in 2013.  At a 20-percent increase, he’d be entitled to $3.57 million if the Colts tag him again.  That’s probably too much, given the market and the annual influx of young punters.  (That said, the Colts should still try to re-sign him.)  Other candidates include cornerback Vontae Davis, running back Donald Brown, and kicker Adam Vinatieri, who had one of the best years of his career.  It would be hard to justify plunking down millions for Brown; Davis could be the guy who gets tagged — especially as the Colts try to justify the second-round pick that was sacrificed in 2013 to get him from the Dolphins during training camp in 2012.

Jacksonville Jaguars:  Running back Maurice Jones-Drew could be one of the highest-profile free agents in team history, but age and injuries make it unlikely the Jaguars would plunk down more than $8 million to keep Jones-Drew around for a ninth season.

Kansas City Chiefs:  Last year, the Chiefs managed to work out a long-term deal with receiver Dwayne Bowe and tag tackle Branden Albert.  The Chiefs then tried — unsuccessfully — to trade Albert.  After the struggles of rookie Eric Fisher at right tackle, the Chiefs may not be ready to entrust the left tackle position to the first overall pick in 2013.  Which could force them to give Albert a 20-percent raise for 2014, or sign him to a long-term deal.

Miami Dolphins:  Defensive tackle Randy Starks got the tag last year, at $8.45 million.  It would cost $10.14 million to tag him again, which means it won’t happen.  It would make more sense to plunk down a little more than that to tag cornerback Brent Grimes, who arrived on a one-year, $5.5 million deal and had a very solid season with the Dolphins.

Minnesota Vikings:  The Vikings surely would love to keep defensive end Jared Allen around, but not at a 20-percent raise over his $17 million cap number for 2013.  Beyond Allen, none of the other free agents are tag-worthy.

New England Patriots:  Cornerback Aqib Talib will have a strong market, if he gets there.  He’ll get there unless the Pats step up with a compelling multi-year offer — or unless the franchise tag is used.  It’s a lot to pay for any non-quarterback, but Talib has become nearly as indispensable to the defense, especially in light of how the team played after he was injured against the Broncos in the AFC title game.

New Orleans SaintsJimmy Graham will be tagged, unless the Saints work out a new contract with him before the deadline for applying the tag.  It’s possible that the two sides will use the uncertainty of the tight end/receiver distinction to carve a middle ground.  Barring that, the Saints will tag Graham as a tight end, Graham will argue that he’s actually a receiver, and a third-party will decide the first-year value of the long-term deal that inevitably will be negotiated in the middle of July.

New York Giants:  The Giants would likely tag receiver Hakeem Nicks only if they believed it would be the precursor to a long-term deal.  Based on his performance in 2013, the money already invested in Victor Cruz, and the potential of Reuben Randle, it makes no sense to make a long-term investment in Nicks.  It’s far more realistic for the Giants to consider tagging linebacker Jon Beason or defensive tackle Linval Joseph.

New York Jets:  Kicker Nick Folk could make the most sense, given the low tag for specialists and the importance of having a reliable kicker.  If the Jets are inclined to spend a lot more than that, underrated right tackle Austin Howard could be a candidate.  Still, few offensive linemen who don’t play left tackle earn that kind of money.

Oakland Raiders:  With nearly $70 million in cap space for 2014, the Raiders could use the tag to keep any of their free agents around.  Left tackle Jared Veldheer is the most likely candidate.  Other options would be defensive end Lamarr Houston (he had a career-high six sacks in 2013) and possibly defensive tackle Pat Sims.

Philadelphia Eagles:  For the second straight year, the Eagles have limited free agents.  The biggest names are at receiver, but with DeSean Jackson already making $10 million in 2014, it’s hard to justify giving more than that to Riley Cooper.  And with Jeremy Maclin recovering from a torn ACL suffered in training camp, it would be foolish to guarantee that much cash and cap space.  Punter Donnie Jones could be an option for the tag, given the low magnitude of the franchise tag for specialists.

Pittsburgh Steelers:  The Steelers opted not to use the tag last year on receiver Mike Wallace.  They most likely won’t use it on receiver Emmanuel Sanders, especially in light of the money previously paid to 2011 and 2013 team MVP Antonio Brown.  On defense, linebacker Jason Worillds could be a candidate, but the Steelers routinely let linebackers walk away via free agency, confident they’ll find a replacement from within.

San Diego Chargers:  It likely will be linebacker Donald Butler or no one for Chargers.  Talks on a new deal began last August; if a deal can’t be worked out, it could be time to tag Butler.

