Skip to content

Patriots want to extend the uprights

New England Patriots v Baltimore Ravens Getty Images

Other than the Fail Mary, the most iconic image from the debacle that was the NFL’s use of replacement officials was Patriots coach Bill Belichick grabbing an official following a loss to the Ravens. Belichick was upset because he thought the Ravens’ game-winning field goal had actually gone over and just outside the upright.

Now Belichick is proposing a rule that would eliminate such confusion in the future.

At next week’s league meeting, the Patriots will propose a rule to extend the uprights five feet higher. The hope is that with higher uprights, field goals won’t go directly above the upright, and officials will have a clearer view of whether a field goal is good or no good.

Current rules say “Vertical posts extend at least 30 feet above the crossbar” and “The actual goal is the plane extending indefinitely above the crossbar and between the outer edges of the posts.” But the Patriots believe it’s too hard for the officials to tell if the ball was inside the outer edge of the post if the ball is higher than 30 feet above the crossbar. So the Patriots want the rule to be 35 feet.

It’s hard to see any reason not to pass this rule. The NFL would have to spend a little money to extend the uprights, but if that means a game-deciding field goal is called correctly, it’s well worth it.

Permalink 100 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Baltimore Ravens, New England Patriots, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
100 Responses to “Patriots want to extend the uprights”
  1. phillyshouldsignmaclin says: Mar 21, 2014 7:18 AM

    For once, I agree with the cheaters

  2. bigredgoog says: Mar 21, 2014 7:18 AM

    Hey you refs out there, a question. When the ball sails high over an upright, how much of the ball needs to be inside the imaginary vertical line for it to be considered good? I thought I heard someone say if “any” portion of the ball is within the outer edges it is considered good.

  3. jtgush says: Mar 21, 2014 7:21 AM

    Anything for the Patriots to win more games!
    cheaters!!!!

  4. allhailkingflacco says: Mar 21, 2014 7:23 AM

    He’s still crying about this ?

  5. jrod2go says: Mar 21, 2014 7:24 AM

    Why don’t they just add huge spot-lights that point straight up from the ends of each goal post upright? This would extend them virtually infinitely. If light hits the ball then the kick is no good. This seems like such a simple fix, IMO.

  6. myeaglescantwin says: Mar 21, 2014 7:25 AM

    all we frickin want is goal post with frickin lazers

    is that too much to ask.

  7. copescabana says: Mar 21, 2014 7:28 AM

    All I want is frikin goalposts with frikin lasers attached on top…

  8. zackattack006 says: Mar 21, 2014 7:30 AM

    What a way for Beli-cheat to be protesting about that game. He is such a loser and crybaby!!! Typical.

  9. mayers59 says: Mar 21, 2014 7:36 AM

    Bigredgoog,

    I officiate high school and college football. NCAA has it to where if ANY part of the ball breaks the vertical plain of the goal post it is considered good. Not sure what NFL rule is.

    I agree with motion to make the post higher. It is not as common in High School for that to happen, but it still happens even there.

  10. pabrownsfan says: Mar 21, 2014 7:37 AM

    Good idea.

  11. mayers59 says: Mar 21, 2014 7:41 AM

    Agree that lasers pointing all the way to the roof would be great. Jrod2go, got it backwards though. If the ball breaks the plain of the lazers, it should be declared good. Good idea there Jrod. Extending the post 5 feet would cut down on the problem, but using laser technology would take care of it. So, extend it 5 feet, then add lasers. That way, if something happens and the lasers go out, you still have the extra 5 feet.

  12. exboomer says: Mar 21, 2014 7:41 AM

    Hard to believe that Belicheat is still whining about this but then again maybe it isn’t.

  13. piscataquis007 says: Mar 21, 2014 7:42 AM

    How about adding another crossbar at the top of the current goal posts. Make a little more difficult to score. Ball has to pass between all four bars in order to count.

  14. mikeyhigs says: Mar 21, 2014 7:42 AM

    If the rule states “vertical posts extend at least 30 feet above the crossbar,” then it sounds like the Pats can extend their posts as far as they like. They would still be “at least” 30 feet above.

  15. 6ball says: Mar 21, 2014 7:46 AM

    .
    As is the case with instant replay, you just want the call to be correct. Often it seems the kickers are given the benefit of the doubt if it’s close.
    .

