Skip to content

Bills start setting up roster for training camp

Kiko Alonso AP

For most Americans, summer will stretch on for several more weeks but NFL teams are preparing to get back to work as training camps open around the league.

One of the ways they prepare is by placing players on various non-participation lists that will keep them from practicing until later in camp or after the regular season starts. The Bills got the ball rolling on Wednesday by making moves involving five players.

Linebacker Kiko Alonso was one of three players placed on the Non-Football Injury list. Alonso will miss the entire season after tearing his ACL while working out earlier this month. Tackle Cordy Glenn, who was held out of some late Spring work with an illness, and defensive tackle Alan Branch are also on the list.

Cornerback Leodis McKelvin, who is recovering from hip surgery, and linebacker Randell Johnson were put on the Physically Unable to Perform list. Players on either list can be activated at any time during camp or they can revert to the regular season version of them if they aren’t ready when the regular season gets underway.

The Bills also announced that they have signed former Steelers linebacker Stevenson Sylvester. Sylvester mostly appeared on special teams during his four years with the Steelers and Alonso’s injury may open up a spot on the depth chart for a linebacker. Tight end Mike Caussin was released to make room on the roster.

Permalink 13 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Buffalo Bills, Home, Rumor Mill

No evidence that Patriots broke k-ball rules

gostkowski AP

So many stories surfaced during the Deflategate media feeding frenzy that it’s hard to remember them all. One that has been largely overlooked was a report from ESPN that a Patriots locker room attendant tried to put an unapproved ball, not an NFL-mandated kicking ball, into the game on a special teams play.

The Deflategate report out today finds no evidence to corroborate that.

“Separate and apart from the issues that arose during the AFC Championship Game with respect to the inflation of Patriots game balls, questions were raised during the game with respect to the authenticity of one of the kicking balls (or “k-balls” as they are commonly known) used by the Patriots. We conclude that there is no evidence to support any finding of wrongdoing with respect to this kicking ball,” the report says.

There was some confusion about the k-balls during the AFC Championship Game. Patriots kicker Stephen Gostkowski complained during the game that the ball he kicked off at the start of the game was in better shape than k-balls he kicked at subsequent times during the game, and he questioned why the first k-ball (which had been removed from the game to be sold at a charitable auction) couldn’t be retrieved. But the Deflategate investigation found that there was no wrongdoing within that confusion.

Permalink 42 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Browns, Falcons may set precedent for Patriots punishment

2012 Pro Football Hall of Fame Game Getty Images

When the NFL imposed what appeared to be a pair of wrist slaps on the Browns and Falcons for violating the game-integrity rules regarding in-game texting and artificial crowd noise, respectively, it was confusing. Now, it may not be.

When the time comes for Commissioner Roger Goodell to discipline the Patriots, the most recent precedent comes from the fine plus no lost draft picks imposed on the Browns and the fine plus forfeited 2016 fifth-round pick imposed on the Falcons. The punishment of the Patriots should compare loosely to the punishment imposed on the Browns and Falcons — and what the Falcons did arguably is worse than what the Patriots did.

As noted at the time the Browns and Falcons punishments emerged, the fact that those teams admitted to their wrongdoing may have been a factor in the perceived lenience. But the finding in this case lacks the kind of smoking-gun clarity that the other cases exhibited. It could be that the Patriots won’t be hammered much worse than the Falcons.

Regardless, the decision to take a 2016 draft pick and not a 2015 draft pick from the Falcons now makes more sense. If the Falcons had been punished before the draft and the Patriots found responsible for a violation after the draft, the outcome would have seemed unfair. As it now stands, both teams will likely lose something in the 2016 draft — avoiding the potential incongruity of the Falcons but not the Patriots being punished via the 2015 draft for conduct occurring prior to it.

Permalink 47 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Eagles sign three draft picks

Eric Rowe, Isiah Myers AP

The Eagles have joined the Bears and Buccaneers as teams that have started signing members of their 2015 draft class less than a week after the draft got underway.