San Francisco 49ers:  The 49ers have several free agents they need to keep.  From receiver Anquan Boldin to cornerback Tarell Brown to safety Donte Whitner, none merit the big dollars payable on a one-year deal.  As to kicker Phil Dawson, for whom coach Jim Harbaugh publicly has lobbied, the franchise tag isn’t an option — unless the 49ers want to pay him quarterback money.  The grievance filed two years ago by Saints quarterback Drew Brees resulted in a determination that franchise tags applied in past years by other teams count toward the total franchise-tag determination.  Because Dawson was tagged twice by the Browns, another tag by any team would result in application of the highest franchise tender for any position.

Seattle Seahawks:  The tag could be applied to defensive end Michael Bennett, but that would more than double the $5 million he received on a one-year deal in 2013.  With cornerback Richard Sherman surely wanting more money now and others surely wanting more soon, the Seahawks may be inclined to let Bennett walk — and to replace him with a veteran who is willing to take less than top market value in order to win a ring.  If not Bennett, the Seahawks could be inclined to tag kicker Steven Hauscka.  Last year, they managed to keep him despite not tagging him; this year, another team will be more likely to pounce.

St. Louis Rams:  Left tackle Jake Long tore an ACL late in the 2013 season, making it important that the Rams keep tackle Rodger Saffold around.  Given the ability of franchise-tagged players to stay away until the eve of the regular season without penalty, it would make the most sense to sign Saffold to a long-term deal, so that he’ll be around for offseason workouts as Long continues to rehab.  If talks on a long-term deal fail, the Rams may have no real alternative to tagging Saffold.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers:  The Bucs wouldn’t have a new coach and a new G.M. if the roster were stocked with great players.  As a result, none of the impending free agents merit the tag.

Tennessee Titans:  Of all of the team’s potential free agents, only cornerback Alterraun Verner stands out. Safety Bernard Pollard had a solid first year with the team, but not so good that it justifies the franchise tag.

Washington Redskins:  If anyone gets tagged, it’ll be linebacker Brian Orakpo, who rebounded from a lost 2012 season with 10 sacks and a third career Pro Bowl berth.  If the team can’t sign him to a long-term deal, the tag should be a no-brainer.

Permalink 46 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Features, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
46 Responses to “Team-by-team look at who could be tagged”
  1. The League's Crusade Against The Steelers Continues says: Feb 10, 2014 10:08 PM

    Steelers once again showing their prowess.

  2. GO FOR TWO SPORTS says: Feb 10, 2014 10:11 PM

    Raiders are no re signing Lamar Houston.
    They already informed him as much.
    he has been on twitter recently bragging that he is going to make “dat money in da Free A”
    He will find out soon enough he is not a great player, nor is he even a good player. He is Average at best and no team is going to pay him the money he thinks.
    He might just run back to Oakland with his tail between his legs begging for a job

  3. hunst009 says: Feb 10, 2014 10:20 PM

    Sammy Shields on Green Bay deserves the tag!

  4. pj1983a says: Feb 10, 2014 10:20 PM

    Regarding the Browns, one of the factors to consider is that Shanahan will probably switch to ZBS. If he doesn’t feel Mack will fit into that scheme, the Browns could either 1) let him walk or 2) try to arrange a tag and trade.

  5. amazingguy101 says: Feb 10, 2014 10:21 PM

    For Vikings they need Everson Griffin to sign back

  6. seatownballers says: Feb 10, 2014 10:23 PM

    Seattle cannot afford to franchise Bennett. Huashka definitely. We are extending Thomas and tate

  7. craniator says: Feb 10, 2014 10:26 PM

    At his age , I doubt Dan Carpenter goes out and has another year like he had in 2013. As for Vontae Davis , after five years in the league he has yet to ever really live up to his potential as a firmer first round pick. I guess that makes Indy just as clueless in trading draft choices for defensive players as they are for offensive players (Trent Richardson) recently.

  8. r8ders4life says: Feb 10, 2014 10:26 PM

    Sorry but a one sided view of The Raiders….

    Lamarr Houston and Jared Veldheer are must keeps at this point.

    Darren McFadden can hit the road jack. My only regret is that we did not trade him last year.

  9. backdapack4evr says: Feb 10, 2014 10:31 PM

    The Vikings will tag Freeman!!!
    Lol

  10. td30 says: Feb 10, 2014 10:36 PM

    DRC is a way more obvious choice as a franchise tag for the broncos. He clearly plays well on a 1-year contract and they absolutely NEED a #1 cornerback with bailey nearing retirement

  11. baltimoresnativeson says: Feb 10, 2014 10:38 PM

    The ravens aren’t tagging anyone this year. Arthur Jones is gone. They will pay Monroe and Pitta and hope the offensive line stays healthy.

    Then count on Joe having his usual 25 td 12 picks type year to get in the playoffs.

  12. 92nick182govikings says: Feb 10, 2014 10:40 PM

    Expect the vikings to make a lot of moves in free agency and the draft.

