Skip to content

Dolphins chose not to delay decision to fire O’Neill

ONeill Getty Images

It took Dolphins owner Stephen Ross five days to decide what to do with offensive line coach Jim Turner and head trainer Kevin O’Neill.  Part of the owner’s decision was a resolution to not delay its implementation.

Per a league source, O’Neill was fired after traveling to Indianapolis for the Scouting Combine simply because Ross hadn’t made a decision before O’Neill left — and because Ross didn’t want to rush the decision based on O’Neill’s travel schedule.

Ross, we’re told, didn’t take the decision lightly, given O’Neill’s tenure and the potential impact of the decision on his future employment prospects.  Ross needed more time because O’Neill’s behavior fell into more of a gray area than Turner’s.

The Wells report found only that O’Neill laughed when players directed racial harassment to an assistant trainer, and that O’Neill expressed hostility to the investigation.

Still, even if Ross decided that O’Neill needed to be dismissed, Ross could have waited until O’Neill returned from the Scouting Combine.  There’s no question about O’Neill’s abilities; he wouldn’t have lasted 18 years on the job if there were.

It’s possible the Dolphins were concerned that the decision would have been leaked before the Scouting Combine ended.  If so, that speaks to the fundamental dysfunction lingering in an organization where the owner couldn’t trust even a tight handful of people to be discreet about a decision to delay implementation of his decision until next week.

And here’s where the decision to tap O’Neill on the shoulder after he had traveled to Indy eventually could blow up on the Dolphins.  If O’Neill, who given his tenure surely is over the age of 40, can cobble together a case of age discrimination or any other alleged legal violation, the facts regarding the way the situation was handled could, when spilled from the mouth of a competent attorney, make a jury more likely to find in O’Neill’s favor — and to give him a significant award of damages.

Permalink 7 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Miami Dolphins, Rumor Mill
7 Responses to “Dolphins chose not to delay decision to fire O’Neill”
  1. sdisme says: Feb 19, 2014 10:07 PM

    The NFL didn’t respond to Hard Knocks spotlighting hazing. Philbin stood a rookie up in a room and joked about his shaven eyebrows.

    Miami can have all the scapegoats they want, but the coaches and the NFL both know what goes on in the locker rooms.

    These guys getting fired is a joke.

  2. cags777 says: Feb 19, 2014 10:10 PM

    If you engage in poor behavior that is not consistent with the organization, prepare to be shown the door. Despite what you think, it’ll be a lot tougher for O’Neill to prove age discrimination due to what was in the Ted Wells report.

  3. xpensivewinos says: Feb 19, 2014 10:13 PM

    The Dolphins need new blood and new ideas and new talent in every position in the organization. Good riddance…..

  4. bigjdve says: Feb 19, 2014 10:21 PM

    How about the fact that he didn’t actually do anything but laugh. That sounds like a lot, but if they want to look at it that way, they need to fire most of the team.

    Not to mention that they also are looking at a possible lawsuit because of unlawful termination.

    Let’s also consider that everyone not named Jonathan Martin and/or Andrew McDonald were hostile to the investigation.

  5. hawksfan4life1001 says: Feb 19, 2014 10:52 PM

    He will get another job and there won’t be any legal action If he is indeed in the “gray” area then he would most likely find another job. Greg Williams just got hired again so he won’t have an issue.

  6. oldcracker says: Feb 19, 2014 11:20 PM

    What is wrong with these select, multi-billion dollar entertainment-sports businesses? They should be embarassed by these actions. How did it ever get this far?

  7. davikes says: Feb 20, 2014 12:02 AM

    O’Neill would be better off not suing. Once he sues, the Dolphins will come up with a lot more witnesses than just what we’ve seen in the Wells report.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!