The team announced Wednesday that they have signed second-round defensive back Eric Rowe, sixth-round cornerback Randall Evans and seventh-round defensive end Brian Mihalik to four-year contracts.

The Eagles traded up to take Rowe, who made 45 starts and intercepted three passes over his four years playing both cornerback and safety at Utah. He’s expected to get his first look at cornerback, where the Eagles signed Byron Maxwell and Walter Thurmond as free agents to go with Brandon Boykin in a revamped position group.

You can add Evans (and fellow sixth-rounder JaCorey Shepherd) to that group as well. Evans started his career at Kansas State as a walk-on, but went on to start 31 games and make the All Big-12 team in his senior season.

Mihalik started every game at Boston College last season and recorded 4.5 sacks. Like many third day picks, he and Evans will likely need to show special teams abilities if they’re going to be on the gameday roster as rookies.

Permalink 4 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Stephen Jones: Veteran running back not a priority right now

New York Jets v Miami Dolphins Getty Images

Veteran running back Chris Johnson told a TMZ cameraman that he’d be a good fit with the Cowboys and invited the team to “holler at me,” but it appears the Cowboys plan to do their hollering in different directions at the moment.

The Cowboys passed on taking a running back during the draft, making good on owner Jerry Jones’s assertion that the need to add a rookie back to Darren McFadden, Joseph Randle and Lance Dunbar was “not urgent.” The team doesn’t seem to feel any different about veteran backs based on executive vice president Stephen Jones’s answer to a season ticket holder’s question about adding Johnson to the mix.

“We haven’t visited with Chris, and we can’t talk about him because he’s a free agent. But right now we’re looking at the guys that we have on our roster,” Jones said, via the team’s website. “He is somebody that is on a short list of ours that we think could ultimately come in and do some good things for us if we asked him to. But I wouldn’t say it’s a priority right now.”

The younger Jones has previously pointed to the Patriots’ acquisition of LeGarrette Blount during the 2014 season as an example of how teams can find veteran help in unexpected places. Waiting until November might not be the best plan, but there figure to be other opportunities as rosters shuffle around the league in the current months should the Cowboys shuffle their priorities.

Permalink 7 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Wells Report: Officials couldn’t find game balls before AFC title game

AFC Championship - Indianapolis Colts v New England Patriots Getty Images

Rule Two, Section One of the NFL Rule Book states game footballs “shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.”

However, according to the Wells Report, when it came time for referee Walt Anderson and the officiating staff to take the game balls to the ball boys on the field 15 minutes before the AFC Championship game in January, the footballs were missing.

According to the report, Patriots officials locker room attendant Jim McNally took the footballs on to the field without the officials’ permission after bringing them into a bathroom for about 100 seconds.

Wrote the Wells Report investigators: “When it was suggested that McNally had or may have taken them to the field, Anderson responded that ‘he’s not supposed to do that.’ Anderson also stated that ‘we have to find the footballs.'”

The investigators also noted: “It was the first time in Anderson’s nineteen years as an NFL official that he could not locate the game balls at the start of a game.”

According to the Wells Report, Anderson and fellow NFL referee Clete Blakeman — also present for the AFC title game — described McNally’s removal of the footballs as unusual and not standard practice.

Wrote investigators: “Numerous game officials, including those assigned to the AFC Championship Game, told us that McNally generally does not remove the game balls from the Officials Locker Room without express permission or without being accompanied by one or more game officials. Walt Anderson said that in his experience, McNally has not removed, and is not permitted to remove, the game balls from the Officials Locker Room without his permission.

“Anderson also said that if McNally had asked to take the footballs to the field before he was ready to leave, he would have told McNally to wait. Anderson has always denied requests by ball boys and locker room attendants in other stadiums to take the game balls out before he was ready to go to the field.

“Similarly, Clete Blakeman—a referee on another officiating crew during the regular season — could not recall a previous instance where McNally took the game balls to the field on his own and without express permission. What happened on the day of the AFC Championship Game was, in his view, a ‘break in our normal protocol.'”

