Skip to content

Report: Raiders doing “background work” on DeSean Jackson

Getty Images

Fans in Oakland have made their desire to add wide receiver DeSean Jackson to the Raiders roster clear, but the team is reportedly still mulling how much of a push to make for the former Eagle.

Albert Breer of NFL Network reports that the team is still doing “background work” on Jackson. Breer believes the team is aware of the possibility that bringing Jackson back to his home state and the area where he attended in college may result in “added risk” of things going poorly off the field.

General Manager Reggie McKenzie will surely weigh that risk against the risk that will come to his continued employment if the Raiders put up another lackluster season in 2014. He’s invested in several free agents to upgrade the roster from last year and Jackson would add a high-level offensive threat to that mix.

Of course, the Raiders may join the rest of the league in watching Jackson try on a Redskins uniform in the near future. Jackson is set to visit with the Redskins on Monday and the right offer from owner Dan Snyder could mean that the background work in Oakland amounts to nothing.

Permalink 58 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Oakland Raiders, Rumor Mill, Top Stories, Washington Redskins
58 Responses to “Report: Raiders doing “background work” on DeSean Jackson”
  1. hanspard says: Mar 30, 2014 10:41 AM

    Don’t want him in Oakland. Draft Sammy Watkins instead.

  2. babygaga19 says: Mar 30, 2014 10:41 AM

    In other words, the Raiders are going to pass because Jackson isnt over 30.

  3. alshonbrandontandem says: Mar 30, 2014 10:44 AM

    Not a Raiders fan at all. However, having said that, the NFL is better when teams like Oakland and Cleveland are good. The Raiders have that aura of being tough (maybe bordering dirty) and signing controversial, (albeit talented) players like DJax and Ingognito would be great for the league.

    Here’s hoping the Raiders sign him.

  4. raiders4lyfe17 says: Mar 30, 2014 10:46 AM

    Reggie hurry up damn

  5. stonefish67 says: Mar 30, 2014 10:48 AM

    Smart. Hopefully if there is a “problem” it will be identified.
    There are enough 8 balls around the NFL as it stands.
    No more needed.

  6. phillieseaglessixersflyers says: Mar 30, 2014 10:52 AM

    Id much rather have him sign in the bay so we dont have to deal with him twice a year

  7. grimreaper12 says: Mar 30, 2014 10:58 AM

    One year deal with the Patriots. Do it Belichick, you know you want to.

  8. jonbeezy says: Mar 30, 2014 11:14 AM

    This team needs to build through the draft. I understand all the FA signings. They just don’t want to get their butts whipped during the rebuilding process even though it still may happen.

  9. jakec4 says: Mar 30, 2014 11:16 AM

    “Background work” means they hear the fans, but they aren’t offering him a deal.

  10. harrisonhits2 says: Mar 30, 2014 11:17 AM

    Raiders background work = “Is he still breathing and in football shape?”

  11. prideof10000lakes says: Mar 30, 2014 11:36 AM

    no red flags yet…

  12. jburk003 says: Mar 30, 2014 11:37 AM

    Any smart football fan is hoping that their team passes on Jackson and gets a rookie for 1/5th the price whom is motivated to Get to a Jackson type contract.

    The new rookie wage scale has dramatically changed free agents. 5 years ago the eagles wouldn’t have cut Jackson because they’d have to pay a rookie 8 mill a year, now that rookies get payed significantly less, teams are much more likely to kick tires on players like Desean Jackson and instead draft a motivated, cheaper rookie

  13. boyshole25 says: Mar 30, 2014 11:53 AM

    This makes sense for Washington to go after desean, however the raiders can get sammy Watkins for rookie pay,and he will be an absolute beast.

  14. mistyzhang says: Mar 30, 2014 11:57 AM

    Raiders doing research are you crazy!