  16. marvsleezy says: Mar 21, 2014 7:51 AM

    Take the 2 uprights and bend them inward, forming a triangle – boom, I just solved your extra point troubles as well. The harder it is to make a kick, the more real football we will see.

  17. phillyshouldsignmaclin says: Mar 21, 2014 7:53 AM

    How about 10 yard lasers to speed measuring for a first down

  18. deadeye says: Mar 21, 2014 7:54 AM

    The laser idea is actually a really good one, in addition to being funny.

  19. camdenyard says: Mar 21, 2014 7:58 AM

    That FG was good. Get over it.

  20. wte1 says: Mar 21, 2014 7:58 AM

    Why does Belicheat want higher goal posts? So he can put his spy cameras on top?

    Ha ha! That’s pretty funny! Don’t you agree all you adolescent Patriot haters?

  21. thefiesty1 says: Mar 21, 2014 7:59 AM

    Why not just eliminate FG altogether? It’s not Soccer! If they can’t score a TD they don’t deserve to score.

  22. lynnko says: Mar 21, 2014 8:00 AM

    I think extending the goalposts might be a safety issue

  23. chmura97 says: Mar 21, 2014 8:00 AM

    The refs have their work cut out for them in trying to make the Packers a playoff team!

  24. eagleswin says: Mar 21, 2014 8:01 AM

    Other than the Fail Mary, the most iconic image from the debacle that was the NFL’s use of replacement officials was Patriots coach Bill Belichick grabbing an official following a loss to the Ravens.

    ————————-

    There are many more numerous instances of the union refs affecting the outcome of the game just in the last year alone. Since they aren’t going away the media doesn’t chew on their mistakes like a dog with a bone. Incorrect downs, ball placement horrendously off, calls missed when staring right at the penalty, penalties called that aren’t penalties, etc.

    The so called “Fail Mary” was ruled correct by a league official in the booth, before it was officially announced by the replacement refs on the field, yet the media omits that fact every time because it doesn’t fit their narrative.

  25. nceaglesfan says: Mar 21, 2014 8:03 AM

    Why stop at 35′. How about 50′, 75′, 100′. Any things better than Big Bill not getting a call his way.

  26. leftyman says: Mar 21, 2014 8:04 AM

    So Bill wants a bigger pole?

  27. titansbro says: Mar 21, 2014 8:06 AM

    Dude just add some laser lights that point straight up. Boom, fixed. Stupid.

  28. akshunj says: Mar 21, 2014 8:07 AM

    Put a crossbar at the top too like a giant soccer goal. that would make it really interesting.

  29. bcgreg says: Mar 21, 2014 8:09 AM

    jrod2go says:
    Mar 21, 2014 7:24 AM
    Why don’t they just add huge spot-lights that point straight up from the ends of each goal post upright? This would extend them virtually infinitely. If light hits the ball then the kick is no good. This seems like such a simple fix, IMO.

    ——————–

    Most games are played in the middle of the day. Way to think that through. smh

  30. thestrategyexpert says: Mar 21, 2014 8:11 AM

    I bet they could get Viagra to sign on as a sponsor and pay for all the extension upgrades.

  31. t8ertot says: Mar 21, 2014 8:15 AM

    This is a rule I actually agree with. It won’t give anyone an advantage, except the refs to make a better decision

  32. dfwhawkguy says: Mar 21, 2014 8:16 AM

    Clearly they have devised some scheme for cheating if the goalposts are extended.

  33. dan1919 says: Mar 21, 2014 8:23 AM

    Laser idea wont solve the issue of weather the football would bounce inside or outside the uprights. It would just hit the laser. So it wouldn’t work.

    Dan

  34. fedupincleveland says: Mar 21, 2014 8:29 AM

    Lasers would work, and be the coolest option.you can have something trigger when light is broken, or see the light on football.

  35. howiefeltersnatch says: Mar 21, 2014 8:29 AM

    Where was this 30 years ago?? Then we could confirm that Rich Karlis’ field goal was indeed wide left in that 86 AFC Championship game.

  36. theytukrjobs says: Mar 21, 2014 8:36 AM

    Bill must listen to the Adam Carolla podcast.

  37. ubepunkedagain says: Mar 21, 2014 8:38 AM

    Yes, it was blatantly obvious that he missed. Michael David Smith has a personal agenda against me and erases all my posts, even if they are relevant to the discussion.

  38. bencoates57 says: Mar 21, 2014 8:41 AM

    Make it like a giant hockey net. If it doesn’t go in the net, it’s no good.