According to the Wells Report, McNally took the footballs out of the officiating locker room at 6:30, took them into the bathroom shortly thereafter and exited with the footballs at 6:32:27. He then took the footballs onto the field.

Less than three minutes later, Anderson and other officials went to look for the footballs — which had already departed, the Wells Report alleges.

Permalink 52 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

T.Y. Hilton on Phillip Dorsett pick: Nothing in NFL should surprise anybody

Cincinnati v Miami Getty Images

The Colts raised more than a few eyebrows last Thursday night when they selected wide receiver Phillip Dorsett in the first round of the draft because they already had a strong crew of receivers on a team that many felt needed more beef on their defense.

Beyond that, Dorsett is a smallish, speedy receiver who looks a lot like T.Y. Hilton, who has caught 214 passes for 3,289 yards and 19 touchdowns during three seasons with the Colts. Don’t count Hilton among those who were surprised to see the Colts add another wideout even if his take on Dorsett’s arrival doesn’t suggest he thought wideout was a pressing need.

“There’s nothing I can do about that. That’s who they picked. That’s cool with me,” Hilton said, via the Indianapolis Star. “Nothing in this league should surprise anybody. (It was) a pick that they thought we needed, so I guess that’s what we needed to help this team.”

Hilton is entering the final year of his rookie contract, which has led some to suggest the Colts are being proactive in adding a player who could allow the offense to roll on unscathed should Hilton depart as a free agent. That may be the case, but the Colts’ wide receiver group might not look as stacked at this point next year even if Hilton gets a new deal.

Andre Johnson is turning 34 and Duron Carter has never played an NFL down, which leaves second-year player Donte Moncrief as the surest thing of the non-Dorsett and Hilton receivers on the roster after one year and 32 catches. While it’s certainly a stretch to say that receiver is a pressing need, the idea that Dorsett’s arrival is attached to Hilton’s future seems like it may be just as much of one.

Permalink 2 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Cardinals claim Alfonzo Dennard off waivers from Patriots

Dennard Getty Images

In case you were jonesing for some Patriots news this afternoon, we’ve got you covered.

According to Field Yates of ESPN, former Pats cornerback Alfonzo Dennard has been claimed off waivers by the Cardinals.

The Patriots released Dennard yesterday, an oddly timed event considering they didn’t draft one until the seventh round, and the offseason program has been going on.

But the Cards were happy to add the depth to their secondary, since they didn’t draft one at all last weekend.

Permalink 5 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Todd Herremans: Kelly is “equally racist to all races” so he’s “not racist”

Pittsburgh Steelers v Philadelphia Eagles Getty Images

Before the Ted Wells report on Deflategate was released on Wednesday, it looked like Bills running back LeSean McCoy’s assertion that Eagles coach Chip Kelly got rid of “all the good black players” the “fastest” since becoming the coach of the Eagles.

It’s not the first time that Kelly’s been the target of such a broadside as ESPN talking head Stephen A. Smith made similar comments shortly after McCoy was traded to the Bills that McCoy referenced in the ESPN Magazine interview featuring his own thoughts. Not everyone jettisoned by Kelly this offseason shares the viewpoint.

Longtime Eagles guard Todd Herremans, who is white and now plays for the Colts, was released before the Eagles traded McCoy (and signed DeMarco Murray and Ryan Mathews to fill his spot in the backfield) and was asked by a Twitter follower if he thought Kelly was a racist.

“I feel he is equally racist to all races … which I guess would make him … not racist,” Herremans wrote.

Last month, McCoy suggested that Kelly got rid of him and other players because he doesn’t like or respect star players. McCoy may not consider Herremans (or Nick Foles or other white players dispatched from Philly in the last few years) to be a star, but the sum total of Kelly’s moves suggest that skin color isn’t the determining factor of who stays or goes.

Permalink 32 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

“More probable than not” carries important legal meaning

Scales Getty Images

To the non-lawyer, the money quotes from the Ted Wells report suggest a mere probability that cheating occurred. But the specific terminology used by Wells actually indicates a belief that the evidence satisfies one of the most common standards used in a court of law.