  13. tictoccpthook says: Feb 10, 2014 10:46 PM

    Steelers defense is the focus now. New corners are needed, linebackers need to be retained, defensive line is in good shape. Let’s hope management makes the best moves so the Steelers are back in 2014.

  14. raiderapologist says: Feb 10, 2014 10:53 PM

    r8ders4life says: Feb 10, 2014 10:26 PM

    Sorry but a one sided view of The Raiders….

    Lamarr Houston and Jared Veldheer are must keeps at this point.
    ————–
    Not so much. Both are the best on their side of the ball for Oakland, but that doesn’t mean they are keepers. The Raiders aren’t bidding against anyone at this point, so there is no reason to lock them up.

  15. J. says: Feb 10, 2014 11:04 PM

    Panthers have a lot of good young players. If they can manage to keep them all locked up they’ll be good for a while.

    Gonna be tough, though.

  16. rodvmunchiii says: Feb 10, 2014 11:10 PM

    The Bucs are loaded with talent – thus the reason the coach was fired. David, McCoy, Revis, Barron, Martin, Jackson, Goldson, etc – just none are up for a new contract.

  17. bigwayne75 says: Feb 10, 2014 11:22 PM

    Giants aren’t going to tag Nicks, if they are smart, they would tag Joseph.

  18. meatcarroll says: Feb 10, 2014 11:25 PM

    Santa Clara definitely gonna tag Anquan Boldin because Jim Harbaugh knows deep down he is pathetic at evaluating talent on his own. Failures like drafting Ronald Johnson over Doug Baldwin, AJ Jenkins over Alshon Jeffrey, Vance McDonald over keeping Delanie Walker, and Quinton Patton confirm this.

  19. sowcrates says: Feb 10, 2014 11:30 PM

    Brandon Pettigrew may be a better blocker than I may have noticed, but his career 10 yards per catch is the worst among very average stats he’s posted as a Lion, particularly the past two years. Stafford has thrown for just short of 10,o00 yards in 2 years, the former 1st-round pick in his prime (25-27) should have managed at least 1000 of those yards if he was a guy that really gelled with what your team’s wanting to do on offense.

  20. nflcommissioner says: Feb 10, 2014 11:48 PM

    The whole raiders team should be franchised another Burger King.

  21. taintedsaints2009 says: Feb 11, 2014 12:49 AM

    If elway is smart, he puts all that money on anything but wide receiver.

  22. yeevie13 says: Feb 11, 2014 1:18 AM

    Bills could very well franchise Byrd again. The defense was very visibly better when he returned to the lineup. Even that raised tag number wouldn’t be too much for the bills with their cap space. He’s arguably the best safety in the game right now, at least top 5, and much better than Goldson and look what he got last year.

    And no way is it gonna be Dan Carpenter.

  23. spfootballfan says: Feb 11, 2014 1:47 AM

    “craniator says:
    Feb 10, 2014 10:26 PM
    At his age , I doubt Dan Carpenter goes out and has another year like he had in 2013.”
    You mean 28? In a position that currently features a 41 year old that shows no signs of stopping? In a position that features the 5 oldest players in NFL history, including a man who played at 48? Yeah, Carpenter is too old…

  24. scw1993 says: Feb 11, 2014 1:58 AM

    Mad great article….good job Mr. F!

  25. defscottyb says: Feb 11, 2014 4:36 AM

    We need RAK… sign him asap. Sign D Hall too, he balled out last year but went unnoticed because the Skins stunk. God I wish the Skins could land Jimmy Graham if the Saints can’t afford him. We have the cap space now. HTTR!

  26. omniscient48 says: Feb 11, 2014 4:45 AM

    What’s with all the franchise tags on the kickers? Looking at fantasy results over the years it sure seems like there are plenty of kickers with the same skill set.

  27. hodag54501 says: Feb 11, 2014 7:44 AM

    I don’t recall Jermichael Finley ever being tagged. I thought he signed a two-year extension which ended last season. Regardless, he will be the “excitable” kid for some other team. Loaded with talent if you can keep him on the field–if he’s cleared to play.

  28. uwsptke says: Feb 11, 2014 7:50 AM

    Sam Shields is the Packer most likely to be tagged. The Packers probably won’t even clear Finley to play, let alone even consider tagging him. They’ll have close to $30 mil in cap space, but have 17 free agents (8 of whom were starters) to re-sign.

  29. blogatron2000 says: Feb 11, 2014 8:21 AM

    I don’t see any way the Chiefs keep Branden Albert. Eric Fisher was drafted to play LT not RT. All (or most) rookies struggle but he played pretty well at times too and picked up some valuable playing time.

    An offseason to rest up and bulk up a bit and he’ll be a beast next season. Time for Branden Albert to move on…

  30. seadog53 says: Feb 11, 2014 8:28 AM

    Research would reveal for you that the Steelers re-sign Linebackers who they think have more to offer and let backers “routinely” walk only when on the downhill side of their career.

