Skip to content

NFLPA points out league’s past projection of flat cap through 2015

200398089-001 Getty Images

It’s fitting that, on April Fool’s Day, the NFL Players Association has opted to point out a past projection from the NFL that ultimately ended up being as accurate as the many phony reports that will be circulating on Tuesday.

From NFLPA spokesman George Atallah’s Twitter account comes the link to a SportsBusiness Journal article explaining that the league believes the salary cap will creep up slowly, maxing out at $130 million in 2016.

We were hearing similar things when the cap was barely moving up.  In 2012, the cap actually would have dropped but for some creative accounting by the league and the NFLPA.

The creeping lasted through 2013.  For 2014, the cap jumped from $123 million to $133 million, defying league estimates from October of a jump to $126.3 million.  By 2016, the spending limit could be as high as $160 million.

It’s unclear why some thought the cap wouldn’t spike by 2014, the first year of the new TV deals.  Still, in prior years multiple influential league figures were insisting both on and off the record that the cap wouldn’t spike but instead “smooth,” even as the NFLPA argued that “significant growth” is coming in 2014, “and beyond.”

While it appears on the surface to be a no-harm/no-foul situation, the problem for players is that budgets get set based on the information disseminated by the league.  So when there’s an unexpected jump, it may be too late for General Managers to go back to owners and get authorization to spend more.

Still, not everyone in the league believed the cap would be flat or close to it.  As one management-side source predicted in 2011, the first few years under the CBA will be good for the owners, the next few will be more of a push, and then the spikes will begin.

That’s what seems to be happening now, with the cap shooting up by $10 million per team from 2013 to 2014.  Next year’s numbers will shed light on whether 2014 was a fluke or a trend.

Those numbers will take on even greater importance because, in the same month the new cap number is released, NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith will face a challenge to the job he has held for five years from Sean Gilbert and possibly others.

Permalink 6 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Rumor Mill
6 Responses to “NFLPA points out league’s past projection of flat cap through 2015”
  1. toybkshr says: Apr 1, 2014 10:26 AM

    The Cowboys & Steelers will still find a way to scramble, cut & restructure every year, no matter how much the cap increases.

  2. joe6606 says: Apr 1, 2014 11:11 AM

    The owners wanted to push the message that they won the cba. With the way the tv contracts were arranged, d smith looked like he got railroaded and it sure appeared that way w the flat cap. But despite Krafts statements, it never made any sense why the cap wouldn’t spike. History will prove d smith made a good deal.

  3. xinellum says: Apr 1, 2014 11:11 AM

    If the league had promised a huge spike and the economy collapsed and the tv deals were much smaller then they would have been on the hook for providing funds inconsistent with growth. As with all businesses, you project the lows and celebrate the highs. I can see how the NFLPA could complain about the previous scenario, but complaining that their clients will be guaranteed to make more money than projected can only be complained about by a moron. If I ran a business and my stakeholders had a much higher payday than expected I would be a hero, only the NFLPA, obviously led by morons, would complain. Perhaps the owners should rescind the cap increase and force every player to take that percentage in pay cuts, how popular would the NFLPA executives be and how much whining would you hear from players.

  4. jchipwood says: Apr 1, 2014 11:57 AM

    Every year the salary cap is getting closer and closer to being irrelevant.

  5. that's the best linebacker i've seen since Joe Montana says: Apr 1, 2014 12:14 PM

    This is why Kaep asking for $18M per isn’t as ridiculous as it first sounded.

  6. kd75 says: Apr 1, 2014 12:21 PM

    Everyone makes more money.

    Should we cut the pie into six pieces or eight?

    Six…I can’t eat eight.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!