“More probable than not” equates to a “preponderance of the evidence,” the standard that applies in most civil lawsuits. It means that the evidence makes it more likely than not, in the opinion of the investigator, that “New England Patriots personnel participated in violations of the Playing Rules and were involved in a deliberate effort to circumvent the rules,” and that “Tom Brady . . . was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.”

That’s a standard perhaps even higher than the one that applies to players accused of violating the Personal Conduct Policy, where “credible corroborating evidence” (even without cooperation from the alleged victim) can result in a significant suspension. Regardless, it’s enough proof on which the NFL can base punishment of a team.

“Too often, competitive violations have gone unpunished because conclusive proof of the violation was lacking,” Commissioner Roger Goodell wrote to the NFL’s Competition Committee in 2008, after the last game-integrity infraction involving the Patriots.  “I believe we should reconsider the standard of proof to be applied in such cases, and make it easier for a competitive violation to be established.”

Although there was nothing easy about the Wells investigation, his decision that a preponderance of the evidence points to a deliberate effort to circumvent the rules gives Goodell the green light to impose discipline.

Still, the use of the term “more probable than not” takes some of the sting out of the finding by allowing non-lawyers to believe that, as Patriots owner Robert Kraft has always said, there was no hard evidence of cheating. When it comes to issues of this nature, hard evidence isn’t needed to justify a stringent punishment.

Permalink 167 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Ray McDonald accuser also accuses Ahmad Brooks of sexual assault

San Francisco 49ers v Oakland Raiders Getty Images

The woman who accused then-49ers defensive lineman Ray McDonald of sexual assault last year has now accused another 49ers player, linebacker Ahmad Brooks.

Although Brooks — unlike McDonald — has not been named in a criminal complaint, the woman says in a civil lawsuit that Brooks sexually assaulted her.

According to, the woman’s lawsuit says she slipped and fell on a pool deck, hit her head and was knocked unconscious, and that’s when Brooks fondled her.

“While she was unconscious from a subsequent fall, Brooks groped her person in a sexual manner,” the lawsuit says.

The 49ers released a statement confirming they are aware of the accusation against Brooks.

“The San Francisco 49ers organization is aware of the media report regarding Ahmad Brooks. We were disappointed to learn of this matter and will continue to monitor the situation,” the statement said.

The 49ers cut McDonald when he was accused last year. The 49ers’ statement said nothing about whether Brooks will be released as well.

Permalink 34 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Tom Brady’s dad declares Wells Report “Framegate”

PGA TOUR - AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am - First Round Getty Images

Even if it didn’t come right out and say it, the main insinuation of the Ted Wells report on DeflateGate is that Patriots quarterback Tom Brady cheated, or at the very least was aware that cheating was happening on his behalf.

And that doesn’t sit too well with his father.

Tom Brady Sr. told Jim Corbett of USA Today that he’s not shaken in his belief in the upright nature of his son.

I don’t have any doubt about my son’s integrity — not one bit,” Brady Sr. said. “In this country, you’re innocent until proven guilty. It just seems Tommy is now guilty until proven innocent. This thing is so convoluted. . . . They say that possibly — possibly — he was aware of this. The reality is if you can’t prove he did it, then he’s innocent, and lay off him. That’s the bottom line.”

Actually, there’s a pretty considerable gulf between not guilty and innocent, and it’s hard to look at the evidence in the report and come away thinking Brady had no knowledge of what was going on.

But dad was unmoved, saying the league was more worried about its image than his son’s.

“The league had to cover themselves. The reality is they had no conclusive evidence. This was Framegate right from the beginning,” he said. “They had to protect their asses, and that’s what they’re doing. . . .

“To impugn somebody without conclusive evidence saying this is more probable than not? The reality is they have scientific evidence. Now they’re overriding the scientific evidence and badgering the Patriots. It’s disgusting.”

Brady Sr. is reacting how any father would, or should react. And the league obviously has a vested interest in the appearance of integrity, which is why this thing dragged on so long.