  39. bencoates57 says: Mar 21, 2014 8:41 AM

    “Where was this 30 years ago?? Then we could confirm that Rich Karlis’ field goal was indeed wide left in that 86 AFC Championship game.”

    ————

    We could have been spared at least one Broncos SB appearance. Ee gads!

  40. PFTISNOTREALITY says: Mar 21, 2014 8:42 AM

    jrod2go says:
    Mar 21, 2014 7:24 AM
    Why don’t they just add huge spot-lights that point straight up from the ends of each goal post upright? This would extend them virtually infinitely. If light hits the ball then the kick is no good. This seems like such a simple fix, IMO.
    __________
    Better yet, use lasers, fill the football with Hydrogen- Flame on! if it crosses the laser. You would have to change the netting to prevent fan deaths, but well worth the fireworks…

  41. bengalsbilly says: Mar 21, 2014 8:43 AM

    I think the old Browns in the 80s got jobbed on a playoff game with Broncos as well.

  42. fatcamper says: Mar 21, 2014 8:44 AM

    Higher posts make better camera mounts.

  43. bradwins says: Mar 21, 2014 8:44 AM

    Cheaters!!1!1!!

  44. whywerule says: Mar 21, 2014 8:49 AM

    People get arrested, justifiably, for pointing lasers at helicopters and airplanes, so what do people really think is the likelihood that the NFL will attach lasers to the top of the goal posts?

    “Weak” short range lasers does not matter. FAA would have that idea shutdown in a hurry if the NFL competition committee brought lasers under consideration.

  45. wawa33 says: Mar 21, 2014 8:55 AM

    Belichik also wants to mount cameras on the ends of the extended uprights.

  46. marima07 says: Mar 21, 2014 8:55 AM

    6ball says:
    As is the case with instant replay, you just want the call to be correct. Often it seems the kickers are given the benefit of the doubt if it’s close.
    ————————————————–
    In that Pats-Ravens game, it was the replacement refs who gave themselves the benefit by calling it ‘good’ and getting off the field alive.

  47. dbfan4ever says: Mar 21, 2014 8:56 AM

    This would be a waste of $ if the nfl decides to eliminate kickers like many are wanting to so. I always enjoyed the drama Of a last second field goal so I hope they will stay in the game

  48. pftbro says: Mar 21, 2014 8:58 AM

    Belichick wants this so his cheater camera is harder to detect.

  49. rhamrhoddy says: Mar 21, 2014 9:01 AM

    Since the goal posts are going to look stupid no matter what changes are made to them, eliminate the goalposts altogether, keep the crossbar and then use lasers.

    If you decide you want narrow goalposts for extra points, then you can shut off the wider field goal lasers and turn on the narrow extra point lasers.

    Then Goodell can fly around the stadium on a hovercraft donning a Darth Vader costume, laughing maniacally at the fans because why the hell not at this point?

  50. patriotsarespygaters says: Mar 21, 2014 9:06 AM

    Patriot haters BRADY is 40-11 in his career VS the NFC the texans, vikings, browns, redskins, jaguars lost more than 11 games last season…embrace the hate

  51. Eutaw's Finest says: Mar 21, 2014 9:09 AM

    As a Ravens fan, I have one major issue with this- the field goal post at the south end of M&T Bank Stadium is actually the original from Memorial Stadium. It’s a piece of history in this town (not that many know about it), and replacing the posts would be removing that history. And let’s be honest- where do you move a historic field goal post if it’s not in the stadium?

    In principle I agree with it. I don’t like to see crybaby BB get his way, but I understand the logic behind it. I simply think it would be more logical to have reviews with projection extensions. Similar to how baseball can show an on screen projection of the foul line, there’s no reason the NFL could not show a projection of the upright. If it’s in or on? It’s good. Any part of the ball outside? No good. Much easier and cheaper than replacing full posts.

  52. jrebar88 says: Mar 21, 2014 9:10 AM

    patriotsarespygaters says:
    Mar 21, 2014 9:06 AM
    Patriot haters BRADY is 40-11 in his career VS the NFC the texans, vikings, browns, redskins, jaguars lost more than 11 games last season…embrace the hate
    ———-

    What’s his record against Denver?

  53. filthymcnastyog says: Mar 21, 2014 9:11 AM

    Sci-fi freaks…. Lasers? you can’t do lasers. what if the laser cut a plane in half that was flying overhead……

  54. melikefootball says: Mar 21, 2014 9:12 AM

    I bet God-del shoulder is wet this morning from old Bill-I-cheat crying so much.