  31. southpaw2k says: Feb 11, 2014 8:30 AM

    The League’s Crusade Against The Steelers Continues says:
    Feb 10, 2014 10:08 PM
    Steelers once again showing their prowess.

    ————————————————–

    Exactly how is that possible, given the Steelers are currently projected to be around $17 million over the 2014 cap limit?

    The Ravens may not be awash with tons of cap space, but at least they have some money to play with.

  32. longislandblitz says: Feb 11, 2014 8:32 AM

    The Browns will probably franchise tag center Alex Mack and then trade him during week 1

  33. fwippel says: Feb 11, 2014 9:23 AM

    The Vikings may tag Everson Griffen. With Allen headed out the door, they’ll need him, even if it is as an OLB in the 3-4 defense.

  34. bucjordan says: Feb 11, 2014 9:32 AM

    “Tampa Bay Buccaneers: The Bucs wouldn’t have a new coach and a new G.M. if the roster were stocked with great players. As a result, none of the impending free agents merit the tag.”

    Wow Florio, did a pirate piss in your Cheerios this morning? Lavonte David, Darelle Revis, Gerald McCoy, Doug Martin, Vincent Jackson, Mark Barron, Dashon Goldson. Just because none of them are impending FA’s doesn’t mean there’s no great players in the roster. Otherwise the previous coach’s performance wouldn’t be so inexcusable.

  35. billco6192013 says: Feb 11, 2014 9:42 AM

    Giants will tag beason if he isnt signed long term.This guy way more value then joseph.Lets go beast beason whooooo.

  36. crownofthehelmet says: Feb 11, 2014 10:24 AM

    The Ravens may not be awash with tons of cap space, but at least they have some money to play with.
    ————————————————–
    This will be the ravens battlecry for the next 5 years, as they’re forced to surround an overpaid QB with mediocre talent. I’d rather be $17M over with Ben than $100M under with Flacco.

  37. weepingjebus says: Feb 11, 2014 10:45 AM

    “And can the Broncos afford to devote more than $10 million to Decker, when quarterback Peyton Manning is making $20 million guaranteed?”

    Bwahaha

  38. ariani1985 says: Feb 11, 2014 10:48 AM

    Don’t worry green bay fans. I am sure Ted Thompson will give aj hawk another huge contract! Lol

  39. johnnyjagfan says: Feb 11, 2014 1:44 PM

    Beason is not going to get a franchise tag. He would have made the starting 11 in CAR if he was worth that kind of dough.

  40. mlmeier says: Feb 11, 2014 6:56 PM

    Eagles should absolutely tag Donnie Jones aka Donnie Football. Most consistent player on the team last year (that’s not sarcastic).

  41. inbredcheesehead says: Feb 12, 2014 3:31 AM

    packers have about 5 players that deserve tags i wish we cud trade franchise tags and collect them i bet those dum vikquens would trade a furst round pick to get a franchise tag and gon put it on ponder

  42. zo121179 says: Feb 13, 2014 12:58 PM

    McAfee needs to stay in Indy. He does so well on Bob and Tom in the mornings and my drive to work just wouldn’t be the same.

  43. lambeauandlombardi says: Feb 15, 2014 4:25 PM

    ariani1985 says:
    Feb 11, 2014 10:48 AM

    Don’t worry green bay fans. I am sure Ted Thompson will give aj hawk another huge contract! Lol
    ………………………………………………………………………
    Lol should be reserved for the team that has Ponder.

  44. dallascowboysdishingthereal says: Feb 15, 2014 11:06 PM

    For Dallas, Jerry made a mistake using the tag on Spencer who played about a game last season. No one knows how he will play in the new 4-3 and it could be argued he was playing for a contract in 2012. I agree, no tag on Spencer.

    I think Hatcher is a possibility but Jerry has almost no wiggle room when it comes to salaries right now.

  45. cdavls17 says: Feb 17, 2014 9:27 AM

    Let me get this straight it is unfeasible for the bills to tag byrd because it is 8.2 million being to high for one year yet the guy is searching for a multi year deal that is larger then that and 5 other safeties make more then that yet he is arguably one of the best safeties in the league? Come on it would be dumb not to tag him.

    Then your talking about franchising a kicker that will cost 2.5-3 million when this guy was picked up and dropped 2-3 times last off season and the bills drafted a kicker who was injured and placed on IR to get better.

    So glad you get paid to throw nonsense out there rather then do some real research

  46. vicvinegar00 says: Feb 22, 2014 12:23 PM

    The Giants are done with Nicks unless they get him at a discount. No way they tag him.

    And while Beason played well for the G-Men, he isn’t worthy of franchise tag dollars.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!