Skip to content

Report: Sam Bradford informed of Johnny Manziel “smokescreen” before it started


Rams coach Jeff Fisher has said more than once this offseason that Sam Bradford is the starting quarterback in St. Louis, something that kept being necessary because the Rams kept finding themselves linked to Texas A&M quarterback Johnny Manziel during the pre-draft process.

Fisher made another show of support for Bradford on Wednesday night, telling a room filled with revelers at the team’s pre-draft party once again that Bradford’s “our guy.” Bradford was standing next to him at the time, which would have made it quite awkward to say anything else although Jim Thomas of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Fisher’s show of support was about more than avoiding an uncomfortable situation.

Per Thomas, Bradford was made aware of the Manziel “smokescreen” before it got underway and the team has always been intent on dealing the pick rather than bringing Johnny Football to St. Louis. There might be another layer or two to the smokescreens before the Rams pick Manziel and he reveals himself to be Tom Cruise while on the stage with Roger Goodell, but things don’t really have a Mission: Impossible feel at the moment.

There doesn’t seem to be much of a push from teams trying to move up for a quarterback, though, although the reportedly high price for the Texans’ pick could make the No. 2 pick attractive to teams looking for help at other spots on Thursday. That would be especially true if Jadeveon Clowney is available after Houston picks, but the Rams may also just have to accept the “high-class problem” of picking second overall.

Permalink 68 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Los Angeles Rams, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
68 Responses to “Report: Sam Bradford informed of Johnny Manziel “smokescreen” before it started”
  1. restorativejusticeprogram says: May 8, 2014 7:18 AM

    Bradford is not an above average NFL quarterback. Why would you commit to mediocrity?

  2. canetic says: May 8, 2014 7:24 AM

    Question — can the Rams trade the pick now, or do they have to wait until Houston picks until they can actually trade the pick?

  3. rwhite84 says: May 8, 2014 7:25 AM

    Obviously, they’re still too invested in Bradford to get a new quarterback.

  4. crabcakesfootball says: May 8, 2014 7:28 AM

    In Bradfords case (his Native American hertiage), wouldnt it be smoke “signals”?

    national football league= where indian stereotypes are embraced!

  5. couldntthinkofaname says: May 8, 2014 7:33 AM

    Make it stop. Just make it all stop.

  6. jimmyt says: May 8, 2014 7:35 AM

    I would like to propose a moratorium, if not an outright ban on the use of the term “smoke screen”. Fans and sportswriters alike use it to the point of insanity. Anyone else glad it’s finally Draft Day?

  7. jets13 says: May 8, 2014 7:36 AM

    As talked about in the other Rams thread, the Rams are in a tough position as the #2 pick does not hold as much value as in other drafts.

    What St. Louis needs to hope for: Clowney not taken at #1.

    Lets not kid ourselves, it’s only because this draft is delayed that most of these FUBAR stories/scenarios are being reported. Clowney is a potential once in a generation player, if he falls to #2, then and only then can St. Louis come close to an RGIII type deal.

  8. feelnsavage says: May 8, 2014 7:41 AM

    Ofcourse they will draft Manziel, they would be the laughingstock of the draft if they truly stick to Bradford

  9. root4cleveland says: May 8, 2014 7:46 AM

    On the day before the draft Colt McCoy was told he was the Browns’ starter right before they drafted Weeden two years ago.

    These FOs don’t may owe these players the truth, but they don’t always share it. Bradford has done little to warrant his contract and his job security should be on the table.

  10. root4cleveland says: May 8, 2014 7:46 AM

    On the day before the draft Colt McCoy was told he was the Browns’ starter right before they drafted Weeden two years ago.

    These FOs may owe these players the truth, but they don’t always share it. Bradford has done little to warrant his contract and his job security should be on the table.

  11. luigiboy12 says: May 8, 2014 7:48 AM

    Matt Lienert was his guy, too. We saw how that played out.

  12. paulsmith107 says: May 8, 2014 7:52 AM

    So it’s a smoke screen which he knew about. A smokescreen is basically to make people think you want someone you don’t for trade purposes. Then it’s let out he knew about said smokescreen letting the world know its a smokescreen. That is some really good smoke screening

  13. eaglesnoles05 says: May 8, 2014 7:58 AM

    Dear local media sources-

    These smokescreens your teams may or may not be setting aren’t as effective when you talk about them on the world wide web.