  15. vegasgreek says: Mar 30, 2014 12:04 PM

    Raiders need DJAX & WR Sammy Watkins to climb over the .500 mark and challenge for a wild card berth. one isn’t enough in today’s NFL. Besides that they need both of them when they pack up and move back to LA where it’s all flash and glitter.

  16. astrategyexpert says: Mar 30, 2014 12:30 PM

    The fans’ interest in this guy isn’t surprising. It’s probably to uphold the team’s intimidating image as it is filling a need at wideout. The front office shouldn’t listen to the fans. They need to be smart and focus on bringing in high character guys.

  17. steelerdeathstar says: Mar 30, 2014 12:36 PM

    ANY team that is considering signing him should do their due diligence concerning him, not just the Raiders. If the Redskins throw a boatload of money at Jackson without a thorough background check, they will likely both regret it, and perpetuate the image that Dan Snyder doesn’t know how to run an NFL franchise, as well as being incapable of learning from past mistakes. Buyer beware…

  18. radrntn says: Mar 30, 2014 12:41 PM

    Watkins will not be there at #5

  19. babygaga19 says: Mar 30, 2014 12:49 PM

    How come the Chiefs have finished their due diligence and said no while the Raiders are still, um, being the Raiders? Always last in everything, yes?

  20. snowdood163 says: Mar 30, 2014 12:53 PM

    I’d love to see his tantrums and dysfunction when they win all of 6 games.

  21. brudog says: Mar 30, 2014 1:43 PM

    Nice that they are doing background work on him considering he ain’t leaving Redskins Park without a contract tomorrow.

  22. dirtdawg54 says: Mar 30, 2014 1:47 PM

    Same team that did background work on JaMarcus Russell, DBH, Lane Kiffin … need I go on?

  23. nodak2de says: Mar 30, 2014 1:49 PM

    If Jackson signs with the sorry ass Redskins, it truly is all about the money.

  24. patriotinvasion says: Mar 30, 2014 1:56 PM

    So take a guy from California with ties to California gang life and let him play in California. Makes sense. Good luck Raiders.

  25. nykfanwakemeupin2015 says: Mar 30, 2014 2:02 PM

    Im starting to think there is a lot more to this story then everyone knows

  26. thetooloftools says: Mar 30, 2014 2:08 PM

    Obviously something is just flat out wrong or the Eagles would not have let their #1 just walk away just to get rid of him.
    This is not how it works.
    Their had to be a reason.
    Does anyone realize that NFL teams hire private detectives to follow it’s own players.
    It’s perfectly legal.
    They have way too much $ invested in these guys to just not know.

  27. oneilistheone says: Mar 30, 2014 2:21 PM

    Its gang life here in DC, big time.It doesn’t matter where he goes.He will do what he wants to do, it is up to him how he wants to live his life he is a free moral agent.

    Structure the contract accordingly to what you want from him and hope it pays off! if it doesn’t it was a risk you were willing to take.Thats real!the rest is emotions and that clouds the ability to reason with reality.

  28. regulator2 says: Mar 30, 2014 2:34 PM

    All 32 NFL teams passed on D-Jax in the draft when he came into the league. And today, no NFL team just releases a Pro Bowl player in his prime without compensation. Just saying. Flag !!!

  29. lbijake says: Mar 30, 2014 3:04 PM

    If Andy doesn’t sign him in KC, that says a lot.

  30. leatherhelmets says: Mar 30, 2014 3:15 PM

    I think the Raiders need to do more background work on the Raiders

  31. packersgreenbay says: Mar 30, 2014 3:23 PM

    This guys doesn’t deserve to be in the NFL. I like what the Eagles did here, other teams should follow there lead.

  32. oneilistheone says: Mar 30, 2014 3:33 PM

    He would not be in the league if all 32 teams passed on him! All 32 passed on him in the 1st round but not all 32 teams passed on him.Again emotions.Risk and reward.What did he do to hurt Philly on the field?

    Off the field? Image? rep of the team and nfl brand?hmmm!Still in the league, no warrants!

