Skip to content

Cowboys deal could earn Melton as little as $2.25 million


We mentioned yesterday that the Cowboys contract with defensive tackle Henry Melton gave them the flexibility to make it a one-year deal.

But the extent to which he’s betting on himself is even more glaring when you see the details of the deal.

According to Todd Archer of, Melton can make as little as $2.25 million this season, but up to $29 million over the next four years.

Melton will make a $1.25 million base salary this year, along with a $1 million signing bonus.

Instead of a bigger bonus, they gave him a $78,125 roster bonus for each week he’s on the active 46-man roster. That could earn him another $1.25 million, assuming he’s fully recovered from last year’s torn ACL and able to stay healthy enough to play all 16 games. There are also $1.5 million worth of incentives for playing time and sacks.

Next year, his base salary of $9 million is guaranteed if the Cowboys pick up his option on the first day of the new year, so it’s no certainty they will.

The per-game roster bonuses are becoming increasingly popular (for teams) in new contracts. Of course, that puts the financial burden of staying on the field on the player, at a time when the preaching about “player safety” is louder than ever.

Permalink 13 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Dallas Cowboys, Home, Rumor Mill
13 Responses to “Cowboys deal could earn Melton as little as $2.25 million”
  1. tenotnamedmiller says: Mar 20, 2014 9:41 AM

    Each day goes by Melton’s deal is worth less and less and Bears wouldn’t even pay that.

  2. firejerry says: Mar 20, 2014 9:42 AM

    Henry…..I think you took too little…..

  3. floratiotime says: Mar 20, 2014 10:14 AM

    Tony got all the cash.

  4. thedano says: Mar 20, 2014 10:27 AM

    Better give him what he wants…..or he’ll bite you.

  5. nwhawkhater says: Mar 20, 2014 10:35 AM

    Did Jerry hire a new GM?

  6. dalfanforever says: Mar 20, 2014 10:38 AM

    I have to tip my cap to Jerrah on this one for staying out of the way this time. It was reported Stephen Jones, Marinelli and Garrett negotiated on this one.

  7. spiderman2014 says: Mar 20, 2014 12:26 PM

    finally, a deal that makes the cowboys brass seem smart

  8. trollaikman8 says: Mar 20, 2014 3:02 PM

    Chicago wouldn’t resign him for $3M?

    Dude must really love Marinelli.

  9. theneedforspeeed says: Mar 20, 2014 3:08 PM

    “as little as $2.25 million”.
    I wish someone would say that about MY paycheck!

  10. agelardi says: Mar 20, 2014 3:10 PM

    Wish I was paid that little.

  11. axespray says: Mar 20, 2014 3:54 PM

    Remember when Bears fans kept calling him Reggie White 2.0 or that he’s a million times better than Suh and Fairley?

  12. dino2997 says: Mar 21, 2014 12:24 AM

    The point isn’t why didn’t the Bears pay him. The point is why did NOBODY want to sign him, only the Cowboys? Did they really get a deal?

  13. jsrdc says: Mar 21, 2014 8:59 PM

    @ dino2997

    “The point isn’t why didn’t the Bears pay him. The point is why did NOBODY want to sign him, only the Cowboys? Did they really get a deal?”

    First of all, he is coming off of a knee injury in the final year of his contract. Would you automatically pay him if you were Chicago? Chicago WANTED him to go out and test the market because of what happened last year with Michael Bennett and Cliff Avril, who both got far less than what they wanted as high-profile FA D-lineman. The market for FA D-lineman is lukewarm after last year, and the Bears knew it. So, Melton went out and met with some teams (which shoots down your theory of “NOBODY” wanting to sign him. It helped that Marinelli coached him in Chicago, and Melton ultimately signed with a team with a legitimate need at DT. Dallas wanted him AND they signed him at a sweet deal. Allow Melton’s to prove that they got a good deal, Einstein. That will be the end-all be-all of the situation. And I bet he plays very well. And if he does, he can get paid nicely in year two and beyond in Dallas.

    My question to you is this: are you simply a hater, or are you acting all butt-hurt for a legitimate reason?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!