  55. ninetysixer says: Mar 21, 2014 9:17 AM

    He’s still crying about this ?

    _____________________________

    I’m surprised he didn’t ask the league to suspend Bernard Pollard permanently!

  56. jtgush says: Mar 21, 2014 9:23 AM

    chmura97 says:
    Mar 21, 2014 8:00 AM

    The refs have their work cut out for them in trying to make the Packers a playoff team!

    what does this have to do with the goal posts
    get a life!

  57. Patskrieg dot com says: Mar 21, 2014 9:24 AM

    Belichick asks for a negligible change to an inanimate object. PFT comments section explodes with insults and conspiracy theories.

    At least the universe is consistent.

  58. dasmol says: Mar 21, 2014 9:25 AM

    Laser goalposts, laser goal line with a traceable football. Pumped in noise and a CGI crowd. Think I’m joking?

  59. getyourownname says: Mar 21, 2014 9:26 AM

    To me this is a lot of angst about a really minor issue. A 30-foot or 35-foot unsupported pole will sway in the wind, even if only a few inches, so if you want complete accuracy, should you also care about such movements affecting whether a kick counts? You can never be 100.00% accurate and there will still be situations above the 35-foot level calling for ref interpretation. How many time has this been an issue anyway?

    If you wanted to be completely accurate about using a vertical plane, you would put a laser in the ground, not in the post. Of course this means the laser would not precisely align with the poles when the poles are moving.

  60. FoozieGrooler says: Mar 21, 2014 9:27 AM

    ( higher camera angle – better coverage )

  61. matthoover4 says: Mar 21, 2014 9:28 AM

    I came into this post to write about the use of lasers, and how it could also be helpful for officiating games, but that it all really comes down to a need for central officiating.

    I’m the first to be against anything “Big Brother”, but if a standard touchdown can be reviewed, than I think a questionable field goal should be able to be reviewed as well. As such, the use of lasers or some kind of technology similar to what TV stations use to show the first down line could be use by a central officiating office to determine if a field goal is good or not, not to mention more accurately call correct spots, fix penalty calls, etc.

  62. chris6523 says: Mar 21, 2014 9:28 AM

    So, what is the iconic image that is the debacle called the current state of officiating in the NFL?

  63. astburyj says: Mar 21, 2014 9:29 AM

    This is a good rule. Im not gonna be a D and talk about things that allegedly happened 10 years ago.

    Look how much kicking rules have changed in the last year and a half and now adding this. Cray

  64. thenyolive says: Mar 21, 2014 9:34 AM

    filthymcnastyog says: Mar 21, 2014 9:11 AM

    Sci-fi freaks…. Lasers? you can’t do lasers. what if the laser cut a plane in half that was flying overhead
    ————

    Thanks for raining on the parade. I was thinking about all the exploding footballs we’d get to watch. That would have been a great little touch.

  65. patriotinvasion says: Mar 21, 2014 9:34 AM

    Can’t we just use God’s fingers?

  66. realskipbayless says: Mar 21, 2014 9:37 AM

    Eutaw’s Finest says:
    Mar 21, 2014 9:09 AM
    As a Ravens fan, I have one major issue with this- the field goal post at the south end of M&T Bank Stadium is actually the original from Memorial Stadium. It’s a piece of history in this town (not that many know about it), and replacing the posts would be removing that history. And let’s be honest- where do you move a historic field goal post if it’s not in the stadium?

    In principle I agree with it. I don’t like to see crybaby BB get his way, but I understand the logic behind it. I simply think it would be more logical to have reviews with projection extensions. Similar to how baseball can show an on screen projection of the foul line, there’s no reason the NFL could not show a projection of the upright. If it’s in or on? It’s good. Any part of the ball outside? No good. Much easier and cheaper than replacing full posts.

    I stopped reading after “as a ravens fan”

  67. harrisonhits2 says: Mar 21, 2014 9:43 AM

    Yes, because wanting to make sure field goals are, you know, actually good, is somehow cheating.

    SMH

  68. spammerscrammer says: Mar 21, 2014 9:43 AM

    This rule is a no-brainer. Fun to see those refs on either side of the goal posts look at each other as if saying “if you raise your arms I’ll raise mine”.