    I’ll take that image and say,Go Raiders!!!

  33. robgilman says: Mar 30, 2014 3:48 PM

    The media loves a good diva story. They have been scrambling ever since TO, Ocho and Moss left the scene. Jackson is maybe not your model citizen but he stays out of trouble for most part and performs on the field. Well worth the signing

  34. raiderraffeal says: Mar 30, 2014 4:10 PM

    Hopefully the Raiders and Djax have an agreement for him to see what he is offered from other teams and then give the Raiders an opportunity to make an offer elsewhere. If they don’t have that verbal agreement, I agree with “brudog” can’t see him leaving Washington without a deal. Also, there’s no way Watkins falls to 5!

  35. shinedown37 says: Mar 30, 2014 4:43 PM

    This may sound crazy but Aaron Rodgers wants his Cal buddy in Green Bay. He might get what he wishes for, as the packers have a unannounced visit scheduled to meet with him early next week. Cobb and Jackson, doing slants would give defenses nightmares.

  36. bigmas26 says: Mar 30, 2014 4:55 PM

    As a Raiders fan, I’m hesitant. He is a dynamic player but I really don’t want Randy Moss part 2.

    At the very least this helps us work on the perception that players don’t want to play in Oakland. This is one of this best receivers in the game and he expressed that he wants to be a Raider.

  37. vegasgreek says: Mar 30, 2014 5:02 PM

    The best place for DJAX is Green Bay by far . He can’t get in trouble there and Rodgers will throw for 4500 yds and 45 Tds next season . If I’m the Packers I sign RB Chris Johnson too to go with Eddie Lacey. If they make these moves EVERY OFFENSIVE NFL RECORD WILL BE BROKEN ! BOOK IT ! NOBODY WILL STOP THE PACKERS OFFENSE !

  38. bsizemore68 says: Mar 30, 2014 5:04 PM

    He will be a cancer on any team. bill

  39. raiderrob21 says: Mar 30, 2014 5:37 PM

    Do the people that use “Draft Sammy Watkins” realize that he probably won’t be there to draft at #5 overall?????????

  40. channer81 says: Mar 30, 2014 5:44 PM

    Isn’t the fact that your organization is closer to the people he allegedly had gang ties with a major red flag to begin with?

  41. professor177 says: Mar 30, 2014 6:28 PM

    We should sign him if available. While this is a deep draft with alot of talent i really cant trust Rmac drafting. He hasnt drafted well in my opinion. If you can get a proven receiver u do it..

  42. thegreatgabbert says: Mar 30, 2014 6:41 PM

    They are on their third private investigator. The first two went missing and haven’t been heard from.

  43. babygaga19 says: Mar 30, 2014 7:40 PM

    When Marky Mark ordered a background investigation, Reg thought he wanted game tape from DJ’s college days. Man, the Raiders move in strange and mysterious ways.

  44. professoroftruth says: Mar 30, 2014 7:56 PM

    If Jackson does a background check on the Raiders front office and head coach, he will surely choose another team to sign with.

  45. raiderapologist says: Mar 30, 2014 8:43 PM

    dirtdawg54 says: Mar 30, 2014 1:47 PM

    Same team that did background work on JaMarcus Russell, DBH, Lane Kiffin … need I go on?
    Same team, different front office. You must take real long naps.

  46. rubicon202 says: Mar 30, 2014 8:53 PM

    LOL Haters still got it going…see you on the field

  47. thetooloftools says: Mar 30, 2014 9:24 PM

    Don’t bring him in here.
    He is a cancer.