But to suggest they’d target a four-time Super Bowl champion seems like a stretch.

Permalink 157 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Pats bring Brandon Spikes back for a visit

Buffalo Bills v New England Patriots Getty Images

It’s been a very quiet day around the Patriots on Wednesday, but there is a little bit of news about the team to inflate our pages.

Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the team had free agent linebacker Brandon Spikes in for a visit that probably didn’t spend much time on introductions. Spikes was a 2010 second-round pick in New England and spent the first four years of his career as a regular on the team’s defense.

Spikes left for Buffalo as a free agent last year and played in all 16 games for New England’s divisionmates before becoming a free agent again in March. He hasn’t generated a lot of interest on the open market, although there have been scattered reports of interest from the Bills in extending their working relationship. Spikes is a stout run defender, but doesn’t offer much help against the pass and that likely explains why his market has been chilly this offseason.

With Jerod Mayo returning alongside Dont’a Hightower and Jamie Collins, linebacker isn’t a particularly pressing need for the Patriots at the moment. If they did want to add some more depth, though, Spikes would provide it without needing much time to acquaint himself to playing for Bill Belichick and defensive coordinator Matt Patricia.

Permalink 8 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Finally, the halftime PSI numbers are known


One of the most puzzling aspects of the #DeflateGate controversy came from a series of contradictory reports regarding the PSI measurements taken at halftime of the footballs used by the Patriots in the AFC championship game.

Initially, Chris Mortensen of ESPN reported that 11 of the 12 balls were two pounds under the 12.5 PSI minimum. PFT later reported that 10 of the balls were closer to one pound under the minimum than two. Hours before Super Bowl XLIX, Ian Rapoport of NFL Media reported that “[m]any of [the footballs] were just a few ticks under the minimum.”

The real numbers remained unknown, until the issuance of the Ted Wells report.

As it turns out, two sets of measurements were made, by alternate game officials Dyrol Prioleau and Clete Blakeman.  The measurements involved only 11 Patriots footballs, with the ball that had been intercepted by Colts linebacker D’Qwell Jackson during the second quarter not included.

Prioleau’s measurements were, in PSI: (1) 11.8; (2) 11.2; (3) 11.5; (4) 11.0; (5) 11.45; (6) 11.95; (7) 12.3; (8) 11.55; (9) 11.35; (10) 10.9; and (11) 11.35.

Blakeman’s measurements were, also in PSI: (1) 11.5; (2) 10.85; (3) 11.15; (4) 10.7; (5) 11.1; (6) 11.6; (7) 11.85; (8) 11.1; (9) 10.95; (10) 10.5; and (11) 10.9.

Each of Prioleau’s measurements were higher, which suggests that: (1) Prioleau measured the air pressure before Blakeman; and (2) the mere act of insert a needle briefly into the football to test the internal PSI decreases the internal PSI noticeably.

Based on Prioleau’s numbers, NONE of the footballs were more than 1.6 PSI below the minimum.  One was exactly 1.6 pounds below the minimum. Six were were between 1.0 and 1.5 pounds under the minimum.  Three were between 0.5 and 1.0 pounds under the minimum. One was only 0.2 PSI below the minimum.

In other words, and as PFT reported at the time, 10 of the balls were closer to one pound under the minimum PSI than two.

Based on Blakeman’s numbers, only one ball was 2.0 pounds under the minimum.  Another one was 1.8 pounds under. One was 1.65 under. One was 1.6 under.  One was 1.55 under. Four fell between 1.0 and 1.4 PSI under. One was 0.9 PSI under. One was 0.65 PSI under.

The numbers show only one ball a full 2.0 PSI under — and that was based on a measurement that apparently happened after a different measurement showed that same ball at 1.6 PSI under.  Given that Mortensen’s report was: (1) taken as completely accurate; and (2) pushed the entire scandal to a new level, it’s important to look at those numbers objectively and to assess carefully whether there’s a plausible atmospheric explanation for the loss in air pressure.