    The more important but more controversial proposal from the Patriots is to push back the extra point line of scrimmage to the 25 yrd line. They should do this or just get rid of the extra point.

  69. myeaglescantwin says: Mar 21, 2014 9:48 AM

    if all you suckers want to eliminate field goals, and extra points and kickoffs,, why would we call it football??

    #stopbeingdumb

  70. patriotsdefense says: Mar 21, 2014 9:57 AM

    Justin Tucker never made that FG. He was wide right.

  71. ijahru says: Mar 21, 2014 10:02 AM

    I like the idea of putting a bar across the top of the goal post making it a square and the ball has to go through that square to be good. You could have sensors in the goal post that light up if the kick is good. The crowd would go nuts seeing a goal post light up with a game winning kick.

  72. willyalistentothis says: Mar 21, 2014 10:05 AM

    In other news, recently declassified CIA documents reveal that spy cameras have been proven to be more effective at 35 feet above the ground than they are at 30 feet.

  73. razzlejag says: Mar 21, 2014 10:06 AM

    Exploding footballs IS the answer. Use technology to do this (I haven’t got time to work this out today).

    If the football explodes, the kick is good.

  74. jucam1 says: Mar 21, 2014 10:08 AM

    Carolla has been talking about this for years, it takes just about 5 more feet to solve the issue, no safety issues. Lasers won’t work cause the ball can’t bounce in or out with a Laser. I do like the idea of putting a cross bar on top, to add another level of difficulty.

    I’m not a Pats fan but the BB hate is insane, let it go. If your team can’t hire a coach or a GM to contend with the guy then that is their fault. My Birds lost an SB to BB, and I don’t blame BB, I blame bad execution, ARs crappy time management, and Donny5 being awful at the end.

  75. mikep363839 says: Mar 21, 2014 10:14 AM

    oh ya cause when he proposes the change he’s expecting them to change the outcome of that Ravens game…idiots

  76. blkandgld4eva says: Mar 21, 2014 10:14 AM

    BB is really focusing on speciat teams – first the 43 yd extra point and now longer goalposts. He should really be focusing on how the Pats continue to roll through the regular season and then choke in the playoffs.

  77. jetsjetsjetsnow says: Mar 21, 2014 10:21 AM

    Get rid of the posts and have 2 Laser beams out of the ground & one from the sideline (crossbar) that explodes the ball if it touches it.. Your Welcome!

  78. deflateddome says: Mar 21, 2014 10:29 AM

    I know Tom and Bill, it just don’t “extend” the same as when you were younger..

  79. thethunderofgunns says: Mar 21, 2014 10:43 AM

    Yes, make ‘em higher that way all the spy cameras Belichick keeps scattered among the stadiums can receive a better signal for Foxboro HQ. :)

  80. lolatpatshaters says: Mar 21, 2014 11:05 AM

    Patriot haters whenever an article that says “Patriots” is posted on PFT:

    ARF ARF ARF clap clap clap clap ARF ARF ARF ARF ARF clap clap clap ARF ARF ARF ARF

    LOL

  81. lolatpatshaters says: Mar 21, 2014 11:07 AM

    blkandgld4eva says: Mar 21, 2014 10:14 AM

    BB is really focusing on speciat teams – first the 43 yd extra point and now longer goalposts.
    ———————

    I think the Steelers should focus on not losing 55-31 to the patriots….

  82. atthemurph says: Mar 21, 2014 11:10 AM

    mayers59 says:
    Mar 21, 2014 7:41 AM
    Agree that lasers pointing all the way to the roof would be great. Jrod2go, got it backwards though. If the ball breaks the plain of the lazers, it should be declared good. Good idea there Jrod. Extending the post 5 feet would cut down on the problem, but using laser technology would take care of it. So, extend it 5 feet, then add lasers. That way, if something happens and the lasers go out, you still have the extra 5 feet.
    ———————————————————

    What are you talking about, roof? Football doesn’t have a roof.

  83. harrisonhits2 says: Mar 21, 2014 11:14 AM

    thethunderofgunns says:

    Yes, make ‘em higher that way all the spy cameras Belichick keeps scattered among the stadiums can receive a better signal for Foxboro HQ
    _______________________

    Really ? Around “stadiums” ? So you’re saying Belichik sneaks into other team’s venues using what, his patented Hoodie Of Invisibility, and somehow installs video systems without the team whose stadium it is having any idea ?

    LOL your tin foil hat must be awfully tight today.