    Thanks for the help, buddy,
    Jeff Fisher

  14. eaglesnoles05 says: May 8, 2014 8:00 AM

    Dear Jim Thomas of the St. Louis Dispatch,

    These smokescreens your teams may or may not be setting certainly aren’t when you try to out them as smokescreens on the world wide web.

    Thanks for the help, buddy,
    Jeff Fisher

  15. cnote94 says: May 8, 2014 8:02 AM

    Why would a Rams source reveal the Manziel link was a smokescreen? Unless that is a smokescreen? Wait, what were we talking about again? The draft process has gone on long enough to beg for mercy.

  16. DonKellyBaby says: May 8, 2014 8:03 AM

    Report: Rams informed Johnny Manziel of Sam Bradford is informed of Johnny Manziel “smokescreen” before it started.

  17. ctiggs says: May 8, 2014 8:15 AM

    That is cute one bust and a future bust. #goNiners #NOOnehasitbetter #teamKAP

  18. quackbury says: May 8, 2014 8:16 AM

    Yawn. Slow news day, eh?

  19. awdlmd says: May 8, 2014 8:16 AM

    If the Rams pass on RG3 and Manziel then Bradford turns out like Mark Sanchez they are going to look pretty stupid.

  20. jayhawk6 says: May 8, 2014 8:17 AM

    So the Rams may be “stuck” with the second pick because of the predatory standards they established a couple years ago.

    Too funny.

  21. notthetroll says: May 8, 2014 8:21 AM

    I think Sam still has a shot of being pretty darn good. Needs a little more help still but thanks to the Redskins he gets it.

  22. Matt dog from C-town says: May 8, 2014 8:29 AM

    I said they same thing to myself over the last couple weeks….i bet they told Sam about this in advance….and as far as trading down….i don’t see that happening either….and give up the chance to draft Watkins , Robinson, or Mack? Silly Rabbits

  23. Matt dog from C-town says: May 8, 2014 8:31 AM

    The more i look at this…it’s looking like Manziel to Cleveland…unless Jacksonville wants to pass on Mack….

  24. reppster says: May 8, 2014 8:36 AM

    I wouldn’t call Bradford a bust. He just never really turned into a NFL Bust and hit his fullest potential after college.

  25. allidoiswin55 says: May 8, 2014 8:40 AM

    Bradford is just unfortunate he’s a bit unity prone now and he plays in the toughest and most physical defensive divisions the nfl has seen in decades . Theirs a top 5 defense waiting for him every nfcw game . Compare that to manning who only played one all year . Hard to survive and win yet alone put up good numbers …

  26. honkeyt says: May 8, 2014 8:44 AM

    This extra two weeks have been hell. All of this garbage with no substance.

  27. robertocfg says: May 8, 2014 8:46 AM

    Is this a smokescreen of a smokescreen?


  28. puckthefatriots says: May 8, 2014 8:47 AM

    What is the point of a smokescreen when you admit it is a smokescreen.?

  29. rajbais says: May 8, 2014 8:49 AM

    What did this guy do to deserve a smoke screen?

    He was the worst Offensive Rookie of the Year choice ever and lost to Seattle in week 17 of the 2010 regular season.

    He’s also a putrid yard/attempt passer.

    6+ YPA??

    Franchise QB?? Never was, never will be.

  30. titansbro says: May 8, 2014 8:52 AM

    Dude, you have 2 first round picks. Use them. Take Clowney, Mack, or Watkins at #2. Then use that other first rounder on another need position.

    There’s a reason high picks are so valuable, because that’s where the best players are drafted. Me personally? I want the best players so I’m using those picks if I’m them. Although I did agree with them trading the RG3 pick 2 years ago.

  31. nflsecurity862 says: May 8, 2014 8:55 AM

    The draft is tonight. What will all the whiners on here complain about now?

  32. justintuckrule says: May 8, 2014 9:02 AM

    These perennially crummy teams like St. Louis should learn a lesson already and draft a good player that high (Robinson ) instead of dealing.