  48. dodadeed says: Mar 30, 2014 9:29 PM

    As talented as he is, yes you can be rest assured every NFL team has their official sources for background checks and their unofficial sources. NFL teams are huge financial corporations and they will scope this guys in and out. The Raiders always did this and will this time as well. The difference nowadays is that no one will take risks like Al would…. I doubt you will see Incognito or Jackson in a Raider uniform. The last big risk Al took was JaMarcus Russell, and it was by far his most famous risk and flop. There are many valid arguments to take Jackson even if just to make sure you don’t see him twice a year in the AFC West. However, are McKenzie and Allen THAT desperate? If I was making the decision and there was some valid past issues, a player would have to be producing Tiffany cufflinks out of his glutes every time, before I would hire him. Even the potential as an instant starter and saving a high pick by not going after a top receiver I would say ‘Thanks but no thanks’.

  49. jayquintana says: Mar 30, 2014 9:40 PM

    Anyone doubt he’ll sign with either the Redskins or the Raiders?

  50. campcouch says: Mar 30, 2014 10:01 PM

    I’m not his advocate,but he seemed to not be an issue his entire career in Philly. He was questioned about some knuckleheads he knew. We all know one (maybe more) person that’s a bit shady. The cops said they had nothing. I think he got popped his rookie year for having weed and last year his house got robbed…but the same can be said for quite a few players. You have a guy in San Fran shooting assault rifles at his own party, another upper cutting his wife, hit and runs with brass knuckles and his alleged “ties” to gangs gets him cut. The NFL is a weird place.

  51. oneilistheone says: Mar 30, 2014 10:06 PM

    What is Mckenzie and Allen’s next job?Can you answer that question? No you cant.They are on the verge of losing their jobs now.

    So the answer to the question are they that desparate?should be yes and what do they have to lose by bringing in DJAX?Nothing!

    Haters are already trying to clown the age of the F/A class we are bringing in.Us bringing in ActionJackson well thats just good old fashion fear.

  52. dodadeed says: Mar 30, 2014 11:11 PM

    They are probably desperate and, most likely short of a AFC 2nd round playoff game, they will be gone. I think the F/A moves so far are actually pretty good. Mac didn’t have the cash to make the moves he did this off season, so he did need more time. Don’t get me wrong, Jackson would be a huge asset and I would love to see help the Raiders get back up the rankings. This is a huge question of risk is based on the BIG IF these alleged issues are true. So…. If you do see Jackson added on then I would be very confident he’s clean and good to go. If they pass on him it’s because there is some dirt under the fingernails. My comment was simply – if there were real issues, I wouldn’t risk it either. They have added good F/As and have plenty of good picks to work with.

  53. easterbunny007 says: Mar 31, 2014 12:55 AM

    If DJAX signs with Washington, it has “revenge” signing all of it. At least twice a season, DJAX will have the opportunity to put make the Eagles regret their decision.

  54. omgitsgreglee says: Mar 31, 2014 1:00 AM

    For those saying Aaron Rodgers wants his “buddy from Cal”, you know they weren’t there at the same time, right?

    They’re about as good as college buddies as Emmitt Smith and Tim Tebow are.

    I’ll give you a minute…..

  55. nitecapper says: Mar 31, 2014 1:41 AM

    Ok let me see this is my first post ever…give D-jax a fat contract for 3 years ….with 50% of the contract in roster /incentive bonus a gangster doesnt want to lose half his $$$$$$ if he screws up can’t a contract be written that way?

  56. oaklandstroke says: Mar 31, 2014 6:48 AM

    Raiders should steer clear…DeSean has too many issues and my Raiders don’t have the coaching leadership or structure to deal with DeSean. Plus, the better value is drafting Sammy Watkins IF he’s still on the board.

  57. rutchaser says: Mar 31, 2014 7:16 AM

    rubicon202 says:
    Mar 30, 2014 8:53 PM
    LOL Haters still got it going…see you on the field

    Really? What team do you play for?

  58. bamboozle99 says: Mar 31, 2014 7:58 AM

    The draft is irrelevant. The Raiders need both, sign good free agents and draft good players. McKenzie knows he has been on the hot seat yet he has been protecting the club with all his signings so far. I don’t see him reach for this guy too far out. Unless Desean wants to come play for real cheap on a 3 year deal, this ain’t happening.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!