  84. fireeyes111 says: Mar 21, 2014 11:14 AM

    myeaglescantwin says:
    Mar 21, 2014 7:25 AM
    all we frickin want is goal post with frickin lazers

    is that too much to ask.
    __________

    PFT comment of the year?

  85. sinisterg says: Mar 21, 2014 11:16 AM

    Patriots want all the other teams playbooks too.
    Bill is out of his damn mind, the guy is going nuts.

  86. vozki says: Mar 21, 2014 11:23 AM

    Laser goal post would cause all sorts of crying from fans when the tip of the ball touches the laser on a winning field goal. With goal post that would be a missed field goal. With lasers it’s a winning field goal. Keep the goal post and let the ball bounce off or in.

  87. erikthredd says: Mar 21, 2014 11:27 AM

    you guys got it all wrong,BB wants to raise the bottom bar up a foot and a half so we can watch 95% of players choke trying to dunk the ball after scoring a TD.

  88. granadafan says: Mar 21, 2014 11:38 AM

    Here’s an idea to use technology. The networks use that digitally added yellow line to denote where the 1st down marker is on TV. Why don’t they put those lines vertically on each post of the goalpost?

    Obviously you wouldn’t be able to see this live on the field, but for those rare questionable ones, you’d be able to see where the ball crossed on TV replay.

  89. jchipwood says: Mar 21, 2014 11:40 AM

    I agree but don’t understand why the patriots would want this. Any call that is even close to questionable wil go in their favor so this would hurt them on close fgs.

  90. patriotsarespygaters says: Mar 21, 2014 11:42 AM

    jrebar88 says:
    Mar 21, 2014 9:10 AM
    patriotsarespygaters says:
    Mar 21, 2014 9:06 AM
    Patriot haters BRADY is 40-11 in his career VS the NFC the texans, vikings, browns, redskins, jaguars lost more than 11 games last season…embrace the hate
    ———-

    What’s his record against Denver?
    ———-
    its 3-1 in the last three seasons including playoffs haha

  91. realnflmaster says: Mar 21, 2014 11:42 AM

    Since when do the cheats run the NFL?

  92. johnsbielen says: Mar 21, 2014 12:26 PM

    Instead of extending a useless 5′, why don’t they just put cameras on top of each corner of the goal post. You can watch the football all you want and replay it whenever you choose to as well.

  93. bleedsoe9mm says: Mar 21, 2014 12:45 PM

    just let bill decide the rules it would be a much better game

  94. zibet says: Mar 21, 2014 1:03 PM

    If its not a clear miss then it should be considered in – cmon thats not even football anyway

    Also I was at that Ravens Pats game – everyone sitting in that end zone with the best view of it went crazy. it was obviously in

  95. 2001asterisk2003asterisk2004asterisk says: Mar 21, 2014 1:17 PM

    low class franchise and coach

  96. neelymessier says: Mar 21, 2014 1:50 PM

    More bs about who made the suggestion. Just like with the foul poles in MLB, it is extremely hard to rule on close calls when the ball goes out higher than the pole. What would be the harm of extending them? More calls would be correct. But since a Pat said it, we’ll just snark on them instead of debating the wisdom of the idea.

  97. RE LEE says: Mar 21, 2014 1:59 PM

    Pats haters= Pavlov’s dogs.

  98. forever272012 says: Mar 21, 2014 2:11 PM

    A good idea is a good idea no matter who it comes from.

  99. lanman11 says: Mar 21, 2014 6:44 PM

    They should raise it 5 feet AND put a cross bar at the top, and require the ball to go through the box, marked by radar or lasers or whatever. Than there are no questions.

    I bet BB could make a few more rule changes that make the game better and more interesting. Maybe all extra points SHOULD be drop kicked!

  100. thethunderofgunns says: Mar 22, 2014 4:50 PM

    harrisonhits2 says:
    Mar 21, 2014 11:14 AM
    thethunderofgunns says:

    Yes, make ‘em higher that way all the spy cameras Belichick keeps scattered among the stadiums can receive a better signal for Foxboro HQ
    _______________________

    Really ? Around “stadiums” ? So you’re saying Belichik sneaks into other team’s venues using what, his patented Hoodie Of Invisibility, and somehow installs video systems without the team whose stadium it is having any idea ?

    LOL your tin foil hat must be awfully tight today.

    —————————————————–

    Lighten up Frances, my post was in jest. Thanks. :)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!