    There is no 2x SB MVP enticing teams to trade up that high for.

  33. igeorgiaboy says: May 8, 2014 9:06 AM

    Rams will take Mack to pair him with Olgetree… and still be able to grab another solid player at 13. Rams are silly if they trade out. I would take Watkins to be brutally honest and then go grab Barr from UCLA.

  34. bennyb82 says: May 8, 2014 9:08 AM

    All these ‘smokescreens’ are pretty ridiculous. I might be more confused if a team stayed silent. Then it may appear that they are set on who they might draft. If a team thinks it is their guy, they might make a great offer.

  35. fishyinalittledishy says: May 8, 2014 9:09 AM

    To many smokescreens for my liking to much guess work move the draft back to April and stop all this time wasting. Life`s to short.

  36. nobreak1269 says: May 8, 2014 9:22 AM

    Why would it be a smokescreen? Bradford is awful.

  37. jjrs89 says: May 8, 2014 9:25 AM

    dont they realize the draft is tonight? Why not admit the smoke, you know, AFTER THE DRAFT in case in might work? Seems a bit dumb to call it now

  38. wannabear says: May 8, 2014 9:29 AM

    To all my brethren out there, I’m happy our day has finally come

  39. isidore2014 says: May 8, 2014 9:31 AM

    The first rule of smokescreens is “Don’t talk about smokescreens.”

  40. threedeep1998 says: May 8, 2014 9:31 AM

    Stop trading out. Take the GIFT of a number two pick!

  41. sterling7 says: May 8, 2014 9:34 AM

    No one listens, I said back when-Johnny Manziel is a living smokescreen. Johnny Manziel will not go until at the earliest in the 20’s of the first round. Johnny Manziel is popular among the media and they push him and people who don’t take their football seriously think he’s “the guy”, but GM’s, Player Personnel Managers and coaches especially head coaches are not going to hang their hats on Johnny Manziel in the early rounds-again at the earliest Johnny Manziel will go in the 20’s of the first round!

  42. Remember Brian Brohm says: May 8, 2014 9:36 AM

    It isn’t much of a smokescreen when Fisher is constantly saying that Bradford is his quarterback. Maybe if he hesitated or nuanced it a little, someone might buy into the bit.

  43. edavidberg says: May 8, 2014 9:50 AM

    It’s not a smoke screen if you don’t confuse anybody. I think most teams were happy St. Louis was “thinking” about Manziel because it meant a better prospect was going to be an option for them.

  44. weepingjebus says: May 8, 2014 9:54 AM

    “Sam, just so you know, we’ll be employing an elaborate smokescreen where we draft Manziel and start him for 4-5 years to increase his trade value.”

  45. whatjusthapped says: May 8, 2014 10:09 AM

    Smokescreens are only effective if someone bites on it. Most GM’s are smarter than that but then we have your Minnesota Vikings. Watch for them to bite on Thursday night.

  46. sallust99 says: May 8, 2014 10:19 AM

    All you Bradford haters out there – buckle up because 2014 is his year – and the RAMS WILL MAKE THE PLAYOFFS.

    The guy finally has help on both sides of the ball.

    I often wonder if anyone here actually watches film or the games for that matter.

    Sammy B is a winner and can play the position. Period.

  47. redbirdnation23 says: May 8, 2014 10:23 AM

    If everyone keeps bringing up Manziel, why does Fisher really care what the media is saying? If they aren’t going to draft him then why the heck does he need to keep convincing everyone that Bradford is the qb in STL? It makes literally no sense, usually the rumor will be denied after the first or second time, but for the fifth time why does he still try to convince the media that they aren’t getting Manziel? Seems the smokescreen is there so Bradford doesn’t see what’s coming.

  48. schmitty2 says: May 8, 2014 10:26 AM

    It’s pretty simple-if the Rams have their eyes on Watkins or Mack they need to stay at #2. If they want either Robinson or Matthews they can trade down to the 6-9 range to a team that wants to move up and gain at least an extra pick in the 2nd.

  49. cueghost says: May 8, 2014 10:26 AM

    Bradford is a lemon… and since he couldn’t keep his mouth shut about this smokescreen, perhaps they ought to just go ahead draft them some Manziel!