Further complicating matters for the NFL is the lack of clear evidence that the starting point for each ball was 12.5 PSI.  Given that the NFL was aware of the issue before the game began, it’s stunning that a record of the measurements wasn’t made.

Moreover, and as suggested by the measurements made by Prioleau and Blakeman, the mere act of confirming that the balls were inflated to 12.5 PSI may have dropped them below the minimum.

The problem for the Patriots is that enough other evidence pointed to a violation to allow Ted Wells to conclude that the preponderance of the evidence suggests to deliberate manipulation.  Regardless, the raw numbers aren’t nearly as bad as they were originally portrayed to be.

In the interests of fairness to everyone, that fact can’t be disregarded.

Permalink 49 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Wells Report: Brady, Pats staffer spoke at least six times after allegations arose

Tom Brady Says He Didn't Alter Footballs In Colts Game Getty Images

Among the most notable assertions in Wednesday’s Wells Report on alleged football under-inflation by the Patriots was that investigators believe it was “more probable than not” that New England quarterback Tom Brady was “at least generally aware” that two Patriots gameday employees were letting air out of footballs.

Writing in the report, the investigative team points to the “material increase in the frequency of telephone and text communications” between Brady and a Patriots staffer alleged to have manipulated footballs as “evidence of Brady‟s awareness” of efforts to under-inflate footballs.

Those communications, the report alleges, picked up beginning on Monday, January 19, when the deflation allegations came to light.

According to the Wells Report, Brady and Patriots equipment assistant John Jastremski communicated via telephone at least six times before Jastremski turned in his telephone to the Patriots to be imaged forensically on January 21.

Overall, Brady and Jastremski had two conversations apiece occurring on January 20 and 21 and “at least” two conversations on January 19, investigators assert. Brady and Jastremski spoke for nearly an hour in total over the three days, the Wells Report found.

Moreover, investigators allege they found Brady sent text messages to Jastremski “seemingly designed to calm” the equipment assistant.

“You good Jonny boy?” read one of the texts allegedly sent by Brady to Jastremski.

Wrote Jastremski in one of his text messages to Brady, as found by the report: “Still nervous; so far so good though.”

According to the Wells Report, Jastremski and Brady had not texted or communicated over the phone for more than six months prior to January 19.

Brady is also alleged to have invited Jastremski to the Patriots’ quarterbacks room on January 19 — something that had never occurred previously, Jastremski was alleged to have told investigators.

After the inflation allegations against the Patriots surfaced after their win in the AFC title game on January 18, Brady told Boston radio station WEEI that it was “ridiculous” to believe New England was improperly altering footballs.

Permalink 56 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Wells report chides Patriots for not cooperating with investigation

Robert Kraft AP

Patriots owner Robert Kraft promised his full cooperation with the Ted Wells investigation.

What Wells found from the Patriots was something that falls well below the threshold of full.

The Wells report said that the Patriots refused to make officials locker room attendant Jim McNally available for a follow-up interview which was requested, “despite our offer to meet at any time and location that would be convenient for McNally.”

The report said Patriots counsel apparently didn’t inform McNally of the request, and that the refusal “violated the club‟s obligations to cooperate with the investigation under the Policy on Integrity of the Game & Enforcement of League Rules and was inconsistent with public statements made by the Patriots pledging full cooperation with the investigation.”

That sets the stage for some significant punishment for the team, which began this process with bluster, demanding an apology from the league if no evidence was found.

The team wasn’t alone playing keep-away, as quarterback Tom Brady refused to provide text messages and e-mails “even though those requests were limited to the subject matter of our investigation” which means they weren’t just looking for cell phone pics of Gisele Bundchen.

The report also concluded that the Patriots “questioned the integrity and objectivity of game officials, various NFL executives and certain NFL Security representatives present at the AFC Championship Game or otherwise involved in the investigative process.”

That’s not surprising. People put on the defensive act defensively. But the team that boasted about full cooperation then refused to cooperate fully, and that’s something the organization will likely answer for soon.

Permalink 68 Comments Feed for comments Back to top