  50. ajgreenhof says: May 8, 2014 10:28 AM

    It’s a smokescreen covering up a smokescreen!

  51. seals1 says: May 8, 2014 10:36 AM

    Code for Vikings didn’t offer up what we wanted for Bradford so now we are going to keep him and pretend it was just for show.

    Bradford,,,,,,,,,,they don’t want you but can’t cut you. I guess you are staying.

  52. u4iadman says: May 8, 2014 10:39 AM

    Bradford is not the answer. They were dumb to pass on rg3 regardless of the picks they received. No QB = no Super Bowl.

  53. belichickdominatedjoemontana says: May 8, 2014 10:41 AM

    I cannot wait for the draft.

    This info being leaked or not being leaked is getting ridiculous.

  54. killitandeatit says: May 8, 2014 10:41 AM

    This is why we love the draft. High drama ,reality t.v. and smokescreens that are not…really real smokescreens ? I kind of like Christmas to be on time. I preferred the draft on the weekend schedule as well .I will watch virtually every second of the draft and always will. Hey NFL : don’t be messin with my draft.

  55. aldog83 says: May 8, 2014 10:42 AM

    If the RAMS leaked this….

    They are Drafing QB!

  56. cornerstone2001 says: May 8, 2014 10:43 AM

    You certainly need to screen what you smoke….

  57. guitarfreak21 says: May 8, 2014 10:48 AM

    With the way the draft deception works, I wouldn’t be surprised if this was just a reverse smokescreen itself… sigh nothing in the draft is knowable…

  58. jaccfrost says: May 8, 2014 10:59 AM

    After the draft smokescreens there’ll be media fog banks to contend with…..GO RAMS!!

  59. casualmalexlfan says: May 8, 2014 11:27 AM

    “Dear other 31 teams, with less than 9 hours before the draft takes place, we just wanted to inform you that we are running what is called a ‘smokescreen’ to trick other teams into trading up for the #2 pick. We now eagerly await your offers.”

  60. flaccoishermanmunster says: May 8, 2014 11:43 AM

    “Bradford’s our guy, but……………”

  61. justintuckrule says: May 8, 2014 11:54 AM

    Maybe broadcasting the smokescreen is a smokescreen.

  62. Brown Anchor says: May 8, 2014 12:10 PM

    Well now you just blew the smokescreen, Sam!

  63. u4iadman says: May 8, 2014 1:26 PM

    I like Bradford, but he does not have what it takes. Should not have passed on RG3, who I dont like, but he is an upgrade over Bradford. Poorly done by Rams, and now they get a lot of picks but again have a mediocre QB. They will move on from him too late, probably in 2016.

  64. jdbaker01 says: May 8, 2014 1:32 PM

    Take Watkins with the 2

  65. scotrugby says: May 8, 2014 1:58 PM

    If their intent was to actually get someone to bite on a trade, a general rule of thumb is not to let the cat out of the bag until after the draft.

    I think this particular smokescreen was pretty stupid actually. Nobody was going to buy it.

    Plus, what makes them think that Manziel is the only player that a team would be willing to trade up for? Clowney, Mack and Watkins are all prime candidates for a trade up.

    Again, this whole thing was pretty stupid.

  66. muencht says: May 8, 2014 3:02 PM

    Sam Bradford has been a disappointment in the pros after his spectacular career at OU. Although his NFL QB rating of 79.3 is better than I thought. He had several surgeries in college and has never been healthy enough for long enough.

    I think the Rams will stick w/ SamB and I don’t see them taking Johnny Football in the draft. Except as a backup. JohnF will never be happy as a backup. He’s a superstar or so he thinks. He (Manziel) does have unique skills but will they transfer to the NFL?

  67. omeimontis says: May 9, 2014 3:53 AM

    I am a 49er fan, and I am glad the Rams did not pick Manziel because the 9ers would have to face him twice a year. Now that he is in Cleveland, he becomes a problem for the Ravens, Steelers, and Bengals twice a year.

  68. rogerrodgers says: May 9, 2014 11:20 PM

    When will these idiot Rams realize they have a bust for a QB? The rest of the NFC West is fine with that too.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!